,professional and ethical responsibility, teamwork, leadership, lifelong learning, andattitudes) in which there may be both a cognitive and affective level of achievement. Asubcommittee has been formed and has the following charge: 1. Review and study research on the affective domain of Bloom’s taxonomy. This should also include the current use of the affective domain in developing college- level educational objectives. 2. Provide a short white paper to the BOK2 Committee documenting the issues related to the affective domain and alternative courses of action for their inclusion in the BOK second edition. 3. Complete the preceding in three months.Pre-licensure Experience to Fulfill the CE BOK:A new committee, focused
12.1281.18Appendix 3Program Outcome #1 : "An ability to apply knowledge of math, science, and engineering"Program Outcome #2 : "An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze andinterpret data"Program Outcome #3 : "An ability to design a system, component or process to meet desiredneeds within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical,health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”Program Outcome #4 : "An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams"Program Outcome #5 : "An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems"Program Outcome #6 : "An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility"Program Outcome #7 : "An ability to communicate effectively"Program
learning outcomes, globalization,advancements in information technologies, and intense competition among numerousproviders of education1–3. Universities are asked to produce graduates who are skilled inhigher-order cognition, such as critical thinking and complex problem solving; behave ina principled ethical fashion; can accept and work harmoniously and productively withpeople unlike themselves; have the ability to adapt to diverse and changing situations;and take responsibility for their work4,5.Modern educational organizations are no longer viewed as formal, rational andhierarchically closed systems with hierarchical control patterns. A way to address oldorganizational structures is to build learning organizations. For Senge a
constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, regulatory, manufacturability, and sustainability; d. an ability to function on and assume leadership roles in diverse, multi-disciplinary teams; e. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve bioengineering problems; f. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; g. an ability to communicate effectively, especially in an interdisciplinary environment; h. the broad education, including service learning and entrepreneurship, necessary to understand the impact of bioengineering solutions in a rapidly changing global, economic, environmental, and societal context; i. a recognition of the
, being a role model forthe student by demonstrating personal and professional ethics, and being accessible and non-judgmental. For faculty mentors, it is important to be in a capacity to help build the mentee’sprofessional network.5,6 For underrepresented minority students, having a mentor that is willingto understand factors that may be attributed to societal mores, associated with the student’sculture and/or gender, that could influence the mentee’s academic success is important.12However, a good mentor-mentee relationship tends be reciprocal and consists of mutual respect, Page 23.562.2shared values, and good communication. There tends to
Materials 6 66 47 97 A8. Numerical Methods 3 44 13 56 E. Management and Professional Tools E1. Design Office Organization/Management/Office Ethics 0 19 34 94 E2. Business Development and Practices 0 10 22 81 E3. Design/Build & Other Project Methods 0 13 23 87 E4. Leadership Skills/Adaptation to Changes 0 32 25 91 E5. Working with Architects, Contractors, etc. 0 27
future and educating engineers to meetthe needs of the new era Engineer of 202022. The report on “The Engineer of 2020: Vision ofEngineering in the New Century” completed in 2004, and “Educating the Engineer of 2020:Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century” completed in 2005 discusses variousfuture scenarios based on scientific and technological trends for United States to maintain itseconomic competitiveness and improve the quality of life for people around the world. It alsoidentifies ideal attributes of the engineer of 2020, and recommends ways to improve training toprepare engineers for addressing the complex technical, social, and ethical questions raised byemerging technologies.22,23 Many engineering institutions in the US are
and interpret data Exemplary Total (c) design a system, component, or process to meet desired a goals 18% 57% 25% 100% 90% (d) an ability to function on a multi-disciplinary team b 0% 0% 0% 0% (e) identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems c 2% 74% 24% 100% 80% (f) understand professional and ethical responsibility d 0% 0% 0
-class discussionsabout ethical, practical, and social aspects of the Challenge. We emphasize that the manner inwhich this overview is presented can differ across institutions and courses, and based on thespecific instructor’s goals. In all cases, however, the broad, cross-disciplinary nature of thetheme and its societal context should be emphasized.Stage 2: Definition/Problem RestatementFollowing the introduction of the theme, students reflect on what they have learned and thendefine the Challenge in their own words. This process engages the students as participants in theproblem-solving process; they must progress from the relatively passive experience of Stage 1 toan active consideration of the Challenge (i.e., what makes it a difficult
Information Security Program and affiliated with The Center for Education and Research in Information Assurance and Security (CERIAS) at Purdue University. He has a B.S. in Computer Science from Chaminade University of Honolulu. His research areas include global policy, ethics, information security and assurance, technology adoption, biometrics, education, pharmaceutical supply chain, and energy. Page 23.205.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Approaches to Integrating Public Policy into Engineering EducationAbstractPolicy education has been deemed an important
SDASME-1,2,&3) algebra, a knowledge of chemistry and calculus-based physics (with depth in physics), and an ability to apply their knowledge of advanced math (through multivariate calculus and differential equations), science, and engineering.2-2. (ABET-i) OU ME graduates will demonstrate a recognition of the need for, and an SA A D SD ability to engage in life-long learning3-1. (ABET-g) OU ME graduates will demonstrate an ability to communicate effectively SA A D SD4-1. (ABET-f) OU ME graduates will demonstrate an understanding of professional and SA A D SD ethical responsibility4-2. (ABET-h) OU ME
Values and Ethical Issues in the Graduate Education of Scien-tists and Engineers. The survey included 1,440 respondents selected randomly from ninety-ninedepartments of chemistry, civil engineering, microbiology, and sociology in major research uni-versities in the U.S. Students were asked to report their level of agreement with 5 questions. Theresults of the survey suggested that there was room for improvement in doctoral programs, bothacademically and socially. Page 25.599.4In a similar vein as the main objective of this paper Crede and Borrego5 argued that If the U.S.was to remain a globally recognized source of technological and scientific
. These four were that (1) collaborationsshould not be stressful, (2) the time requirements should be reasonably low, (3) all thecollaborators should have clear roles in the project, and (4) all the collaborators should live up totheir commitments. In order to achieve these ideal collaborations, seven factors were identifiedas being most important, namely: (1) compatible interests/passions; (2) shared goals; (3)complimentary skills; (4) compatible personalities; (5) compatible work ethic; (6) a sharedunderstanding of rigor; and (7) a desire to learn from each other (see Figure 3). Common to theseseven factors was the notion of sharing and compatibility. Factors most important for a
19 Defining engineering 11 Space in curriculum 10 Work ethic/ability of students 9 Budget issues 9 Lack of effective/proven curriculum 9Figure 2: Greatest Challenges to K-12 Engineering EducationThe third research question posed to participants asked, “If you could participate in a meeting withSTEM educators from various countries, what would you define as the most important topics todiscuss?” Figure 3 shows the most frequently mentioned issues. For this question
; Transportation; Tropical Medicine; Water Resources2 Acoustics; Anthropology; Biophysics; Clinical Neurology; Ecology; Engineering, Aerospace; Genetics & Heredity; Hematology; History Of Social Sciences; Imaging Science & Photographic Technology; Industrial Relations & Labor; Infectious Diseases; Linguistics; Materials Science, Ceramics; Medical Ethics; Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering; Nanoscience & Nanotechnology; Nutrition & Dietetics; Physics, Applied; Physics, Multidisciplinary; Public Administration; Social Issues; Virology; Women's Studies3 Allergy; Astronomy & Astrophysics; Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
, including nonlinear structural analysis, computational mechanics, and biomechanics. He is also active in engineering education and engineering ethics, particularly in the subjects of mechanics education and appropriate technology. At UPRM Papadopoulos serves as the coordinator of the Engineering Mechanics Committee in the Depart- ment of General Engineering. He also co-coordinates the Social, Ethical, and Global Issues (SEGI) in Engineering Program and Forums on Philosophy, Engineering, and Technology.Dr. Aidsa I. Santiago-Romn, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Aidsa I. Santiago-Romn is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Science and Materi- als and the Director of the Strategic Engineering
N MeanApply knowledge of mathematics, 0 0 2 35 9 46 4.15science, and engineeringDesign and conduct experiments, as 0 2 4 30 10 46 4.04well as to analyze and interpret dataDesign a system, component, orprocess to meet desired needs withinrealistic constraints such as economic, 0 0 2 25 19 46 4.37environmental, social, political,ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainabilityFunction on multidisciplinary team(s) 1 1 6 26 12 46
the make up of students who select to enroll in pre-collegeengineering classes. To deny (or even delay) access to suit research faces serious ethical barriers,since it denies students and parents their preferences, and could impose serious damage to theirscholastic progress and even later academic and workplace opportunities. In a somewhat similarmanner, teachers opt to participate in or avoid engineering instruction and manipulating thisselection for research purposes faces serious professional and ethic issues. With limited ability inpublic schools to assign teachers to their classes, there is a need to document inherent differencesthat may exist among teachers and to interpret the impact of training and teaching experiences
. This paper attempts to review the literature onthe subject of inclusivity with respect to these issues, within the context of first year post- Page 15.362.2secondary education, to create a practical framework that unites the different approaches into anup-to-date resource that is relevant for engineering.The Online Ethics Center at the National Academy of Engineering 1 has a collection of over 50abstracts that address teaching to diversity in engineering. Minority retention rates in post-secondary education, for instance, is a topic that also falls in this category. The 2008 annualreport by the National Action Council for Minorities in
. Action items were identified toprovide a better education in the professional skills without detriment to the technical skills. An Page 15.668.2important element of these criteria is the emphasis on assessing the following professional skills: 1 ≠ Ability to design systems, components, or processes to meet needs (globally) with realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety ≠ Ability to function on multidisciplinary (multi-cultural) teams ≠ Understanding of
some aspects of the modern practice of engineering, namely:teamwork, problem and data analysis, design creation, presentation and defense of a designedsolution, and professional ethics. The Introduction to Engineering course is taken by allincoming students to the School of Engineering and the class is not separated by engineeringdiscipline. Because of this diverse student population and potential interests, efforts are made tomake the case study subjects as general as possible with detailed discipline specific technicalanalyses minimized. Generally, the case study work concentrates on the evaluative nature ofengineering work such as identifying important variables in a problem, project assessment, andsystem analysis. Highly technical aspects
courses by our program to teach students how to present their concepts effectively by means of oral, graphics, or writing. On the other hand, we can provide in the course “Mechanisms” only the opportunity for them to acquire communication ability by means of working on homework.(2) Ability for team management and communication. Because of time limit in course, it is to us very difficult in after-class activity to provide the students with knowledge about team management and communication. They learn these competences only through trial-and- error by themselves.(3) Professional and ethical responsibility. In general we, and also the other educators in Taiwan, pay less attention to the ethical issues in our curriculum
sophomore year through a set of department-defined courses in engineering, mathematics, science, and social science.• Integration of Mathematics, Science, and Social Science into Engineering & Connection of Engineering Back to these Areas Students must be shown and understand the relevance and importance of science, mathematics, and social science in the practice of engineering. Links, both in course content and among professors, must be created among these areas. The societal aspects of engineering (e.g., ethical, environmental, social impact) are a key part of this integration.• Expose Students to the Engineering Disciplines Throughout the freshman year, students must be shown what engineers in the various
dynamic interactions of humans in society and be able to interact constructively across societal and cultural lines. ‚ Develop a clear understanding of the ethical implications of engineering issues and engineering decisions upon humanity, as well as a working knowledge of professional engineering ethical codes and responsibility.Step 3: Examine the requirements of the research centers and the necessary skills andattributes of potential internsResearch becomes more productive when the scientists have a collection of tools that arespecifically designed for the task at hand. The CBE is a leading edge research center currentlydeveloping new testing methods and procedures. These methods and procedures requiremechanical lab
Nanotechnology, andComputational Modeling and Simulations in Materials Processing and Nanoengineering. Thefollowing enrichment topics were carried out. During the opening program, a diversityicebreaker/mixer activity was done to establish interactions between participants to facilitateteam building and later team work. Also, seminars on: intellectual property and patient rights -The How and Why of Data Collection, a case study in biomedical ethical issues and dilemmas,funding sources and technical grant writing, a presentation by the state’s BiotechnologyResource Center, oral presentation skills, a plant trip to a producer of ostomy and woundsupplies, and a trip to an incubation center for entrepreneurship were done. These once to twice aweek programs
“helpful,”the highly technical, tedious, and sometimes uncertain nature of their work resulted inparticipants on the Final Day also using words such as “failure,” “erratic,” and “monotonous.” Table 2: Participant Descriptions of Engineering Before and After Participation in the REU Program Three Words That Describe Three Words That Describe Engineering– First Day Engineering – Final Day •challenging, changing, cohesive •difficult, innovative, important •precise, technical, necessary •innovative, logical, important •details, ethics, precision •detailed
the University of Michigan. The prototype Environmental Engineering course titled “Heavy Metal Contamination in theUrban Environment” will examine heavy metal burdens in Valparaiso area commons identifiedby the participating Valparaiso University students. Students will participate in sampling andmeasuring contamination levels and computing HI values. The students will also develop a planto address the legal and ethical issues associated with generating this type of knowledge.Table 2–Number of Commons with Hazard Index >1 Commons Based on Cr(III) and Cr(VI) Guidance State Cr(III) Cr(IV) State Cr(III) Cr(VI) Alaska 8 10 Missouri 14 14
substantial leadership roles so that they canhelp drive initiatives for developing technological solutions to—and policy decisions for—globalproblems in our increasingly technology pervasive society. Emphasized by ABET 6, engineersare charged with understanding the global, economic, ethical, and societal impacts of theirtechnical decisions. Policy decisions in our dynamic, technical society require this firmunderstanding of the limits and effects of science and technology 3. To accomplish this goal, theNAE cites the need for engineers to understand the principles of leadership and apply themthroughout their careers. 3As the world’s technical expertise continues to globalize, leadership is also important for anindividual’s professional success in
& data 4 0.800 0.639 e: Solve Problems 3 0.033** 0.539 k: Use skills 3 0.004*** 0.121 Broad Skills 26 0.609 0.012** d: Multi-disp. Teams 3 0.293 0.227 f: Ethics 3 0.919 0.292 g: Communication 3 0.955 0.187 ABET Outcomes i: Lifelong learning 3 0.424 0.165
faculty shortly after completing her Ph.D. and chaired the Department of Computer Sci- ence from 1996 to 2010. Her research interests are in software engineering, including software processes, software measurement, and software engineering education. She also has interests in ethical and social aspects of computing and has been active in efforts to increase the number of women in computing for many years. She has been a co-PI on nearly $1.5 million in grants from industry and the National Science Foundation. Dr. Ott is a 2010 recipient of the ACM SIGSOFT Retrospective Paper Award for the paper ”The Program Dependence Graph in a Software Development Environment” co-authored with Dr. Karl Ottenstein. The paper was