register into B register 0002 47 ;MOV B,A;Main loop: ;Add B register to A register 0003 80 ;ADD B ;copy A register into C (temp) 0004 4F ;MOV C,A ;Copy B into A 0005 78 ;MOV A,B ;Copy C into B 0006 41 ;MOV B,C ;Store the result at memory location 0x1234 0007 32 ;\ 0008 34 ; STA 0x1234 0009 12 ;/ ;Jump back to continue the loop 000A C3 ;\ 000B 03 ; JMP 0x0003 000C 00 ;/ The bus-centric design of the DrACo/Z80 lends itself to the creation of peripherals, andwe have designed a few to use
register into B register 0002 47 ;MOV B,A;Main loop: ;Add B register to A register 0003 80 ;ADD B ;copy A register into C (temp) 0004 4F ;MOV C,A ;Copy B into A 0005 78 ;MOV A,B ;Copy C into B 0006 41 ;MOV B,C ;Store the result at memory location 0x1234 0007 32 ;\ 0008 34 ; STA 0x1234 0009 12 ;/ ;Jump back to continue the loop 000A C3 ;\ 000B 03 ; JMP 0x0003 000C 00 ;/ The bus-centric design of the DrACo/Z80 lends itself to the creation of peripherals, andwe have designed a few to use
studentevaluation of the design experience in a senior level heat transfer laboratory course.Course Learning Objectives1. Heat Transfer Measurements and Apparatus a. Students fabricate thermocouples b. Students demonstrate an understanding about the calibration of thermocouples c. Students demonstrate an understanding about the use of thermocouples d. Students participate in computer data acquisition e. Students calculate uncertainty error f. Students identify systematic errors2. Demonstrating Basic Heat Transfer Principles a. Students experience the basic principles of conduction b. Students experience the basic principles of convection c. Students experience the basic principles of radiation d
. and Patrikios, N., “RFID Implementation Framework in Supply Chain”, 2008, RFID in Operationsand Supply Chain Management – Research and Applications, pp. 3-11.4. Visich, J. K., Li, S., Khumawala, B. M, “Enhancing Product Recovery Value in Closed Loop Supply Chainwith RFID”, 2007, Journal of Managerial Issues, 19, pp. 436-452.5. Wong, C. Y. and McFarlane, D., “Radio Frequency Identification Data Capture and its Impact on ShelfReplenishment”, 2007, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 71–93.6. Fosso Wamba, S., Lefebvre, L. A., Lefebvre, E., 2006, “Enabling intelligent B-to-B Ecommerce Supply ChainManagement Using RFID and EPC Network: a Case Study in Retail Industry”, ACM International
. and Patrikios, N., “RFID Implementation Framework in Supply Chain”, 2008, RFID in Operationsand Supply Chain Management – Research and Applications, pp. 3-11.4. Visich, J. K., Li, S., Khumawala, B. M, “Enhancing Product Recovery Value in Closed Loop Supply Chainwith RFID”, 2007, Journal of Managerial Issues, 19, pp. 436-452.5. Wong, C. Y. and McFarlane, D., “Radio Frequency Identification Data Capture and its Impact on ShelfReplenishment”, 2007, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 71–93.6. Fosso Wamba, S., Lefebvre, L. A., Lefebvre, E., 2006, “Enabling intelligent B-to-B Ecommerce Supply ChainManagement Using RFID and EPC Network: a Case Study in Retail Industry”, ACM International
1 − dσ1 / 3 − eσ τ = ]1.06η − 1.03(1 - η)_ 4 in g/cm3 3.1975 − aσ − bσ − cσ 1/ 3 where σ = 647.27 – T a = -0.3151548, b = -1.2003374 x 10-3, c = 7.48908 x 10-13 d = 0.1342463, e = -3.946263 x 10-3 Temperature (T) in KelvinsSpecific Volume 1 in m3/kg v? τSpecific Heat cP = 0.0571 + (3.7234)η + (1-1.02η)(.93)(a+bT+cT2+dT3+eT4) inkJ
how math helps solve problems in science and engineering has 6. My knowledge of science and engineering fields hasFigure 11. Student Reponses to Changes in their Interest, Attitude, and Confidence Levels Increased Decreased Stayed the Same A = 2004-5 B = 2005-6 C = 2006-7 D = 2007-8 100
from faculty, the 2001 ABET review, theMinority Engineering Program, industry, alumni, graduating seniors, and otherstakeholders, have sought to impart design concepts and related computational tools atthe lower division to improve student preparation for the senior design capstone courseand their future careers. These changes resulted in a mechanical design sequence ofcourses (shown in Figure 1) that comprise of the freshman orientation course ME101, theone-year sophomore design sequence ME286AB, the junior-level machine design courseME330, and a year of senior design. In this paper, this sequence will be referred to as thedesign-stem sequence. ME101 Intro ME286A ME286B ME330 ME486A/B to
student learning outcomes were assessed viaperformance criteria using (a) grades from the paper, poster and presentation; and (b) professorevaluation. Additional indirect assessments were obtained through student surveys and peerreviews. All assessment techniques indicated that the students met and exceeded both courseexpectations and the performance of other student groups enrolled in the capstone design course.Seeking Significant and Interesting Topics for Senior Capstone Design CoursesAs anyone who teaches and advises undergraduate senior capstone design courses will attest,seeking undergraduate topics with the appropriate amount of depth and design is an unending
as they approach surface 1 b) The person will feel warmer as they approach surface 2 c) The person will feel the same warmth in both cases. d) Not enough information givenStudent results indicated that this question was quite difficult, with only 25% of studentsidentifying the correct response. In addition, the question was a poor discriminatorbetween students who did well on the instrument and those who did not, with adiscrimination index that was actually negative (-0.08). Because of this, the question wassignificantly revised in Phase 2, as shown below. Page 14.469.7Radiation Question: Phase 2A person walks toward two diffuse grey
profession and those who regulate the engineering profession, not ABET, to set the required body of knowledge. ABET cannot do what is beyond its scope of authority. Even if ABET could require universities to increase their credit requirements for a bachelor’s degree, the resulting five-year or longer bachelor’s programs would provide far less flexibility than B+M/30, at substantially greater cost to students, and would significantly increase the potential for decreased enrollments. It is difficult to create for any constituency a rationale as to why this would be preferable to the proposed B+M/30 requirements.6. What are some of the implications of these changes for engineering education in the US?First, it should be recognized that this
they have learned.A Proposed Workshop ModelThe issue of what should or should not be included in the soil mechanics curriculum (includingthe lab portion) has long been debated. Karl Terzaghi’s7 opening comments to the FirstInternational Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Design contained a number ofimportant and challenging statements dealing with the teaching of soil mechanics—many ofthese issues are relevant today as they were in 1936.While it is beyond the scope of this paper to address these issues, it might be sufficient to quoteJ. B. Burland8 from his Nash lecture on his personal view on the teaching of soil mechanics whostrongly suggested that the profession reread Terzaghi’s comments on the teaching of soilmechanics and cited
construction equipment.Following the pre-test, students were given a 30-minute opportunity to operator the wheel loadersimulator for both stockpiling materials and truck loading operations. The material stockpilingsimulation required each participant to operate the wheel loader to: a. excavate material from a rock stockpile, b. execute a three point turn by reversing from the stockpile while articulating and then proceed to the dumping zone while articulating in the opposite direction, c. dump the material into the dumping zone, d. reverse from the dumping zone, and e. stop the wheel loader and activate the hornThe operator’s view from the simulated equipment cab during the stockpiling operation is shownin Figure 3
distinction between its program objectives and program outcomes,(b) demonstrates the relationship of Criterion 2 [a] – [k] to each objective, and (c)demonstrates the assessment measure and metrics associated with each objective. OnJanuary 3, 2008 it was communicated to ABET that a response to this finding would beprovided at a later date.Finally, in response to the findings, the MET Program Spring 2008 Assessment Reportwas submitted to ABET prior to the 2008 Summer Meeting. This report included arevised version of the previously submitted attachments, along with assessment resultsand analysis in a tabular format. Following the 2008 Summer Meeting the final responseon August 15, 2008 from ABET was that the MET Program be reaccredited.I believe that it
I know in my classes.(F2) The field of engineering is interesting. I am considering switching majors. I am confident about my choice of major.Confidence in I can analyze and interpret data. [3(b)] ETechnical Skills I can use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for(F3) engineering practice. [3(k)] I can identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. [3(e)] I can think critically. I can apply my knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. [3(a)]Coursework My course work gives me practical engineering
Department.Bibliography1. B. Farbrother, M. Chow, M. Churpek, M. Woodruff, T. Schroeder, and T. Schroeder, “The EiR Program at Ohio Northern University: Paralleling the Workplace on the University Campus,” Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Engineering Education, Manchester, U.K.2. J. Hurtig and J. K. Estell, “Truly Interdisciplinary: The ONU ECCS Senior Design Experience”, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon.3. C. Dym, A. Agagino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, January 2005, pp. 103-120.4. J. M. Conrad and Y. Sireli, “Learning Project Management Skills in Senior Design Courses
to complete the project were: 1. Project definition 2. Technical specifications 3. Project planning and management 4. Project execution a. Feasibility analysis (algorithms development, functional modeling, performance estimation and simulation) b. Proof of concept prototype implementation and verification c. Final product development and verification d. Project documentation: development manual and user guide e. Final presentation and future workThe various steps were not always followed sequentially; and indeed there have been “feedbackloops” and “re-adjustment” in most of them.The purpose of step 1 and 2 was to define the project’s objectives as thoroughly and
programs in site designand survey data management will be introduced. Drainage, soil stabilization and erosion controlparameters, and design techniques are applied to site designs. Safety and geometric standards forroadway design and construction are incorporated into the course.”B. Sustainable Development Design Guidelines within a Proposed Sustainable Site Planning & Design Course Outline:According the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) there are over 70 different green buildingrating systems in the country. Nationally the USGBC’s Leadership in Energy andEnvironmental Design (LEED) is the most recognized for new commercial construction (LEED-NC). The USGBC also currently has 8 other rating systems including LEED for; Homes
programs in site designand survey data management will be introduced. Drainage, soil stabilization and erosion controlparameters, and design techniques are applied to site designs. Safety and geometric standards forroadway design and construction are incorporated into the course.”B. Sustainable Development Design Guidelines within a Proposed Sustainable Site Planning & Design Course Outline:According the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) there are over 70 different green buildingrating systems in the country. Nationally the USGBC’s Leadership in Energy andEnvironmental Design (LEED) is the most recognized for new commercial construction (LEED-NC). The USGBC also currently has 8 other rating systems including LEED for; Homes
optimization, machine design, fluid power control andengineering education. Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Regional Conference 256Appendix A: Accident Reconstruction MEAMemorandum To: Forensic Engineering Team From: H. M. B. G. Kotakadeniya, Senior Deputy Inspector General of Police, Sri Lanka Police Service RE: Traffic Accident Reconstruction Protocol Priority: [Urgent]Since 2003 your country has been making large aid efforts toward development and economicstabilization here in Sri Lanka. Relations have gotten
distribution with A = 1 and B = 7. In the(N + 1)st column compute the sample mean of the N columns for each of the 1000 rows.(a) For the case N = 25 compute the mean and variance of the sample mean using the (N +1)stcolumn statistics. Compare with the theoretical results. Note that you only have 1000 data pointsand hence the observed value would only be close to the theoretical but not exact. Attach thedensity plot and verify the normal distribution property of the Central Limit Theorem.(b) For the case N = 100 compute the mean and variance of the sample mean using the (N +1)stcolumn statistics. Compare with the theoretical results. Note that you only have 1000 data pointsand hence the observed value would only be close to the theoretical but not
." Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 2600.23. Pierrakos, O., Alley, M., Vlachos, P. (2006). "Using Research to Educate Freshman Engineers and High School Students about the Multidisciplinary Character of Engineering." Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 1470.24. Baker, M., Nutter, B., Saed, M. (2008). "Development of a Freshman and Pre-Freshman Research and Design Program in Electrical Engineering." Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 1459.25. Boudreaux, A., Crittenden, K., Nelson, J., Turner, G. (2008). "Increasing Student Success in
of Computing Sciences in Colleges, pp. 274-284, 2005.18. Holly Patterson-McNeill and Carol L. Binkerd, “Resources for Using Lego Mindstorms,” Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, pp. 48-55, 2001.19. Pamela B. Lawhead et al., “A Road Map for Teaching Introductory Programming Using LEGO Mindstorms Robots,” in ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 35, New York, 2003, pp. 191-201.20. Madeleine Schep and Nieves McNulty, “Use of Lego Mindstorm Kits in Introductory Programming Classes: A Tutorial,” Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, pp. 323-327, 2002.21. Myles F. McNally, “Walking the Grid: Robotics in CS2,” in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 165 Proceedings of the 8th Austalian conference on Computing education
do, inorder. Think in terms of what you have learned (or will learn) in this class.” There was onemultiple choice question concerning perceived impact of production decisions on theenvironment and the student was then asked their confidence about their response to thatquestion. This set of questions is shown in figure 2. How easily/compatible are environmental (green) issues with production systems? a. very compatible b. compatible c. not compatible d. not at all compatible What is the impact of waste in a production system on the environment? How confident are you about answering the previous questions correctly? a) I feel very confident I answered everything correctly b) I feel somewhat confident that
will be discussed.FunctionalityThe system through its camera recognizes a variety of medicine boxes (products) randomlycirculating on the conveyor belt. There are two modes of operation. In the automatic mode, thesystem completes one of the preprogrammed orders that is stored within the human-machineinterface (HMI) unit. An order contains the quantity and type information for the products in theorder. For example, 1: Box A, 1: Box B, 3: Box C make up an order. In the manual mode, HMIwaits for a user-input. User can specify the order through an interactive menu systemprogrammed in the HMI.The system will complete an order by inspecting the products circulating on the conveyor beltwhile robot arm and its camera are stationary at a pre-specified
. She recently won an award for maximum number of publications in a year from chemical engineering department at MSU. She is associated with Medical Micro Device Engineering Laboratory (M.D.-ERL) at MSU working under Dr. Adrienne Minerick. Soumya is been an active member of AIChE, AES, ASEE, SWE and Sigma-Xi.Anurag Srivastava, Mississippi State University Anurag K. Srivastava received his Ph.D. degree from Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT), Chicago, in 2005, M. Tech. from Institute of Technology, India in 1999 and B. Tech. in Electrical Engineering from Harcourt Butler Technological Institute, India in 1997. He is working as Assistant Research Professor at Mississippi State University since
funded by the National Science Foundation (DUE-0737277).References1. http://www.nsf.gov2. http://www.engineeringk12.org/Engineering_in_the_K-12_Classroom.pdf3. Jahan, K., Hesketh, R. P., Schmalzel, J. L. and Marchese, A. J. (2001). Design and Research Across the Curriculum: The Rowan Engineering Clinics. International Conference on Engineering Education. August, 6 – 10, 2001 Oslo, Norway4. Harvey, R., Johnson, F., Marchese, A. J., Newell, J. A., Ramachandran, R. P., and Sukumaran, B. (1999). Improving the Engineering and Writing Interface: An Assessment of a Team-Taught Integrated Course. ASEE Annual Meeting, St. Louis, MO.5. R.P. Hesketh, S. Farrell, and C.S. Slater, An Inductive Approach to Teaching Courses in
funded by the National Science Foundation (DUE-0737277).References1. http://www.nsf.gov2. http://www.engineeringk12.org/Engineering_in_the_K-12_Classroom.pdf3. Jahan, K., Hesketh, R. P., Schmalzel, J. L. and Marchese, A. J. (2001). Design and Research Across the Curriculum: The Rowan Engineering Clinics. International Conference on Engineering Education. August, 6 – 10, 2001 Oslo, Norway4. Harvey, R., Johnson, F., Marchese, A. J., Newell, J. A., Ramachandran, R. P., and Sukumaran, B. (1999). Improving the Engineering and Writing Interface: An Assessment of a Team-Taught Integrated Course. ASEE Annual Meeting, St. Louis, MO.5. R.P. Hesketh, S. Farrell, and C.S. Slater, An Inductive Approach to Teaching Courses in
scanning provides much faster inspection speedwithout the need to move the transducer and can also be used to produce a top-view (C-scan)image of a large area by moving a transducer doing raster scanning. Figure 4(b) depicts thefocusing operation. The focal law attached to each diagram tells the pulsing time delay for eachelement. It can be seen that different focusing depth corresponds to a different focal law.Figure 4(c) illustrates the steering operation which allows a single transducer to scan multipleangles compared to the single angle solution for the conventional ultrasonic technology. Moreimportantly, the capability of steering the beam for reaching limited-access regions within acomponent is extremely valuable for the inspection of parts
. Page 14.345.4 #include int main ( ) { int A, B, AplusB, AtimesB ; printf (“ input 2 numbers, A B”) ; scanf (“%d%d”, &A, &B) ; AplusB = A + B ; AtimesB = A * B ; printf (“ A + B = %d\n”, AplusB) ; printf (“ A x B = %d\n”, AtimesB) ; return 0 ; } Figure 1. A simple C language program that prompts the user for two numbers and then adds and