‘ 1 .— - . . . .. Session 0475 : —.. . Successful Proposal Collaborations in Polymer Processing and Computer Integrated Manufacturing Laura L. Sullivan, Winston F. Erevelles, and Daryl J. Doyle GMI Engineering& Management InstituteAbstract The process of developing grant proposal ideas, identifying appropriate programs for submission, develop-ing the necessary .- contacts, and writing the actual proposal is an
Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com- munication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teach
, ranging from including entrepreneurial competenciesinto core engineering classes 30 , to programmatic threads in entrepreneurship 26 , to the alignment ofEntrepreneurship and ABET 24 .K-WIDE integrates engineering design and entrepreneurship in a way that lies between formalinstruction and competitions. On the one hand, K-WIDE operates outside of curricular require-ments, in a similar manner to design competitions, business pitches, start-up weekends and othersuch student opportunities 31 . On the other hand, the end goal of K-WIDE is not a product butpersonal growth and learning. This aspect is more similar to a formal curriculum, and as a resultthere is a significant degree of guidance and instruction from the instructors.3 K-WIDE
Capstone DesignEducation model and expanding the reeducation program of industrial workforce.Engineering students, after learning system design, an interdisciplinary curriculum of designeducation, a design information system with a data base of various design techniques, designelements, and teaching materials are expected to grow out of the projects. The SeoulNational University of Technology has hosted annual engineering education forums since Page 12.451.52001 and has recommended students of design engineering to participate in national andinternational design contests.Second, specific methods to spread capstone design education are as follows
: survey questions for students completing interdisciplinary project work. 1. What did you need to learn from a discipline other than your own in order to conduct your project? 2. How did you integrate this interdisciplinary knowledge with the knowledge of your discipline (in this case Mechanical Engineering) ? 3. How did this interdisciplinary knowledge impact the success of your overall project solution?Survey responses obtained from one of the students on the team clearly indicated that inclusionof an interdisciplinary project had a positive impact on his learning experience for the course. Inresponse to the first question he stated that in working on a mechanical project that would beinstalled in a nuclear power plant, several nuclear
program begins in thesummer semester and completes in the spring with students being off campus for the fall.The program is multidisciplinary in nature drawing from mechanical, electrical and computerengineering curriculums. When this program began, there were more electrical and computerengineers than mechanical. However, in recent years this ratio is typically 50-70% mechanicalengineers and a mixture of electrical and computer engineers. The computer and electricalengineers tend to gravitate toward working on control and electronic issues while the mechanicalengineers focus on aircraft design, aerodynamics and experimentation. For the multispectralanalysis there is usually an equal mix from both groups.While the traditional capstone design
project.This paper will primarily be focused on the implementation aspect, particularly related to thesystems engineering process, of this NASA EMSD senior design project. In additioncomparison of the NASA ESMD group experience to the implementation of systems engineeringpractices into a group of existing design projects is given.IntroductionPrior to the discussion of the implementation of system’s engineering into engineering design, abrief background on the curricular structure of the Materials and Metallurgical Engineering(MME) department and how the design courses fit into the curriculum is given.MME Course StreamThe design courses are structured to integrate material learned in core courses with the solutionof problems within the field. Typically
strongimpression of the action of a transcendent, yet calculating, intentionality. The most coherentview of the cosmos appears to be that of an engineered system of interdependent subsystems thatefficiently interact to prepare for, develop, and support advanced life, subject to variousconstraints. Considerations of intention and purpose in natural science have recently beendisallowed, and yet our world seems to be infused with purpose. The cosmological quest benefitsfrom the integration of knowledge from all areas of study, including those that considerquestions of purpose, such as design engineering. The synthesis of this knowledge that providesthe most satisfying answers for the human condition is one that admits the recognition ofpurpose, and possibly
Paper ID #6423Statistical Outlier Detection for Jury Based Grading SystemsProf. Mary Kathryn Thompson, Technical University of Denmark Mary Kathryn Thompson is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the Technical University of Denmark. Her research interests include the development, improvement, and integration of formal design theories and methodologies; assessment in project-based engineering design courses; and numerical modeling of micro scale surface phenomena. From 2008 - 2011, Prof. Thompson was the Director of the KAIST Freshman Design Program, which earned her both the KAIST Grand
Capstone design program including companion design courses has beendeveloped1,2 that has become an integral and important component of the MechanicalEngineering (ME) curriculum. Attention continues to be focused upon the formation of studentteams and the selection process in the hopes of developing High Performance student teams3,4and successful project outcomes5. Successful student teams should include enthusiastic,motivated and engaged students as they must address the project over the academic year of theFall, Winter and Spring quarters. The student team should also include satisfactory skills,technical or academic expertise as well as mutual accountability for each project.Our Capstone design program has established Industry and Research
-represented groups in STEM disciplines.Prof. John P. Wolfe, University of Michigan John P. Wolfe received his B.A. degree in Chemistry from the University of Colorado, Boulder in 1994 and his Ph.D. degree in 1999 from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology under the guidance of Professor Stephen L. Buchwald. He carried out postdoctoral research under the supervision of Professor Larry E. Overman at the University of California, Irvine, prior to joining the faculty at the University of Michigan in July, 2002, where he is currently an Arthur F. Thurnau Professor of Chemistry, and the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the Department of Chemistry. Professor Wolfe’s current research is directed towards the
-year effort to moretightly integrate process and product by focusing on design representations, or artifacts, thatcapture process and also serve as part of the product of a design course.Design representations are an integral element of the design process that have been tied to designcreativity [7] and process [8]. Representations are also important in education in both math andchemistry [9] and have been shown to relate to how well engineering students can create models[10]. At a more fundamental level representations are integral to engineering design and help todistinguish engineering from science. As Basset and Krupczak [11] have pointed out scienceseeks to produce theory by abstracting from specific observations. Engineers on the other
of Health Science and Technology, and holds an S.M. in Aeronautics & As- tronautics from MIT and a B.S. in Materials Engineering from the University of Kentucky. She co-directs the UM Center for Socially Engaged Design and directs the Sensory Augmentation and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Laboratory for Innovation in Global Health Technology, and Global Health Design Initiative.Madeline A. Gilleran, University of Michigan Madeline Gilleran is an senior undergraduate student at the University of Michigan, majoring in Mechan- ical Engineering and completing International Minor for Engineers. She is involved in the Engineering Global Leadership Honors Program, a specialization within the Honors Program that integrates
time-domain simulations of distributed generation renewable energy facilities. Today, he leverages his experience managing projects in industry to develop an extremely realistic senior capstone program at SDSU. Cory has also developed or implemented numerous active and experiential learning opportunities in a number of 200- and 300-level electrical engineering courses.Dr. Robert Fourney, South Dakota State University Bob Fourney is an Associate Professor at South Dakota State University, where he has been teaching since 2003. He teaches the digital design and embedded systems portion of the Electrical Engineering curriculum and serves as both a formal and informal advisor for the microcontroller and computer aspects
Jiaotong University, and B. Eng. from Xi’an University of Technology, all in Mechanical Engineering. He also received a graduate minor in Applied Statistics from Purdue and an undergraduate minor in Com- puter Science. His research interests lie in systems integration and design informatics, with the goal of building the decision-centric science foundations for complex systems engineering and design. Particular emphasis of his research is on: i) complex systems and complex networks; ii) artificial intelligence in en- gineering design; and iii) decision-based enterprise-driven design. Dr. Sha is the recipient of NSF CMMI Conference Fellowship in 2012, ASME Robert E. Fulton Best Paper Award in 2013, and ASME CIE Best PhD
. Page 13.923.21 Introduction and BackgroundMany engineering schools are now employing a service-learning approach to globally-basedhumanitarian projects1,2,3,4. The importance of integrating both globalization and social needsinto the engineering curriculum is acknowledged by the ABET criteria5, and human need is aclear priority of the engineering profession, as indicated in the NSPE creed*,6. However, themajority of North American engineering students are not familiar with the contexts in which vastneeds exist, such as those among the physically disabled or the estimated 4 billion people livingon less than $2 a day (PPP)7. These conditions represent a formidable “frontier designenvironment”, or environments outside the experience and expertise
as pathways and retention to and through K-12 and undergraduate engineering, teacher education, and curriculum development. She is passionate about hands-on engineering design for every student, at every age level.Dr. Michael A Soltys, University of Colorado, Boulder Mike Soltys is an Instructor for the Engineering Plus degree program at at the University of Colorado. Mike is passionate about engineering education, and teaches engineering design in First-Year Engineering Projects (GEEN 1400), Engineering Projects for the Community (GEEN 2400), Statics (GEEN 3851), Thermodynamics (GEEN 3852) and Theoretical Fluid Mechanics (CVEN 3313). Mike is the co-PI for TeachEngineering, a curricular digital library with the
net-zero energy building design. Professor Figgess was the lead faculty advisor for the CSU Sacramento entry into the US Department of Energy Solar Decathlon 2015 and played a supporting role in the 2016 SMUD Tiny House Competition. Figgess holds a BS in Construction Management and an MBA. His research interests include sustainability, water conservation, and renewable energy, as well as methods of teaching and learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Experiential Learning Opportunities through Collaborative ProjectsIn 2014, California State University Sacramento entered the SMUD 2016 Tiny HouseCompetition. Sponsored by the local
Choudhury, Western Michigan University Alamgir A. Choudhury is an assistant professor of industrial and manufacturing engineering at Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan. He earned his MS and PhD from NMSU(Las Cruces) and BS in mechanical engineering from BUET (Dhaka). His interest includes computer applications in curriculum, MCAE, mechanics, fluid power and instrumentation & process control. He is also a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Ohio and affiliated with ASME, ASEE, SME and TAP.James Kamman, Western Michigan University Dr. James Kamman is an Associate Professor of Mechanical & Aeronautical Engineering at Western Michigan University. He has
changethe market dynamics of CAD design through revitalization of the design curriculum. Thoughuniversities currently exhibit full design cycles across a variety of courses spread out in differentsemesters, it could be of major benefit for universities to integrate student extracurricular designteams as a part of the engineering curriculum. The ingrained collaboration required in designteams, as well as the cross-disciplinary interaction of students, academic mentors/advisors andindustry sponsors, is the most realistic analogue to the full end-to-end design cycle currentlypresent in an academic setting. In addition, since the competitive aspect of design competitionsto create superior designs push students to explore new/creative design avenues
. His research interests include advanced vehicle modifications, ergonomics and mobility devices for individuals with disabilities. He received the Presidential Award from NMEDA and an award from the University of Miami for course development and recruitment for their online training in AT. He is actively involved with the state VR program to develop policy and train- ing for better integration of rehabilitation technology services. He is on the advisory board for the RERC on Wheelchair Transportation Safety at the University of Michigan. Recent awards include: Engineer of the Year (American Society of Mechanical Engineers), Innovation Research Award (USF), and Florida Governors Point of Light. In 2006, He founded
STEM pedagogy, design thinking, project-based learning and educational entrepreneurship.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of
followed this trend.The self-efficacy findings are comparable to the findings from the phenomenologically basedinterviews of female students who are each voluntarily involved in the makerspace. The femaleusers were introduced to the space through both friends and class, and given that the intervieweeswere split 50/50 with seeking out hands-on making activities upon starting their undergraduate,this reaffirms that initial motivation does not impact involvement in the space as strongly as beingpresented an initial opportunity to use the space. It seems that student involvement in themakerspace is more impacted by the engineering design curriculum and their exposure to thespace. Engineering design curriculum does not necessarily have to enforce
program, and mostthought it was an excellent addition to the curriculum. Although the percentage of responses waslow (3%), we did make contact with some excellent prospects.Another source of prospects is to contact any company in the area that hires engineers. This listis publicly available through a “Book of Lists” that is published by a national newspaper chain,the American City Business Journals (www.bizjournals.com). A database was created with thesecompany names and addresses, their websites were visited and contact information extracted.Directors of Engineering and Human Resources were added to the database along with the typeof work the company performed and the disciplines of engineers they had recently hired. Usingthe database
Electrical Circuit course.James M. Conrad, University of North Carolina, Charlotte James M. Conrad received his bachelor’s degree in computer science from the University of Illinois, Urbana, and his master’s and doctorate degrees in computer engineering from North Carolina State Uni- versity. He is currently an associate professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He has served as an assistant professor at the University of Arkansas and as an instructor at North Carolina State University. He has also worked at IBM in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, and Houston, Texas; at Ericsson/Sony Ericsson in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; and at BPM Technology in Greenville, South Carolina. Dr
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Interactive Design and Technology Research: From Ideation to ImplementationAbstractThe growth and acceptance of interdisciplinary education has blurred the boundaries associatedwith more traditional and insular curricular models. In this environment, multidisciplinaryprojects are fast becoming the norm. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the framework andworking process of a new interdisciplinary capstone course that creates a dynamic new learningcontext by combining an Industrial Design Studio with a Computer Engineering TechnologyLaboratory. Integrating two core courses, senior students in Industrial Design and ComputerEngineering
Paper ID #30876Developing a Bridging Language: Design Decisions in Informal MakingExperiencesKathryn Elizabeth Shroyer, University of Washington c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Developing a Bridging Language: Design Decisions in Informal Making Experiences1: IntroductionThe complex nature of design practice makes it both challenging to teach and to learn [1].Historically, engineering programs have had difficulty integrating design in their curricula. As aresult, both the positioning of design coursework within the curricula and the teaching practiceswithin this coursework vary
experiences in the engineering sciences.First, academic obstacles include vertically integrated and rigid curriculum requirementsand the need for quality computational and non-computational laboratory facilities.Second, recent geo-political developments have made increasing the size of study-abroadprograms (or even maintaining current levels) more difficult. After September 11, 2001and the war with Iraq, complications of student security and international travel logisticshave only increased the difficulty of arranging for safe and secure educational travel.Our innovative program in international engineering education, recently developed atMichigan State University (MSU), addresses these challenges with great success.The organization of the paper is
manufacturing processes and details challenges that were overcome to effectively integrate 3D printing into the course in a way that strikes a balance between reliability, ease of use, and learning potential. Introduction This paper describes the implementation of consumer grade 3D printers in a firstyear introduction to engineering design course, ENES100, at The University of Maryland, College Park. Providing firstyear engineering majors with an opportunity to experience engineering through a projectbased design course has become an important curricular element in many 15engineering degree programs . Additionally, many experts point to the benefits of rapid
courses are designed with theopposing goal of providing as uniform of an experience as possible to all students. Due tothis fundamental difference, that some courses aim to provide a uniform experience forall students while others embrace a range of experiences for individual students, the sameevaluation framework cannot be applied to both types of courses.While an evaluation framework for a course with minimal variation between studentexperiences can assume that each student receives the same "treatment," the effect ofdifferences between individual student experiences must be integrated into an evaluationframework for a capstone course within which there is a large range of individualexperiences. In this paper, an assessment framework is