exceptionally qualifiedkeepers.Based on the description above, it can be inferred that this basic idea of team selection based onfunctional position should be considered for possible adaptation in forming student engineeringteams. The various aspects involved in this approach are described in the following sections.Rationale for the Functional-based ApproachThe lack of functional roles as a criterion in team member selection for student teams is an issuethat needs to be addressed. A potential highly effective approach to team member selectioncould be developed based on the success and experience available in team member selection inteam sports. The key elements here are: A. Identification of the purposes/goals of the team B. The
(Areas a and b: weeks 1-2) using an applet. The applet accepts an ASCII character as This Lab is divided into two parts, OSI and TCP/IP. input and draws the Fourier distribution for the periodicThe first part focuses on students' ability to accomplish decomposition of the character. For example if characterthe following tasks: ‘A’ is input, the applet will draw the distribution for the • Name the seven layers of the OSI model in order periodic bit pattern “01000001”, since ASCII for ‘A’ is using a mnemonic Ox41. A sample of output is shown in Figure 1. The • Describe the characteristic, functions and keywords
with, rather this class as a whole and our group project has forced me tothink about its appropriate applications at the K-12 level.” and “Both technology educationpapers addressed the difference between technology education and educational technology – twodifferent concepts I had not thought of before”). Our technique allowed us to capture thesubtleties of understanding and the progression of metacognition. The rubric demonstrated thatthe DET course had a strong impact on students thinking about and applying DET to teaching.IntroductionQuantitative approaches to assessment can tell you how much, how many or whether group Aoutperforms group B and provide descriptive statistics for a data set. However, quantitativeanalysis is unable to tell us
-determined future. The new venturecreator with a need for recognition and who is confident of his ability to perform will be verymotivated. Fred Fry 3 has suggested that these variables do come together in an equation:M = Ai x TiWhere M= MotivationAi = Antecedent variables (e.g. background, creativity, personality, experience, and education)Ti = Triggering factors such as job loss, opportunity, idea, environmental change, etc.)Fry incorporates a “Triggering event” as a component of motivation. The Antecedent Variablesemphasize the roles that historical and personal variables play in defining the entrepreneur.In examining technically-oriented entrepreneurs, Robert Edwards4 lists three primary causes (a)independence, (b) challenge and (c) monetary
: Page 9.92.2 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education a. understanding of the operation of an industrial organization and the nature and importance of the engineering dimension within it; b. understanding of systems of communications and control within organizations; c. personal skills of working with other people at all levels in an organizations; d. understanding of the organizational and administrative principles of running a business particularly the roles of financial control, costing and marketing; e. appreciation of the kinds of work in
loads due to shear. Equivalent alt. Torque due to shear forces is calculated for each plane and added to the torsion. The maximum is used in the resultant sheet. 14 Mean torque, user input; occurs between the input and output points, zero otherwise. 15 Alternating moment, computed from bending moments 16 Mean moment - computed to the right of workspace based on converting thrust forces into an equivalent moment based on F/A = Mc/I. A moment curve from a centrifugal force can also be computed and placed in the moment column. For most shaft designs, this can be ignored and thus set to zero. 17 A factor in the DE-Gerber equation 18 B factor in the DE-Gerber equation 19 r: if r greater than rcrit above, then the
presentation • Communicate clearly and with civility • Listen effectively • Show respect for different opinions • Accept criticism gracefully • Be a reliable member of the team • Cooperate with the other members of the team • Carry your share of the load Your ratings may be as follows: • Excellent - A [10 pts] • Very good - B [8-9] • Satisfactory - C [7] • Marginal - D [6] • No show/Deficient -E, Fail [5 and below]• Library Research Over the years, the LEAP Program has developed a close working relationship with the Marriott Library Instructional staff at the University of Utah to provide a sequence of 5 increasingly advanced
widespectrum of opinions, comments and ideas expressed both in class discussions and writtenessays. Whatever the cause, it has become an important component of the class.Course ObjectivesThe course has two main categories of objectives that: (a) promote awareness of technologicaldevelopment, and (b) provide a rudimentary understanding of the social, political, economic andcultural impact. These two main objectives were then expanded to create a more comprehensivelist for the student.Upon completion of the course a student: 1. Can recount the interconnected events and cultures in which a technology developed. 2. Can describe how technologies are inter-related. 3. Can critique technologies based on: system aspects, applied knowledge, specific
%). Page 9.286.6 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright©2004, American Society for Engineering Education Appropriate to Evaluate Actually Evaluate 92 a. Economic considerations 85 b. Environmental 74 considerations
Page 9.1022.8Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education 4- Base Size: Determine Plate B and L thickness 5- Bracing Determine Design base shear bracing 6- Bill of Description Quantity Materials and sizeConclusionAn alternative method for teaching an undergraduate steel design course has been demonstrated.This method was based on designing a single story mezzanine inside a warehouse. The studentswere
Demo:The 2-bit multiplexer demo window run by program mplexer.m is shown in Figure 4. Itshows how selecting the proper states of inputs A and B allow only one of the fourswitched inputs to pass through to the output. Figure 4: Multiplexer Demonstration Window. Page 9.63.5 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”Seven Segment Driver and Display Demo:This demonstration shows the effect of a BCD to 7-segment encoder/driver and the formof the output on the 7-segment display. The demo may also be
. and Eison, J., Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom, ASHE-ERIC Higher Educational Report No. 1, 1991. 2. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., and Smith, K., Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, Interaction Book Company, Edina, MN, 1991. 3. Bidanda, B. and Billo, R., On the Use of Students for Developing Engineering Laboratories, Journal of Engineering Education, April 1995. 4. Pai, D., Kelkar, A., Layton, R. A., Schultz, M., Dunn, D., Owusu-Ofori, S., and Duraphe, A., Vertical Integration of the Undergraduate Learning Experience, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual conference, Charlotte, NC, 1999. 5. Shih, C., Hollis, P., and Buzyna, G., The Development of a
region for assessment and toget input on possible refinement of the program learning objectives. This action is being taken inresponse to the recommendations made by the ABET accreditation team, from the visit thatoccurred in October 2002.B.3. Closing the LoopSummaries from all of the assessment procedures are provided to different committees, at bothinstitutions, such as the Teaching Enhancement Committee, Syllabus Evaluation Sub-committee,Learning Enhancement Committee, and Peer Evaluation Sub-committee, to take the requiredcorrective actions and close the loop through performing the following: 1. Establish committee focus and recommendations; 2. Establish a Course Syllabus Assessment Plan and work with the undergraduate director
://www.tea.state.tx.us/special.ed/conf/scorecard.pdf, July 2002.7. “PeopleSoft 8 Enterprise Performance Management (EPM)”, PeopleSoft Inc., Pleasanton, California, 2002.8. “BNET”, http://www.bnet.com/, 2002.9. “The Balanced Scorecard Collaborative”, http://www.bscol.com/, Balanced Scorecard Collaborative®, Inc., Lincoln, Massachusetts10. Janna, W.S., “Design of Fluid Thermal Systems”, 2nd Ed., PWS Publishing, Boston, Massachusetts, 1998.11. Hochstein, J.I., Tan, T. E., Janna, W.S., Marchetta, J.G., Jamison, T., Shrader, B., Bilderbeck, M., “A Useful Intersection: The Balanced Scorecard and EC2000”, Session 1556, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, June, 2004.Biographical
; Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education"As far as grading I do not spend much time looking at the details, but more looking at the overallprocess. I divide the solutions into different categories and assign scores based on the category.Typically I have an A and a B pile, on rare occasions I have a student that does poorly on the laband will receive a C or D.Once the lab has finished I then introduce the concepts of intrusion detection systems and honeypots. I provide the students access to the intrusion detections I installed in 532corp so they canlook at attacks they carried out. The honey pots upset the most students. They get very madwhen they find out they “wasted” their time on the honey
a section of the survey. There can be multiple sections for a single survey, hence the one to many relationship b. MSEQuestions: This table holds question details for a question of the survey. Again, there can be multiple questions for a single survey, hence the one to many relationship c. MSEAnswer Choices: This table holds answer choices for the custom radio box and he custom check box types of questions d. MSEAnswer s: This table holds answers that the student has entered for the survey. The design of this table is such that every answer is stored as a text field, and is then interpreted depending on the kind of question that the answer is associated
parts.Educational institutions above all profess engineering education infused with human values. Acentral outcome should be the formation of institutions which deliver the common good topeople, and which take responsibility when that does not happen.Critical questions arise: a) how is the common good represented in professional education, and realizedin subsequent practice? And b) can one identify a universal form of professionalism, i.e. one that canrest on a Public Theology or a Common Morality? There are growing calls for some compass to guidelarge, pluralistic social organizations; a metaphysical Referent for Public Virtue. This would addtranscendent depth to our social constructions; “virtue” to our institutions. As our secular professionsembrace
-32768 to 32767) C a = actual PWM output (unsigned char 0 to 255)Figure 4 - The Feedback Control LoopThis motion control system is bidirectional, and uses an H-Bridge as shown in Figure 5. Cd H-bridge PWM (L293D) motor CW (PD2) CCW (PD3) 68HC11 shaft coupler Vcc Phase A (PD4) Phase B (PD5) encoderFigure 5 - Bidirectional H-Bridge Schematic
Integrating Soft Skills in a BME Curriculum Paul Benkeser and Wendy Newstetter Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory UniversityAbstractABET’s Criterion 3 requires engineering programs to demonstrate that its graduates possess anumber of “soft” skills related to the practice of engineering. These include skills related toteamwork, communications, professionalism, ethics, life-long learning, impact of engineeringsolutions, and knowledge of contemporary issues. Too often programs seek to satisfy thiscriterion through what might be called an “inoculation” approach, i.e. giving students a dose ofethics
, J.A., Ordonez, R., Schmalzel, J.L.,Sukumaran, B., Benavidez, H. and J. Haynes, “A Pedagogical Concept of IntegratingMultidisciplinary Design and Technical Communication,” Proceedings of the ASEEAnnual Conference, St. Louis, 2000.9. Ruane, M., “SPECTRE – An Extended Interdisciplinary Senior Design Problem,”Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Charlotte, 1999.10. Somerton, C., “Using Student Evaluations for Individual Grading in Team Projects,”Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, St. Louis, 2000.AuthorsHARRIET S. CORNACHIONEHarriet S. Cornachione is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering and Geomatics atOregon Institute of Technology. She is a registered Professional Geologist in Oregon.Harriet received a B.S. from Western
second part tests the students’ ability to integrate ideas, do design andevaluation, and apply concepts to new problems. These problems test at the upper level of theTaxonomy (Analysis, Design and Evaluation). Both parts are weight equally. Since we begankeeping records in 1998 for this study there were from 35 to 45 students every term. Thestudents were roughly evenly divided between electrical, mechanical and computer engineeringmajors. The course is criteria-based and the grades are not curved. Student performance hasaveraged between a C+ and B- every year – the desired performance range. Student critiqueshave been very positive throughout this period. Performance of these students in subsequentcourses like Signal and Systems, Electronics
including threedifferent equipment bundles, multiple lab stations and the management server. Management Server Internet Lab Station PC Agilent DAQ or National Instruments Test & Measurement Serial/Parallel ELVIS Platform Instruments Port Interfaces User A User B
opportunities to mentor bright, youngpeople. This paper provides two authors’ descriptions of what can be done to promote successfulexperiences, ones that benefit both the student and the faculty member. Through theirexperiences, or what they have learned from their colleagues, this paper offers a qualitative lookat how a URP might best be structured. An important element is joint development of theexperience, by the faculty member and the student. The goals and objectives of both parties haveto be taken into account. The faculty member may need help with a research project while thestudent may want a foretaste of graduate school or just a chance to earn money. Ideas about howto incorporate leadership, responsibility, independence, networking and
GEARE: A Comprehensive Program for Globalizing Engineering Education E. D. Hir leman 1, D. Atkinson 1, E. A. Gr oll1, J . Matthews1, L. Xu 1, B. Aller t 2, W. Hong2, A. Alber s3, S. L. K. Wittig4, Z. Q. Lin 5, and L. F. Xi5 1 School of Mechanical Engineer ing, Pur due Univer sity / 2Depar tment of For eign Languages and Liter atur e, Pur due Univer sity / 3Institut für Maschinenkonstr uktionslehr e und Kr aftfahr zeugbau, Univer sität. Univ. Kar lsr uhe / 4Ger man Aer ospace Center (DLR), Köln / 5School of Mechanical Engineer ing , Shanghai J iao Tong Univer sity GLOBAL ENGINEERING ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION (GEARE)AbstractThe
Session Number LEARNING FROM NATIVE CULTURES: EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES IN SUSTAINABILITY, CULTURAL SENSITIVITY AND GLOBAL AWARENESS Amy V. Grommes, David R. Riley, PhD Department of Architectural Engineering, Penn StateABSTRACT: At the dawn of the 21st century we live in a world plagued by her inhabitants.Increased consumption, depletion, contamination, pollution, and waste have led to the currentfragile state of the planet. Financial pursuits have created wider economic gaps between thosewho have the knowledge and the ability to address environmental issues and those who do not.An increasing need for environmental awareness and sustainable
Session 3661 Science, Technology and Society ... of Consumption A Reflection Renato Lucas Pacheco, Walter Antonio Bazzo, Renato Carlson, Lúcia Helena Martins-Pacheco Universidade Federal de Santa CatarinaIntroductionIn recent years, Science, Technology and Society (STS) studies have increased considerablyin Brazil, especially in engineering courses, through the publications of books and papers,and with the work of professionals who are interested in studying this subject. STS typicalapproach frequently puts together the social role of
correlate with POs.) (a) Apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) Design and conduct experiments … (c) Design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs (k) Use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools … (e) Identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (o) Work professionally in fluid/thermal systems area … (l) Be knowledgeable about chemistry and calculus-based physics … (p) Work professionally in mechanical systems area … (m) Apply advanced mathematics … 2. To
-onewith student SI facilitators to review and reinforce the fundamentals introduced by the instructorin a formal classroom setting. From its modest beginnings in Fall 2001, where two core courseswere supported, the program has expanded coverage to as many as 18 core courses from theengineering and basic sciences. One or more SIs are assigned to a particular course. SIrecruitment is selective, hiring students that have recently completed the same course with a B orbetter. This places them in a better situation to share both the fundamentals as well as successfultest-taking and situation-handling techniques. Our results are very encouraging, and anunexpected additional benefit observed is the increased confidence of SIs in their ownknowledge and
themselves, and used the Assignment tool to submit a short paragraph on their academic background and what they hoped to get out of the course. • Pre-course survey and quiz – These were first administered in the fall of 2003 to serve multiple purposes: a) to collect demographic information about students, b) collect Page 9.1047.2 computer-use information about the students to assist with troubleshooting technologyProceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright 2004, American Society for Engineering problems, and c) to serve as a means to record their
operators to construct a more Page 9.102.4sophisticated function. If the operators are limited to the subset defined in Section 3.3, “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education” a op1 x > op2 + y - state b 1