Barriers, Bridges, and the Trolls under the Bridge: Issues in Human Factors Education for Engineers and Others William S. Helton, Michele H. Miller, and Robert Pastel Michigan Technological University Houghton, MichiganAbstractHuman Factors (HF) is the scientific discipline concerned with the interactions amonghumans and built systems. HF requires the knowledge of both human experts(psychology) and machine experts (for example, computer science and mechanicalengineering). In this paper, we will present our observations of teaching HF from theperspective of a psychologist, a mechanical engineer, and a computer scientist. We willdiscuss our observations in
AC 2009-1307: INSTRUCTIONAL BENEFITS OF A COURSE MANAGEMENTSYSTEM IN K-12 EDUCATIONPatricia Carlson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Patricia A. Carlson has taught a variety of professional writing courses at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and has held ten ASEE Summer Research Fellowships. She is on the editorial board of three professional publications for advanced educational technology and has served as a National Research Council Senior Fellow at the Air Force Human Resources Laboratory. Email: patricia.carlson@rose-hulman.edu Page 14.745.1© American Society for Engineering
since as Assistant Professor (2005-2011), Associate Professor (2011-2012) and Professor (2012-). Rohit was the first assistant professor hired into the new Bioengineering department and played a key role in the development of its curriculum and activities. He later founded and serves as the coordinator of the Cancer Community@Illinois, a group dedicated to advancing cancer-related research and scholar- ship on campus. Research in the Bhargava laboratories focuses on fundamental theory and simulation for vibrational spectroscopic imaging, developing new instrumentation and developing chemical imaging for molecular pathology. Using 3D printing and engineered tumor models, recent research seeks to elucidate hetero
actions and knowledge about their current practice. Consequently,we used four analytical themes (Reflections on Practice, Changes in Practice, Intentions toChange Practice, and Change in Knowledge) to examine the likelihood that what teachersencountered in the course would transfer to their classrooms. Three graduate students allowed usto gather data over a semester to develop in-depth cases. The teachers were Alice, an elementaryteacher; Denise, who taught at a Science Center; and Dana, a high school chemistry teacher.Alice intended to change, or changed things, such as teaching the design process explicitly,learning the science behind engineering concepts, developing activities for young children, usingeveryday contexts, and planning a model
students. He has served as the Civil-Site design option evaluator for Senior Design projects each semester as part of his normal teaching responsibilities. Dr. Lester has developed new courses in Civil Engineering Technology to better distribute the student load in Fluid Mechanics and the accompanying laboratory. Dr. Lester has also taught the Professional Engineering preparation courses through the ODU Business Gateway. Dr. Lester has embarked upon the initial asynchronous modality course development and was instrumental in promoting the program forward with this initiative with the Center for Learning and Teaching. He has developed an asynchronous course for Fundamentals of Building Construction and will develop
, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 196-221.Minichiello, A., Armijo, D., Mukherjee, S., Caldwell, L., Kulyukin, V., Truscott, T., Elliott,J. & Bhouraskar, A. 2020, "Developing a mobile application-based particle imagevelocimetry tool for enhanced teaching and learning in fluid mechanics: A design-basedresearch approach", Computer Applications in Engineering Education, .Naukkarinen, J. & Sainio, T. 2018, "Supporting student learning of chemical reactionengineering using a socially scaffolded virtual laboratory concept", Education for ChemicalEngineers, vol. 22, pp. 61-68.Newstetter, W.C. 2005, "Designing cognitive apprenticeships for biomedical engineering",Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 207-213.Ng, O.-L. & Chan, T. 2019
and Y. C. Cheng, "Teaching Object-Oriented Programming Laboratory With Computer Game Programming," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 197- 203, 2007.[6] python.org, "turtle — Turtle graphics," [Online]. Available: https://docs.python.org/3/library/turtle.html. [Accessed 30 December 2022].[7] E. Engheim, "Why Should You Program with Julia?," Manning Free Content Center, 6 May 2022. [Online]. Available: https://freecontent.manning.com/why-should-you-program-with- julia/. [Accessed 30 December 2022].[8] Apache Maven Project, "Introduction," Apache Maven Project, 1 January 2023. [Online]. Available: https://maven.apache.org/what-is-maven.html. [Accessed 1 January 2023].[9] M. Kimberlin, "Reducing Boilerplate
Learning Styles of Construction Management StudentsAbstractStudents take in and process information in different ways. College faculty members‘teaching methods are not all the same. However, rarely there are any efforts by facultymembers to harmonize their teaching styles with their students’ learning styles. Whenthere is a major mismatch between the learning styles of majority students and teachingstyles of the instructors both get frustrated. Although it is not possible for the instructorsto match individual learning styles of every student in the class, as long as there is abalance in teaching method in relation to the teaching styles of the majority of thestudents overall effectiveness of the teaching in the class will rise. It is theorized
engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence and on effective methods for teaching global issues such as those pertaining to sustainability.Ziyan Bai, University of Washington Ziyan Bai has a Ph.D. in educational leadership and policy studies with a focus on higher education. She has over six years of research and professional experience in the field of higher education. With a dedication to diversity, equity, and inclusion, she is committed to using qualitative and quantitive research to inform impact-driven decisions.Neha Kardam, University of Washington Neha Kardam is a Ph.D. student in Electrical
University. Dr. Zapanta has served as a Visiting Assistant Professor of Engineering at Hope College in Holland, MI, an Adjunct Professor of Engineering at Austin Community College in Austin, TX, and an Assistant Professor of Surgery and Bioengineering at The Pennsylvania State University in Hershey, PA. He also worked for CarboMedics Inc. in Austin, TX, in the research and development of prosthetic heart valves. Dr. Zapanta’s primary teaching responsibilities are Biomedical Engineering Laboratory and Design. Ad- ditional teaching interests include medical device design education and professional issues in biomedical engineering. Dr. Zapanta’s research interests are in developing medical devices to treat cardiovascular
moderately controlled proxies, and in the “real world,” students willencounter problems, data, and information presented in all sorts of ways. It is our responsibilityas educators to prepare them for these encounters.While multiple representations are promoted for their ability to engage different types of learnersand diversify teaching styles, there is little research available on their effect on problem solvingand critical thinking skills. Furthermore, the work that is available often focuses on a singlerepresentation (e.g., visualization3). Because exposure to diverse representations willtheoretically allow students to be more versatile thinkers, we believe this will result in greaterdevelopment of problem solving and critical thinking skills. To
school level. Moreover, the projects used in first year engineeringcourses can be used to bring “reality” to the interdisciplinary project-based learning initiatives insecondary education. Faculty, both high school and college, can work together:• to design learning experiences for students;• to explore alternative teaching pedagogies;• to explore strategies for motivating students (& teachers): and• to find ways to connect learning for the students.The benefits are by no means one-way from the university into the high-school. Engineeringprograms benefit from (1) students who are better prepared academically, (2) an increasedunderstanding by both students and teachers of what the engineering profession does, (3
Session 2364 A Computer Application In Materials Engineering Technology Course Seung H. Kim Manufacturing Technology Department Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne, IN 46805-1499 ABSTRACT This paper describes the application of mathematical software, Mathcad™, in designingthe heat treatment of steel. Such a software solution method is an effective teaching tool thatfinds many practical applications in engineering and
. Page 24.515.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Engineers Assemble: The Use of Popular Culture in Engineering EducationThe idea of other universes appeals to most of us. Whether it’s a universe where lonely kids areswept away to learn magic in a haunted castle, or where vampires and werewolves run the world,or where superheroes take on the bad guys and win, most of us have a favorite escape. Ourstudents sometimes seem to spend most of their time in their favorite alternate universes to theconsternation of their parents and teachers. We spend a lot of time trying to pull them back intothis universe to teach them engineering. But sometimes, we can actually
,content-integrating and interrelating and so on (Rieley & Crossley, 2000; Cole et al, 2000;Tan & Thoen, 2000; Bradley et al, 2007) . So, the teaching approach requires faculty tobelieve and affirm that every student can learn and model good practices that increaselearning. However, the traditional teaching approach cannot develop Higher Order CognitiveSkills (HOCS) and problem-solving skills that are needed in the work (Broussard et al., 2007;Mbarika, 2003). The mission of the Laboratory for Innovative Technology and Engineering Education(LITEE), created at Auburn University, is to bring real-world issues into classrooms, usingmultimedia case studies that illustrate in detail how an industrial problem is analyzed and asolution found
Bottomley, North Carolina State University Laura Bottomley received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering in 1984 and an M.S. in Electrical Engineering in 1985 from Virginia Tech. She received her Ph D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from North Carolina State University in 1992. Dr. Bottomley worked at AT&T Bell Laboratories as a member of technical staff in Transmission Sys- tems from 1985 to 1987, during which time she worked in ISDN standards, including representing Bell Labs on an ANSI standards committee for physical layer ISDN standards. She received an Exceptional Contribution Award for her work during this time. After receiving her Ph D., Dr. Bottomley worked as a faculty member at Duke University and
of the nature of the material andthe laboratory classes, I learned and learned well. I could see and touch and hear the results ofmy calculations. “A picture is worth a thousand words” can also be stated as “a concrete exampleis worth a thousand minutes of lecture”. Of course, for some courses the abstract and theoreticalnature of the material makes it a little harder to present such examples, but it really helps thelearner.Teaching Style Page 23.882.3 One major influence of this adventure was on my teaching style. I started using motivationalexamples in my classroom. These were not just examples taken from the end of the chapter wewere
theprofession in order to adjust content and method to the changing needs of practice.A decade later, the AIA sponsored the 1967 ‘Study of Education for Environmental Design’.Widely referred to as the ‘Princeton Report,’ this study is a frequently cited but oftenmisconstrued. However, the study does stress the importance of ending the isolation of thearchitectural discipline. It called for making connections – ‘building ladders and bridges’,again, closing the gap between the schools and the profession.Building Community: A New Future for Architectural Education and Practice (TheBoyer/Mitgang Report) by Ernest L. Boyer and Lee D. Mitgang of the Carnegie Foundation forthe Advancement of Teaching, 1996, was intended to be a “comprehensive study of
instructional modules, peer-assistedcooperative learning structures, a “just-in-time” learning paradigm, and industriallyrelevant projects that introduce design concepts early in the year. Our goal is to addressproblems with the traditional academic structure that include poor retention, segmentedlearning, and the need to deliver a cost-effective education to a student audience ofdiverse backgrounds and learning styles.We will present a detailed description of the spiral curriculum and discuss the results ofthe first year’s implementation. We are teaching the new sequence to a randomly selectedgroup of sophomores and comparing their performance to students in the traditionalsequence. Our evaluation design will be described including the variety of
21st century of digital learning, and technology integration. Yang’s latest research focuses on employing an innovative synergis- tic approach to prevent/eliminate misconceptions from forming with first-year engineering students, and teaching STEM disciplines in online environments.Dr. Inanc Senocak, Boise State University Dr. Inanc Senocak is an associate professor with the Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineer- ing at Boise State University. He obtained his Ph.D. degree in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Florida in 2002. Dr. Senocak served as a postdoctoral research associate at the Los Alamos National Laboratory and Stanford University prior to joining Boise State in 2007. Dr. Senocak
A Study in Learning Styles of Construction Management Students Amit Bandyopadhyay, Ph.D., PE, F.ASCE State University of New York -FSCAbstractStudents take in and process information in different ways. College faculty members‘teaching methods are not all the same. However, rarely there are any efforts by facultymembers to harmonize their teaching styles with their students’ learning styles. Whenthere is a major mismatch between the learning styles of majority students and teachingstyles of the instructors both get frustrated. Although it is not possible for the instructorsto match individual learning styles of every student in the class, as long as there is abalance in teaching method in
The Neglected Art of Sourcing in Engineering Education Alex Antunes, Angela Walters & Amanda Raab, Capitol Technology UniversityWe present methods for teaching schedule and cost delays in engineering projects as experientialteam learning within a classroom, without incurring unscripted schedule or cost delay to thecourse. Matching design and schematic specifications to a single vendor solution is a necessarybut rarely taught step in engineering. Engineers need parts, but most courses magically provideeither kits, chosen parts, or single-sourced components to speed student focus on the coreengineering topics. Sourcing of parts, however, involves real world process- and people-relatedissues that can add schedule and
consisting of process engineers to upper management and from multinationalcompanies to start up companies. This allowed the “instructors” to determine which KSA’s to focuson in the course. IntroductionMainstream graduate STEM education programs are traditionally designed to train students foracademic careers as they focus on knowledge and skills related to laboratory research practices,writing technical journal papers, and presenting results at conferences to academic peers. Thismethod of education has value in preparing students for academic careers but falls short in Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at
Technology, Teaching and science education, engineering or Initiatives Learning Laboratory higher education Assistant or Ph.D. South Dakota School of Mines, Backgrounds in all areas of engineering Associate professor, First Year Experience and science will be considered STEM education research Associate Professor, Ph.D. Arizona State University, Ira A. Earned doctorate in engineering or Engineering Fulton School of Engineering closely related field Education* Assistant or Ph.D. Stony Brook University, Doctorate in science and technology Associate Professor
- sultant for the Introduction to Engineering and Design course, and also teaches courses in Science and Technology Studies such as the international history of the Internet, the history of science and race, and science fiction.Prof. Gunter W. Georgi, New York University Polytechnic School of Engineering Gunter W. Georgi, a registered Professional Engineer, is an Industry Professor at the New York University Polytechnic School of Engineering in Brooklyn, New York. Prof. Georgi is the course director for the Introduction to Engineering and Design course. He received his B.S. from Cooper Union and his M.S. and professional M.E. degrees from Columbia University. He has worked many years in the aerospace industry in design
AC 2010-1109: CHANGING HIGH SCHOOL STEM TEACHER BELIEFS ANDEXPECTATIONS ABOUT ENGINEERING LEARNING AND INSTRUCTIONMitchell Nathan, University of Wisconsin, Madison Professor Mitchell Nathan, PhD and BSEE, is currently Chair of the Learning Sciences program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and a founding officer of the International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS). Dr. Nathan studies the cognitive, embodied, and social processes involved in learning and teaching mathematics, science and engineering in classrooms and the laboratory, using analysis of discourse, survey and assessment instruments, and experimental design. Dr. Nathan examines teacher beliefs about student
Professional Development Course Series for all engineering graduate students. Assanah’s research focuses on synthesizing hydrogels to mimic the mechanical behavior of the brain matter and investigate the cellular response to injury. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Cultivating Scientific Communication Skills through Professional Development Course Series for the Graduate CurriculumBritney Russell, University of ConnecticutBritney Russell is a doctoral student in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the Universityof Connecticut. She was a teaching assistant for the First Year Experience, ScientificCommunication, and Engineering Internships and Careers in Industry courses that
co-teaching, classroom technologies, active learning in the classroom, and various classroom-based affective inter- ventions targeted at fostering self-efficacy, belongingness, metacognitive learning strategies, and growth mindset affect outcomes such as student retention and success, particularly during the freshman and sophomore year. Her field of research is undergraduate engineering education. Dr. Kiehlbaugh com- pleted her BS and MS at the University of Arizona and her PhD at UC Berkeley. She is now a Research Assistant Professor in the College of Engineering at her undergraduate alma mater. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 1 Scalable and Practical
ethics emphasize theresponsibility of engineers to consider the “safety, health, and welfare of the public” [2,3].Regulations, standards, laboratory practices, etc. reflect the importance of safety in engineeringwork. Also, the negative consequences associated with safety-related failures such as accidentsand product defects make such issues a priority for industry. Creating a safety culture isdifficult. It involves the performance of proper actions and the avoidance of improper actions.Any definition of safety must specify what is considered proper, what is considered improper,and what is an acceptable degree of risk.In engineering education, practical safety concerns are necessarily part of laboratory courses andsafety concepts are often
engagement. Bielefeldt is also a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Faculty Responsibility for Student Safety, Health, and Welfare?AbstractMany engineering codes of ethics state that engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health,and welfare of the public. As engineering educators should we extend this responsibility to ourstudents? And if so, how? Each of these three elements are distinct in some ways. Faculty areresponsible for student safety in experimental laboratory and hands-on design/build settings, forexample. Unique safety concerns may arise during study abroad