to understand the basicconcepts involved in measuring signals, converting them to a different form and controlling asimple system. Most of the activities developed are accessible from the Internet so studentsanywhere can have concepts reinforced through computer-based activities. The activities varyfrom viewing animations to interacting with programs, to working with interactive Excelspreadsheets. The activities are meant to supplement actual laboratory experiences that normallyoccur in engineering curricula.Greenfield Coalition Curriculum ApproachTo implement the concepts of experiential learning and allow students to more easily acquirecore competencies, Greenfield Coalition developed a unique approach to design coursematerials. An
authors have begun a multi-year research programto assess a specific area of basic science education, general chemistry, within an environmentalengineering education. Chemistry was selected as an area of investigation because of itsrepetitive application within the environmental engineering curriculum and, as such, provides abasic science topic that should be reasonably well understood by all environmental engineeringundergraduates. A cohort of 12 seniors majoring in an ABET accredited environmentalengineering program at the United States Military Academy were interviewed a few monthsbefore graduation on selected chemistry topics. Each student was presented with five questions(Table 1) and asked to work the problems on a blackboard, explaining to
development of pilot testing fa- cility, mechanical instrumentation, and industrial applications of aircraft engines. Also, in the past seven years, she gained experience in teaching ME and ET courses in thermal-fluid and energy conversion ar- eas from various levels of instruction and addressed to a broad spectrum of students, from freshmen to seniors, from high school graduates to adult learners. She also has extended experience in curriculum development.Dr. Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University Yalcin Ertekin received his B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Istanbul Technical University. He attended the Business School of Istanbul University and received M.S. degree in production management. After working for
/j.2168- 9830.1997.tb00303.x.[24] G. Guohua and T. Bo, Faculty facilitated study group: Improving students’ academic performance in engineering courses. 2018. doi: 10.18260/1-2--28352.[25] T. J. Webster and K. C. Dee, “Supplemental instruction integrated into an introductory engineering course*,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 377–383, Oct. 1998, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00368.x.[26] Brose, “Identifying and addressing student difficulties in engineering statics,” Jun. 26, 2011. https://peer.asee.org/identifying-and-addressing-student-difficulties-in-engineering- statics[27] M. H. Holdhusen, “A ‘Flipped’ Statics classroom,” Jun. 14, 2015. https://peer.asee.org/a
Paper ID #42441The Impact of the New DEI Landscape on Minoritized Engineering Students’Recruitment and RetentionJordan Williamson, CSEdResearch Jordan Williamson graduated with a BA in English from the University of Texas at Austin. Her research interests center on minority experiences in the American Education System.Dr. Julie M. Smith, CSEdResearch.org Dr. Julie M. Smith is a senior education researcher at CSEdResearch.org. She holds degrees in Curriculum & Instruction and Software Development. She also completed a doctoral program in Learning Technologies at the University of North Texas. Her research focus is
& Lab* ECE Systems Design^ & Lab*Figure 1. The ECE curriculum flowchart with the communications spinehighlighted. symposium treating several of those issues. In addition, students will produce a lengthy researched argument on a topic relevant to engineering.”This special section of Composition II is taught by a PhD candidate in creative writingwho worked as a technical writer for thirty years. Although she is an exception to thenorm of graduate students who teach Composition II, it is hoped that CCE and theDepartment of English can continue to offer these courses to interested first-yearengineering students. Graduate Seminar in
years at the University of Lahore, Pakistan. Additionally, he has been associated with the software industry in various capacities, from developer to consultant.Dr. Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University, West Lafayette Muhsin Menekse is an Assistant Professor at Purdue University with a joint appointment in the School of Engineering Education and the Department of Curriculum and Instruction. Dr. Menekse’s primary research focus is on exploring K-16 students’ engagement and learning of engineering and science con- cepts by creating innovative instructional resources and conducting interdisciplinary quasi-experimental research studies in and out of classroom environments. Dr. Menekse is the recipient of the 2014 William
engineering education.Dr. Arnab A. Purkayastha, Western New England University Arnab A Purkayastha is an Assistant Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering department at Western New England University, Massachusetts. He received his PhD in the year 2021 from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. His research interests and activities lie in the recent advances in High Performance Computing and Machine Learning fields, including system level integration both at the cloud and edge.Dr. Gladys Ekong Dr. Gladys Ekong is an Associate Professor in the Department of Pharmaceutical and Administrative Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Western New England University (WNE). Her research work
initiative to integrate this equipment into the .,.~i& :4 } 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings qzlllRllL,: 1lectures. Conversely, if the availability of certain equipment in the classroom is a given, then the professor isencouraged to employ this equipment in a creative manner. As an illustration, if the author of this paper knowsthat an overhead projector and dry erase board will be available, he will project and annotate transparencies onthe board. A seldom-mentioned, yet a significant problem is
: Routledge, 2013, pg. 23-51.[40] G. Ladson-Billings and W. F. Tate, "Toward a critical race theory of education," Teachers college record, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 47-68, 1995.[41] G. Ladson-Billings, "From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools," Educational researcher, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 3-12, 2006.[42] T. J. Yosso, "Toward a critical race curriculum," Equity & Excellence in Education, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 93-107, 2002.[43] A. J. Artiles, "Untangling the racialization of disabilities: An intersectionality critique across disability models1," Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 329-347, 2013.[44] A. Bal, K. Afacan, and H. I. Cakir, "Culturally responsive
project and how it helps overcome the onlineteamwork challenges will be discussed. We will also describe a team formation process, wherestudents are allowed to select their own teams and have control over the membership as theproject progresses. Plans for future work to assess the efficacy of this project structure and teamformation process will be discussed as well.IntroductionTeamwork is an important part of engineering and an integral part of project-based learning.While incorporating team projects in face-to-face engineering courses is commonplace,implementing a team project in an online course has its own unique challenges [1]. One obviousdifficulty is collaborating on a project whose components are handled by students in differentphysical
abroad for a Dutch company, international orientation is a necessity and the Page 1.203.1knowledge of languages is an essential part of this. In the engineering curriculum, time is allocatedfor this purpose. But since the teaching of engineering knowledge and skills takes up much time, anindustrial placement abroad and/or graduating abroad was chosen, in addition to the regularteaching. The European Union has set up a number of funds that support and stimulate students toorient themselves towards Europe. As an engineering university, we use these funds, as it allows tolink practical experience in engineering with increasing the practical
perceptions are problematic becausein the lower grades, students do not see the connection of science and math to engineering anddo not develop these skills. In the middle grade, students find math and science difficult andstop taking these classes. In the upper grades, they desire to be an engineer but see it as animpossible task. These perceptions were reinforced when the students were asked to describeengineering students. While the answers were diverse, they seperated into too broad categories,the study of engineering and personality. Comments related to the study of engineeringincluded: “curriculum is hard”, “too many math classes”, “always glued to computers”, “verystructured – no room to accommodate other interests”. Comments related to
discharge desalination; interplant water network design;synthesis of natural gas; integration of solvent and process design with controllability assessment. Work-in-progress – Incorporating sustainable development fundamentals in the first year engineering program Jorge R Lara, Mark Weichold, Patrick Linke Texas A&M University, jlara@tamu.edu, m-weichold@tamu.edu, Patrick.linke@qatar.tamu.eduAbstract. In this work-in-progress paper, the authors propose an instrument to measure sustainabledevelopment literacy in first year engineering students, and based on the outcomes of the survey;implement a strategy to train freshman-engineering students on the fundamentals of engineeringfor sustainable
an ardent reader. He and his wife share their home with two disabled cats and a disabled dog. Looking ahead, Adam is committed to enhancing undergraduate lab spaces and curriculum, facilitating the transition from secondary to post-secondary education in STEM, and improving Teaching Assistant (TA) training. His mentorship and guidance continue to impact individuals, educators, and STEM enthusiasts, solidifying his role as a leader in the field.Mr. Kip D. Coonley, Duke University Kip D. Coonley received the Ph.D. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Duke University, Durham, NC in 2023, the M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, in 1999 and the B.S. degree in
. Sustainability is an important issue for any organization in thetwenty first century and has become an integral part of the engineering practices and policies.Engineers have a critical role to achieve this with sustainable development. Engineers should notignore the challenges and opportunities that arise from the needing sustainability development,and sustainability is a key driver for new directions in engineering all the way from design tomanufacturing. Systems thinking, problem-finding, visualizing, improving, creative problem-solving and adaptability are the six types of cognitive abilities that engineering students need todevelop as identified by the Royal Academy of Engineering [1]. All the above mentionedrequires an understanding of multiple
design implementation. Thisrenegotiated boundary will impact architectural practice and design team dynamics by increasingthe requirement for each team member to contribute equally to the design and constructability ofthe project. Since design and implementation in BIM become more tightly intertwined, theseparation into designer and detailers becomes meaningless. The next level of the designproduction integration removes architectural drafters from a design team structure.Figure 8 Final design implements multiple parametrically altered instances of the same proto-element, SophiaSobers, NJIT.Final ThoughtsThis paper discusses an adoption of BIM tools as a teaching opportunity for various aspects ofthe architectural curriculum, from building
tensions of service learning in higher education: A philosophical perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(2, Special Issue: The Social Role of Higher Education), 148-171. 7. Bringle, R., & Hatcher, J. (1995). A service-learning curriculum for faculty. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 2(1), 112-122. 8. deKoven, A., & Trumbull, D. J. (2002). Science graduate students doing science outreach: Participation effects and perceived barriers to participation. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 7(1). 9. Banzaert, A., Duffy, J., & Wallace, D. (2006). Integration of service-learning into engineering core at U Mass Lowell and MIT. American Society of Engineering
evokes are proposed by P21 in theirFramework for 21st Century Learning [2], including collaboration, social/cross-cultural skills,productivity, accountability, leadership, and responsibility. Multiple pre-packaged curriculasuch as TeachEngineering, Engineering by Design and Project Lead the Way [3-5] addressteaming as a major professional skill. Such curricula are typically built upon frameworkssuch as NGSS [6] or the Common Core English Language Standards [7]. Attempts toeffectively integrate such content can be constrained for teachers lacking time and funding toconsider major revisions or additions to their curriculum implementations. Suchconsiderations inform this study’s premise to investigate teaching in pre-college classroomson a limited
. Based upon these and similar experiences, it is clear that theeffectiveness of an EAP depends heavily on planning and practice before emergencies; inconjunction with clear coordination and communication linkages to integrate stakeholders duringrecovery.[1] It was this challenge that our student engineers faced when developing the first planfor New Jersey from scratch, assuring it would meet the specific needs of this coastal state. The purpose of EAPs was established by multiple Federal entities who created a set ofhelpful and prescriptive guidelines to assist states in creating their custom EAP. The lead agencywas the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE).Other key entities who aided in
. Page 23.1106.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Student Projects in Engineering History and HeritageAbstractUniversity undergraduate engineering programs have technical components as well as generaleducation and liberal arts components. Often, the various components are not integrated well,and students may not see the relationships between technology and history. On the other hand,non-engineering students very rarely take engineering courses, and thus may graduate with verylimited understanding of engineering and technology and their roles in society. At ClevelandState University, a course entitled ESC 200 Engineering History and Heritage has beendeveloped to allow students to
state-of-Art Technology in Collaboration withand State- of-Art courses as well. This will regional Hi-Tech Industry”, ICC April 2012.7. Ambarish Roy, Bradley P. Barber, andKanti Prasad, “Microwave Filter and DedicatedSensor-an Integrated Resonator,” student paperin IEEE Sarnoff Symposium, Princeton, NJ, 2010.8. Solanki A, Prasad K, Nunan K, Oreilly R“Comparing process flow of monolithic CMOS-MEMS Integration on SOI wafers with monolithicBiMOS-MEMS integration on Silicon wafer” atIEEE’s conference held at Seattle Aug 2010.9. Ambarish Roy, Bradley P. Barber, VinayS. Kulkarni, and Kanti Prasad, “Material AcousticSpeed and Density Parameter Extraction inSolidly Mounted Resonators,” student paperin IEEE Sarnoff Symposium
associated. Figure 1. Composition of the Collaborative Design Team.Design and ImplementationThe grant was designed to intentionally integrate undergraduate student perspectives in thedevelopment process of creating these open robotics textbooks. As such, the purpose of theCollaborative Design Team is to review the OER robotics textbook chapters produced by theauthoring team, specifically looking for places to incorporate learner-centeredness into thematerial. The undergraduate students, who review the textbook chapters using their backgroundknowledge and experiences as a lens of what works in an academic setting and what can beimproved, are the key pieces in constructing learning materials that have higher efficacy
highlyvalues familiarity with these topics in biomedical engineering (BME) undergraduates; there is agrowing demand for professionals who possess a combination of both technical knowledge andregulatory affairs [1]. However, it is challenging to instruct students on these inherently drytopics, particularly in the absence of practical applications.Recognizing that expertise in any of these areas is an impractical goal for undergraduatestudents, BME programs have implemented several different approaches to provide a workingknowledge of these topics to equip graduates for work in the medical device industry. Theseapproaches range from entire courses devoted to singular topics, such as medical deviceregulation [2], to lectures integrated into the capstone
, and ASCE chapters) and a Summit gathering a subset of these advisors.This paper will present some of the main findings from the survey, an overview of the Summitstructure, and preliminary findings from that meeting.2. Faculty SurveyThe survey focused on two main topics, service learning in engineering education, and aspects ofbeing an advisor. Nearly 100 responses were gathered; response rates among EWB-USAadvisors were much higher than those for ASME and ASCE, 30% versus 6%, suggesting generalinterest in the subject. Among respondents, nearly 40% of engineering colleges have servicelearning courses (Figure 1); most engineering faculty though admit to using an informaldefinition of service learning, so these courses may better be described as
topics. This multi-pronged effort aims to improve DEI outcomes througha variety of new practices in curriculum, course staffing, and logistics.2.3.1. Integration of historical and modern-day techno-social content and discussion. In a typicalintroductory computational science and engineering curriculum, the only “historical voices” thatappear are those people who have left their names on the subject's core algorithms andtechniques (e.g., Newton, Euler, Riemann, Dirichlet, von Neumann, Runge, Kutta). Althougheach of these individuals played an instrumental role in founding numerical computation,limiting the curriculum to these names creates the harmful misconception that this field onlycounts “dead white men” amongst its champions.To diversify the
AC 2010-498: EMULATION OF A WIND TURBINE SYSTEMRuben Otero, Student at University of Puerto Rico - MayaguezApurva Somani, University of MinnesotaKrushna Mohapatra, University of MinnesotaNed Mohan, University of Minnesota Page 15.458.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Emulation of a Wind Turbine SystemAbstractRecently there has been an increasing interest in wind power generation systems. Amongrenewable sources of energy (excluding hydro power), wind energy offers the lowest cost. It istherefore imperative that basics of wind power generation be taught in the undergraduateelectrical engineering curriculum. In this paper, an experiment
Session 2793 Capstone Design Projects in Undergraduate Electrical Engineering Education E. H. Shaban Electrical Engineering Department Southern University Email: eshaban@clsuter.engr.subr.eduIntegrating design in an undergraduate electrical engineering curriculum and theapplication of creative design ideas in senior capstone design projects have receivedample comments from repetitive ABET visitor’s teams. To address such a seriousdeficiency that is critical to the program survival, a radical change must be
school makerspace often have a difficulttime integrating the makerspace into their day-to-day instruction in a sensible and impactful way.In addition, we have observed that when K-12 educators who use school makerspaces havequestions about best practices, or when they need guidance developing their own maker-basedactivities, they have relatively few helpful resources to consult. These issues appear to be due, inpart, to the fact that there is no universally-agreed-upon cannon of makerspace best practices andlimited high-quality makerspace standards-aligned curricula.In an effort to support K-12 educators integrating makerspaces and maker-based activities intotheir instruction, we created The SMU Maker Education Project. The SMU Maker
toeffectively discuss someone else’s ideas… two basic needs for successful teamwork. With theincreasing role of group work in student learning, faculty have an increased responsibility to teachstudents how to collaborate successfully on group projects… in essence, ‘how to develop a wholethat is better than the sum of the parts’. The focus of this paper is on one aspect of teamcollaboration… the teaching and use of constructive feedback to discuss and evaluate each othersideas and/or projects as incorporated in the course ART 155 Residential Construction as part of aSchool Faculty Development Grant beginning during the 1999 school year, and continuing to thefollowing semesters.Furthermore, to truly reinforce in class instruction in constructive feedback