. Thereflective comprehensive report challenges students to evaluate themselves against a benchmarkstudent—referred to as a "world-class" engineering student—based on the following objectives:1. Goal setting a. Setting your goal(s) i.e., major, time to graduation, GPA b. Strengthening and clarifying your commitment to your goal(s) c. Setting up a ‘Road Map’ – a plan to guide you over the next years to graduation d. Understanding the essence of engineering2. Community building a. Building relationships, and making effective use of your peers (help-seeking) b. Participating in co-curricular activities3. Academic development a. Navigating the university system, resources, and academic advising b
reflects the student’s attendance and performance inthe quizzes, lab assignments, industry project, and exams. Upon satisfactory completion of IE470course, students should be able to: o Understand the key performance measures of manufacturing systems. o Understand the different techniques and tools for manufacturing systems design and analysis. o Understand key techniques to improve manufacturing systems productivity and efficiency. o Be able to use process improvement methods in real manufacturing or service environments.The course includes the following topics: o Introduction to modern manufacturing o Basics of manufacturing systems o Manufacturing strategies o Demand planning and forecasting o Material
programs. After an overview of the PEGS program, thequalitative analysis tools used and their results are presented. The paper concludes with adiscussion of results and future plans to improve the PEGS21 program and its assessment methods.PEGS21 ProgramThe PEGS21 program at UC Davis seeks to examine the transition from undergraduate to graduatestudy in engineering, extending the research of Gardner (2007), Gardner and Holley (2011) andTate et al. (2014) who identified five following challenges to graduate degree attainment in first-generation students. 1) Breaking the Chain: Low-income, academically-talented, first-generation (LIATFG) graduate students may have to overcome obstacles to enter and persist in graduate study and their
-efficacy has been identified as an importantfactor in predicting student outcomes [12], [13].Engineering also represents an interesting domain in terms of academic self-efficacy becausesuccess in engineering often requires not only academic ability in the traditional sense (i.e., tolearn and perform well in a course), but also the ability to actually make products successfully.Several fields of engineering at Carnegie Mellon University have a heavy focus on the latterability, and that is the ability explored here. This paper investigates elements of self-efficacy in afreshman engineering course that is founded not just on students’ ability to learn concepts, butalso to plan and execute tasks with accuracy. In Fundamentals of Mechanical Engineering
constructed treatment wetlands to be a helpful research and coursemodule platform. In both instances, students gained field-specific technical knowledge, as well asexposure to larger, more open-ended problems in the environmental engineering field whichprovided creative and sustainable-thinking opportunities for all students, research experiences forsome students, and career shifts for a couple of students.In terms of research students, it seems clear that the research opportunities had a large impact onstudents personally and professionally. To improve their experiences, I would like to try to ensurethat all students get to work with a partner. To grow as a mentor, I plan to create an “expectations”memorandum of understanding to help students know
project teams).The inventive process of the proposed model has a foundation in the fundamental processobserved in successful inventors. This process has seven steps: 11 1. Observation of a need or difficulty. 2. Analysis of the need. 3. A survey of all available information. 4. A formulation of all objective solutions. 5. A critical analysis of these solutions. 6. The birth of a new idea. 7. Experimentation to test and refine the most promising solution.As previously mentioned, the first step in the inventive process is ‘observation of a need ordifficulty’ followed by ‘analysis of the need’. These steps could also be referred to as ‘marketneeds assessment’ or ‘opportunity focuses’ in standard business plan terms. 12
directors to try to determine expected and potential student needs. As will be addressed,our experience is that these students’ needs push the boundaries of traditional academic librarysupport. However, the more planning done prior to the launch of the program, the better for allparties involved.Our purpose is to provide insight on how the librarians and professional staff in one universitylibrary collaborated with one another and program faculty to identify the needs of students in theUniversity’s DSA graduate program, and then collectively developed and implemented supportservices and tools to address those needs.BackgroundAbout the UniversityGeorge Mason University is a comprehensive, doctoral institution which is classified a Research1
and instructional materials for engineering students/professionals utilizing SAM, storyboard, and need analysis, as well as coding, hardware/software, and engineering skills. Chen is proficient in English and Mandarin and can provide real-time professional translations both verbally and in writing.Jordan Orion James, University of New Mexico Jordan O. James is a Native American Ph.D./ABD in the Organization, Information, and Learning Sci- ences (OILS) program as well as a lecturer at the University of New Mexico’s School of Architecture and Planning in the Community and Regional Planning program. He has served as a graduate research as- sistant on an NSF-funded project, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments, and has
USDepartment of Agriculture (USDA) [8] to purchase Cisco WebEx boards [9] and deploy them to 12colleges and high schools across Eastern North Carolina to facilitate distance education (Figure 1).Figure 1. Footprint of the Planned Distance Education ServiceThis new service enables a more engaging, collaborative instructional experience involving students inmultiple classrooms across Eastern North Carolina and ECU instructors. The potential positive impact of3this service is significant. The USDA grant covers the cost of the hardware and the WebEx cloud-basedservice provided by Cisco [10].Cloud-based services have been heavily marketed to give the impression that with the purchase of theendpoints and the service, the only thing needed to turn this
confident that they had chosen the correct major, will do well in their major during the currentacademic year, were comfortable approaching a faculty member, and will graduate with a degreein their major. The responses for “I am well prepared for post-graduation plans” were more evenlydistributed. One 3rd-4th year student and one 4th-graduation student chose “slightly disagree”indicating that perhaps participating in such a program during earlier academic years would haveproven helpful in determining a career path.Figure 2In the survey, students were given three prompts to reflect on their experience. A simple wordfrequency query in NVIVO 12 pro on each prompt produced the respective word clouds. The top10 most frequent words (with stemmed words
intern’s research project. They sharedthat being involved in designing their interns’ project improved their ability to develop a“realistic clear experimental plan." Because of the rigid and time-bound structure of the program,the mentors had to ensure the plan was achievable within eight-weeks and that the intern wouldhave data to present at the conclusion of their summer internship. Additionally, the interns’limited background knowledge and lack of research experience required that mentors createprojects that specifically fit their abilities. This is supported by the following evaluation data: It has strengthened my ability in terms of developing a research project that is tractable for a fresh person to come in and contribute
Figure 2. Application ProcessBased on the final selection of the students, the CS department team at the university (UTRGV)along with the team from Upward Bound program identified the technical and non-technical skillsthat were then targeted in the summer camp. Table 1. Summer Enrollment Total 31 Forensics& Cybersecurity Track 16 Mobile Applications Track 15Gender GapAs we were planning for the summer camp, one goal of the team, which consisted of two femalesand two males, was to make sure that the selected applicants are more diverse in terms of thegender, since the schools are already
and write the best that could be done.” " …[Caitlyn] is in charge of keeping documents because responsibility is one of her top five strengths…[Kyle] is a competitive person and this will help our team to turn in the best work possible and strive for success..." “We chose to give me the task of the recorder because I am an includer. Therefore I want to make sure that everyone is on the same page with what is going on in every aspect of the project. Also, I am strategic so writing things out allows me to organize and visualize everything in a more complex way. Being able to see write everything allows me to strategically plan out and keep up with the rest of the group.” “I am resotarive
pedagogical practice,such as grouping strategies, management techniques, questioning types, engaging students inproductive struggle, and fostering classroom discourse to promote problem solving skilldevelopment, and 3) plan lessons which integrate cybersecurity concepts in teachers’ classroomsbridging cross-curricular content.Computational thinking is relevant across academic disciplines and has the potential to promotestudent interest in STEM pathways [23]. Female students in MS score as well as their malecounterparts on content area assessments [24], however, they are vastly underrepresented in thecomputer and information science field [25]. Teachers can promote equity and access tocomputer science and technology in nonthreatening environments and
the curriculum in which themethodology was applied. Then, it shows the results of its applications to discuss the implicationsto adopt this approach to inform curriculum design and evaluation.2. Involving students in curriculum evaluation A curriculum is a broad concept. According to Stark and Lattuca (1997), it is not only a subsetof courses in a study plan, but also its content, the course sequence, the students, the teaching-learning processes, the evaluations, the resources, and the necessary adjustments to improve itsresults. Thus, curriculum design and evaluation should consider multiple factors, such as thelearning environments and the interactions between teachers and students [18], [19]. Surprisingly, teachers and students are
introduce PNMSat/CubeSat [13], [14], [15]mission design in a systems engineering framework and foster leadership development amongparticipants. The objectives of the course catered towards – (i) Introducing Systems Engineeringfor PNMSats, (ii) Engage students in the design of a PNMSat with a novel payload and (iii)Foster leadership and team development through learning stages. The course agenda consisted of3 phases and the following outcomes were sought for assessing the success of the course.1. Demonstrate a basic understanding of PNMSats and their purpose.2. Demonstrate an understanding of systems engineering and its need for the design and development of PNMSats.3. Envision a project life cycle of a PNMSat mission and plan to be successful.4
Team Building and Dinner 6 8 Team Building Demo Class 1 9 Demo Class 1 Assessment of Demo Class 1 10 Assessment of Demo Class 1 Learning Styles 11 Learning Objectives Learning Objectives 12 Lunch LunchDay 2 1 Planning a Class Planning a Class 2 Writing Writing 3 Team Time: Board Writing and Class Team Time: Board Writing and Class 4 Preparation Preparation 5 6 Team Dinner 8
awarded the Glen L. Martin ASEE Civil Engineering Division Best Paper Award. Steve is a registered professional engineer in Utah.Dr. Mercedes Ward, University of UtahProf. Sajjad Ahmad, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Dr. Ahmad is a Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV). His teaching and research interests are in the area of sus- tainable planning and management of water resources, water-energy nexus, and stormwater management . He is particularly interested in using systems approach to address water sustainability issues.David Lawrence StevensonProf. Tariq Banuri, University of Utah Professor Tariq Banuri, Department of
Craftsman Program through Collaboration between Industry, Technical Community College and 4-year UniversityAbstractEngineering Technology curriculum generally provides wide spread knowledge in problemsolving, management of resources, and process planning. An Industry Advisory Council for auniversity in Louisiana expressed the need for multi-skilled craftsman trained graduates, andworked with Engineering Technology faculty to develop an associate of science degree program,in collaboration with a local technical community college, that is focused on advancedmanufacturing.This paper discusses the development of an industry-driven program on advancedmanufacturing. The program is implemented as a collaborative offering by a university inLouisiana and
Denise Female 5 Evan Male Erin Female 6 Farrah Female Frank Male 7 Gary Male Genna Female 8 Hal Male Henry MaleContextPictureSTEM incorporates science, mathematics, engineering, technology, literacy, andcomputational thinking into three different lesson plans targeted at Kindergarten, first, andsecond grade students. The curriculum used in this study was the Kindergarten-focused lesson,Designing Paper Baskets. There are six main lessons as seen in Figure 1 in addition to anintroductory lesson that presents the engineering design challenge. The unit is centered aroundthe engineering problem presented by the two clients, Max and Lola. They are avid
accomplish this, outreach to other educational units across campus has proven to beextremely beneficial. The planned DCI curriculum has sought contributions from a group offaculty coming from four different departments (Construction Technology, Interior Design,Landscape Architecture, and Mechanical Engineering Technology), which are located withinthree different colleges (Liberal Arts, Agriculture, and Technology) of the same institution.These faculty members have collaborated to identify existing courses within their departmentsthat could provide the expected learning outcomes related to built environment design for DCIstudents. Through this collaboration, students would be able to choose a design concentrationthey prefer: Interior Design
students. Alex’s plans upon graduation involve becoming a professor or lecturer, specifically at a primarily undergraduate institution. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Soft Skills Boot Camp: Designing a Three-Day Student-Run Seminar and Workshop Series for Graduate StudentsAbstractA common challenge amongst the graduate student population is finding time to work ondesirable soft skills that would create a more dynamic applicant for academic and industrial jobs.Between lectures, classes, research, and duties required for assistantships or fellowships,graduate students have little time left over to attend workshops or seminars to cultivate theseproficiencies. This has been a
existing conveyor system. They also designed,built and tested the programmable logic control (PLC) system and its inductive proximity sensorcontrols. They installed the detection system, made slight assembly modifications and tested thesystem. With a successful installation the team then performed a 10,000 bag production test(nearly four hours) and confirmed that the percentage of soup mix bags without flavor packetsdetected and removed by the machine was similar to that percentage of customer complaints theprevious year. The detection system (Line #2) was released to production, and plans made toinstall another detection system on a second identical production line (Line #1).Statistical Verification of the Inspection SystemAfter eight months of
material.The computer science realm has led the charge for agile methods based on iterative stages ofdeveloping software [10]. The most basic idea of a Gantt chart from 1917 of what is required andin what order developments should occur is crucial, but these charts can be improved on byallowing users to adjust timelines on the fly [11]. Many so-called DevOp tools have beendeveloped over the last decade to facilitate tracking of software development, bug tracking, andentire life-cycles for software [12]. The idea is to adapt, iterate, and prioritize working quicklyand deftly rather than following a plan [13]. Gradually the success of these tools has encouragedother product development realms to adopt similar strategies. Educators are also beginning
Engineering Department. Understanding and classifying the knowledge gapsin the progression of BAE courses can lead to applying the proper integrating techniques in orderto balance and equilibrate the prospective teaching modules.Therefore, in this work we examined specific knowledge concepts considered essential withinthe curriculum at a large southwestern University’s Bio-based engineering program. Theresearch aimed to understand the level of students’ exposure to essential knowledge and suggestrecommendations for an improved comprehensive degree plan. The study used a survey in orderto evaluate knowledge areas required for discipline specific core courses by a program basedassessment of faculty who have taught through at least one academic year
rarely ever one “right” answer. Author SWS has implemented this project 3 times over the course of 3 years and is stillmaking minor improvements to the assignment. Author DAC implemented a scaled-downversion of this project for the first time in Fall 2018 with approximately 70 students and plans tocontinue iterating on a scaled-down version of the assignment. For the interested reader, detailsof assigning this project (including lesson plans, handouts, and instructors notes) can be found atwww.engineeringunleashed.com with the creation of a free account.Level 4: Make-Your-Own Context While simply creating one homework problem may seem simple, asking students to maketheir own context problems is the most challenging task for them
accompanymany of the courses in engineering programs, as well as the long prerequisite chains that tend toexist in these curricula.To gain a better understanding of the aforementioned factors, consider the electrical engineeringdegree plan shown in Figure 1, offered by a university in the southwest of the United States that hasa high curricular complexity score. The analysis provided in this figure was created by utilizingthe Curricular Analytics Toolbox, an open source framework created for the purpose of analyzinguniversity curricula.6 The complexity associated with a given course c is a function of the numberof courses that are “blocked” by c (i.e., the number of courses that cannot be attempted until cis successfully completed), and the longest
a demographic andleadership questionnaire. Additional sections include logistics reminders for researchers, aprobing question plan, and engineering and leadership identity checklists. To ensure the focusgroup runs smoothly, at least two recording devices are utilized to capture focus groupdiscussion, participants are sent multiple reminder emails and texts, and the interviewers’ tone iskept friendly and conversational. In Focus Group 0 all three researchers interviewed REUstudents. In Focus Group 1 and Focus Group 2 two researchers interviewed participants whilethe REU students and one researcher observed from a viewing room.IntroductionThe introduction is based on standard practice for an IRB exempt study. Participants arewelcomed as they
, and starting a design challenge for high school students to address the needs of the less fortunate.Dylan Bargar, Clemson UniversityDr. Penelope Walters Brunner, Clemson University DR. PENELOPE BRUNNER is the Director of Assessment and Planning for Clemson’s College of En- gineering. In this role, she works with academic departments and administrative offices on assessment reporting and strategic planning alignments. Prior to joining Clemson, Dr. Brunner was an Associate Vice President at the College of Charleston. As an associate professor within the University of North Carolina system, she taught courses in Management and Management Information Systems. Her national and international consultancies involve working
competition are to deliver a market-driven technology application, create aninnovative business plan, and develop a deployment strategy. Two faculty advisers, a mechanicalengineering assistant professor from the college of engineering and an entrepreneurship assistantprofessor from the college of business designed and delivered content to help student memberseffectively collaborate and innovate across their disciplines and form a cohesive and highfunctioning team. In addition to being members of the cross-disciplinary team, half the studentswere concurrently enrolled in a business management course with an emphasis in socialentrepreneurship and market analysis while another half were enrolled in a senior capstoneengineering course. Activities in the