Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 8341 - 8370 of 8955 in total
Conference Session
Technical Session 10 - Paper 3: Bridging the STEM Gender Gap through Women-focused Outreach
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Isabel A Boyd, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Anne Skutnik, Tickle College of Engineering Academic and Student Affairs, University of Tennessee Knoxville ; Jalonda Nakay Thompson, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Marcel Brouwers, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
  Findings Collection analysis research September‐October  August‐early  2021 October‐November  September 2021 2021 Data collection will  Statistical analysis of  continue throughout  survey data spring and into fall  Survey sent to all  2022 Write up
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 11: Projects
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gerald Tembrevilla, Mount Saint Vincent University; Andre Phillion, McMaster University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
. Li, A. Öchsner, and W. Hall, "Application of experiential learning to improve student engagement and experience in a mechanical engineering course," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 283-293, 2019/05/04 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1402864.[65] W.-J. Shyr, "Multiprog virtual laboratory applied to PLC programming learning," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 573-583, 2010/10/01 2010, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2010.497550.[66] M. Andersson and M. Weurlander, "Peer review of laboratory reports for engineering students," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 417-428, 2019/05/04 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1538322
Conference Session
Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 1
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Victoria Beth Sellers, University of Florida; R. Jamaal Downey, University of Florida; Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, University of Florida
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
the thought policing.This participant seemed in conflict with the ideas that were presented during thevignette-based HC survey and expressed frustration. He thinks that women do not gointo engineering only because they choose not to, which is related to the first conceptionthat systemic discrimination (a form of HC) is not an issue, yet the experiences andstatistics of marginalized individuals in engineering argue otherwise. The participantdoes not account for gender stereotypes and influences that impact women’s choices togo into engineering, such as the influence of family, peer groups, and societal/culturalgender stereotypes on the attraction of adolescent boys to STEM-related subjects andemphasis on their performance [48]. The participant
Conference Session
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED) Technical Session 9: Student Experiences in Laboratory Courses
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Caroline Crockett, University of Virginia; George Prpich, University of Virginia; Natasha Smith P.E., University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)
, University of Virginia Professional Skills and Safety are my main pedagogical interests. I use the Chemical Engineering labora- tory to implement safety training to improve safety culture, and to adapt assessment methods to enhance development of students’ professional skills. I am an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Virginia and I hold a B.Sc. (University of Saskatchewan) and Ph.D. in Chemical En- gineering (Queen’s University). Complimenting my pedagogical research is an interest in bioprocess engineering, environmental engineering, environmental risk management, and I have authored more than 40 peer reviewed publications in these fields. I’m also active in developing workforce
Conference Session
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED) Technical Session 2: Community Retrospectives
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Milo D. Koretsky, Tufts University; Lisa G. Bullard, P.E., North Carolina State University, Raleigh; Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware; Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Vanessa Svihla, University of Texas, Austin; Sindia M. Rivera-Jiménez, University of Florida
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)
my classes. I can easily reach out to most people.”Values, Attitudes, and BeliefsThe focus group participants clearly expressed the attitude that CEE has played an enduring rolein the chemical engineering community, both historically and currently, with one participantdescribing CEE as a “needed place." Several participants expressed the value that CEE was auseful source of ideas for lessons, courses, and programs that faculty members can use ininstruction and share with colleagues. They also expressed the belief that the journal, as a peer-reviewed resource for content that is specific to the discipline, is used in practice, citing that, “itserves a really important role as both a research and a practice journal.” In addition, they
Collection
2022 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference
Authors
James Lipuma, NJIT; Cristo Leon, NJIT
. [Online].Available: https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/211184/[30] S. van Ginkel, J. Gulikers, H. Biemans, and M. Mulder, “Fostering oral presentationperformance: does the quality of feedback differ when provided by the teacher, peers or peersguided by tutor?,” Assessment and evaluation in higher education, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 953–966,2017, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2016.1212984.[31] S. F. Peregoy, Reading, writing, and learning in ESL: a resource book for teaching K-12English learners, Seventh edition. Boston: Pearson, 2017.
Conference Session
ERM: Instruction and Engagement
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rachel Sangree, The Johns Hopkins University
– 2018, but“chunked” into two to three - 20-minute lectures that were easier for students to digest.To ensure that students watched and retained some of the information from the video lectures,they were required to submit short electronic journal entries through the Learning ManagementSystem (LMS) before each class. This form of reflection is called “write to learn” and can helpstudents improve their ability to retrieve information, make connections between new and oldmaterial, and explain concepts in their own words. [14] These journal entries were used toassign the “preparation grade” (see Table 1), and the questions asked by students in their journalentries formed the basis of a short (10 – 15 minute) review of the lecture material at
Conference Session
Assessment in Chemical Engineering Education
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica Pittman, Texas Tech University; Sheima Khatib, Texas Tech University; Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University
active learning in which students aregiven an outline of the day's lecture, with certain aspects of the lecture blanked out. Students areexpected to fill out the missing sections as the lecture is delivered, in order to help facilitate theirattentiveness. Next, the students were given handouts containing 15-20 FE-type multiple choicequestions on the topic that was being covered in class that week. The remainder of the lectureand discussion sessions were spent solving the problems.The format used in class to solve the FE-like problems was mainly Think-Pair-Share. Inapplying the Think-Pair-Share method, students were given 30-seconds to read the problem,then 1 minute to think and discuss solutions to the problem with their peers. This was
Conference Session
Social Identities and STEM Experiences: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jacqueline Handley, University of Michigan
did not belong, and what theyhoped to see changed in engineering programming for youth.Data Analysis and Positionality The purpose of this paper is to explore the particularly critical discussions of engineeringand engineering experiences with youth, to better inform the design of equitable engineering. Todo so, I engaged in multiple rounds of data analyses of all interview data, examining patterns incodes and colligating data to arrive at a set of assertions, which I then submitted to axial andselective coding processes to develop categories [47], [48]. I undertook this process of movingiteratively from data points to holistic claims and back again repeatedly, using key linkagecharts, category charting, and theoretical memo writing
Conference Session
CIT Division Technical Session #8
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tasmeer Alam, Morgan State University; Hashmath Fathima, Morgan State University; Kofi Nyarko, Morgan State University; John Attia, Prairie View A&M University; Petru Andrei, Florida A&M University - Florida State University; Shujun Yang; Sacharia Albin, Norfolk State University; Corey Graves, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (CoE)
, several teachers have indicated that they will pursue additionalstudies through graduate education or future RET programs.ConfidenceGenerally, teachers gained confidence in a range of areas except for “confidence writing aresearch paper,” in which cohort 2021 entered with more confidence but left gaining the leastconfidence.Teaching STEMIn their self-assessed teaching skills at the start of RET experience, the 2021 cohort gained moreconfidence in teaching STEM than cohort 2020. Most RETs were interested in the researchtopics and learned a lot.MentorshipThe 2021 RETs reported strong mentorship. They also documented that mentors wereapproachable, had professional integrity, and were supportive and encouraging.Potential impact on teachingAll 2021
Conference Session
LEES Session 9
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cayla Ritz, Rowan University; Cheryl Bodnar, Rowan University; Melissa Montalbo-Lomboy, Rowan University
involved testimony, biography, photos, and datarelated to the Holocaust, compiled into a “story” that the students followed over multiple weeks.The narrative structure was used because students tend to relate better to personal stories andinformation over traditional lectures – they are drawn to the lives and cultures of others to whichthey can relate [15]. Topics on genocide and crimes against humanity were chosen because these“hard histories” contain relevant STEM topics, but they are not the main focus. Rationale forusing the Holocaust as a focal point in an engineering classroom can be summed up by EricKatz, who writes that we should “begin with this fact: engineers, architects, and othertechnological professionals designed the genocidal death
Conference Session
NEE Technical Session - the Best of NEE
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Heidi Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Emily Stratman, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
coding scheme was used to identify the metacognitive strategies students engage inwhile writing their reflections. Ku and Ho [17] used theoretical ideals from Flavell [6] to developa coding scheme to categorize university students’ verbalizations about their thinking during aseries of decision-making tasks into three dimensions (planning, monitoring, and evaluating)with low and high strategy levels for each dimension. Planning comments related to identifyingprocedures, strategies, and resources students would use to develop their understanding.Monitoring comments showed a reference to understanding and pointing out certain ideas thataided a student’s comprehension or ideas were difficult to process. Evaluating commentsincluded evaluating and
Conference Session
Energy Conversion and Conservation Technical Session 5: Strategies for Increasing Classroom Engagement
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kenneth Walz, Madison Area Technical College; Kevin Cooper, Indian River State College; Benjamin Reid; Christopher Baechle, Indian River State College; Christopher Akelian, Cuesta College; Kathleen Alfano, College of the Canyons
. Baechle is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science at Indian River State College where he teaches courses in programming and data mining, as well as serving on various workgroups and projects related to data analytics. In addition to his academic duties, Dr. Baechle is an active consultant in the healthcare analytics industry where he specializes in the field of natural language processing. Previous to IRSC, he was employed as a software developer for almost 10 years in several private and governmental organizations writing utilities and financial software.Christopher John Akelian (Cuesta College)Kathleen Alfano Kathleen Alfano has a Ph.D. from UCLA in Higher Education with a cognate in
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rick Hill, University of Detroit Mercy; Jocelyn Bennett Garraway, University of Detroit Mercy
positions [8].In addition to exposing students to careers, the iDRAW program also seeks to provide moreimmediate pathways into post-secondary education. This is also achieved through guest speakersand field trips, as well as through one-on-one assistance with college advising, applications, andfinancial aid. The confidence the students develop through their success in college-level dualenrollment coursework can help students feel more prepared to pursue post-secondaryeducational opportunities. The program also employs current college students as teachingassistants in the dual enrollment courses, providing near-peer role models to help the students tosee themselves in the next stage of their academic path.Some students have a natural interest in
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kenneth Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Craig Scott, Morgan State University; Mohamed Chouikha, Prairie View A&M University; Pamela Leigh-Mack, Virginia State University; Barry Sullivan; John Kelly, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (CoE); Stephen Goodnick, Arizona State University; Mark Smith, University of Texas at Austin; Michelle Klein, Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept. Heads Assoc. (ECEDHA); Shiny Abraham, Seattle University; Ben Oni, Tuskegee University; Esther Ososanya, University of the District of Columbia; Abdelnasser Eldek, Jackson State University; Shujun Yang; Hector Erives, University of Texas at El Paso; Cole Joslyn, University of Texas at El Paso; Ivonne Santiago, University of Texas at El Paso; Peter Romine, Navajo Technical University; Shayla Sawyer; Rodrigo Romero, University of Texas at El Paso; Yuanrui Sang; Hassan Salmani; Delia Saenz, Arizona State University; Miguel Velez-Reyes, University of Texas at El Paso
barriers? 3) What has hada large impact? 4) What are the biggest challenges faced now and previously? 5) What are theoutcomes? The panelists described programs and initiatives they have led in their own careers tobroaden participation of underrepresented persons at every level of higher education(undergraduate and graduate student levels, faculty success, grant writing). They sharedsuccesses and pitfalls and highlighted high impact efforts that are replicable and sustainable.Breakouts provided opportunities to address issues raised by this outstanding panel, tobrainstorm collaborative ideas across institutions.On day 2, panel presentations from day 1 were reviewed and participants divided into breakoutgroups to identify 1-2 promising best
Conference Session
Joint Session: Entrepreneurially-Minded Learning in the Classroom
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anna Howard, North Carolina State University at Raleigh
methods which were the same for all the projects. Studentsmet with Dr. Howard to learn about literature reviews, citation management software, projectstatements, abstract writing, preparing a portfolio, etc.. Students also learned about EM anddelved into what curiosity, connections, and creating value meant in the research environment.Undergraduate training in EML amounted to approximately 8 hours over the semester in additionto the instruction students received in their technical research.The program offered mentoring for the faculty as well as for the undergraduates. For the faculty,our communications were online only. Four mini-briefings were offered for faculty. Each mini-briefing started with an email recap of the concept and its application
Conference Session
College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Darrell Kleinke, University of Detroit Mercy; David Pistrui, University of Detroit Mercy; Shuvra Das, University of Detroit Mercy
laborwas the order of the day. Education was not necessary to earn a living, it was merely a luxury forthe elites and the rich.Education 2.0 - Originated from the need to read and write and was developed in the model ofIndustry 2.0, with emphasis on production orientation such as repeatability, uniformity,efficiency, and mass production.Education 3.0 - Did not constitute much of a paradigm shift. The advent of automation meantthat the education system now could do the same thing they were doing but faster and moreefficiently.Education 4.0 - Accelerated speed of technological change, impact of COVID-19 on instructionand learning, domination of legacy systems and outdated business models with all financialburden on the backs of students.Source: Das
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Siddhant Joshi, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Kirsten Davis, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Lori Czerwionka, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Elisa Camps Troncoso, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Francisco Montalvo
Define ‘Engineering,’” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 309–319, 2009, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2009.tb01029.x.[10] M. Hynes and J. Swenson, “The Humanistic Side of Engineering: Considering Social Science and Humanities Dimensions of Engineering in Education and Research,” J. Pre- Coll. Eng. Educ. Res. J-PEER, vol. 3, no. 2, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.7771/2157-9288.1070.[11] National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004. doi: 10.17226/10999.[12] National Research Council, Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012. doi
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Division - Innovative Changes to the Typical Civil Engineering Coursework.
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrea Welker, Villanova University; Virginia Smith, Villanova University; Kristin Sample-Lord, Villanova University; Shweta Shrestha, Villanova University
sustainability. For example, Outcome 4 requires students tobe able to “consider… global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts.” VillanovaUniversity was awarded a grant to pilot the EOP framework. To integrate the EOP framework asrapidly as possible a faculty workshop was developed. This workshop has been delivered twiceto cohorts of eight faculty each during five half-day sessions. These faculty have addressedtwenty outcomes and assessed seven. At the time of writing, EOP outcomes have been includedand assessed in three courses: two required undergraduate courses and one graduate level course.Assignments, group projects, and exam questions were used to assess the achievement ofselected EOP outcomes.This paper will present an introduction to
Conference Session
Community Engagement Division Technical Session 3- Multi- and Inter-disciplinary, Collaboration, and Engagement in Practice
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Monica Quezada-Espinoza, Universidad Andres Bello; Ruben Bustamante-Encina, Universidad Andres Bello; Marcela Silva, Universidad Andres Bello; Nivia Diaz, Universidad Andres Bello
methodologies, community engagement projects, evaluation tools and technology, and gender issues in STEM education. https://orcid.org/0000- 0002-0383-0179Ruben Bustamante-Encina Ruben Bustamante-Encina is an academic secretary and professor at the Faculty of Engineering at the Universidad Andres Bello in Santiago, Chile. Ruben holds the degrees of Survey and Civil Industrial Engineer and an MBA. For the last ten years, his experience has focused on educational management, leading careers in industrial, logistics and mining area, and community engagement projects. In addition, he has contributed as a peer evaluator in accreditation processes in higher education institutions.Marcela Silva (M. Ed) Marcela Silva is the
Conference Session
ERM: Let's Talk about Tests! (Tests Part 1)
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nelson Granja, Universidad San Francisco de Quito; Miguel Andrés Guerra, Universidad San Francisco de Quito; Vanessa Guerra, University of Virginia
their classmates. The second setof questions referred to their feelings during the first 45 minutes of the exam, beforehaving the coffee break. Did they feel anxious? Did they have problems concentratingon the test? Did their minds go blank? Did they experience a mental block reading thequestions? And if so, explain.The third set of questions inquired about their feelings during the coffee break. Thesequestions were related to how useful it was to mingle with classmates in the middle ofthe exam, and if they were able to help their peers, and how. The fourth set of questionsreferred to the time of the exam after coming back from the coffee break. The questionsinquired about their feelings after returning from the coffee break, if they were
Conference Session
ERM: Student Professional Development: Professional Skills and Moving Beyond the Classroom
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrew Olewnik, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Bahar Memarian, University of Toronto
enabling data collectionduring co-curricular experiences rather than at the end of the academic year, eliciting studentskill acquisition reflection on both individual and team levels, and triangulating studentresponses within teams as a way to combine students’ assessment of self with peers, leading to amore shared understanding of professional skills gained.Data Collection and AnalysisStep 1 – Practice: The final research stage of research data collection and analysis explores thebrevity and quality of results. Data collection in survey research often takes on qualitative andquantitative forms, though with the emergence of educational technologies more visual andnatural forms of data collection are also becoming possible. Surveys such as the PDS
Conference Session
ERM: Exploring Educational Technology in Engineering
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kelsey Rodgers, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Matthew Verleger, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Farshid Marbouti, San Jose State University; Angela Thompson, University of Louisville; Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville
Models, then they were coded asGraphical/Virtual Models.Mathematical ModelsThere were a few keywords that easily led to Mathematical Models being coded, including math,equation, formula, and “calculat” for calculating, calculation, calculate/d, etc. If students wroteprocess or data model, these were also coded as identifying Mathematical Models. There were afew keywords that were coded as Mathematical Models, if the students’ responses were notalready coded as Computational Models. These included algorithm and data. In order for data tobe coded as a Mathematical Model, the students’ responses also could not include graph, plot, ortable. Also, if students wrote about a flow chart in their survey response and did not write aboutgraphing
Conference Session
ERM: Find Out More About Faculty!
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kaitlyn Thomas, University of Nevada, Reno; Derrick Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno; Jeanne Sanders, University of Nevada, Reno; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Kelly Cross, University of Nevada, Reno
Publication Source Figure 2: Publication source for all papers in the literature reviewData AnalysisThe literature review followed the methodology outlined in Borrego et al. [10]. We accumulateda number of articles in an initial database search of the journals and conferences. Once apreliminary set of 892 articles was found, we performed secondary and tertiary rounds of inclusionand exclusion as we read through the articles and determined if they addressed our researchquestion. The decided inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed below. 1. The paper was published between 2000 and 2021. 2. The paper was a peer-reviewed conference or journal paper. 3. The publisher was a prominent engineering education venue. 4
Conference Session
PCEE Session 11: Engineering Outreach / Summer Programs
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Maya Denton, University of Texas at Austin; Bryant Chambers; Indu Venu Sabaraya; Navid Saleh, University of Texas at Austin; Mary Kirisits, University of Texas at Austin
discussed the various organs. In addition, we prepared a “freshman lab-report guidelines” document and led a discussion regarding the parts of a lab report. The studentsfollowed this document to prepare their lab reports. STEM Activity 1 was intended to give thestudents a hands-on scientific experience, an introduction to technical writing, and anopportunity to get to know the project team members. In the year 2 chemistry course, we held apanel discussion on STEM for STEM Activity 2 (one meeting). Four members of the projectteam comprised the panel, and each panelist described their pathway to STEM. Their pathwaysto and reasons for pursuing STEM were quite diverse, as was the composition of the panel (75%female). Students had the opportunity to ask
Conference Session
EMD Technical Session 1: Captstone, Ethics, and Statistical Methods
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cole Shannon, South Dakota State University; Patrick Lovrien, South Dakota State University; Bret Barnett, South Dakota State University; Carrie Steinlicht, South Dakota State University; Ekaterina Koromyslova, South Dakota State University
practices.Students’ learning experiences, including benefits, challenges, and lessons learned are discussedin the paper, presenting different points of view from different disciplines.Relevance of multidisciplinary teaching for student career goals and value for their professionaldevelopment are discussed in the paper. The authors provide suggestions for improvements andadvice to instructors and peers for improving multidisciplinary learning experiences at thecollege level.IntroductionMultidisciplinary collaborations are important for several reasons. First, it improves learningand student engagement. As stated by Drake and Reid, after reviewing numerous studies,“interdisciplinary approaches can lead to increased student engagement and motivation
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Maria Chrysochoou, University of Connecticut; Arash Esmaili Zaghi P.E., University of Connecticut; Connie Mosher Syharat, University of Connecticut; Todd Campbell, University of Connecticut
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
the historical focus on individual problem solving, it is traditionally expected that everyteam member strives toward excellence in all skills involved in the project, such as writing, oralpresentation, and analysis. However, in the collaborative problem-solving paradigm, there is ageneral understanding that students can contribute to projects in a way that is more tailored totheir skills and interests. By promoting this approach, a culture of collaboration, innovation andinclusion in engineering education and the profession is fostered. This shift in focus should alsoinclude flexible teaching and evaluation methods that recognize that different students learndifferently [14].A Theory of Change for an Engineering DepartmentThe NSF
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT) Technical Session 1: Robotics and Bio-Inspired Projects
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Soheil Fatehiboroujeni, Colorado State University; Lisa Bosman, Marquette University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)
with my time until the very end. I felt as though I started early enough but towards the end, I started to become rushed which is unpleasant when you want to do your best in the creation of this design. I would change the amount of work and the kind of work I will do in the session I work. At first, I was just doing the fun stuff like coming up with ideas and working on rough prototypes which left all the harder report writing for the end. In the future I would like to more evenly balance these two aspects of many projects.”4.2 Flexing the creativity muscleFor reasons such as the open-ended nature of this project as well as sufficiently structured stepsinvolved in the
Conference Session
Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 7
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Karina Ivette Vielma, The University of Texas, San Antonio; Joel Alejandro Mejia, The University of Texas, San Antonio
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
characteristics that they believe are representative of anengineering educator. This adoption and emulation of attitudes, behaviors and practices – in allforms of linguistic and symbolic units – serve the purpose of being recognized as engineeringeducators by peers, mentors, professors, and those who are part of the world of engineering [38,39]. Thus, we posit that current discourses and practices of doctoral engineering students in theclassroom, as they engage in teaching, are a representation of the current culture of engineering.That is, doctoral engineering students enact overt and subtle behaviors learned and adopted inengineering spaces throughout their undergraduate and doctoral programs such as a sense ofsuperiority in their ability to solve
Conference Session
Engineering Libraries Division (ELD) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sarah Weiss, University of Maryland- College Park
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Libraries Division (ELD)
reference lists can be another way to discover other researchers from diverse backgrounds.AuditingAuditing citations at several points in the research process is important, especially as citationsoften change in the editing and peer review process. The UMD research guide to citation justicelinks to a basic spreadsheet template that can be used for in depth auditing [23]. Keeping trackof citation composition using a spreadsheet allows the audit to be in-depth and thorough,although it can be time consuming. Codes have also been developed to analyze the gender andethnic makeup of a bibliography and can provide an overview audit in a fraction of the time. It isimportant to keep in mind, however, that these codes are far from precise and are based