, race/ethnicity, sexuality, labchangers, and change considerers. Analyses of pilot data demonstrated the negative impact ofunfair treatment on students and their development as engineers.IntroductionLimited data about STEM graduate student experiences and persistence exist [1]. However, theexisting evidence demonstrates Women and Men of Color and white Women remainunderrepresented in graduate STEM programs, particularly in engineering [1], [2]. Qualitativeevidence shows that underrepresented groups face discrimination and bias in addition to therigors and difficulties inherent in engineering graduate education [3 - 7]. Existing literature onthe experiences of Men and Women of Color and white Women, discrimination, and bias inengineering
,technical professionals must be able to communicate effectively in order to realize their fullpotential [1]. Although these intangible qualities are often referred to as “soft skills”, they aretightly coupled with professional performance and play a hard role in a professionals’success, including those in STEM careers [2]. However, these skills have become stifled, asthe typical engineering graduate spends approximately five years building her/his technicalexpertise, with little to no time devoted to communication training [3]. Evidence suggests thatin the industry, engineers lack the basic required communication skill sets to “hit the groundrunning” [4]. A recent study indicated a high percentage of professional engineers reportedthat ineffective
summit is to: 1) develop on-campus opportunitiesfor visiting undergraduate and master’s students to learn about advanced degree programs andresearch opportunities; 2) facilitate in-person interaction among faculty to build relationships andexplore potential opportunities to initiate and foster collaborations; and 3) to facilitate discussionabout shared degree programs and inter-institutional agreements. As part of the initiative, theprogram offers several workshops for students to attend and provides a unique context for facultyto engage in discussion on partnerships and explore research and teaching opportunities. Startingin 2018, the program organizers built on the previous efforts and initiated a research study tobetter understand
engineering classrooms? This socialnetwork may play a role in STEM retention for all students. Researchers found that studentswho had more friends in a STEM class were more likely to take the next course in thesequence - regardless of race or gender and made more friends in the class. Thus, whenstorytelling is combined with personal self-affirmation of values - we felt that this could be apowerful tool for engineering students - both socially and academically.We designed the RE3 program to reach the community in three phases. In Phase 1,which occurred during Spring and Summer of 2020, we hired ten undergraduateengineering students to be RE3 Student Trainers and trained them over the summerto teach and tell stories over the course of 3 faculty-guided
Paper ID #28366Using motivational interviewing to assist engineering students infinding a more inclusive way forwardProf. Philippa Anne Martin, University of Canterbury Philippa A. Martin received the B.E. (Hons. 1) and Ph.D. degrees in electrical and electronic engineering from the University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, in 1997 and 2001, respectively. She com- pleted a Postgraduate Certificate in Tertiary Teaching in 2015 and a Postgraduate Certificate in Strategic Leadership in 2018. She was a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at the University of Canterbury in
conversations, the community of engineeringeducation collaborators decided to develop a week of action as a goal towards which to organize.This provided a structure and intention for which to build content specific to engineeringeducation, as well as start to develop an infrastructure for continuing conversations andcollective support. We have been collectively generating content that can be shared and used viathe website www.engineersshowup.org.Background and structure of roundtable sessionThis session will start with a brief framing description by core organizers of the overarchingRelational Organizing/Action Research (ROAR) project, in which we are interested in achievingtwo goals as outcomes of research with and about engineering educators: (1
marginalized groups.In Section 1 of this paper, we introduce Seattle University and our previous work. Following, inSection 2, we review relevant literature. In Section 3, we first present the results of focus groupsconducted with students from a variety of backgrounds and experiences such as transfer students,female-identifying students, URM women, URM men, international students, and students whohave either switched out of an engineering program or have a GPA that put them at risk to notcomplete an engineering degree. The focus groups confirmed the results of the survey: studentsfrom marginalized groups experience bias and microaggressions from other students and faculty.Combining past analysis and the new focus group results, we identified two
1 Overview As a work‐in‐progress, we aim to improve teamwork and foster more inclusive professional identities for chemical and biological engineering (CBE) undergraduate students. Our goal is to continually engage students in instruction related to inclusion and diversity by integrating a variety of activities and assignments throughout their engineering curriculum.Weber and Atadero. 2020 Annual CoNECD Conference. 2Why are we doing this? ‐ We hope to assist students in more effectively working with each other throughout their academics‐ We also hope to achieve a more diverse and inclusive engineering workforce that is capable of solving the numerous
aspects since theypromote the development of students’ sense of belonging and disciplinary identity [1], [2]. InRLCs, students who have similar interests live and learn together. These communities provideauthentic educational contexts to students, which allows them to engage in knowledge constructionwhile they socialize with mentors and peers [3]. This integration of academic and social settingsallows students to create personally meaningful learning experiences, which in turn helps themdevelop a stronger sense of belonging and disciplinary identity. Thus, RLCs are recognized as anexcellent intervention to retain, attract, and help undergraduate students to collaborate with like-minded people [4]–[6].Since the data science profession is growing
COVID-19 pandemic on mentored research from a chemical engineering faculty member. The context ofthe experience is discussed below.Context of Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Research ExperienceThe undergraduate research experience was a part of a larger DMREF (Designing Materials toRevolutionize and Engineer our Future) grant from NSF (grant title will be provided in final paperdraft). The overall goal of the grant is to accelerate the materials design of organic semiconductorsthrough the combination of experiment and theory efforts.In addition to the technical research, educational activities proposed for the grant include thefollowing: 1. Use web-based seminar courses and remote mentoring techniques to expose commonwealth campus
use in multiple contexts (c.f., Rodell, 2013; Colquitt etal., 2019). The original instrument uses four subscales, procedural, distributive, interpersonal, andinformational justice. However, Colquitt and Roddell (2015) suggest a two-factor solution that collapsesinterpersonal and informational into distributed and procedural is also acceptable. In our survey,students responded to the derivative instrument for three different contexts: (1) Courses they had takenin previous semesters, (2) Their capstone course, and (3) Their TechCom course. We plan a moreextensive reporting of the instruments’ development and validity in future work that is not possible in aWIP.In addition to the grading justice and fairness instrument, we asked two additional
technical and non-technical (i.e. social,economic, cultural, political, etc.) factors that are simultaneously connected with one another [1].In order for engineering students to be prepared to solve the challenges and problems in aconstantly changing world, they must learn how to think in a sociotechnical way [2, 3].However, current engineering curricula fail to prepare students to problem solve in this mannerand instead mainly focus on the technical content [4-6].One area that is suitable for a sociotechnical approach is energy education. Energy inengineering education is usually taught in foundational courses, such as Thermodynamics orCircuits, where problem solving is narrowly structured around the technical aspects [7, 8]. Eachengineering and
. Her re- search focuses on internationalization of higher education, faculty engagement, and international program assessment. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: Examining the Literature on Virtual Internships for Insights Applicable to Engineering EducationAbstract:Internships are undertaken by roughly half of U.S. engineering students nationally and arewidely thought to benefit students in a variety of ways, strengthening students’ academicself-concept and increasing their persistence in engineering [1]–[3]. However, the COVID-19pandemic of 2020 caused an unprecedented shift in the structure of internships
communities/resources as a central part of their development as amaker. Through qualitative data analysis, we develop a model for how students are learningonline. These findings show the role digital spaces play in developing competent, inspiredmakers.1 IntroductionIncreasing complexity continues to challenge engineers. Today, designers are required to expandthe boundaries of design, often involving multi-disciplinary skills [1, 2]. To help cope withcomplexity, engineering designers must be adept at seeking and learning new information andrelevant skills. Fortunately, in the digital age, we have instant access to endless knowledge andinspiration through the internet.21st century students are integrating web-based technologies to augment their studies
is an active-learning method that reverses the typical order of instruction. Traditionally, instructors givestudents a lecture, followed by problem-solving practice. However, students often experiencefluency—thinking they understand the material better than they actually do. Then, studentsdevote superficial attention and effort that does not sustain learning [1-2].In exploratory learning, students first explore the new topic with an activity, and then areprovided with lecture [2]. This method is thought to have both cognitive and metacognitivebenefits over traditional instruction. Students become better aware of gaps in their knowledge,motivating them to attend to the subsequent lecture [3-4]. By working through the novelmaterial, students
Education, 2021 Work-in-Progress (WIP): Exploring the Relationships between BME Student Perception of the Field and Career PlansIntroduction Biomedical engineering (BME) programs attract students with a range of post-graduationaspirations including medical school, graduate school, engineering-focused industry,biotechnology-focused industry, etc. [1]–[3]. This diversity in how students aim to utilize theirBME degree may reflect diversity in their motivation to study BME, their educationalexpectations, and even their perception of the field [2], [4]. Understanding the relationshipbetween these factors would allow BME programs, at both the curricular and individual courselevels, to better balance students’ interests and
being to put their own safety back in their hands and motivate workersto supplement company training with their own targeted focus.Research QuestionsWhile examining the effectiveness of the baseline scenario, other existing safety programs, anddeveloping a new AR/VR safety training module, the research team is guided by the followingresearch questions: 1. To what extent does playing a game that simulates a construction site improve student scores on the OSHA fall prevention questionnaire? 2. To what extent does playing a game that simulates a construction site improve student retention of fall prevention knowledge over time?MethodologyThe first phase of the research program is establishing the baseline efficacy of the
: IntegratingContext with Engineering) so that it could facilitate the establishment of healthy team dynamicsamong student design teams. Specifically, we asked the following questions: (1) does the formatof the course support healthy team practices? (2) do students find CATME sufficient/helpful forlearning about their strengths and ways to improve? and (3) how healthy are the design teams?CATME was introduced in ME 170 as a tool to evaluate the extent to which teams wereengaged in healthy team practices and to generate discussion within teams about healthy teamdynamics. Following the end of the course, semi-structured interviews were conducted to learnabout student CATME experiences. Based on the CATME scores from 13 design teams (51students) and interviews
languages, flipped classroom, and virtual training. She is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 WIP: Gamified Learning in Graphical Communications During the COVID-19 PandemicIntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has challenged engineering educators on how to engage students tostudy in a virtual environment [1]. Research has been showing that students may experience alower level of satisfaction, lack of interaction with instructors and peers, and reduced motivationto complete the course work [1]–[3]. This study investigates if a gamified learning in asynchronous class
. The exam results and course evaluationwill be compared with the past three semesters (without hands-on learning) to measureimprovement in passing rate.IntroductionMotivationEngineering Dynamics is one of the fundamental courses that most engineering students have totake in sophomore year. This course serves as a gatekeeper for several upper-level courses suchas Intro to Fluid Mechanics, Intro to Environmental Engineering, Mechanism and Dynamics ofMachines courses. Student needs to develop an in-depth analytical skill of a dynamic system tosucceed in these upper-level courses. Students find the Dynamics course very challenging andoften define it as the hardest course [1]- [3]. In Dynamics, students have to deal with theories andproblems of
achievement and persistence, respectively.Measures (summarized in Table 1)Prior Achievement – Prior achievement is operationalized using academic record data originatingfrom three different sources: standardized test scores (ACT or SAT), high school GPA, andcollege GPA at the end of the first year.Chemical Engineering Self-Efficacy - Chemical engineering self-efficacy is assessed using theGeneral Engineering Self-Efficacy subscale developed by Mamaril et al. [24] with itemsmodified by replacing “engineering” with “chemical engineering.” Students are asked toindicate their level of certainty in statements like “I can master the content in the chemicalengineering-related courses I am taking this quarter.”Coping Self-Efficacy - Coping self-efficacy is
form of a design constraint or performance metric. The five moduletopics include continuity, smoothness, local maxima and minima, inflection points, and areaunder the curve. Students are expected to refine their models in each module, resulting in theprevious design's iteration to satisfy a new set of requirements. This paper presents the projectorganization, assessment methods, and student feedback. This work is part of a multiple-yearcourse intervention and professional development NSF project to increase the success ofunderrepresented and women students in engineering.IntroductionThe attrition rates among STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics)disciplines are among the highest of any academic discipline [1, 2]. An analysis
applications of that theory. Additionally, it gives the opportunity to learn skills in design,manufacturing, electronics, controls, and prototyping. This study looks at a mechanics of materialscourse project that has the students build a tensile-testing device from course-supplied kit toevaluate mechanical properties. The project detailed in this paper is a redesigned and scaled-downversion of a project previously used for this course [1]. With the restrictions from COVID, thepreviously group-based project had to be revamped into an individual based project. Despite thischange, this project still requires the students to combine knowledge from other areas, includingcircuits, controls, and mechanics of materials. They learn to build a microcontroller
) is the “decoupling economicactivity from the consumption of finite resources, and designing waste out of the system” [1].The world is shifting closer towards a circular economy model every day; a prime example isthe embrace of circular economy in post-secondary institutions. Post-secondary institutions arefertile ground for adopting CE in part due to increased students’ desire for their universities tolead sustainability efforts. Over 90% of university students noted the desire for sustainabledevelopment integration in their place of study, while 70% of students would like to seesustainable development incorporated within classes and 25% have not heard of SustainableDevelopment Goals (SDGs) [2].Researchers have not delved deeply into the
spectrum efficiency and cost-effectiveness of wireless systems over the next severaldecades to meet anticipated and unanticipated increases in wireless data capacity.2. BackgroundCISCO Systems’ annual survey [1] indicates continued strong growth in demand for wirelessdata capacity. Meanwhile, undergraduate electrical and computer engineering courses incommunication systems, electromagnetics, and networks tend to emphasize mathematical andtheoretical fundamentals and higher-layer protocols, with less focus on fundamental conceptsthat are more specific to RF wireless systems, including the physical (PHY) and media accesscontrol (MAC) layers of wireless communication systems and networks. An efficient way isneeded to introduce basic RF system and
Effectiveness of an Orchestration Tool on the Nature of Students’ Collaborative Interactions During Group WorkIntroductionThis work-in-progress paper focuses on the relationships among orchestration technology,instructor interventions, and student interactions in an undergraduate engineering context.Collaborative problem solving (CPS) has become increasingly common in engineering courses[1], as it more closely mimics work performed by engineers in industry. Complex real-worldtasks require practicing engineers to consult and collaborate not only with colleagues of similardiscipline but also experts from various other fields [2]; thus, creating effective CPS experiencesin engineering curricula is important for
successfully complete the project, students need to think critically and creatively about howtheir programming skills can create value, not just in a functional game, but one thatcommunicates and educates effectively on a unique issue. Ultimately, this is an engineeringproject, not just a programming task [1].As part of the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network [citation to Engineering Unleashed],Marquette is committed to “Entrepreneurial Mindset” as part of their student mindset.Entrepreneurially Minded Learning is utilized throughout the curriculum. EntrepreneuriallyMinded Learning is not focused specifically on entrepreneurship, but instead on developingmindsets focused on Curiosity, Connections, and Creating Value [2].Literature BackgroundEML
whatconnects best with learners at various skill levels, predictive aspects of the users regarding theirlearning and pathways, as well as different learning format designs.Research QuestionsFive research questions are being studied for this project, which are listed here: 1) How do psychological characteristics of learners, including mindset, self-efficacy, and metacognition affect performance in the online course modules? 2) How do the learners’ demographic characteristics, such as gender, prior knowledge, and educational background affect performance? 3) What is the interaction among the psychological characteristics and demographic characteristics of learners that affect performance? 4) How do the psychological