fundamentals and; (v) focus on the practice.The author, in principle, argues in favor of adopting the framework of integrated curricula. Thescenario proposed by Everett et al (8) appears to have produced impressive results that have comeabout as a consequence of the synergistic effect of four elements deemed necessary in the designof an integrated undergraduate engineering curriculum today. These elements are: · integration of science and mathematics into problem solving and design; · an emphasis on teaming and cooperative learning; · wider use of computers to improve design and problem solving throughout the educational experience; and · continuous assessment and evaluation of methods and outcomes.The Integrated
the curriculum relates to broader engineering themes on the way to Senior Design.Linkages of first year and senior design teams has shown early academic career engineeringstudents were able to effectively decide on whether engineering was an appropriate career path[14]. Future plans include organizing facilitated meetings between Freshmen and Seniorstudents, which could accelerate the development of engineering identity through role acquisitionand socialization [16, 17].ConclusionsThe Senior Design Capstone class in the Chemical and Biological Engineering department atMontana State University was integrated into three undergraduate classes at the freshman-juniorlevel. In Fall 2016, these efforts focused on using technical aspects of the
if not well thought out. In this paper, we focus on the use of an integrated online homeworkdelivery system based upon the Google online ecosystem, an integrated online delivery system for weekly quizzesthat follow the formats and guidelines of the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) national examination forprofessional engineers, as well as an integrated system of virtual lectures and office hours. Student performance wastracked weekly for 12 weeks throughout one semester. We present, statistics and comparisons, week after week,from student grades in administered quizzes, homeworks, as well as student assessment and overall insights from thepilot use of this framework towards improvements in other inter-disciplinary, large-audience courses in
, however, have observed that terms that are distinguished by theorists and scholarsare used interchangeably by faculty32-37. To capture this variation in our study, we definedinterdisciplinarity broadly to include curricular topics that require contributions from multipledisciplines, whether or not faculty seek to integrate disciplinary knowledge or insights.Influences on Faculty Members’ Curricular DecisionsIn a multi-institution, multi-field study of faculty course planning, Stark, Lowther, Bentley,Ryan, Martens, Genthon & others38 found that an overwhelming majority of faculty identifiedtheir own background, scholarly training, teaching experiences, and their beliefs about thepurposes of education as significant influences on their course
,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) field as a whole has failed to provideeducators with an adequate literature-based framework for the infusion of engineering designexperiences into the classroom. This includes determining proper sequencing of engineeringdesign activities and establishing what types of engineering design problems high schoolstudents are able to work or solve. This paper will attempt to ameliorate some of these issues bypromulgating a conceptual framework for introducing engineering design experiences to highschool students. We will address the following areas in regards to engineering design in highschool settings: situating engineering design in the curriculum, sequencing the engineeringdesign experience, selecting
(Riley and Lambrinidou, 2015) in engineering ethics literature, it is still not surprising tosee persistent reliance on presupposed “correct” responses for a given case; an overemphasis onheroic actions and unusual mistakes without contextual considerations; and the overlooking ofthe importance of society and peer culture in the teaching of ethics. In this paper, we argue thataddressing imaginal capacity as a core component in ethics curriculum helps educators movebeyond isolated and product-oriented pictures of engineering ethics instruction and we illustrateways to bridge complexities embedded in how we think and how we relate to one another insociety.Stimulating moral imagination has been recognized as one of the major goals of
characteristics. There is a great need foremphasizing interaction between material science, design and processing. Application-orientedcourses and research, such as the ones described here, seem to be more appropriate for theautomotive industry of the future.This paper describes first the graduate degree program in automotive systems engineering,followed by the curriculum in automotive materials and how it is integrated in the graduateprogram on automotive systems engineering. The automotive materials program is part of theCenter for Lightweight Automotive Materials and Proceessing, which was established in 1998with funding from the US Department of Energy under the auspices of the Graduate AutomotiveTechnology Education (GATE) initiative
academia for more than 15 years.Dr. Nicholas B. Conklin, Gannon University Nicholas B. Conklin received a B.S. in applied physics from Grove City College in 2001, and a Ph.D. in physics from Penn State University in 2009. He is currently an associate professor and chair of the Physics Department at Gannon University, Erie, PA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Assessment of Student Learning Experience in Two Exemplary Engineering ProjectsAbstractIn this paper, we examine and quantify similarities of two engineering projects each of which iseither 1) an undergraduate research project primarily integrating off-the-shelf devices and referredto as the
characterize student teams’ modeldevelopment as they proceed through a laboratory project. In this paper, the ModelRepresentations for 15 teams are examined as they complete physical and virtual laboratoryprojects in the senior year of the curriculum. Analysis of the Model Representation confirms thatthe virtual laboratory project affords students a richer opportunity for model development,modification, and use of evidence-based reasoning.IntroductionAs technology is integrated into classroom instruction, virtual laboratories have been receivingmore attention as an alternative mode to engage students and promote learning.1 Mostcommonly, the virtual laboratory is used as an alternative mode to deliver the correspondingphysical laboratory by simulating
amajor worldwide deployment surge adding generating capacity at a remarkable rate, alsoincreasing employment opportunities [2]. While many universities offer classes in powerelectronics and its role in renewable energy development, the enormous breadth of a modernelectrical curriculum leaves little room to expose students to the issues of grid integration [3]. Atypical first course in power electronics may well focus on the underlying power switchingtechnologies, but the relevance to the associated technologies may be limited [4],[5].Compounding this problem, the enabling technologies for renewable integration, embeddedcomputing, and controls, are seldom taught within a context in which their applicability toenergy production and distribution is
AC 2009-992: ENHANCEMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING IN EXPERIMENTALDESIGN USING VIRTUAL LABORATORIESMilo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He currently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Dr. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels.Christine Kelly, Oregon State University
, industrial engineering, and computer science, robotics can now play acentral role in the education of students in these disciplines. A critical obstacle to this goal,however, is the lack of familiarity that students in each discipline have for the other fields ofstudy, making a thorough understanding of overall robotics design principles quite difficult.This paper presents a model for multidisciplinary cooperation that alleviates this problem andelevates robotics to a potentially pivotal position in engineering education.I. IntroductionRobotics provides a comprehensive view of an integrated, fully engineered system. It affords aview of information processing from the microprocessor level up through the applicationsoftware, and it illustrates the
order to tacklethe interesting and challenging problems of the future. Survey questions 6 and 7 are aimed atunderstanding students’ perception of how engineering analysis techniques learned in engineeringscience courses inform the process of design learned in engineering design courses. Authentic designprojects across the curriculum lead students to break down the mental barriers that design is different inengineering science courses, and work toward an integrated perspective of engineering. Furthermore,understanding subsystems and how they interact is a qualitative reasoning skill that is often introducedin engineering design and plays a significant role in developing a system perspective of circuits. Surveyquestions 8 and 9 were given to
disruption to an already full curriculum by integrating engineering with existingscience lessons. Lessons are organized around the engineering design cycle concept as a unifyingframework. Sample curriculum modules developed to date include • Brainstorming about such topics as removal of leaves from the school grounds, or the absence of chalk in the classroom; • Testing the optimum amount of water needed in a water rocket (made from a 2-liter plastic soda bottle and pressurized by a bicycle pump) to introduce testing, data collection and graphing; • Designing a “dream house” to introduce sketching and economic design constraints; • Designing, building, and testing (using individual stream tables made out of foil
including NSF, NIDRR, VA, DOD, DOE, and industries including Ford and GM. Currently, Dr. Kim is the site director for the NSF Industry and University Cooperative Research Center (I/UCRC) for e-Design. Dr. Kim is an editorial board member of Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science. Dr. Kim received top cited article award (2005-2010) from Journal CAD and 2003 IIE Transactions Best Paper Award. Dr. Kim was a visiting professor at Kyung Hee University, South Korea from September 2013 to June 2014. Dr. Kim’s education includes a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from University of Pittsburgh.Carolyn E Psenka, Wayne State University Carolyn Psenka, PhD is a cultural anthropologist with research interests focused on the
integrated into Gonzaga's existing civil engineering curriculum while at thesame time providing Spokane County with an opportunity to prepare for the 2018 NPDES permitchanges by having students evaluate different BMP monitoring systems and the effectiveness ofthe BMP . The project started in the fall of 2013 as a civil engineering capstone design projectwith a team of students designing a multi-cell bio-infiltration pond equipped with a differentmonitoring systems. Year one activities are described in the case study section of this paper.During the summer of 2014, construction of the bio-infiltration pond BMP and monitoringsystems will occur on Gonzaga's campus. Post construction plans for this project are described inthe Future Plans and
skills and higher-order thinking, and an improvement in student achievement (Newberry & Hughes23, 2006).Claim 2: The course objectives integrate mathematics and science content with technology and engineering instruction through rigorous and relevant instructional tasks. PLTW’s curriculum makes mathematics and science relevant for students. The curricular objectives integrate math and science content as defined by NCTM20 (2000), NRC21 (1996), and AAAS1 (1993) and with standards for technological literacy as defined by the ITEA11 (2000) and enduring engineering concepts as identified by ABET, Inc. Criterion 3-Outcomes A-K (ABET2, 2007) By
cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Students’ Responses to Professionally Contextualized Activities in a Studio ClassIntroductionIn a project to “re-situate” learning to better align student work at school with the work they willdo in professional
Society for Engineering Education. June 2008.[3] Hull, W.R., Waggenspack, W.N., Bridwell-Bowles, L., Bowles, D., Choplin, T. “An Innovative Model forTeaching Communications Skills In the Engineering Curriculum” Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Conference ofthe American Society for Engineering Education. June 2009.[4] Hull, W.R., Waggenspack, W.N., Bowles, D. “Assessing the Integration of Communication into EngineeringCurricula” Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education. June2007.[5] Engineering Accreditation Commission, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective forEvaluations During the 2005-2006 Accreditation Cycle, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc.,Report, Nov
certificate programs require the completion of sixto nine credit hours compared to our requirement of 18 hours. Our belief was the completenessand integration that such an extended program provides would offset the length and associatedcost. However, the commitment to an extended course of study that does not yield a degree isoften difficult to make.We have found that non-engineers can successfully participate in technical management coursesoriginally designed for engineers. In fact, the mixing of these two populations appears to have apositive effect on both. The perspective that each population brings to class discussions andassignments enriches the learning experience of both.ConclusionSince its introduction in 1997, we have had two students enter
University Dr. Hyuksoo Kwon has completed his Ph.D. in the Technology Education/STEM Education program at Virginia Tech. His research interests are curriculum development, integrative approach among STEM subjects, and biotechnology education.Ms. Patricia Watson, Virginia Tech Patricia Watson is a PhD student in the Integrative STEM education program at Virginia Tech. She re- ceived her bachelor’s degree in technology education, also from Virginia Tech. After graduation, Patty spent eight years working for the Department of Defense Dependents Schools in Japan and Germany teaching technology education and instructional technology. During that time, she earned a master’s degree in educational technology from Michigan
through Transdisciplinary CourseworkAbstractIn the face of today's complex challenges, it is clear that the convergence of academic disciplinesin the support of creating innovative solutions is more important than ever. To enable thisconvergence, universities can adopt transdisciplinary learning experiences that promote theintegration of different academic fields. One common method for integration is the application ofdesign thinking methods and the development of cross-cutting innovation-focused skills. TheMission, Meaning, Making (M3) model is an example of a transdisciplinary educational modelthat aims to transform traditional undergraduate learning experiences by combining the strengthsof different academic units. The
of Chemical Processes, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1998. JOSEPH A. SHAEIWITZ received his B.S. degree from the University of Delaware and his M.S. andPh.D. degrees from Carnegie Mellon University. His research interests are in design and design education. Ofparticular interest is the use of performance problems to complement design problems, the integration of designexperiences throughout the curriculum, and assessment of learning outcomes. RICHARD TURTON received a B.Sc. from the University of Nottingham and an M.S. from Oregon StateUniversity. He then worked for 4 years in the engineering and construction industry prior to obtaining his Ph.D.from Oregon State University. His current research interests are
on enhancing undergradu- ate and graduate student learning, engagement, and workforce development by transforming biomedical engineering education through scholarship and research of innovative teaching and learning practices and technologies. He has worked in higher education for more than 35 years at state and private universities and an NCI comprehensive cancer hospital. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Professional Development Through High- Impact ExperiencesIntroductionThe Department of Biomedical Engineering at Texas A&M University (TAMU)comprehensively redesigned its undergraduate curriculum in response to a host
Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).Dr. Nicole P. Pitterson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University Nicole is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Prior to joining VT, Dr. Pitterson was a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University. She holds a PhD in Engi- neering Education from Purdue University and other degrees in Manufacturing Engineering from Western Illinois University and a B.Sc. in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the University of Technol- ogy, Jamaica. Her research interests are exploring students’ disciplinary identity through engagement with knowledge, curriculum design, assessment and evaluation and teaching for
each semesterhave a required course in which S-L projects are mostly required but in some cases optional. Lastacademic year (2010-2011) 1267 students were engaged in service-learning projects in theengineering college. The total enrollment for the college was 1600 the same year. An estimated49,500 hours were contributed to the community. One way to illustrate the number of courseswith S-L integrated into the curriculum is depicted in Figure 1. Each column represents anacademic year under its department. Within each column, dots with deeper shading indicate thatthe S-L was required for everyone in the course that semester. Lighter shading indicates that theS-L was a choice, or elective, opted by only some of the students in the course, usually
is the trustee of the Temple University Amateur Radio Club (K3TU, www.temple.edu/k3tu), which he has integrated into the undergraduate communications curriculum and capstone senior design projects. Dr. Silage is a past chair of the Middle Atlantic Section of the ASEE and now the Secretary/Treasurer of the ECE Division of ASEE. Page 11.1206.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Teaching Digital Communications in a Wireless World: Who Needs Equations?AbstractDigital communication is traditionally taught by examining the temporal and spectralresponse and the
whatengineering is and what it means to be an engineer. The module integrates the InnerDevelopment Goals (IDG), which is a framework of skills and qualities needed to address theUN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). The IDG were developed from a perspective thattechnical knowledge is not the limiting factor in addressing the climate crisis and relatedsocietal challenges, but rather, it is the emotional and cognitive skills of individuals andorganizations to fulfil the vision of the SDG. Learning activities throughout the year weredesigned to support students’ engineering identity, including the trajectory of theirconceptualization and the role, if any, that affective and macroethical considerations play.This work aligns with the LEES conference theme
Coordinator at Purdue Ella IngramP, R,*: The receiving school coordinator resides at an institution with an Associate Dean for interest in expanding their understanding of engineering education Professional Development research. Responsibilities include: & Associate Professor of Receiving ● provide job descriptions for available positions Biology and Biomedical School ● affirm that REEFE participants will be integrated into Engineering at Rose- Coordinators faculty/staff life as appropriate
student grades basedon individual performance. Despite the minimalist philosophy shaping the evolution of ourapproach, truly effective use of the system developed requires substantial time investment by theinstructor; we close by outlining an online system we are developing to largely automate theteam management process. Benefits of automation include real-time feedback to instructor andteam members, automated flagging of potential trouble, and automatic documentation ofcontributions/performance for individual team members.1.0 IntroductionThe past decades have brought a growing awareness of the value of integrating training in abroad range of “soft skills” – including teaming, project management, and oral and writtencommunication – into the