that faculty need immersive training in cultural responsiveness, and that suchtraining is the lowest hanging fruit [3]. Furthermore, Mack and colleagues clearly document thebreadth and depth of the cultural disconnect between engineering faculty and their students,explaining that this problem cannot be fixed with a checklist, and instead call for the cultivationof mindfulness among faculty [4].One reason that attempts to change faculty behaviors fail may be how independently facultyoperate in the classroom. Any attempt to shift teaching practices cannot rely on top-downmandates, but instead needs top-down support with bottom-up encouragement from colleagues,accompanied by a shift in the overall culture of a college of engineering. By providing
Paper ID #36072Correlations of Student Personality Components with First-Year StudentSuccess and RetentionDr. Matthew Cavalli, Western Michigan University Dr. Cavalli is Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and Associate Dean for Undergraduate Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences.Ms. Anetra Grice, Western Michigan University Anetra Grice is has served as the STEP Program Director for Western Michigan University’s College of Engineering and Applied Sciences for since 2010. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022
SESSION 2475 INTEGRATING TEACHING, RESEARCH AND SERVICE TO DEVELOP SCHOLARLY PUBLICATIONS Albert Lozano-Nieto The Pennsylvania State University School of Engineering Technology and Commonwealth Engineering P.O. Box PSU Lehman, PA 18627 Phone: (570) 675-9245 FAX: (570) 675-7713 email: AXL17@psu.eduAbstractThe publishing of scholarly work is one of the most critical elements at the time of
Session 3675 Excelling in Two Careers: A New Team Approach Ben Humphrey Parks College of Engineering and Aviation Saint Louis University INTRODUCTION Dual career family situations have traditionally been approached with the assumption thatboth spouses have individual careers and must integrate them into their family situations. Thispaper presents the viewpoint that one spouse can successfully administer two different careerssimultaneously, if the other spouse acts as organizer/augmenter to both careers (and
Paper ID #35511Partnering with Industry to Improve First Year OutcomesMrs. Jacqueline Faith Sullivan, University of Central Florida Since 2012, Jackie Sullivan (MSEnvE), has been an Adjunct Instructor at UCF (Orlando) in the College of Engineering and Computer Science (CECS) and has instructed the first year engineering students since 2015. Ms. Sullivan worked in consulting engineering and STEM program development prior to joining UCF.Mr. Mark Easley, Texas Instruments, Inc. The TI University Program is committed to engineering student success and supporting institutions of higher learning that will train the next
meet the needs of its students. Some practical examples from the past are:adjusting the placement and content of hands-on lab exercises to relate more closely to materialcurrent in students’ minds; identifying material not clearly conveyed in lecture; intervening withstudents who are having academic problems; and, uncovering misconceptions about course,College, or University polices. Clearly, if evaluations and comments were collected only at theend of the course, most, if not all, of these kinds of issues would either not come up or would Page 7.162.3 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference
, calculations and data. Survey resultsindicate positive outcomes in students’ awareness of the profession, skills required of anengineer, different disciplines, ethics, use of computer tools, core technical skills, and what realengineering problem look like. It is hoped that giving students a holistic view of engineering intheir first year, while helping them acquire the “habits of mind” [3] of professional practitioners,will provide them with a foundation for approaching the remaining curriculum with motivationand increased capacity to connect course material with their life experiences and aspirations.References[1] B. Seely, “Patterns in the History of Engineering Education Reform: A Brief Essay”,Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering
Statistics Computer Science Mechanical Engineering Technology Education Electrical Engineering Microbiology Theoretical & Applied Mechanics Environmental Engineering Molecular Biology Theoretical Biology Managing such a diverse program is surprisingly easy; primarily because of the energy andenthusiasm exhibited by the faculty and students alike. Furthermore, we consciously emulate thecooperative team environment that we are trying to foster in our students in every aspect ofcurriculum development, course delivery, and departmental administration.Contribution to Engineering Education: We must keep in mind that the goal of the
Session 1608 Development of Workplace Competencies Sufficient to Measure ABET Outcomes S. K. Mickelson, L. F. Hanneman, R. Guardiola, and T. J. Brumm Iowa State University/Iowa State University/ Development Dimensions, International/Iowa State UniversityAbstractThe opening paragraphs of the ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 state: “To be considered foraccreditation, engineering programs must prepare graduates for the practice of engineering at theprofessional level.” Criterion 3, Program Outcomes and Assessment, states, “Engineeringprograms must demonstrate that
possible toconceive in the human mind, it cannot reveal, amplify, or clarify that semi-to-subconscious state ofmind where much of the uniquely individual and human creative act takes place (Sorenson, 2007).It doesn’t really matter if mechanically engineered lines are drafted by triangle and T-square or bycomputer assisted design software. It does matter that the drawings should present the designers’personality and immediate response of solving the problem. Mechanically created images tend toproject a sense of sterility, of surreal environments devoid of the messiness of real-life experience,absent all evidence of human spirit or soul and passion (Sorenson, 2007). Thus, keeping freehandsketching in the schematic design phase and representing the
Session xxxx INTRODUCTION OF PLM CONCEPTS IN A GRADUATE INSTRUMENTATION COURSE Vijay Vaidyanathan, Roman Stemprok, Preethi Nagarajan University of North TexasAbstractProduct Lifecycle Management (PLM) is a vital component of a company’s function as it goesthrough various rites in passage from idea conception to development and finally to producttransition. The Electronics Engineering Technology program at UNT offers undergraduate as wellas graduate degrees in electronics. A graduate course in instrumentation design is offered as partof the core curriculum. It was decided
that arefor kids all ages. They keep children occupied and can challenge the mind of even the mostintelligent people. These toys possess the capability of providing high level learning skills.In order to increase student learning in design projects, these procedures have been implementedin a new elective chemical engineering course at Michigan Technological University, CM4900:Interdisciplinary Design. The project that the students worked on focused on the developmentand construction of a prototype bench scale reactor to mix three fluids together in a desiredproportion. For their electrical networks, students used one of two electronic kits to develop afoundation of knowledge in electronic circuits: · the BASIC Stamp II Microprocessor
Paper ID #40948Motivations of Students in a Thermodynamics CourseNancy J. Moore PhD, North Carolina State University The author is a Teaching Associate Professor at North Carolina State University in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department. She teaches undergraduate courses in the thermal-fluid sciences. She is the course coordinator for Thermodynamics I and has taught the course in the traditional lecture and flipped formats.Dr. Aaron Smith, Mississippi State University Aaron Smith is an Assistant Clinical Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Mississippi State University. He obtained his
leadership for the effort under this structure. While student participation can beeasily achieved if the activity can be offered for credit, as in a capstone design experience, itseems as if a club-type activity is a good alternative and involves many students from variousbackgrounds and with varying levels of ability. WPI has found that as the number of FIRSTalumni grows, such association forms naturally and forms the basis for student efforts in thecompetition.An important fact for universities to bear in mind is that FIRST includes thousands of highschool students predisposed to science and engineering. In order to reward the enthusiasm ofthese students and further pique their interest, WPI offers a full-tuition, four year scholarship toone FIRST
Cognitive Learning in Introductory College Science EducationEileen M. Kowalski, Department of Chemistry and Life Science, and Joe D. Manous, Jr.,Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering, United States MilitaryAcademyAbstract This research seeks to categorize dominant areas of cognitive learning weakness and strength withintraditional college-level, introductory science education. The basis of any undergraduate STEMeducation is an understanding of fundamental concepts and how these concepts describe or predictphysical phenomena. However, the apparent retention and understanding of basic concepts is sometimesminimal as expressed by student work during subsequent courses. Potential causes for this difficulty in
Cognitive Learning in Introductory College Science EducationEileen M. Kowalski, Department of Chemistry and Life Science, and Joe D. Manous, Jr.,Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering, United States MilitaryAcademyAbstract This research seeks to categorize dominant areas of cognitive learning weakness and strength withintraditional college-level, introductory science education. The basis of any undergraduate STEMeducation is an understanding of fundamental concepts and how these concepts describe or predictphysical phenomena. However, the apparent retention and understanding of basic concepts is sometimesminimal as expressed by student work during subsequent courses. Potential causes for this difficulty in
Cognitive Learning in Introductory College Science EducationEileen M. Kowalski, Department of Chemistry and Life Science, and Joe D. Manous, Jr.,Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering, United States MilitaryAcademyAbstract This research seeks to categorize dominant areas of cognitive learning weakness and strength withintraditional college-level, introductory science education. The basis of any undergraduate STEMeducation is an understanding of fundamental concepts and how these concepts describe or predictphysical phenomena. However, the apparent retention and understanding of basic concepts is sometimesminimal as expressed by student work during subsequent courses. Potential causes for this difficulty in
: letters, technical reports, etc. j. Use modern techniques, skills and modern engineering tools k. Use computing technology l. Recognize the need for and engage in life-long learning6. How can we improve OSU’s Capstone Program in preparing students for their professional career?7. How can we improve OSU’s Capstone Program experience for sponsors?8. Any other suggestions or comments? Page 26.958.18 Table A-2: Industry Sponsor Open-ended Survey ResultsHow can we improve OSU's Capstone Program in preparing students for their professionalcareer?Open their mind and provide more opportunities on industry experienceMore
Paper ID #9282Optimizing Summer ExternshipsMajor Hans J. Thomas P.E., U.S. Military Academy Hans Thomas is a Major in the US Army, and is currently an Instructor in the Civil & Mechanical Engi- neering Department at the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York. He has his Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Military Academy (2002), his Master of Science in Engineering Management from Missouri Science & Technology (2008) and his Master of Sci- ence in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the University of Washington (2012). His teaching focus is thermodynamics, fluid
. Forexample, faculty members are told to set goals, but they should also be told how to goabout choosing correct goals. This paper describes a process for setting specific careergoals and building a hierarchy of objectives to complete them. This makes long termgoals easier to handle by dividing them into smaller manageable goals (month-to-month). Since faculty members are only human, state of mind effects productivity. Lowmorale often leads to low productivity which in turn leads to time inefficiency. Burn-outand low morale are factors that can be accounted for with good goal setting. Forexample, instead of setting a goal in number of dollars of grant/contract money, set a goalwhich the faculty member has control over like number of proposals
Academic Emotions, and Achievement: A Mediational Analysis,"7 Ahern, A., et al., 2019, "A literature review of critical thinking in engineering education," Studies in Higher Education, 44(5), pp. 816-8288 Kellam, N., et al., 2018, "Exploring emotional trajectories of engineering students: A narrative research approach," International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(pp. 1726-17409 Immordino‐Yang, M.H. and A. Damasio, 2007, "We Feel, Therefore We Learn: The Relevance of Affective and Social Neuroscience to Education," Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), pp. 3-1010 Stedman, N.L.P. and A.C. Andenoro, 2007, "Identification of Relationships between Emotional Intelligence Skill & Critical Thinking Disposition in
Session 6-4 Innovative Design-Build Approach to Project-Based Learning Susan M. Bogus Civil Engineering Department University of New Mexico Kerry J. Howe Civil Engineering Department University of New Mexico AbstractAll undergraduates in the Civil Engineering Department at the University of New Mexico must takea senior capstone course in the last semester before graduation. The
AC 2011-1356: AN INVESTIGATION ON THE IMPACT OF THE DESIGNPROBLEM IN IDEATION EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCHGul E. Okudan Kremer, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Gul Kremer is an Associate Professor of Engineering Design and Industrial Engineering at the Pennsylva- nia State University. She received her Ph.D. from University of Missouri-Rolla in Engineering Manage- ment and Systems Engineering. Her research interests include multi-criteria decision analysis methods applied to improvement of products and systems and enhancing creativity in engineering design settings. Her published work appears in journals such as Journal of Mechanical Design, Journal of Engineering Design, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
Program of theNational Science Foundation under Award Number EEC-9876363. Page 6.334.9 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationBibliography:1. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). How people learn: Brain,mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.http://www.nap.edu/html/howpeople1/ (1999).2. Schwartz, D. L, Brophy, S., Lin, X. & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Software for managingcomplex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course
particularly opportune time to highlight the topic of innovation is through a courseon product and process design. A specific example is the two-semester course entitledProduct and Process Design, Development and Delivery (P2D3), an integral part of theMaster of Engineering and Management (MEM) curriculum at Case Western ReserveUniversity.3 Briefly, the MEM degree involved a one-year, 42-credit curriculum forB.S.-degreed engineers and computer scientists. It was launched in 2001 in thoughtfulresponse to much input from industry about the need for ‘business-minded innovators.’We currently have students from a broad spectrum of technical disciplines, includingbiomedical, chemical, civil, computer, electrical, mechanical and systems engineering, aswell
to apply, manystudents still viewed their mathematics classes favorably for the mental training they provided,which these students perceived as preparation for the logical, structured nature of engineering.As Ben (Year 2) said, “It's not necessarily to learn the math, like the material. It’s more to, like,train your mind to think a certain way.” Despite doubting that all topics seen in theirmathematics courses would be relevant to their future careers, a few students essentially equatedengineering and mathematics. As Connor (Year 3) put it, “You can’t do engineering withoutmath.… Engineering is math. It’s just math with meaning behind the numbers…. It’s a way ofgiving an explanation of how things work in the world.”Students who had no
inthe design of the afterschool engineering program, emerging in how Adina viewed problemsolving in this environment. In the robotics example, the problem seemed more straight forwardthan when her cousins were fighting. Adina’s acknowledgement that there are “always two sidesof the stories” brings to mind the different stakeholders in engineering design problems [4], [23].Connecting to the work that we were doing in the community engineering program, Adina wasthen asked about how she would describe the data-driven community engineering program: “Cooperative…instead of us just saying, ‘one person choose where they want to work at or work with,’ we all came together and was like, ‘you know what, instead of doing… instead of
. Page 8.1243.13• 11 tunnel boring machines (TBM): 6 undersea, 5 underland. “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”• Rate of advance of TBM (England side): best day - 75.5 m.• Rate of advance of TBM (France side): best day – 56 m.The main factors addressed in this project include:• Political factors related to the easy access the tunnel creates between two countries with different cultures, languages, laws, and policies.• Economical factors related to the enormous cost of the project and the rate of return on the investment.• Social factors related to the mind set created by the physical presence
Paper ID #37874Work In Progress: Developing a Faculty Community ofPractice to Support a Healthy Educational EcosystemNancy Warter-Perez Nancy Warter-Perez is the chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department and a professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at California State University, Los Angeles. For more than twenty-five years, Nancy has been dedicated to improving STEM education and outreach, particularly for minoritized students.Corin L. Bowen (Postdoctoral Researcher) Corin (Corey) Bowen (she/her/hers) is a postdoctoral researcher in the College of Engineering, Computer Science and Technology at
preferences.With the proper approach and information, the academic job hunt can be a manageable process witha favorable outcome. A logical set of steps to follow when seeking an entry-level academic position,with resources for each step as needed, form the framework of this paper.OverviewJob hunting information will be presented as a 16-step process. Figure 1 gives an overview of thewhole process, showing decision blocks. The rest of the paper elaborates on this breakdown. Page 8.882.1 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for