of inclusion in engineering, engineering ethics, and environmental justice. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 WIP: An Autoethnographic Account of a Female Engineering InternAbstractThis paper is a work in progress (WIP) that explores the experiences of a female undergraduateengineer, Kayla1, in both professional and academic settings. Studies have found that womenwho persist in engineering describe themselves as having an engineering identity [1]. Accordingto Faulkner, however, the normative engineering culture tends to make working relationshipseasier for men than women, and women are “visible as women, yet invisible as engineers” [2, p.169]. This
Engineering Undergraduate Performance Outcomes Introduction The improvement of engineering students’ learning through collaboration has theoreticalfoundations in social learning theory [1]. Further, students’ ability to effectively work in a teamis a required outcome for all U.S. accredited engineering programs [2]. Research suggests thatwhen collaborative learning (i.e., working with peers) is implemented in undergraduateengineering courses, students show increased engagement with course material [3] and improvedacademic performance [4]. Despite these promising results, current engineering education research regarding groupwork and collaborative learning is limited
SCADA Systems Design, whichrequired several labs to be modified or replaced with new ones. Surveys administered to thestudents and lab scores were used to assess the effectiveness of the equipment and the labs [1],[2]. The objectives of the labs formed the basis of the survey questions. The survey results areused to identify areas of improvement.CourseENGR 382 SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) Systems Design is an upper-division course taught to students in the Engineering Department as an elective or requiredcourse, depending upon the program. The following are the course learning outcomes: 1. Understand common Industrial Automation concepts, methods, and control algorithms. 2. Understand sensors and
the barriers instructors face when using activelearning in first- and second-year STEM courses in online-settings at post-secondary institutions.Here, we focus on fully online courses, taught in both asynchronous and synchronous settings,that have no in-person component. For our purposes, we define active learning broadly, as anytime the instructor goes beyond simply lecturing with the students taking notes. Active learningleads to improved student learning, more engaged students, and increased interest in STEM (e.g.,[1]-[5]). Additionally, active learning increases the quality, number, and diversity of STEMgraduates [5]. Despite these positive findings, adoption of active learning in classrooms has beenslow [4], and researchers have sought
academic success and on-timegraduation. We show how the IDPs, paired with a faculty mentoring component are able toproduce a powerful mechanism to boost LIATS actions, propelling them to become highlycompetitive engineering students.IntroductionLow-income students have been found to traditionally fall among groups with marked attrition,longest time to graduate, and reduced persistence indexes in many higher education institutions[1], [2]. Although many non-academic factors have been linked to this trend and numerousapproaches reported to address the problem, its incidence continues to create a success gapbetween this group and the general student population.This reality has not been an exception in the Engineering School of the University of
Elgin Wickenden Award by the American Society for Engineering Education. Dr. Menekse also received three Seed-for-Success Awards (in 2017, 2018, and 2019) from Purdue University’s Excellence in Re- search Awards programs in recognition of obtaining three external grants of $1 million or more during each year. His research has been generously funded by grants from the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), Purdue Research Foundation (PRF), and National Science Foundation (NSF). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 WIP: Challenges and Mitigation Strategies in STEM Courses – Students' PerspectiveBackground and Motivation With various
inprogress, we shared our initial framework to explore the systems thinking cognitivecompetencies of iGEM participants, open coded the content of one of the wikis, and presentedsome preliminary evidence of the competencies. Through continuing research, we will furtherexplore systems thinking in biological systems design by analyzing the remainder of the sixteams’ wikis. 1. Introduction The design of biological systems has gained attention as an opportunity to solve society'sproblems by envisioning new environmentally friendly bio-products or developing lesscontaminant alternatives. A biological system may be defined as whole living entities, or theirparts, that have biochemical processes in common such as growth, respiration, self
research focused on thecollege experience and academic success of college students with ADHD.Introduction Approximately 6.5% of incoming college freshman are students with attention deficithyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [1], [2]; yet, the college experience and academic success ofthese students remain understudied [3]. Students with ADHD commonly identify high energylevels, resilience, courage, and the ability to hyper-focus on tasks of interest as strengths [4]-[6],which are likely advantageous for academic success. However, college students with ADHDearn lower grades than their peers on average [2], [7]-[9] and are less likely to graduate [10].Researchers attribute these students’ lower than average academic achievement to difficulty
laboratories. Theseinclude: teaching proper use of sensors; comparing theoretical models with physical reality;allowing students practice in experimental design; practicing data analysis and interpretation;designing within constraints or to specifications; learning from mistakes; demonstratingcreativity and problem solving; choosing appropriate engineering tools for a problem; operatingsafely in the laboratory; presenting laboratory results orally and in writing; demonstrating theability to work in teams, presenting data honestly and objectively; and engaging their own sensesin observing and solving real-world problems [1]. Some of these objectives can be met equallywell in a virtual or remote setting as they can in a physical lab. Theoretical
among engineering students. Theargument in favor of this has been that engineers, with their critical thinking and problem-solving skills, if equipped with an entrepreneurial mindset, will be better suited to “createpersonal, economic, and societal value through a lifetime of meaningful work” [1]. The practiceof promoting and developing entrepreneurial thinking of engineering students extends beyondthe KEEN institutions, and the collective efforts appear well documented. For instance, a simplesearch for the phrase “Entrepreneurial Mindset” within the Papers on Engineering EducationRepository (PEER) reveals a steadily increasing appearance within ASEE-related conferenceproceedings [2]. Figure 1 depicts the count of papers related to these
BS degrees in civil/environmental engineering, as well as bachelor’s degrees in journalism and art history. Her research group investigates the relevance and application of context to engineering and entrepreneurial processes both domestically and internationally. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 WIP: Contextualizing Engineering Service Learning by Applying the Practices of Community OrganizingIntroductionService learning projects are recognized in engineering curricula as an excellent means oftangibly applying fundamental concepts, as well as allowing students to see a greater purposebehind their studies[1]. However, the
University of Delhi. His research interests are broadly in the field of child development and disability with a specific focus on emotion processing, mental health, adolescent issues, and information processing among the students. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: Creating an Internet Platform for Indian and USA Students to Share Ethical ViewpointsAbstractEthical engineering practice is a global issue. Future engineers must learn about ethics inclassrooms and apply the knowledge and skills in workplaces that are locally relevant andglobally sustainable [1]. However, cultural norms and social realities may result
Education, 2021 Work in Progress: Creative Biomechanics Project using an Interactive Digital Experience as an Alternative Laboratory (IDEAL) – Phase 2 Active learning is known to improve learning and retention [1], and gamification via a“Choose Your Own Adventure” structure has been shown to improve student motivation to study[2]. We previously implemented Phase 1 of the Interactive Digital Experience as an AlternativeLaboratory (IDEAL) for a creative biomechanics challenge problem [3]. Students were asked toanalyze musculoskeletal biomechanics data to determine the mechanism of injury and the person-at-fault in a fictional forensic investigation. A storyline and unique characters were
minimal; studieshave previously determined that students should be able to achieve the same score on a testwhether taken through the computer or taken on paper.1-3 Some concerns persist in that thechange in format may allow more technology-skilled students to gain a boost compared to otherstudents,4 as well at the inequality in digital and internet resources between students, which couldlead to an imbalance in performance,5 all of which is before considering any potential increasedchance of student cheating on exams.6Primarily, however, additional perspective for the fall 2020 semester was provided based onevents not directly related to coursework. With the backdrop beyond the classroom of a globalpandemic, a movement for racial justice, and a
andcolleagues in campus offices. In part, these elements make us good teachers. Prior to March2020, face-to-face interaction was the way we taught, collaborated, served and learned. Then,COVID-19 became real and, within a week, we could no longer be physically present with ourstudents and peers. We shifted instruction to Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT). We alsoshifted the way we collaborated in our scholarship and service. Informed by research, this paperhighlights aspects of our journey, challenges along the way and lessons learned to apply to thefuture.As educators in a predominately engineering university, the courses we teach address identifiedgaps in traditional engineering education and focus on the “soft skills” [1]. Team-based learningand team
Cornell University and a Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from the University of Virginia. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: Departmental Analysis of Factors of Engineering CultureIntroductionEngineering culture is described as unique compared to other academic disciplines. A 2010 studyby Godfrey and Parker described engineering culture as one that has an expectation of harshnesscoupled with continuous struggles [1]. Rigor and competition within engineering programsperpetuates a perception of a “meritocracy of difficulty” [2] where student success can bedescribed as “being able to take it” [1]. “Horrific” workloads create an environment of
the recitation would be devoted to students working on special homework problems(“section problems”) which we describe next.Each week, one of the students’ homework problems, written by E. B., was more authentic than a typicaltextbook problem. Students would be required to make their own assumptions and set their own designcriteria, and might have to look up information to solve the problem (i.e. in handbooks, published researcharticles, etc.). In general, they would have to make design decisions with limited information, just as anengineer would do in the workplace. An example problem is in Figure 1. These section problems were 50%of students’ weekly homework grades. Students would be given 15 minutes in section each week to workon these
pedagogical strategies employed by the instructor are alsodiscussed.IntroductionOne of the primary goals of an instructor is to present all the required course material and assessthe student learning outcomes (SLOs) as often as possible. The assessment results provide theinput to the instructor to adjust, improve, modify, or adopt new pedagogical strategies to achievebetter results on SLOs. The principles of pedagogical learning analytics intervention design [1]and the quality indicators for learning analytics [2] adequately emphasize the need to analyze thedynamics of the learning process. The intervention techniques or pedagogical strategiesemployed by the instructor to improve SLOs can be viewed as a controller to the dynamic systemof teaching and
including cave diving in over 50 caves throughout the U.S. and Mexico, and several cave dives to 300 or more feet. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work-In-Progress: Developing Undergraduate Research Experiences in Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) CybersecurityDuring the fall 2020 semester, nine students were recruited to participate in a UAS cybersecurity-focused undergraduate research experience. Three faculty members each identified a small topicarea for undergraduate students to pursue. The three areas are: 1. Small UAS (sUAS) Vulnerability and Threat Assessment and Mitigation 2. Effects of Cyber Attacks on Communication in UAS
they might have had in the classroom withoutleaving the safety of their home. Additionally, it removes the burden on parents of having topurchase outreach materials. The contents of the kits were designed with the followingconstraints: 1) experiments must be easy to complete with minimal instructions, 2) there must bea limited mess and 3) they must be easily and inexpensively shipped. With these constraints, fourexperiments were developed: analyzing the pH of household acids and bases using a red cabbageindicator (chemical engineering), building a popsicle-stick bridge (civil engineering), creating adrinking-straw prosthetic hand (biomedical engineering), and assembling an automatic LEDnight light (electrical engineering). The instructional
model developed by the authors thatencourages students to learn and solve complex problems pertinent to current challenges facing society. Since its beginnings, the IBL model has evolved to improve upon course aspects and processes from previous course iterations [1]–[11]. IBL is currently implemented into a cardiovascular engineering course within four institutions across the United States. This model strives to emphasize freedom and responsibility to students through self-directed learning. In the course, students identify relevant societal problems, form diverse multidisciplinary, multi- institutional teams, and work collaboratively towards innovative solutions. IBL uses an online learning management system (LMS) that was designed and
help students understand the projectthey will work on over the summer and allow them to hit the ground running upon arrival to thehost labs. Examples of planned activities for this virtual training series are outlined in Table 1. Table 1: 10-week virtual training series – weekly 90-minute Zoom sessions Week Topic Homework 1 Welcome & Introduction to Sweden and Swedish culture (inside and outside of the lab) N/A 2 Genetics - DNA & RNA structure and function Reading 3 Genetics - Gene expression
plans.This is perhaps the tougher skill of the two to develop, which, if successful, will help immenselywith their senior design manufacturing planning.The purpose of this Works in Progress paper is to document our initial attempt of a completevirtual introduction to machining and manufacturing, highlight successful strategies andchallenges, and provide insight on what could be improved. This is still an ongoing effort as thiscourse is currently being taught again. The current course strategy is based on what is describedin this paper, with minor improvement implementations based on student feedback.GoalsThe traditional course learning objectives were for students to (1) learn safe use of machiningtools, (2) demonstrate an understanding of design
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: Early Exploration of Engineering Students' Perspectives about Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in an Introductory Materials Science and Engineering Course Aroba Saleem1,2, Sindia Rivera-Jimenez1, Idalis Villanueva1 1 Department of Engineering Education, University of Florida 2 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of FloridaAbstractDespite numerous efforts made by the engineering community, maintaining a diverse, equitable, andinclusive education environment still seems a distant goal. Persistently, nationwide
in future careers. Sadly, themiddle school students have shown a lack of interest in STEM careers in the recent years [24].This lack of interest in STEM fields is even higher for female students [4]. Early exposure canhelp improve students’ interest in STEM career pathways [3]. In addition to interests, middleSchool students' attitudes towards STEM education play a significant role in their academicperformance as well [2]. Student’s attitudes towards science are one of the biggest factorsaffecting students' science achievements [1]). Students’ negative attitudes towards STEMsubjects have detrimental effects on their STEM career choices [18]. Improving student’sperceptions towards STEM subjects and careers can greatly improve the chances of
), called for a Decade of Education for sustainabledevelopment from 2005 to 2015 [1]. This worldwide reflection is creating a new engineeringeducation culture. Engineering educators are observing significant shifts in societal expectationsof the engineering profession to help address immediate and longer-term sustainable developmentchallenges. According to the World Federation of Engineering Organizations (WFEO),engineering plays a significant role in planning and building projects that preserve naturalresources, are cost-efficient, and support human and natural environments [2]. The NationalAcademy of Engineering formulated in 2004 its vision of the engineer of 2020 [3]. This reportoutlines a number of aspirational goals where it sees the
annual earnings. According to U.S. Bureau ofLabor Statistics, the overall employment of electrical and electronics engineers is projected togrow 3 percent from 2019 to 2029, about as fast as the average for all occupations 1. However,minorities continue to be underrepresented in science and engineering fields as reported by theNational Science Board, Science & Engineering Indicators 2. Hence, it is essential to enhanceundergraduate EE education in historically black colleges and universities (HBCU) and minorityserving institutes (MSI) to achieve the goal of diversifying and improving minority students’interests and academic achievements.Over the last two decades, the modern EE systems have changed significantly due to theincreased complexity
-semester sequence (offered Fall-Spring) where studentslearn about launching new technology products/services, start-up companies, and designing andbuilding new products. The broader goal is to develop an entrepreneurial mindset in students.Students form teams themselves, choose an idea together, prove a market for their idea,prototype the idea, and build a viable business plan and financial model. At the end of theprocess, the teams own the core concept and intellectual property for a valuable start-upcompany to take with them after they graduate. The core deliverables for EEP students are (i)Product Development Plan, (ii) Business plan, (iii) Financial model, (iv) Prototypes 1 and 2, (v)Project status reviews (v) Senior design day public
compared the mentors’self-rated competencies with the ratings provided by the mentees to identify differences acrossdemographics. Preliminary findings identify differences in the mentoring competencies ofmentors from the perspective of both mentors and mentees. Recommendations for research andpractice are also presented.1. IntroductionDespite various efforts to broaden participation, historically marginalized students (Black,Hispanic/Latinx, and American Indian/Alaskan Native identifying people) and women continueto be underrepresented in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) fields andcareers. For example, women continue to receive less than 30% of engineering degrees, 35% ofcomputer science degrees, and 25% of physics degrees at all
education programming to innovate their fields.IntroductionIn the United States, national calls have emerged for expanding the science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce [1]. Government officials suggest that anincrease in the number of STEM professionals and innovations is important for meeting risingsocial, economic, and environmental concerns across the country [2], [3]. One approach forSTEM workforce development is the launch of STEM entrepreneurship education programming.STEM entrepreneurial education programs (EEPs) promote and support university faculty,students and administrators in their transformation of STEM research into marketable products[4]–[8]. Since their emergence in the late 20th century, STEM EEPs have