ready for Calculus the following fallwithout the need for a summer course or delaying their studies unnecessarily.This Integrated Precalculus I course was offered as a pilot program in 2017 and has now beenoffered for three consecutive years. Only students in the STEM majors of engineering,economics, chemistry, computer science, kinesiology, and mathematics are currently allowed totake the course as they all require some sequence of mathematics that involves courses that areonly offered once a year. This is an ongoing project as we are still evaluating the course throughstudent success in subsequent mathematics courses, retention in the major and at the university,and time to complete the mathematics sequence. We are in phase one of conducting
, become an even smaller group ofindividuals who are able to move on in the engineering major after the course is over.Data collection and analysisThe study follows a quasi-experimental, multi-method design to answer the research question.We utilize two quantitative measures along with semi-structured interviews of a sub-sample ofparticipants in order to triangulate the results of the quantitative measures. The two quantitativemeasures consist of an observational protocol to measure instruction and student participation,and a survey instrument designed to measure students’ sense of community in the classroom.First, the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS) [9] is a protocoldesigned for use in university settings to generate
) the NSF Pathway Fellowsprogram, 2) work published in a 2016 ASEE Paper, 3) redefinition of the programgoals to include retention of underrepresented students and exposure to globalengagement and 4) the evolution & connection to the Penn State Clark ScholarsProgram 8U NITED S TATES F ULBRIGHT S CHOLAR 2015 AT U NIVERSIDADN ACIONAL DE INGENIERIA (UNI) – L IMA , P ERU• PILOT: NSF PATHWAY FELLOWS TRIP TO PERUPilot 2015: The research question in this project was: While conventional retentionprograms for underrepresented students have shown to achieve graduation ratesequal to or surpassing those of the majority male population over an extendedperiod, could
underrepresented students pursuing an associate degree (AES)in engineering and computer science and streamline two transitions: high school to community collegeand 2-year to 4-year institutions. Through the grant, Wright College created a holistic and programmaticframework that examines and correlates engineering students' self-efficacy (the belief that students willsucceed as engineers) and a sense of belonging with student success. The project focuses on Near-STEMready students (students who need up to four semesters of math remediation before moving into Calculus1). The project assesses qualitative and quantitative outcomes through surveys and case study interviewssupplemented with retention, persistence, transfer, associate and bachelor's degree
, where her thesis topic was Nanoparticle Diffusion in Polymer Networks. Her research interests include polymer physics, nanoparticle diffusion, and engineering and physics education.Lily Skau, Austin Peay State University Lily Skau is an undergraduate student at Austin Peay State University pursuing a bachelor’s degree in Engineering Physics and a minor in Mathematics and Sociology. She plans to graduate with her degree and minors in May of 2026 and enter the industry as a Mechanical Engineer.Dr. Bobette Dawn Bouton, Austin Peay State University Dr. Bobette Bouton is an associate professor at Austin Peay State University. Her current area of research is socio-emotional development in the domain of empathy. She is a
system models, whichare the core skills that engineers and scientists develop. The Mobile Studio I/O Board, a personalelectronic instrument, was used as the technology to support the ECP. It is a portable,inexpensive, but highly useful hardware platform, which recreated a classroom or laboratoryenvironment e.g. at home. When coupled with the Mobile Studio Desktop software, the systemduplicated a large amount of the hardware often used to teach electrical engineering, computerengineering, physics and K-12 technology-oriented courses.There was a lot of refinement of the project through pilot studies and subsequent results showedthat the use of personal electronic instruments increases the level of student engagement andmotivation [2], [3]. Prior
progression as a leader in recruiting,retaining, and graduating Black and Brown engineering students. All site coordinators wereinvited to participate in the pilot interviews; all but one had completed their interview at the timeof this publication. We invited six participants to participate in the pilot interviews through a recruitmentemail. Five pilot interviews were completed in Year 1 of this project. Each interview wasapproximately 90 minutes in duration, except for three participants where a second 60-minuteinterview was scheduled to complete the interview protocol. The second interview wasapproximately an hour. Two researchers co-facilitated each interview. These interviews wereaudio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. These interviews
implementation.The project collaborators worked closely to design a 37-hour Biosystems Technology Certificatefocused on process engineering, applied life science and engineering technology. The certificatealso includes college transfer courses for those students wanting to pursue a four-year degree atClemson University. Page 23.969.53. Biosystems Technology MinorOne of the principle goals of the BT-ATE project was to establish a 15 credit hour BiosystemsTechnology academic minor at Clemson University. The establishment of a new minor areainvolves review and approval of new courses and the program of study at the department,college, and university levels.The
Dec. 9, 2017].[11] J. A. Fredricks and S. D. Simpkins, “Promoting positive youth development through organized after-school activities: Taking a closer look at participation of ethnic minority youth,” Child Development Perspectives, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 280–287, Sep. 2012.[12] B. A. Danielak, A. Gupta, and A. Elby, “The marginalized identities of sense-makers: reframing engineering student retention,” in 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2010, pp. S1H–1–S1H–6.[13] R.M. Marra, K.A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Women engineering students and self-efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self- efficacy,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no
identify potential users, wesurveyed first-year undergraduate engineering students to capture their intention to participate inacademic makerspaces. This study reports on work done as part of a larger study that follows thepaths of first-year students at two academic institutions, tracking their participation andperceptions of makerspaces over four years. Quantitative data were collected from two onlinesurveys that were distributed at the beginning of the Fall 2022 semester and the end of theWinter/Spring 2023 semester. Each survey took approximately 10 minutes to complete andconsisted of a series of Likert-type and single-selection questions about theirattitudes/motivations toward makerspaces and psychosocial assessments of their
technology. Page 25.937.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Millennials Perception of Using Clicker to Support an Active Classroom Environment: An Early Adoption PerspectiveAbstractThis paper presents a multi-year study of students’ perception associated with the introduction ofa technology tool, personal response systems, starting from its initial stage to date. The goal is toprovide a reflective perspective of this topic that intertwines the instructor’s and students’ viewsassociated with the adoption of a technology tool that addresses Millennia’s need for quickfeedback
diversity, and understand their effects in students performance. Isabel received her professional degree in biological engineering at the Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile and her MA in policy, organizations and leadership studies at Stanford Graduate School of Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Redesigning engineering education in Chile: How selective institutions respond to an ambitious national reformIntroductionIn 2012, the Chilean government launched the “Nueva Ingeniería para el 2030” program, whichaims to redesign engineering education, enhance applied research, technology development,innovation and entrepreneurship around engineering campuses.1
Assistant Professor in Mathematics at Navajo Technical University (NTU) as well as the Program Advisor for the Mathematics Program at NTU. His current research focuses on technology-enhanced active learning in college mathematics for tribal students. He works developing lessons and curriculum to promote students’ interests in learning mathematics. He teaches both graduate and undergraduate courses about mathematics. He received his doctoral degree in the Science, Technol- ogy, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Strand of Teaching Learning and Culture Program at The University of Texas at El Paso in 2014 under the mentoring of Dr. Judith Munter.Alice Carron, Blue Marble Institute of Space Science Alice Carron is a Science
workshop design, we chose to restrict our data to that generated by normalworkshop activities.A brief description of what "normal workshop activities" consisted of is helpful at this point. Theworkshop we studied was the week-long "Designing for Student Engagement" summer instituteoffered by the Collaboratory (formerly the Institute for Innovation in Engineering Education, orI2E2) at Olin College, a small, all-engineering undergraduate teaching college based in Page 24.1366.3Needham, MA. The workshop is developed and facilitated by Olin faculty and has been runningunder its current design since June 2011. It was based in a large open space set up
retention and graduation rates along withstronger ties to recent alumni which could translate to an increase in reputation and alumnigiving.Next StepsThe Program piloted the framework with small cohorts using funding from an initial Track 2(single institution) NSF S-STEM award. During the Track 2 award, the program leadership teamrefined the program components and demonstrated a capacity to increase in scale and provensustainability. With the recent receipt of an S-STEM Track 3 (multi-institution) award, theProgram is expanding to larger cohorts and a partnership with a local community college. TheiAM Program now includes 25 majors across eight departments (Biology, Chemistry, ComputerScience, Engineering, Math, Physics, Psychology, and Geology
algorithms to the omission of important topics and key theoretical ideas.Langley’s findings provide a rationale for integrating discussions and ideas commonly in the realm of thehumanities and social sciences into AI course design for engineering education [31]. Their study found that“problem areas like qualitative reasoning, analogy, and creativity are ignored in favor of ones that are more easilyformalized” [31]. Promoting critical thinking and creativity through interdisciplinary approaches to problem-solvingcan set the basis for qualitative reasoning beyond quantitative analyses. It also allows for deeper reasoning on theinterplays between society and technology.These findings echo Mishra and Siy, who warned that “a Computer Science centric
preliminary sizing of beams, columns, anddecking (depth-to-span ratios and tributary areas techniques). Quantitative theory, intuitiveapproaches, and case studies support the content. Achievement is based on a structural framinggraphic vignette of comparable to size and character of the NCARB Practice Program StructuralLayout Vignette. The students develop a horizontal solution for a multi-level flat roof with Page 24.815.7clerestory windows that resists gravity loads.The statics and mechanics module characterizes the internal member shears and moments fromapplied loads then constricts to their properties and stresses. Rigid body statics
rubric was integrated into the capstone presentations from thetwo departments. The three primary findings from this study were that (1) many engineeringstudents start college with weak writing skills; (2) a significant number of engineering studentsare graduating with writing skills below the desired level; and (3) based on the ACT score, abasic writing skills test and a writing sample, a heuristic can be developed to effectively identifystudents required to take an additional writing course at the start of his/her college career.IntroductionA one-year pilot study was performed to assess the undergraduate written and oralcommunication skills from two departments, Civil Engineering (CIVE) and Biological SystemsEngineering (BSEN), at the
] Cooper, R. & Heaverlo, C. (2013). Problem solving and creativity and design: What influence do they have on girls' interest in STEM subject areas? American Journal of Engineering Education. 4. 10.19030/ajee.v4i1.7856[24] Katz-Buonincontro, J., Davis, O., Aghayere, A., & Rosen, D. (2016, February). An exploratory pilot study of student experience in creativity-infused engineering technology courses. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), Special issue on Creativity.[25] Zappe, S.E., Reeves, P., Mena, I.B., & Litzinger, T. (2015). A cross-sectional study of engineering students' creative self-concepts: An exploration of CSE, personal identity, and expectations. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
the instructor initiates a multiple choice question and the students using remote deviceskey in their answers. The results are saved in data file and the instructor can then display a Page 10.435.3histogram of class results. In order to promote the use of these questions and answers as a study Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005 American Society for Engineering Educationtool, the FIC designed an online application web site that provides a feedback loop for theinstructor and students to examine their responses. Our site also provides
development in the First Year Experience at the University of Houston, the Course Coordinator for ENGI 1331 (Computing and Problem Solving), and is the outreach and student organization director the Program for Mastery in Engineering Studies (PROMES).Dr. Erin J. McCave, University of Houston Erin is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Cullen College of Engineering at the University of Houston. She joined the University of Houston after completing a postdoctoral/lecturer position split between the General Engineering program and the Engineering & Science Education Department and a Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University. Erin’s research interests include preparing students for their sophomore year
AC 2012-3832: THE PATHWAYS TAKEN BY EARLY CAREER PROFES-SIONALS AND THE FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO PATHWAY CHOICESMs. Cheryl A. Carrico P.E., Virginia Tech Cheryl Carrico is a Ph.D. student in engineering education at Virginia Tech and a graduate research as- sistant. Carrico is conducting research on early career professionals and their pathways as part of the engineering pathways study. Carrico has industry experience including as an engineering manager for General Dynamics.Ms. Katherine E. Winters, Virginia TechMs. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Stanford University Samantha Brunhaver is a fourth-year graduate student at Stanford University. She is currently working on her Ph.D. in mechanical engineering with a focus in
, educators and policy makers have expressed growing concerns over thelevels of math and science achievement among American students and the gradual decline in thenumbers of young people moving into science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)careers [1], [2], [3]. These concerns have led to the development of new standards for scienceand technology education [4], [5], [6], policy initiatives aimed at promoting science andtechnology education [7], [8],[9], and to a growing body of research on math and sciencelearning and the pathways leading to STEM-related careers [10], [11]. While the picture oflooming shortages of scientists and engineers has been challenged and recent studies haveindicated that American students are taking more science and
Technology,” presented at American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006. 3. Knight, M. and Cunningham, C. “Draw an Engineer Test (DAET): Development of a Tool to Investigate Students’ Ideas about Engineers and Engineering,” presented at American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2004. 4. Cunningham, C.M., Lachapelle, C., and Lindgren-Streicher, A. “Assessing Elementary School Students’ Conceptions of Engineering and Technology,” presented at American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005. 5. Thompson, S. and Lyons, J. “A Study Examining Change in Underrepresented Student Views of Engineering as a
BackgroundSince the publication of the Green Report in 19961 there has been a strong push withinengineering education practice and research to better prepare engineering graduates for the socio-technical world in which engineers are embedded. Surprisingly, this drive to better alignengineering education with the socio-technical world began many decades earlier with theCarnegie Foundation's 1918 publication of A Study of Engineering Education2. In spite of theeffort in recent years to operationalize the student learning of the necessary competencies (e. g.through ABET outcomes3) there is a disconnect between what students learn in engineering, Page
students’ experiences as they leave their capstone(aka senior) design courses and enter engineering workplaces. The project is currently in itsinitial phase, with instrument development and pilot testing currently underway.Multiple studies show significant gaps between school and work with respect to engineeringpractice 1-3. That gap is clear, for example, in a recent American Society of MechanicalEngineering (ASME) survey that found weaknesses among new graduates in skills includingpractical experience, systems perspectives, project management, problem solving, and design 4, 5.Equally important, industry supervisors identified such gaps more frequently than early careerengineers or academic department heads 4, reinforcing Stevens et al.’s claim
input from others, 4) learningfrom failure.Understanding the Purpose of the CourseAs this was the first time the course was offered, there were a few different understandings aboutwhat the course was about. Some students thought the course might prepare them with financialmanagement skills for after college, how to communicate in the workplace, or how to besuccessful in graduate school. As one mechanical engineering student noted: I don't remember this correctly, but when I signed up for the course, I think, the idea was that this would be a little bit more of like the skills for when you actually leave college. So, for example, ... like taxes or, you know … how would you communicate with people who are higher status
AC 2012-3989: PK-12 COUNSELORS KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, ANDBEHAVIORS RELATED TO GENDER AND STEMMs. Meagan C. Ross, Purdue University, West Lafayette Engineer turned engineering education enthusiast, Meagan Ross is a doctoral candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and a recipient of a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. She received a B.S. in computer science from Texas Woman’s University and a M.S. in electrical engineering from Texas Tech University. Prior to beginning her doctoral studies, she worked as a microelectromechanical-systems (MEMS) engineer for Texas Instruments. Ross is currently a K-12 STEM consultant, curriculum developer, professional development
’ scholarship investigated stu- dent teams in engineering, faculty communities of practice, and the intersectionality of multiple identity dimensions. Her research interests include diversity and inclusion in STEM, intersectionality, teamwork and communication skills, assessment, and identity construction. Her teaching philosophy focuses on student centered approaches such as culturally relevant pedagogy. Dr. Cross’ complimentary professional activities promote inclusive excellence through collaboration.Mr. Joseph Francis Mirabelli, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Joseph Mirabelli is an Educational Psychology graduate student at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign with a focus in Engineering
system combining textbook-quality content with algo-rithm visualizations and interactive exercises. DSA courses emphasize dynamic processes suchas how various algorithms work. OpenDSA supports presenting such content in a highly visualmanner through the frequent use of slideshows, simulations, and visualizations. Students werealso provided a continuous stream of automated assessment questions and interactive exercises,thus providing immediate feedback to the students on their progress.A pilot study was conducted with students in a Computer Science course at Virginia Tech duringFall 2012. We tested three weeks of content on sorting and hashing in a quasi-experimental set-ting and collected quantitative and qualitative data. The data consisted of