prerequisites to besuccessful in a reengineering effort. A few of the major organizational elements thatmust be effected along with many other parts of the organization are: governance andmanagement structures, organizational culture and climate, quality initiatives,measurement of customer satisfaction and overall service delivery. Reengineering is distinctly different from traditional total quality management andcontinuous quality improvement. Reengineering triggers changes of many kinds --anything associated with the process must be refashioned in an integrated way. There are no industries today as difficult to change as in academia. In academiashared governance structure, faculty unions, accreditating agencies, student-faculty-industry
since its inception over a century ago. Changing technology, ofcourse, has provided much of the impetus for reform. But so, too, has the continually evolving context in whichengineers operate. The realms of business and government have simply refused to stand still. Those responsible fortraining engineers, if they wished to put their graduates in position to do meaningful work in the world, have had torevisit the curriculum from time to time with an eye toward preparing students to function in novel workingarrangements that reflect both changing economic circumstances and evolving social values. Perhaps never has this been so true than at present. Today’s engineering graduates enter a work environment fardifferent from the one their
Vertically Integrated Projects(VIP) (Strachan et al., 2019; Cullers et al., 2017), now known as, the VIP Consortium Inc. The VIPprogram is an alliance of universities from around the world including Georgia Tech., Texas A&MUniversity, Stony Brook, Purdue, University of Pretoria, South Africa, Inha University, South Korea,etc., where graduate and undergraduate students take part in long-term projects. The projects areled by faculty from the same or other schools in the consortium in a start-up company setting wherestudents apply and develop technical as well as professional skills. The VIP program, for example, isa credit-bearing course counting towards the students’ degrees, which makes the VIP, essentially,a modified version of the second
undergraduate courses offered in the Department in order to maintain University-mandated minimum teaching loads. One of the faculty was asked to teach a course outside theconstruction program. Another faculty member took over a course taught by a part-time lecturerwho has been an integral and valuable part of the construction program for many years. TheDepartment and faculty scrambled to rearrange the teaching schedules in the few days prior tothe start of the semester. Page 4.467.10V. ConclusionsDeveloping the Master’s degree program in construction has required extensive effort andcommitment by the program faculty. Its future success is an
security system. Level 1 users are the faculty users. These type of users havethe ability to add SLOs at the program and course level. In addition, they can also run all theassessment reports. Level 3 users have administrator privileges. These users have all the level 1capabilities plus the ability to add other users and modify user information.A forum area is provided to track suggestions and comments for program and processimprovement (see figure 2). The students modified an open source bulletin board system,Philboard4, and integrated it into the assessment system. This allows users to post suggestionsand make comments on previously posted comments. Before the post will be public viewable itmust be approved by a level 3 administrator. Anytime a
to examine the approaches used by students and experts to solve theseproblems. This paper describes a knowledge representation framework developed by Hahn andChater [41] for analyzing a person’s episode of reasoning while solving a problem and presentssome preliminary results of the application of this framework to students taking a course insignal and systems. This course occurs in the junior year of an electrical engineeringundergraduate curriculum at a larger public university. The preliminary results demonstrate thatthe framework can be successfully used to distinguish between different types of reasoning thatstudents use when solving problems in this course. This study is part of a larger effort that istrying to determine if there is a
the secondsemester. In PBL organization the subject was compressed into one semester with anallocation of 2 hours of lectures and three hours of seminars and laboratory sessions perweek. Effectively, this represented a 16.7 percent reduction in total contact time and 50percent reduction in lectures. This paper is focusing on the way the chemical sciencecurriculum was developed and organized for a traditional mode of delivery and then and thenits evolution into an integrated PBL subject in a challenging educational environment.SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT- INTRODUCTION OF CHEMICAL SCIENCES INTOENGINEERING CURRICULUMThe philosophy of this subject development was guided by the knowledge constraints ofstudents enrolled in the course. The incoming students
Military Academy.” Journal of Engineering Education, 2000. 89(4): p. 471-474.11. Magleby, S. P.; Sorensen, C. D.; Todd, R. H.. Integrated Product and Process Design: A Capstone Course in Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering. in Proceedings of the 1992 Frontiers in Education Conference. 1992.Biographical InformationLawrence E. Whitman is an Associate Professor of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering atWichita State University. He received B.S. and M.S. degrees from Oklahoma State University. HisPh.D. is from The University of Texas at Arlington is in Industrial Engineering. He also has 10years experience in the aerospace industry. His research interests are in enterprise engineering,engineering education, supply
during thecommunication is called grounding. (Clark & Schaefer, 1987, 1989) McCarthy & Monk (1994)integrated the theory of common grounding (Clark & Brennan, 1991) with the Shannon andWeaver’s (1949) theory of communication with research on cognition. Shannon and Weaver’stheory of communication was used by both Hill and McCarthy & Monk, which suggests a linkbetween these two models (Mandviwalla & Hovav, 1998).The framework designed by McCarthy & Monk was based on a multidisciplinary approach tocomputer-mediated communication in which they developed an information processing model.They identify three resources that facilitate grounding. First, they suggest a multi-channelcommunication system. Face to face communication is
International Sustainability: Curriculum Design under the Sustainable Futures Model,” Proceedings of 5th Annual ASEE Global Colloquium on Engrg Educ., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, October 9-12, 2006.Fry, L.M. and J.R. Mihelcic, "Integrating a Global Perspective into Graduate Engineering Education & Research," Proceedings of 5th Annual ASEE Global Colloquium on Engrg Educ., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, October 9-12, 2006.Hokanson, D.R., J.R. Mihelcic, L.D. Phillips, “Educating Engineers in the Sustainable Futures Model with a Global Perpective: Education, Research & Diversity Initiatives,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 23(2): 254-265, 2007.Hokanson, D.R., Q. Zhang, J.R. Cowden, A.M. Troschinetz, J.R
). “Teaching Real World Issues through Case Studies,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, no. 4, October, pp. 501-508. 7. Wankat, P.C. (2002). “Integrating the Use of Commercial Simulators into Lecture Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 1, January, pp. 19-24. 8. Mackenzie, J.G., Earl, W.B., Allen, R.M. and Gilmour, I.A. (2001). “Amoco Computer Simulation in Chemical Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 3, July, pp. 331-346. 9. Thompson, B.E. (2002). “Pedagogy of an Aircraft Studio,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 2, April, pp. 197-202. 10. Lackey, L.W., Lackey, W.J., Grady, H.M., and Davis, M.T. (2003). “Efficacy of Using a Single, Non
. She has also served in administrative and teaching faculty roles at Virginia Tech and The Ohio State University.Catherine SleezerRob Sleezer (Associate Professor, Twin Cities Engineering) Rob Sleezer serves as an associate professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato. As an active member in ASEE and IEEE Rob works to connect the learning of engineering to the practice of engineering. He supports learning across the breadth of electrical engineering and facilitates a seminar where student engineers engage in design and professional learning. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by
methods, models and research to enhance professional and technical backgrounds andto develop technical management skills by combining qualitative approaches and quantitativetechniques in a balanced curriculum.Project management, telecommunications, and automatic data capture courses were added to thecore curriculum. Similarly, financial and managerial economics were added as an option for thesupporting management area. Students are required to conduct research in all graduate courses.Specific research methods are covered in ET 603, Applied Research and Design. For the ET 603course, students are required to complete a research study using accepted methods and statisticalanalysis. Additionally, all students have the option to take ET 648, Research
the same time otherrevisions were made to our curriculum such that the number of total credit hours required wasnot modified.Although the students are required to take a quarter of statistics, there appeared to be very littleconnection between the concepts learned in that course and the analysis necessary as part of thelaboratory projects. Also, despite the widespread use of Design of Experiments (DOE) inindustry and the desire of many of our employers to find students with a background in DOE andstatistical analysis, our students generally did not have any formalized training in this area unlessthey selected an elective course on this topic which is periodically offered in the mathematicsdepartment. Thus, the new course addresses topics not
. Additionally, Mariam has taught both on-level and AP Physics I (formerly known as Pre-AP Physics) and played an integral role in writing the district physics curriculum consisting of rigorous labs, activities, and projects. Mariam fills the role of Alumni Representative on the UTeach STEM Educators Association (USEA) Board and was also elected Secretary-Treasurer. She is also currently pursuing a Ph.D. in STEM education at Texas Tech University.Mr. Ricky P. Greer, University of Houston Ricky Greer graduated from Tuskegee University with a bachelor’s in History. He went on to work at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign as a community outreach specialist & unit operations laboratory manager, and through his
. Throughout this course, students learn howto apply mathematical concepts in solving cryptographic puzzles[1]. Another important objectiveof the mini-project is for students to be able to effectively function as a team member, witheffectiveness being determined by peer rating and self-assessment.I. IntroductionThe College of Engineering at Villanova University has established a new seven-week coursethat is required for freshman-engineering students. An integral part of this new course is aninterdisciplinary project-based experience, which according to the literature, has shown to be aneffective way to improve learning in freshman as well as upper level courses[2-8]. Previous workin project-based, hands-on learning experiences shows that restructuring
]. Page 22.1351.2The team based presentation project evolved within advanced thermodynamic courses as a wayto introduce upper-level engineering students to an engineering outreach opportunity while alsostrengthening communication skills and deepening engineering knowledge. The need for moreworkers with an engineering background in the coming years is clear [6] and it is often necessaryfor students to track into appropriate math and science classes as early as middle school if theyare to be ready for a college engineering curriculum. RIT already has an active women inengineering (WE@RIT) outreach program [7] with a successful infrastructure in place, so it is anatural extension of work already being done within the college to start a program to
radical strategies for integrating African Americans and also the immediate meetingof all rights including political rule and economic suffrage. His strategy to “fit in the world” wasto ship African Americans to Africa and have an independent nation.55Scholarship on liberation indicates some similarities, as well as noteworthy differences. Howbest to study liberation given its diverse and underrepresented history in academic research? AsMatheis argues, liberatory movements may most commonly (though not always) refer to aspecific priority and two objectives.38 Liberatory movements take as their priority a respect (orsurrender) to “alterity.” The term alterity, here, refers to the ways that unfamiliar differencesdeserve respect even while appearing
remain in engineering programs.The Need for Empathy in EngineeringThere have been numerous calls for an infusion of empathy into engineering [6], [7]. Empathyaddresses 21st century needs that require interaction and intuition of others’ needs related tosustainable design [6]. Work, management and social science scholar Daniel Pink proposes thatempathy is one of six qualities vital to future global success [8]. The increased appreciation ofsocial issues that accompanies expanded empathy gives greater insight into things like socialinequality and discrimination [9]. Moreover, an academic curriculum that teaches empathy isassociated with greater ease in learning, future promotion in the workforce, leadership skills,business acumen, and positive
Paper ID #26030The Professional Doctorate in Technology Leadership, Research & Innova-tionDr. Kathryne Newton, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kathy Newton is an Associate Dean of Graduate Programs and Faculty Success for the Purdue Poly- technic Institute at Purdue University. She is a Professor of Supply Chain Management Technology in the School of Engineering Technology. Her teaching and scholarly interests are in the areas of supply chain management, quality control, and graduate education. She served as Department Head of Industrial Technology from 2007 to 2010. Prior to her appointment at Purdue University in
elements so core to project management as both a leader and a team member.This paper describes an innovative approach to using project managers (PMs) in the classroomthat has had measured effects in several areas, including individual student participation, groupproject disposition, and in-class presentations. Results have been encouraging, with studentfeedback (from both PMs and group members) indicating positive effects on interest in the fieldand application of project management, improved group dynamics, and more individualparticipation in the outcome of group projects.Specifically included in the paper are examples of PM inclusion in both the class curriculum andmain project from beginning to end and how they have been applied to a process
AC 2008-2535: TEACHERS’ NOTICING ENGINEERING IN EVERYDAYOBJECTS AND PROCESSESSean Brophy, Purdue University Sean P. Brophy, PhD. is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Brophy is a learning scientist and engineer; his research focuses on the development of learners’ ability to solve complex problems in engineering, mathematics and science contexts. As a research scholar with INSPIRE he has been investigating teacher and students cognition of engineering problem solving and perceptions of engineering.Gemma Mann, Purdue University Gemma E. Mann is a research associate with INSPIRE in Purdue University’s department of Engineering Education. She received her
maintaining or dismantling that privilege. We hope that these examples willbe helpful to others interested in integrating such content into their courses.Institutional ContextThe history behind the creation of these courses stems from being at the forefront of institution-wide transformation, including the inauguration of a new university president, theimplementation of a new University Core curriculum, the award of an NSF RED grant, and thecreation of a new General Engineering department [11]. The University of San Diego is amajority undergraduate, private four-year [12], faith-based institution that embraces Catholicsocial teaching in its mission. Our new president has enacted a new strategic plan, TheUniversity has identified six pathways through
them to drop out of college? Extensive research thereforeis still being conducted to determine how people learn [1], [2]. The importance of engagementhas been identified as key to retention, learning, and the development of self-regulated learners[3] – [9]. Interest as an affective state representing students’ experience of learning has beenproposed to be the result of integration of the three dimensions of engagement which arebehavioral, cognitive and affective engagement [10], [11].The effect of engagement in meaningful academic activities on retention of first year students [5]showed statistically significant impacts on GPA and persistence. It was also noted aproportionally higher positive impact of educationally engaging activities on
embarking on educational research [1]. The last hurdle inBorrego’s assessment (a very engineer-like construct) was to integrate social scientists intoengineering education research teams. Essentially, her description of this process implies that thesocial scientists will be consultants supporting the efforts of the engineering educators.However, what we found was that our scholarship was improved and our experience moresatisfying when we moved beyond an engineer-consultant relationship to an integratedpartnership. Our research process is similar to those strategies espoused in recent forums andreports on qualitative research in engineering education and the work of social scientists studyingengineering education. (Ref. such as [2-21]) We will share
Session 3226 ENGINEERING DESIGN EDUCATION IN THERMAL SYSTEMS LABORATORY Lang Wah Lee Tamer Ceylan Department of Mechanical/Industrial Engineering University of Wisconsin-Platteville Platteville, WI 53818ABSTRACT: This paper presents four methods to integrate design to an equipment-intensivelaboratory course. These four methods are: (1) design of measurement systems with a graphicalprogramming method; (2) design of components for testing; (3
INNOVATIVE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING Ajit D. Kelkar, Ram Mohan, Guoqing Tang, N. Radhakrishnan and Kenneth Murray Computational Science and Engineering Program North Carolina A&T State University Greensboro, NC 27411 North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (NCA&T) has established a master'sdegree program in Computational Science and Engineering (CSE). The program will be highlyinterdisciplinary, drawing expertise and resources from various disciplines across the University,and operating outside a department. It will offer an interdisciplinary curriculum combiningapplied
askfor input from the program faculty. A visual chart or “map” helps considerably in this processand may be completed initially for each course then for the entire curriculum. An example ispresented in Figure 3 for the course presented in Figure 1. The Program Outcomes a-k closelymatch the prescribed a-k in the ABET requirements with minor variations that make them more Page 12.1483.3specific to the Biomedical Engineering Program. It may be noted that this course only maps toProgram Outcomes a, b, c, f, and k. It is obvious that not every course will address or assessevery Program Outcome. The “Measured Score” column reflects the information
research interests include educational data mining, ethical considerations regarding the use of data in education, assessment in engineering education, and the statistics curriculum for engineering. She is a member of Eta Kappa Nu (HKN), Purdue.Ms. Huma Shoaib, Purdue University Huma Shoaib is an engineering education graduate student at Purdue working with The Weldon School Biomedical Engineering. Her research interests are; identifying computational thinking patterns in engi- neering students and underrepresentation of women in engineering.Dr. Kerrie A Douglas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Douglas is an Associate Professor in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. Her research is focused on
above letter, the US Department of Commerce conducted a series ofinterviews with institutions across the nation in an effort to understand howuniversities are nurturing and promoting innovation/entrepreneurship and publishedthe “The Innovative and Entrepreneurial University; Higher Education, Innovation &Entrepreneurship in Focus” (2). While there is significant research on innovation andentrepreneurship within the formal curriculum (3, 4) there is less focus on extra-curricular programs. Authors believe informal programs offer a great opportunity toengage engineering students in activities promoting innovation and entrepreneurshipas it has been shown by the impact of Innovation Challenges on the development ofinnovative skills (5). Per C