Page 26.1292.2university.IPv4 exhaustionThe last remaining public IPv4 addresses were allocated by the Internet Assigned NumbersAuthority (IANA) to the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) on February 3rd, 2011. Four of thefive RIRs have depleted their IPv4 address pools and are currently operating under final IPv4address depletion policies. At the time of writing, only the African Network Information Center(AFRINIC) has IPv4 address space remaining for general allocation and assignment. IPv4 is nowa legacy protocol and all future Internet growth will occur over IPv6.If an organization, such as a university, desires to maintain competitiveness, interoperability, andgrowth, that institution must become proactive in adopting IPv6. However
3. The usefulness of quantitative problems (and particularly numerical worked examples which 79% found helped them learn, as noted previously) in understanding material is characteristic of engineering students in our experience. The importance of examples and applications of theory for engineering students was one of our guiding principles in writing the book to feature concrete applications and phenomena that arise from the scientific principles.Figure 2 Response of Engineering Leadership students on difficulty of problems based from draft text. Page 26.1357.9 The "x" problems in the book help
knowledge base and professional network. The constantadvance of technology and the emergence of engineering education programs across the U.S.have changed the playing field for graduate students seeking to discuss engineering educationwith their peers. Every few years, there is an analysis of the needs of graduate students involvedin engineering education.3-5 This study is a look at the current landscape of ASEE’s StudentChapters.Students have a long history as members of ASEE. Jim Jones, a Mechanical Engineeringprofessor, was the adviser for the creation of the first Student Chapter at Purdue University in1993.6 Student Chapters expanded to other institutions with strong student membership in ASEE.During the 2000s, student membership increased
manufacturing challenges, including life cycle engineering methods, manufacturing process performance modeling, and sustainable engineering education. He has received funding from DOE, NIST, NSF, the U.S. Army, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Oregon Metals Initiative, and industry. His work has appeared in more than 60 peer-reviewed proceedings and journal articles. Page 26.398.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Constructionist Learning for Environmentally Responsible Design Page 26.398.2 Constructionist Learning for Environmentally
no previous programpractice exists. In practice, colleges often look to their accrediting bodies, such as ABET forengineering programs, for guidance on curriculum, which requires external input fromemployers. Engineering programs ask their advisory board or council for input, and also rely ontheir internal panel of faculty experts, as well as exploring practice at peer university programs.Methodology-wise, industrial engineering faculty have used system theory[1], domain analysis[2]and structural models[3] as an aid in curriculum development. Likewise, methods from the qualitymanagement and product development domain, specifically the House of Quality (HOQ) andQuality Function Deployment (QFD), have also been deployed in this particular
thermodynamics instructions by someresearchers. This method trains students to tackle ill-defined, ill-structured problems as found inthe real world.4 Studies have shown that this learning method results in more positive students’attitudes, a deeper conceptual understanding and improved retention of knowledge.12 Thesuccess of problem-based learning depends to some extent on students’ self-efficacy and thedegree of collaboration among peers. In problem-based environments, learners practice higherorder cognitive skills (analysis, synthesis and evaluation), and constantly engage in reflectivethinking.34 Lape35 presented tiered scaffolding techniques to bridge the gaps in high-cognitive-load problem-based learning in thermodynamics. In a problem-based
with internetaccess and we recorded their website browse history for future analysis. For the purpose of thisstudy, we have decided that the data analysis focuses only on the mathematical informationgathered from the facilitator during students’ design. Finally, participants were given access to atoolbox of resources such as rulers, calculators, writing utensils, and post-it notes. They wereable to use anything inside the toolbox during their design process. Name Gender Ethnicity Mathematics Design Experience Experience Kasira F White High Yes Mark M
, wireless sensor networks, wireless mesh networks, and cyber-security and wireless communication for smart grid. Dr. Rawat is the recipient of NSF Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award in 2016. His research is supported by US National Science Foundation, University Sponsored Program and Center for Sustainability grants. Dr. Rawat has published over 120 scientific/technical articles, 7 books and over 15 peer-reviewed book chapters. He has been serving as an Editor/Guest Editor for over 10 international journals. He serves as webmaster for IEEE INFOCOM 2016, Student Travel Grant Co-chair of IEEE INFOCOM 2015, track chair for wireless net- working and mobility of IEEE CCNC 2016, Track Chair for Communications
pedagogical and curricular practices at the intersection with the issues of gender and diversity. Dr. Zastavker is currently working with Dr. Stolk on an NSF-supported project to understand students’ motivational attitudes in a variety of educational environments with the goal of improving learning opportunities for students and equipping faculty with the knowledge and skills necessary to create such opportunities. One of the founding faculty at Olin College, Dr. Zastavker has been engaged in development and implementation of project-based experiences in fields ranging from sci- ence to engineering and design to social sciences (e.g., Critical Reflective Writing; Teaching and Learning in Undergraduate Science and
-learning. She has over sixty publications in peer reviewed conference and journals and she was member, PI or CO-PI of several multidisciplinary research grants, sponsored by the European Union, NSF and industry. She is member of IEEE society and Chair of Women In Engi- neering (WIE) Affinity Group for the IEEE Long Island section. She is the Public Seminar Coordinator for Renewable Energy and Sustainability Center at Farmingdale State CollegeDr. Mircea Alexandru Dabacan, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca Mircea Alexandru Dabacan received the M. Eng. degree in electronics and telecommunications engineer- ing from the Polytechnic Institute of Cluj-Napoca, Romania, in 1984, and a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from the
. Dietrich has performed and directed research in the areas of cognitive radio, software defined radio (SDR), multi-antenna systems, and radio wave propagation, and has authored or co-authored more than 50 peer- reviewed journal and conference papers. He has worked at Virginia Tech, Bell Northern Research, and the Defense Information Systems Agency. He has served as chair of the Wireless Innovation Forum’s Educational Special Interest Group, is a member of ASEE and Eta Kappa Nu, Senior Member of IEEE, and an Extra class amateur radio operator.Dr. Vuk Marojevic, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Vuk Marojevic graduated from University of Hannover (MS), Germany, and Polytechnic University of Catalonia (PhD
using collaborative quizzes. However, they did findthat collaborative quizzes encouraged students to come to class prepared and students who tookcollaborative quizzes viewed the quizzes more favorably. Enz and Frosch come to a similarconclusion stating “Peer collaboration improves quiz scores, is favorably perceived by studentsand enhances their course satisfaction, but does not improve subsequent performance on midtermand final examinations taken noncollaboratively.”13 However, Roa, Collins, and DiCarlo find“completing the quizzes in groups enhances the understanding of the material.”14 Moreover,Leight et al. hypothesis that collaborative testing might improve students’ obtainment of lower-order learning outcomes (Bloom’s levels 1 and 2), but
robots were provided to thestudents by our department. Nonetheless, this does not mean that the project is simply puttingvarious parts together. In particular, students first had to design the electrical circuits andmechanical layout of the robot; they then needed to write embedded software that uses the inputfrom various sensors and transducers to control actuators (motors). Our next two learningobjectives are:Objective #2: To learn how to interface with and program Raspberry Pi in an embeddedenvironment.Objective #3: To learn the basics of computer networking and Wi-Fi received signal strength(RSS)In what follows, we present how we use project-based learning to inspire the students to achievethe above learning objectives along the way.3
Analyst. She was the owner and chief systems engineer for Systems Engineering Services (SES), a computer systems design, development, and consultation firm. She joined the faculty of the School of Engineering and Computer Science at Baylor University in 1997, where she teaches a variety of engineering and computer science classes, she is the Faculty Advisor for the Women in Computer Science (WiCS), the Director of the Computer Science Fellows program, and is a KEEN Fellow. She has authored and co- authored over forty peer-reviewed papers.Dr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University Ken Van Treuren is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at Baylor University. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical
technologycourse. Throughout the course, students were assessed using a 360-degree evaluation process.The implications suggest the benefit of applying self- and peer-assessment techniques toCBE.2.2 Scaffold Assignments“Scaffolding assignments assist students as they generate solutions to complex problems,goals, or tasks, helping increase and integrate their higher order skills in the process. [16]”Scaffolding is a common pedagogical approach in higher education used to leverage priorlearning and to promote higher level skill development. Wass and colleagues [17] conducteda longitudinal study to assess the influence of scaffolding on zoology undergraduate students’development of critical thinking skills. Their analysis suggested the greatest benefit
) attending SOLIDWORKS World,or 5) being given one from a SOLIDWORKS employee or another representative ofSOLIDWORKS. [REDACTED] [15] provide an overview of SOLIDWORKS certificationpricing and further details. According to the SOLIDWORKS Certification Center there are, atthe time of this writing, 232,168 CSWA, 100,997 CSWP, and 3,693 CSWE users world-wide. Figure 1. SOLIDWORKS Certification CatalogReview of Literature for CAD CertificationTo promote exams, CAD software companies have marketed perceived benefits of achieving acertification in their respective CAD software. Obviously, CAD software companies feel thatthere is value in becoming certified and claim that it provides users with an advantage. Autodeskoffers
bring together the different subjects and to relate classroomtheory to real world application. Four laboratory exercises develop the students’ understandingof the material, reinforce prerequisite knowledge, and develop hands-on skills. Good teachinginvolves more than communicating the content of one’s discipline; a good teacher also needsboth to motivate students to continue learning and to teach them the skills and strategies neededfor continued learning.Student teams of two were provided an Arduino microcontroller kit and various components toinclude basic sensors and actuators. Teams had to review lecture material, read componentspecification sheets and instructions, write program code to implement and calibrate thecomponents, and answer
toareas Can group projects together, especially read a map or a scale drawing. multidisciplinary. Difficult to get peer review of layout. Guarantees everything ‘fits’ into the venue.3’x4’ Maps & Backs up the brochure. Must be printed and mounted inPosters Can give more detail. advance. Easy to read; stationed strategically. Requires floor standing easels – more Professional look and feel. to move. Requires time and expense to reprint if
assignment, finding an instructor’s office hours andlocation, or learning how to use an LMS feature. Adapting research on human factors in websiteand course design to LMS course structure could avoid such student issues and sitediscrepancies. Students from IE 225 – Fundamentals of Human Factors Engineering – classexamined issues with Blackboard Learn 9.1 course design during the spring 2018 quarter at CalPoly Pomona. This included peer surveys and time to complete certain tasks.Understanding Student UsersUnderstanding the primary and secondary users of a product is an integral component of userresearch and webpage design. Primary users interact with the interface directly while secondarydo not necessarily interact with the interface directly, but
Communication Studio in the Chevron Center for Engineering Education at Louisiana State University. He earned a baccalaureate degree in English and a Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing from Virginia Commonwealth University.Adrienne Steele, Louisiana State University Adrienne Steele has 20 years experience in STEM education. Currently, Adrienne works at Louisiana State University as the Assistant Director of Student Programs and Outreach in the Chevron Center for Engineering Education. Her current responsibilities include managing a large peer mentoring program, fa- cilitating all aspects of a first year student bridge camp, assisting faculty members with outreach activities and grant proposals, and working with other
disciplines. He received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering and an Executive MBA from Marquette University. He is a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and is a registered Profes- sional Engineer (PE). Dr. James is also an avid inventor with over two dozen patents and he has several publications in peer reviewed journals related to his research in biomechanical systems. Prior to joining academia, he worked for over a decade in the consumer products industry, most recently as Senior Vice President of Global Engineering at Techtronic Industries, headquartered in Hong Kong, where he lived with his family for several years. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
. Conventionalconstruction pedagogical methods put students in a passive role, especially when solvingpredictable construction problems with simplistic and anticipated solutions [3]. In general, mostSTEM coursework are heavily skewed towards writing deliverables, which ultimately hindersactive engagement [4]. Thus, a paradigm shift in pedagogical methods such as integrativelearning is required in CM programs to prepare minority CM students with the skills andknowledge to interface with the unstructured challenging environment of the constructionindustry. An integrative learning pedagogical methodology is a potential innovative method thathas been found to be effective in other disciplines, such as the medical field; specifically toprepare students through inter and
groups of students work together on a technically focusedvideo. The video transfer the learning they have gained in the course in both the lecture and thelaboratory, and translate that into a short video they create on their tablet computers supplied bythe academic department. All equipment in the laboratory space is available for their use tocreate the video. Example topics of videos are: manifold gauge operation, propeller nick repair,and carburetor icing. The students present their video to their peers during a classroom period.The students are assessed by both the course instructor and other faculty that are not part of thecourse. The assessment of the project is a rubric that includes the major sections of introduction,video content
Moore analyzed the perspective of studentsboth during and after the completion of the same course[9]. Interviews done with currentstudents revealed the same time concerns as before. However, the same students reported a yearlater that the mastery homework was a fair and representative evaluation of their abilities and ledto more collaboration with peers. Over half of the class later reported that the grading systemmotivated them to pursue the correct answer more than a traditional grading system. Althoughstudents were faced with concerns over the time consumed by a long series of attempts, theacademic benefits may outweigh this stress. In another instance, mastery homework was applied in an introductory physics class byGutmann et al
, consistency of contracts and recognizes valuable contributions • Employ an open loop evaluation system that allows ongoing tracking, [12] analysis, communication and synthesis and communication of findings for continuous improvement of the faculty and the institution • Require more equitable scrutiny and evaluation among various faculty [13] groups to communicate the need for quality irrespective of faculty status •Allow time for active learning for adjunct faculty including reflection, [12] writing and self-improvement audits College Communication • Integrate the use of two way communication platforms and powerful [4] technological tools into processes to help build rapport
findings, andcontinuously interacting between data and analysis [19]. We made this methodological decisionbecause our goal was to better understand students’ perceptions of what engineering is by theway they draw their response to the question.A typical activity to help the students understand their perceptions of the engineering disciplineis to ask them “What is engineering?” However, instructors have been frustrated by the lack ofdepth in students’ responses. We used a different approach to explore students’ perceptions ofthe engineering discipline by taking an arts-informed methodology; instead of writing down theirperceptions or talking with a peer, students are first asked to draw the response to the question“What is engineering?” Arts
looking up online resources to help me in writing the program in multiple test stages.” Electrical Active Learning/Content/Tool Usage: “We learned more about basic circuit components Circuits such as integrators, op-amps, and high/low pass filters. We also gained hands-on experience through designing some of these newly learned components on a breadboard and verifying their uses through an oscilloscope.” Active Learning/Tool Usage/Collaborative: “My team and I built three different Inverting Amplifier using electronic components and a SparkFun breadboard and tested the
advertising in the event program. In this way, Professional Ethics LIVE! affordsthese local and regional firms a way to publicly showcase their commitment to professionalismand ethics, both for their employees and their professional peers and colleagues. From the outset, Professional Ethics LIVE! was framed as a relationship between TexasTech University engineering students, faculty and the local design professional community topromote and satisfy the needs of all partners. Tech TSPE student members invest sweat equitynecessary to host the event. In exchange for publicity, NIEE has provided technical content (itseducational materials) and expertise (its Deputy Director). Production costs are shared betweenTech TSPE and South Plains TSPE, with
interrelated critical concepts for the construction industry. Knowledge management refers to the creation of a thriving work and learning environment that fosters the continuous creation, aggregation, use and re-use of both organizational and personal knowledge in the pursuit of new business value. (Anumba, C. et al 2005). Best practices are defined as the policy, systems and procedures that, at any given time, are generally regarded by peers as the practice that delivers optimal outcome, such that they are worthy of adoption (The Constructor n.d). Figure 1. Vent diagram representation of the CDMI PillarsIn addition to the three pillars described above the following considerations survey design
• organize, participate in, and document team meetings • participate as a contributing team member in the design and problem solving processes Page 12.1432.4They should also understand and be able to • apply graphical 2-D and 3-D drawing principles • use a 3-D drawing software package • use the principles of good oral communications to effectively communicate ideas • use Microsoft PowerPoint software to aid oral presentations • use Microsoft Project for creating a simple Gantt Chart • use principles of good technical writing to effectively communicate major ideasThe IED Culminating ProjectThe goal of the IED team project is to