responses. Instead, we took the group average responses on each of the pre-and post- questions, as shown below in Table 1, (which is not inclusive of all questions, for spacereasons).As seen in Table 1, students indicated a 0.9 (2.5 3.4) increase in their familiarity with design,engineering, and technology; a 1.7 (2.1 3.8) increase in confidence in incorporating design,engineering, and technology in their classrooms; and a 0.9 (2.1 3.0) increase in theirknowledge and familiarity with NGSS. When asked about the qualities of a typical engineer,notable increases (>0.5 Likert points) were seen in categories of (a) works well with people, (b)has good verbal skills (0.87), and (c) has good writing skills (tabulated data not shown). Webelieve
Strength SimulationBrian J. Seely, a Karl M. Kapp, a Larraine A. Kapka, b and Steven Wendel b a Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, b Sinclair Community College Virtual Online Tensile Testing Strength SimulationIntroductionOne of the challenges of educating high school students about tensile strength testing is the lackof available equipment or the non-systematic approach to teaching. It was postulated that anonline virtual simulator may address the issue. This research study was a collaborative effort thatfocused on the development and implementation of an open source, online virtual tensilestrength testing simulation designed to emphasize the equations used as part of tensile testing.The
capture how students valueddiversity within engineering specifically or how likely students were to enact inclusivebehaviors. Thus, we created two new scales: Valuing Diversity within Engineering and InclusiveBehaviors in Engineering.To determine what constructs needed to be addressed in the two scales, we examined literatureaddressing reasons for promoting diversity and inclusion in the workplace and school –specifically in engineering; and barriers to participation encountered by students fromunderrepresented populations in engineering For the Valuing Diversity Scale, three constructssurfaced. Specifically, engineers should value diversity to (a) address issues of social justice(e.g. Baillie, Pawley, & Riley 2012), (b) improve the bottom
non-ESP students. Of the students who completed the course, 80% of theESP students earned an A, B, or C compared to 65.9% of the non-ESP students. ESP studentshad higher GPAs in all 4 courses than non-ESP students. The difference in grades between thetwo groups was statistically significant for both Pre-calculus and General Chemistry I. Andsignificantly, no ESP student failed either of the mathematics courses.Moving forwardThese results were presented to the AURAS Internal Advisory Board, which was constituted asrequired for STEP programs of science & engineering department chairs and chaired by theuniversity provost. Coming at a time in the life of our institution when increasing numbers ofstudents were coming into science and
, and personally through their transition to higher education andengineering coursework (Hinds, Walton, Urban-Lurain, & Briedis, 2014; Walton et al., 2013).Specifically, we examined the following research questions:1. Are there differences between students who report low versus high belonging in the CoE interms of (a) the degree to which potential sources of belonging (e.g. tutoring, residential halls,teamwork in courses) differentially predict students’ overall sense of belonging in the CoE, (b)mean level of perceived support for belonging from the potential sources of belonging, (c)overall participation in support activities, and (d) gender and race/ethnicity?2. For students who expressed low feelings of belonging in the CoE, what types
-work. Namely,with the new LSM/KI pedagogical structure and substantial portions of class time being devotedto KI sessions, it has become evident that the students must engage very intensely in the assignedpre-work that, in turn, must be carefully thought out and guided, and, most importantly,meaningfully assessed.To this end, one of the faculty team members (B. M. Notaroš) has developed a unique andextremely comprehensive collection of as many as 888 Conceptual Questions inelectromagnetics6, to help students comprehend anchoring concepts in this core competency, as away of encouraging active learning through a partially flipped classroom approach and problem-based learning. These are multiple-choice questions that focus on the core concepts of
1.043 .307 19.717 .000 .335 .563Table 4. Results of two-way repeated measures ANOVA to check for interactionbetween gender and spatial ability. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)Figure 3. Graph of the interaction of gender and spatial ability level on (a) MPT, (b)GPA, (c) SAT Math, (d) ACT Math and (e) ACT SCIRE.Finally, a correlation matrix is presented in Table 5 to show the extent to which each of thetest measurements correlate with each other based on the full data set n 2 3 4 5 6 1. MPT 1053
Consortium.Cathalina Juarez, University of Southern California Cathalina Juarez is a Program Specialist in the Division of Engineering Education at the University of Southern California. She previously worked in outreach and recruitment at Minority-Serving Institutions for NASA internship, fellowship, and scholarship programs. She has nearly a decade’s worth of expe- rience working with non-profits where she created and implemented yearly programs that focused on Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). She received bachelor’s degrees from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County - a B.S. in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and a B. A. in Psychology. She went on to receive a master’s degree in Education from
test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and motor skills. 1978;47(2):599-604.16. Peters M, Lehmann W, Takahira S, Takeuchi Y, Jordan K. Mental rotation test performance in four cross-cultural samples (n= 3367): Overall sex differences and the role of academic program in performance. Cortex. 2006;42(7):1005-1014.17. Maeda Y, Yoon SY. A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue spatial visualization tests: Visualization of rotations (PSVT: R). Educational Psychology Review. 2013;25(1):69-94.18. Hilton E, Williford B, Li W, McTigue E, Hammond T, Linsey J. Consistently Evaluating Sketching Ability in Engineering Curriculum. International Conference
science standards. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 52(3), 296–318.7. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states.book, Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.8. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.9. Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentation and learning. In Argumentation and education:Theoretical foundations and practices (pp. 91–126). Boston, MA: Springer US.10. Besnard, P., & Hunter, A. (2008). Nature of argumentation. In Elements ofargumentation (pp. 1–20). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.11. Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientificthinking. Science Education, 77
among GTFs, it may beuseful in future semesters to give a sample lesson or sample worksheet in core courses todemonstrate how LLs will be run, and all the possibilities for how LL sessions might go.Perhaps a description of the benefits of active learning, and the intended benefits of theLL program may be worth going explaining to first-year students the program is beingadvertised to.Figure 2. LL attendance and feedback across engineering disciplines. (a) Shows abreakdown of overall LL attendance across first-year engineering courses. (b) Quantifiesoverall LL attendance of students who progressed and did not progress betweensemesters. (c) Quantifies survey responses of whether or not the LLs were helpful while(d) summarizes the reasons for non
. Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington Cynthia J. Atman is the founding director of the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT), a professor in Human Centered Design & Engineering, and the inaugural holder of the Mitchell T. & Lella Blanche Bowie Endowed Chair at the University of Washington. Dr. Atman is co-director of the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE), funded by the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. Her research focuses on engineering design learning, considering context in engineering design, and the use of reflection to support learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
operations you see in this video that are powered by pneumatic systems, or compressed air. b. List the advantages to pneumatic systems given in this video. “Pneumatic Desktop capping machine with printing function for semi-auto shampoo production line” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zlINr3Vqj4 c. You may need to watch this video a few times to see what is happening. Describe in detail what is taking place. Why is this operation beneficial? “A car that runs on air” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRpxhlX4Ga0 d. The AirPod car is a vehicle powered by pneumatics (compressed air). Describe the history of using compressed air to provide power to move a vehicle. e
printing services by acquiring two entry level fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printersfor its Teaching Resource Center (TRC).37 The 3D printers were placed in the TRC because thedepartment directly supports the College of Education, and 3D printers were rapidly becomingcommonplace in K-12 school libraries across the state and the rest of the United States. (a) Signage above study room (b) ZPrinter® 310 Plus Figure 1. Collaborative 3D printer lab and equipment.7, 30, 31One of the new 3D printers, a FlashForge Creator Pro38 (see Figure 2), is an FDM style 3Dprinter with a dual extrusion print head. The FlashForge’s dual extrusion head allows interlacedcolor objects to be printed, and the printer can extrude
database. 2. Code the background data on the educators. 3. Eliminate records with missing data. 4. Score the EDP pre and post data. 5. Calculate the difference in pre and post EDP data as well as pre and post pile sort data. 6. Conduct analysis of the data using descriptive and inferential statistics. 7. Report findings. Educator background data were coded into five categories based upon the reportedundergraduate or graduate degrees of the WaterBotics educators. The five categories were a)engineering, b) science, c) mathematics, d) technology education, and e) other disciplines.Engineering degrees included industrial engineering, mechanical engineering, and electricalengineering. Science degrees
HW 5 HW 8Assessment … … … … … … … …Section A 3.93 … 3.38 … 2.93 … 2.86 … 3.30 0.25 … 1.10 … 1.43 … 1.34 … 1.48Section B 3.71 … 3.89 … 2.67 … 2.99 … 3.13 0.75 … 0.65 … 1.54 … 1.49 … 1.65Section C 3.81 … 1.54 … 2.56 … 2.28 … 2.83 0.61 … 0.73 … 1.44 … 1.42 … 1.80Section D 3.75 … 1.86 … 2.36 … 2.87 … 3.11 0.47 … 0.91 … 1.59 … 1.18 … 1.65Section E 3.71 … 1.91 … 2.57 … 2.57 … 2.66 0.81 … 0.99 … 1.46 … 1.29 … 1.82Section F 3.74 … 2.60 … 2.31 … 2.44 … 2.48
with students embracing a growth mindset.Considering the dearth of literature about mindset, engineering identity, and gender, weexplore whether fixed or growth mindsets influence how students identify as engineers and seeif this relationship differs for women and men. Understanding whether mindset contributes toengineering identity can help engineering educators understand how to design and createlearning opportunities that cultivate engineering identities and promote engineering studentpersistence, particularly among women.The Current StudyThe purpose of this study is threefold: (a) to explore how does engineering identity developduring the first semester of engineering course work, (b) to determine if the development ofengineering identity
-year graduates ashaving “Excellent” critical thinking skill. Obviously, a more concerted effort must be made incurricula and educational practices to achieve a more measurable outcome to close the skill gap infresh college graduates.Active learning, with its strategy especially in the computer-based classroom 5 , is ideal to blendpertinent curriculum elements to help students develop the highly-sought abilities. The issuesnow become: a) identifying the proper problem to provide context and motivation; and b) findingthe technical vehicle for student engagement and assessment.For the first issue, Kahlen et al. 6 and Benner et al. 7 show that providing accurate and timelydiagnosis for system failures or malfunctions embodies the culmination of
. Terrell, the Office of Occupational Statistics and Employment Projections, "STEM Occupations", Occupational Outlook Quarterly 2007, BLS10. Occupational Outlook Handbook www.bls.gov/oco.11. J. Kuenzi, C.Matthew, and B. Mangan, "Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education Issues and Legislative Options", CRS Report for Congress, 2006.12. Bonvillian, W. B. "Science at a crossroads", The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology Journal, 16, 915–921, 2002.13. Gonzales, P., Guzmán, J. C., Partelow, L., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., Kastberg, D., & Williams, T., "Highlights from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)", Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education
2017 ASEE Mid Atlantic SectionSpring Conference: Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland Apr 7 Paper ID #20816Assessing ABET Outcome E in a Junior Level Circuit Analysis Course Usinga TPN Design Problem.Prof. Kenneth E. Dudeck P.E., Pennsylvania State University, Hazleton Campus Kenneth Dudeck is an associate professor of Electrical Engineering at the Pennsylvania State University located in Hazleton, Pa. He has been teaching Electrical, Computer, and Electrical Technology Engineer- ing Courses for the past 29 years. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Assessing ABET
Paper ID #19548Using Programming and Simulation as a Research Tool in a Graduate Capi-tal Budgeting CourseDr. James D Burns, Purdue Univeristy Jim Burns, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Department of Technology Leadership & Innovation Jim joined the faculty at Purdue Polytechnic in 2015 after completing a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Western Michigan University, and has more than 10 years industry experience in the manufacturing sector in a variety of roles including process engineering, operations management, and technical sales. His area of expertise centers on applying OR/MS and Simulation techniques to Supply
Paper ID #19204Does Knowing a Study’s Outcome Further Impact It’s Conclusion: A Class-room StudyDr. Kate D. Abel, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science) Kate Abel serves as the as the Director of the Bachelor of Engineering in Engineering Management Program in the School of Systems and Enterprises at Stevens Institute of Technology. She holds a Ph.D. in Technology Management and Applied Psychology. She has held several professional service positions, including the President of the Engineering Management Division of the American Society for Engineering Education and the President of Epsilon Mu Eta
Paper ID #17951A review of the benefits of a residential solar power installation in westernNorth CarolinaDr. Sung Joon Suk, Western Carolina UniversitySteven Anthony Sciara, Western Carolina UniversityDr. George D Ford, Western Carolina University Dr. George Ford P.E. is an associate professor in the Construction Management Department at Western Carolina University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A review of the benefits of a residential solar power installation in western North CarolinaAbstractThis paper examines the costs and benefits of a five kilowatt
Paper ID #17963A Student-Developed Lesson Plan for a 4th Grade Energy Module (ResourceExchange)Miss Anna Colleen Sage, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Anna Sage is an undergraduate student majoring in Early Childhood Education in the Honors College at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Dr. John R. Reisel, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Dr. John R. Reisel is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM). He serves as associate director of the Center for Alternative Fuels and co-director of the Energy Conversion Efficiency Lab. In addition to research into engineering education
Paper ID #18922An Exercise in High-School Engagement: Making a Demo Jammer for a Mil-itary Applications CourseProf. Gene L. Harding, Purdue Polytechnic Institute GENE L. HARDING is an associate professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Purdue University, where he has taught since 2003. He has three years of industrial experience with Agilent Technologies, 28 years of combined active and reserve service in the United States Air Force, holds an MSEE from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and is a licensed professional engineer.Mr. Frank Joseph Rossi Jr., Trinity School at Greenlawn A current high
Paper ID #18449A New Pathway: A Software Engineering Master’s Program for Liberal ArtsGraduatesProf. linda m laird, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Systems & Enterprises) I am an industry professor in software engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology. Prior to that, I ran large development projects at Bell Labs/Lucent. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A New Pathway: A Software Engineering Master’s Program for Liberal Arts Graduates Linda M. Laird engineers and executives who
Chemical Reaction Kinetics and Equilibrium with Building Blocks, J. Chem. Ed., 2011 88 (10), 1400-1403. 13. Nichol, C.A., Hutchinson, J.S. Professional Development for Teachers in Nanotechnology Using Dis- tance Learning Technologies, J. Nano. Ed. 2010, 2, 37-47. 14. Diaconu, D., Radigan, J, Suskavcevic, M., Nichol, C. ”A Multi-Year Study of the Impact of the Rice Model Professional Development on El- ementary Teachers”, International Journal of Science Education, 34 (6), 855-877, 2012. 15. Crawford, C., Beason-Abmayr, B., Eich, L. and Nichol, C, (2014) Going viral, using laptops, and Youtube videos to model the structure and function of viruses, The Science Teacher, 51-53. 16. Nichol, C.A., Szymczyk, A., Hutchinson
Paper ID #17723Student Perceptions of Sustainability and Engineering Mechanics in Under-graduate Civil and Environmental Engineering Education at Virginia TechProf. Craig M. Shillaber, Northeastern University Craig M. Shillaber is an assistant teaching professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engi- neering at Northeastern University. He earned a Ph.D. in civil engineering from Virginia Tech in 2016, an M.S. in civil engineering from Virginia Tech in 2009, and a B.S. in civil engineering from the University of New Hampshire in 2008. His research interests include sustainability education in civil engineering
comments in the excel files: a. What are the topics of your comments? b. What is the tone of your comments? c. What in your history/identity has defined these topics/your attitudes towards these topics and made them important/unimportant? d. What are the topics of the survey that you responded to most strongly? Least strongly? 3. What did you discover about yourself from the holistic process of building the survey? 4. Look at all your answers and thematically code them using examples and thick descriptions.Once we completed our reflections, we met virtually to discuss the protocol and to collectivelyshare our data, while three of us kept field notes. At the conclusion of our two-hour
courses. Admittance requiredobtaining a B or better in all four courses, passing a math readiness exam, and attending allrequired activities. STEP is run through the Center for the Enhancement of EngineeringDiversity (CEED) office and is separate from the first-year program at the current university.Evidence based curricular innovation is welcomed in the development of STEP courses,specifically the engineering fundamentals course. Additionally, this development is supported bythe administrators and instructors of STEP. The curriculum for STEP is revisited every year bythe program director and instructors in order to address new needs or areas of improvement, andin conjunction with the first-year engineering courses that the students will