establish peer/mentor relationships.Students receive a paid 2-week research skills workshop, followed by 8-10 weeks of researchtraining as a full-time UMB employee during the summer.24Promoting early engagement for community college students in STEM research, the Internshipsin Nanosystems Science, Engineering, and Technology (INSET) program, is held at theUniversity of California at Santa Barbara, a tier-one research university. Similar to the SCCOREprogram goals, INSET provides research opportunities to increase retention and degreecompletion. Unlike bridge programs that were researched, the INSET program involvescommunity college faculty in all aspects of program planning and implementation of theprogram. The faculty from the four community
University. Usingboth internal experts and external consultants, workshops were planned for delivery in half-daysegments throughout each academic year, culminating in a regional one-day-long seminar at theend of the academic year. Additionally, leadership development for department chairs andprograms directors was planned to occur once each semester. Reactions to the workshops weregenerally positive, attendance has increased over the past four years, and sustained support ofthe workshops has been allocated by the administration through a collaboration betweenAcademic Affairs and Human Resources.Each strategy had its own challenges and successes, providing unique insight into the feasibilityof converting a successful technique from a research
manufacturing industry because these skills are a “differentiating factorbetween entry-level and middle-skill jobs [11], p. 10.”1.3. Florida Efforts to Develop AM CompetencyCareer and Technical Education (CTE) prepares individuals for occupations important toFlorida’s economic development. The Florida Department of Education (FLDoE) offers severalsecondary and postsecondary courses, certifications, and degrees in manufacturing as a part ofthe CTE program. For example, middle schools offer introduction to manufacturing andfundamentals of career planning. High schools offer specific courses and programs inautomation, production, electronic technology, welding, maritime repair, machining technology,and industrial machinery. Similarly community and state
of our larger study.2. Prior Literature on Choosing Engineering in the Academy vs. IndustryFor nearly 60 years, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has tracked information about USAPhD recipients, their post-graduate plans, and their employment experiences well beyondgraduation. At least in the USA, most PhDs work in academia, but this number is on the decline[10]. The tracking of this information by the NSF has led some researchers to ask what makesscientists and engineers choose the kinds of jobs they do. Yet, the research on self-selection intoan academic versus industry career in engineering is limited. To begin, almost all of it isquantitative in nature, much of it focuses on STEM PhDs in general, and almost all of it isperformed on
Mississippi State University and her Ph.D. from the University of Texas at Austin. She has 18 years of work experience with NASA in the areas of orbital mechanics, mission planning and mission operations. Dr. Olsen teaches upper division and graduate courses in orbital mechanics, space mission design and related topics. Her research interests are in aspects of orbital mechanics as related to space mission planning and operations.David Bridges, Mississippi State University David Bridges is an Associate Professor of Aerospace Engineering at Mississippi State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering from Mississippi State, and his Ph.D. in Aeronautics from the
describes our implementationplans and the early steps we have taken; and finally it outlines plans for collecting andinterpreting evaluation data.Background and Literature ReviewIn developing the rationale for the use of VCPs in engineering faculty development, we reviewthe literature in five areas: the need for new engineering faculty development efforts, the inherentlimitations of current faculty development approaches, the effectiveness of learning communitiesand communities of practice, the effectiveness of virtual approaches, and the participation ofengineering faculty members.Need for New Engineering Faculty Development Efforts: Many faculty professionaldevelopment efforts rely on the “develop-disseminate model” in which individuals or
before pursuing the EET degree Transfer from other major Are you working at a part-time job now during the school year? Y or N, __ hrs/week Briefly describe the job you have currently Plans for school beyond BS degree Past jobs where you used your technical degree skills/knowledge: Company/location Briefly describe your job duties - repeat as necessaryFigure 2. Instrument #1 - Student BiographyThe information gathered in this instrument is in words, but numbering scales were assigned, inorder to be able to do a quantitative analysis. The student’s GPA was recorded as a two-digitnumber, with the data ranging from 2.6 to 4.0, on a 4.0 scale. All students in the course hadextensive work histories, but some
23.474.8year.Quotes from Year 2Brandy: Well, I always want them to put thought into it. I’m a big proponent of you know, “let’splan it first and look at it and then go on.” But actually putting it into those stages of the process,I saw them developing skills that I probably haven’t developed before….Really deeper thinking. Ialways wanted that, that’s my objective, but this- to break it into the parts and to see thesequence and have go into deeper thought after they planned it, and to actually take their planand look at it better or a little deeper than they normally would, and I was doing that, too. Youknow, it cause me to do that, too, and me to question in a different way- Okay, why are you doingthat? Is this going to get you where you want to go
to be conducted in order to substantiate the results.Program Goals Moving ForwardEven though Rensselaer’s Engineering Ambassador program aims to promote engineering to anunderrepresented audience, the Ambassador role models currently do not depict the audience weare attempting to attract. Going forward, Rensselaer plans to address this, in addition toincorporating representation from all engineering majors. With these goals in mind, Rensselaer’sAmbassador recruitment efforts have become targeted to help encourage a diverse population ofEngineering Ambassadors. Expanding industry connections will also help to strengthen thesustainability of the program within Rensselaer’s School of Engineering culture and community.The university partnership
EngineeringEducation, which was designed to meet the growing need for a clear definition of quality K-12engineering education.MethodsThe Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education was developed using a design-basedresearch methodology10-12. For the design of the Framework, the researchers planned iterativecycles of revision in order to get a robust and inclusive framework that encompasses the coreideas necessary for a quality engineering education. Here, we first describe the final framework,and then the development process from the initial version based on a modified ABET Criterion3: Student Outcomes a-k4 for K-12 students through to the final version. For each iteration,academic standards from a sample of states were coded by multiple researchers
operational planning, project management, and technical sales and marketing. Prior to joining the University, Hunter worked for several companies, including IBM and Anaquest, Inc., as an engineer, engineering manager, technical sales professional, and Director of Informational Technol- ogy. At the University of Arizona, she oversees the freshman engineering experience, which includes the introductory engineering course required of entry-level students. She also teaches undergraduate/graduate courses in the Engineering Management program. She is a member of Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society, American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), Project Management Institute (PMI), and American Society for Engineering
on research topic with input from advisors12) Technical meetings and presentations (Hernandez) a. DUE: Biographical sketch13) Proposition outline (Minerick) a. DUE: 2 page outline14) Style in writing proposals (Minerick) a. DUE: Motivation, Hypothesis (mark originality), and Literature (presuppositions) (> 4 pages)15) Intellectual Property (C. Rivenburgh)16) Experiment / simulation: Methods planning (Minerick prepare notes, Hernandez give lecture) a. DUE: Methods section matching revised proposal objectives (> 4 pages), Facilities17) Ph.D. / M.S. jobs in industry / National Labs - writing proposals in this atmosphere (Hernandez)18) Mentoring & educational efforts to compliment
Individuals reach Specific curricular across departments for and co-curricular University leaders specific projects projects (such as math join ownership of Building/ Constituents success) are STEM grants or 2 Connecting consulted undertaken initiatives STEM education research a university Extensive focus integration and Policies and Interdisciplinary development of STEM strategic plans STEM faculty learning student success deliberately
early on to the teaching of problem solving and solutionapproaches, saving discussion of language syntax specifics until much later. In Section 4, weoffer some examples of how to apply this approach to the teaching of iterations and decisions.Finally, in Section 5, some directions for future work are outlined, including plans for evaluatingthe effectiveness of the approach with an assessment of student progress for CS1 students.2. BackgroundWe claim that the approach currently used to teach CS1 suffers from a lack of attention to well-known results from cognitive psychology on how students learn. In this section, we review someof the relevant models of learning in general and then focus on research that addresses learningcomputer programming in
wereperformed on the collected data to determine predictor variables for faculty technicalcurrency. The statistical analyses revealed that the “institutional support andencouragement for maintaining technical currency,” and “allocation of funds forprofessional development” are the most significant predictors for maintaining facultytechnical currency. In light of survey findings, recommendations are made to improvefaculty development activities and departmental policies to enable faculty to stay currentin their fields of specialization. As technology leapfrogs and new technological domainsevolve, it becomes increasingly important to synchronize the curriculum developmentand revision cycle with the planning and implementation of faculty
time and opportunitiesavailable and provides the highest value possible to the student.The intention of this paper a review of a collection of existing approaches to providing practicalexperiences and to provide information of how the Admiral Lewis B. Combs Memorial DesignRetreat was developed, its goals, as well as demonstrate the value of such a practical experience.In doing so the discussion will examine the structure of past retreats and the impacts they havehad on their participants.ReviewAt the undergraduate level practical experiences appear in a variety of activities. Students areexposed to practical experiences through courses, planned events, co-ops, internships, etc.Without question, these practical experiences add significant value
recommend that the interested readerlook at Kerth’s excellent book9, containing advice on performing retrospectives and manyexample formats. Page 8.1080.12†† However, due to pressures of working on the project, we did not hold every planned retrospective. See Appendix2 for our complete course schedule. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationMost students appreciated the variety of the retrospectives we used, though one studentrecommended (in their feedback four months after the course
Copyright© 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationFrom the author’s perspective, the “prep- program” would have a mission statement (goals) andstrategic plans to help accomplish the following: (i) rekindle the tacit knowledge acquired bystudents during the pre-college years (K-12); (ii) improve their English skills to a desired level;(iii) help develop a proper learning environment and foster creative thinking; (iv) provide, incooperation with industry, a short-duration “practical/hands-on” training period, to help create anappreciation for the role of the engineer in the work place; and (v) re-visit high school math andscience through innovative pedagogical approaches in an attempt to fill gaps and develop a firmfoundation for future math
work, and international relations. To address these issues accurately, engineering and liberalarts faculty would need to work together, not simply broadening the syllabus or team-teaching,but explicitly identifying common ground and conflicts between approaches to problem- Page 5.570.4solving. For engineering, the goal would be to suffuse the content of a liberal education intostudents’ perspectives of what they will do as engineers. The civil engineering student wouldask: instead of minimizing the impact of building a highway through a wetlands, are thereother alternatives -- transportation, economic incentives, land-use planning -- that
in the 1999 – 2000 academic year and has now been conducted fortwo consecutive years. A third survey is planned for the 2001 – 2002 academic year. Summaryresults from the first two years of the study are presented here. Detailed results are available atwww.ecsel.psu.edu/setce/ExitSurvey2000.htm and www.ecsel.psu.edu/setce/ExitSurvey2001.htm.Description of the Survey The exit survey for Penn State engineering technology students was derived, withpermission, from an assessment survey for engineering schools developed by EducationalBenchmarking, Inc. * It consists of 59 questions. The first eight questions define basicdemographics of the respondent, including the student’s degree program, campus location,estimates of average weekly study
curricula for the science classroom, students arerequired to create a detailed science mini-unit in teams of two. The topic of study foreach unit is derived from the Pennsylvania State Education Standards. Inquiry must beutilized as the main method for teaching and an ENGR Gizmo must also be infused intoat least one of the lessons. The duration of the unit must be between 3 and 5 consecutivelessons and each lesson is designed to be active, interesting, education, fun andmeaningful. Students are encouraged to use current research in the field of scienceeducation to complete the assignment and all lessons must be aligned with the state andnational science education standards.In addition to planning the unit, students are also asked to justify the
norms of practice.Professional While engaged in engineering project work, individuals recognize needs forDevelopment development of technical, interpersonal, and individual attributes, plan and achieve progress, and articulate tangible current and future value from professional development.Professional Responsibility. Professional responsibility addresses moral, legal, and ethicalaccountabilities for which one must answer. For engineers, this means that one is informed aboutand reasons through obligations to society, clients, and the profession, then appropriately appliesethical principles to responsible fulfillment of obligations. These obligations are defined bymoral and
werecurrently working with at their home institution. The goal of the case studies was to allow Page 25.356.4participants to devise a plan for managing this research group based on the themes determined det inthe first session and the current organization and resources available to the research group.Participants often cited examples from their own experiences, but the case studies gave acommon anonymized foundation for the discussion. The questions listed in Table 1 were usedby the facilitators to guide the discussion. The first three questions applied to
engineering disciplines. The plan is for three of the six collaboratinguniversities to host an enrichment opportunity over three consecutive summers that focus onentrepreneurial education themed to the unique attributes of the host city. The first summerenrichment program was hosted at Lawrence Tech University who partnered with The HenryFord in the Detroit metro area. The first camp was focused on exploring creativity, innovation,and ingenuity as it relates to the American experience and manufacturing. In addition to learningobjectives, a goal of the program is to demonstrate the curricular enhancement of engagingmultiple institutions in interdisciplinary problem solving and to inspire students by showing themthe history of innovation in technology
self-reported feelings of confidence and preparedness to facilitate EiE activities with their students.EiE Professional Development Workshops: An OverviewThe majority of EiE professional development workshops take place at the request of a school ordistrict that is planning to have its teachers implement an EiE unit in their classrooms. (EiE alsohosts professional development workshops for teachers at the Museum of Science, Boston, albeitless frequently.) District or school-sponsored workshops are typically attended by in-serviceteachers and focus on one specific EiE unit, ideally the unit that is to be implemented by theworkshop participants in their classrooms. These workshops typically take place on a single dayand span four to six hours
tohave this event on FIU’s engineering campus because she had observed that engineering studentsgenerally lack concern for political issues.To carry out this event, JEDI partnered with the FIU Women’s Center. Tinoco met with theirstaff members regularly, and they generously provided guidance on designing the panel andassisted with recruiting attendees. Tinoco also met with Secules intermittently and Bond-Trittipo,Garcia, and Elaouinate weekly from the beginning of the Fall 2022 semester up until the time ofthe event to work on event planning and developing materials to promote the panel.The event was held in October 2022 and included three panelists, a Florida Planned Parenthoodemployee, the faculty advisor for Medical Students for Choice, and
Engineering and the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the College of Engineering, Computing and Applied Sciences. He earned his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in civil engineering at Clemson University.Khaled A. Al-Sahili, An-Najah National University Prof. Khaled Al-Sahili received his PhD degree in Civil Engineering in 1995 from Michigan State University, USA. He is currently a professor in the Civil and Architectural Engineering Department at An-Najah National University, Palestine. Prof. Al-Sahili held the position of Dean of Engineering and the Director of Transportation and Construction Research Center at An-Najah National University. His research and teaching interests cover transportation planning, traffic
structure, we also continue to meet the original learning objectives ofinstructing students on the basics of experimental planning and reporting.Introduction and motivation for a consolidated Chemical Engineering laboratory: Most Chemical Engineering curricula include at least one or two laboratory courseswhere students develop their hands-on skills by working on experimental stations that are relatedto fundamental processes used in traditional chemical industries. Various independent stationsare usually used in the laboratory to cover a wide range of important Chemical Engineeringconcepts such as heat exchange, distillation and chemical reactions. Typically, these individualunits are conceptually independent from each other because the
with all ofthe program outcomes, ABET does not define lifelong learning or provide guidelines forassessing achievement of lifelong learning skills. Besterfield-Sacre et al.[2] identified keyattributes of lifelong learning as part of an NSF-funded Action Agenda study (listed on theEngineering Education Assessment Methodologies and Curricula Innovation website[3]). Theseattributes included the ability to: ● demonstrate reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills; ● demonstrate an awareness of what needs to be learned; ● follow a learning plan; ● identify, retrieve, and organize information; ● understand and remember new information; ● demonstrate critical thinking skills; and, ● reflect on one‟s own
triangulated withobservations and field-notes from an extended site visit to PKU as well as informal and formalinterviews conducted in the field and after returning. For the full project, we were interested inunderstanding what was going on-- professionally and personally-- in different realms of theinternational component of the experience, that is, their observations of and adaptation to: • life among the Chinese culture and people; • living with their CURE colleagues; • their research as planned and as enacted; • the way work is conducted in the PKU labs (as compared with and in contrast to their US lab) ; • the nature of collaboration with PKU lab personnel.For this report, we will concentrate on the last three that deal