Reseachers Figure 9. small, especially for advancedcourses, and so self-publishing seems appropriate. For 50 years or more teachers haveself-published text material. In one of the author’s experience in 1960 one of his professors didan entire undergraduate service course in engineering on “dittos”, with hand writing, typing andhand sketches. The advent of the Xerox machine in the 60’s made it possible to incorporate partsof printed text material, especially figures, graphs and tables, and university reproduction centerscould use offset printing to provide alternative text material. Now Modern computer-generateddocuments using a word
. That is, they typically need assistance with identifying the deliverables andpossible resources available for the project. Further, Blumenfeld, et al.4 describe that studentsmust have the competence to complete a project satisfactorily or they will try to simplify theproblem and potentially provide less effort, striving to meet only the minimum requirements.Each of these project characteristics influence the level of interested held by students’ in theproject and whether or not they will enjoy the experience or simply suffer through a list ofrequirements. Gehringer 5, writing on the subject of independent studies, states that wiselychosen projects play a large part in students’ development because they typically engagestudents at a higher
, develop, and use cognitive tools in authentic domain activity” (p.39);that is, using tools increases cognitive activity and ability. Salomon writes of his disagreementwith Brown (above), and argues that the interaction between a human being and an intelligenttool (computer) results in a favorable “cognitive residue” (p.5) that does not result from theinteraction between a tool user and a non-intelligent tool (“situated”).7 The “cognitive residue”that results in these situations is that the use of intelligent tools may result in thinking skills beingtransferred to other dissimilar, or at least similar, situations (but the author notes that too littleresearch has been done in this area).Vygotsky’s notion that understanding is social in origin,8
to real-world expertise and mentoring from professionals in academia andindustry. HSE teams write business plans, solve real-world problems, perform testing andanalyses, build prototypes, manufacture parts, operate within budgets, and manage their projects.Each spring, HSE teams showcase their work alongside college students at the University’sUndergraduate Expo. At the conclusion of their HSE experiences, it is expected that the studentswill demonstrate proficiency in applied workforce skills, they will be more disposed to enterSTEM careers, and they will be prepared to undertake the training and education needed to enterthose careers.HSE is modeled after Michigan Technological University’s highly successful and nationallyacclaimed
. Page 24.1044.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Northeastern ADVANCE Research Leadership Development Initiative: A Program to Strengthen the Leadership Skills of Mid-Career FacultyAbstractAs part of the ADVANCE program, Northeastern University launched the Research LeadershipDevelopment Initiative (ReDI) in the fall of 2012 as a leadership program for associate and earlyfull professors. The goal is to prepare these rising research scholars to lead collaborativeresearch teams of peers in activities to create or grow centers, institutes, and/or multi-institutional collaborations. Through participation in the different program components
tenured faculty and four part-time facultyalong with one faculty jointly appointed with the Electrical and Computer EngineeringDepartment. The BS in Systems Engineering was ABET accredited in 2012. Both theundergraduate and graduate programs are also accredited by SACS (Southern Association ofColleges and Schools). In addition, the online program is certified by the USDLA (United StatesDistance Learning Association). The program has been growing by about 15-20 students per yearmainly due to growth in the undergraduate program since 2008 and due to the introduction of theonline MS in Engineering Management in 2009. To support this growth the program is recruitingtwo tenure-tracks and several part-time faculty at the time of this writing. SEEM has
Paper ID #6188STEM inSight: Developing a Research Skills Course for First- and Second-Year StudentsDr. Dirk Colbry, Michigan State UniversityDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Recruiting at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she received her Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published nearly two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational
Makes An Authentic Research Why Do I Have to Know This?Program for Girls Work?Awareness of College Scholarships Robotics Supports STEMUsing the Legacy Cycle to Challenge Leadership, Persistence, Mindset andStudents in STEM STEMEngaging Girls In STEM Beyond The Finding Your Passion – Presenting theClassroom Possibilities with STEMClues to becoming a STEM Major: How the Write Less, Think MoreSAT Questionnaire and AP exam takingpatterns & performance can predict STEMmajorsFlowers, Food, and Farms: An Edible Expanding STEM Options ThroughGarden STEAM Project Online ClassesThe Innovation Portal and the
ability to control. Consequently, they intend to share their knowledge with other students. However, Tohidinia and Mosakhani [8] contend that knowledge sharing involves both knowledge collection and donation. Entering students seem more willing to collect knowledge from their peers than donate to it. This situation represents a potential opportunity to target learning activities towards building knowledge sharing skills and confidence. Survey of the motivational design of the assignments themselves. Keller [9-12] contends that effective instruction employs a motivational design that (1) attracts and maintains student attention; (2) demonstrates the relevance of what students learn to important personal goals
include a graduate assistant, an undergraduate mentor, and five The initial thinking was that recruiting for the research undergraduate students. The research process is structuredcourse would be pretty easy as enrollment is up, and word of through a course module focused on conducting hands-onmouth from the current students would be an effective strategy experiments, developing solutions for real-life problems,for attracting other students. Unfortunately, according to the writing algorithms, presenting results in groups, classrooms,project leadership, even though the project was not designed and schools, reporting experimental results
writing five complete sentences immediately before the FSCQ questions. Overall, as anarrower and entirely quantitative instrument, the FSCQ was more desirable for this evaluation.The study by Brixton et al (2020) is notable for demonstrating that the three latent constructs offuture self theory are correlated but independent factors; however, it studies these relationshipsthrough multiple modified scales [29], whereas Sokol and Serper examine a single instrument,the FSCQ, across multiple studies. Notably, all three investigations use 10 years as a time framefor imagining the future, in alignment with the time frame used in the initial Future SelfContinuity Scale [21], which all three studies acknowledge as a seminal instrument.The ten questions
importance of finding and incorporating relevant data sources for theiranalysis. They also found that visualization is a powerful tool not only for presenting the finalresults, but also in framing their approaches for analyzing the problem. For example, studentsfound that spatio-temporal analysis using ArcGIS and the resultant visualization were veryinformative, helping them quickly grasp the main characteristics of the dataset. All the teamsincorporated results from spatio-temporal analysis with writing Python code to develop softwaresystems for bike flow prediction. All the students benefited from the process. The competitionformat engaged all team members to contribute to the outcome based on their individualbackground and skill
,only the first-year students exhibited a positive (though non-significant) trend in CD. Thiscontrast may reflect developmental differences between student cohorts. First-year studentsare typically in a period of social and academic transition, during which they are more likelyto engage with new perspectives and unfamiliar peers. In contrast, third-year students mayhave already formed more stable social networks and academic identities, potentially limitingtheir openness to intercultural engagement. These findings suggest that interventions aimed atenhancing global competence may need to be tailored to students’ developmental stages.3.2.Results of STEM COIL modules (one purely STEM COIL and one STEM COIL with supplementary history components
M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development.Kim-Doang Nguyen, Florida Institute of Technology Dr. Kim-Doang Nguyen is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the Florida Institute of Technology. His research interests include engineering education research, data science, machine learning, robotics, and dynamical systems. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Exploring the Role of Data Proficiency in Shaping Engineering
open-ended questions asked by the observer after the game. If participants were unable to write like the 1st graders, theFig. 4: Minimax decision tree with alpha-beta pruning (shown with red dashedlines). The diagram represents Emma's decision-making process. observer recorded their responses. Older graders wrote their answers directly on the paper. The responses on the post- To make the game a bit easier for the human player, the assessment survey helped to "identify the AI character theydepth of the game tree searched by the algorithm is limited
workstations that are updated on a two to three year cycle. New topics in the classes weretypically introduced every one to two weeks via a traditional lecture in which the instructor walksthe students through the rudimentary steps required to complete a particular task. Each topicconcluded with a lab assignment aimed at providing the students with practice and providinginstructors with a way to assess if students are meeting intended learning outcomes. Class timeduring the balance of the week was allocated to guided work sessions in which the instructor anda peer TA helped students work through the assignments. Thus, the courses followed the time-honored approach of delivering content to student followed by an immediate expectation for themto
6. AutoCAD exposureThe laboratory portion of the course continued to provide time each week for students towork on their specific capstone design, but this designated lab time became slightly morestructured. The first month of the semester, the course instructor guided the students tofocus on the planning aspects associated with their project. This phase of the courseconcluded with Planning Presentations and a chance for the students to share theirresearch and project goals with their peers and instructors. The rest of the semester, thestudents spent in the design/build (depending on the project) phase of their capstoneexperience. The semester still concluded with a final presentation where the studentsreported their results and summarized
detailed explanations of science and engineering are used throughout the course alongwith replaying some clips related to each relevant topic.Rockets and Launch VehiclesThen, once the reasons for going to space are established, the first critical technology thatenables spaces exploration is rockets. In class, several examples of rockets are introduced whichare connected (one of the 3C’s) back to the Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) which Mark Watneyuses to finally escape Mars. In the associated laboratory, students build water rockets and launchthem exploring variables like number of fins for stability, pressurization of the water, and massratios (fuel to vehicle mass) that give the longest flights (Figure 2). The students are then askedto write a
: Engineering Communication: from principles to practice (with Dr. Peter Eliot Weiss) and Writing in Engineering: a brief guide, both with Oxford University Press. He teaches enginee ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Building Sociotechnical Competencies through an Integration of Engineering Ethics and Science, Technology and Society Studies: A Reflection on Instructional PracticesIntroductionWith the goal of providing engineering students with a solid grounding in sociotechnicalthinking, and an opportunity to explore the complexities of sociotechnical systems, engineeringcurriculum can draw from a combination of engineering ethics and STS (Science, Technologyand Society) studies to offer students
1g also address DEI within Society, namely, “treatall persons with respect, dignity, and fairness, and reject all forms of discrimination andharassment” (Provision 1f) and “acknowledge the diverse historical, social, and cultural needs ofthe community, and incorporate these considerations in their work” (Provision 1g).The Natural and Built Environment, Profession, and Peers are identified as stakeholder groups 2,3, and 5, respectively. Equity appears in a number of places. Provision 2c of the ASCE Code ofEthics requires engineers “to mitigate adverse societal, environmental, and economic effects,” 3erequires engineers to “promote mentorship and knowledge-sharing equitably with current andfuture engineers,” 5d requires engineers to “promote
their own experiences and needs while neglecting the lived realitiesof marginalized communities. Additionally, these leaders shape privacy and accessibility policiesto serve corporate interests—protecting profits and consolidating power—at the expense ofusers. This is becoming exacerbated as these CEOs and tech leaders are gaining power ingovernment and access to large data sets. Still, there are some ways that their power is beingdestabilized. A recent example (as of the writing of this paper) of this is DeepSeek, anopen-source model that was developed in China and cost far less to create than other AIplatforms, including OpenAI [21].This disconnect between the people who use technology and those who create it has significantimplications for
., Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET))requirements. It is critical to identify and create best practices that will support both students andsponsors to ensure the achievement of educational requirements (e.g., ABET, technical writing),project deliverables, and student success. The research goal is to identify collaborativetechniques to support project mentors (e.g., instructors, industry partners, faculty) and studentteams, and help determine the type and scope of projects best suited for remote collaboration. Inaddition, we aim to investigate how to determine teaming strategies for fully remote teamsappropriate to the various expectations of project outcomes (computational/theoretical solutionsversus physical prototypes, for
tool for VW experiences,especially among younger audiences. With millions of active users under age 13, Robloxprovides an engaging and immersive environment where children can explore virtual worlds,create games, and socialize with peers [2]. This platform has attracted significant attention fromboth educators and researchers for its potential as a learning tool. Studies have shown thatRoblox fosters creativity and collaboration, allowing children to experiment with gamedevelopment, storytelling, and design. Its user-friendly interface and wide range of gamesappeal to children, while its open-world nature allows for exploration and interaction within asafe, controlled environment. However, despite its entertainment value, concerns have
fourteen working lab stations and flight zone is performed. Then, at the end of the course,the students have an experiential learning where the real-time implementation of controlstrategies is useful to bring theory closer to practice. In coming years, the use of augmentedreality based on animated characters already created will be considered, and the department willmonitor the success of the program through alumni surveys and feedback.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of Writing Lab, Institute for theFuture Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico, in the production of this work. Also, theuse of the Intelligent Control Lab and all the support provided by the Regional Dean of theSchool of Engineering and
, andspaced learning. Additionally, textbook pre-reading assignments and group peer discussionvideos were also available as extra credit throughout the entire course. Feedback was given tostudents for the first two active recall, concept mapping, and weekly schedule assignments, andthe rest was graded for completion. Students were also given a weekly learning journal, whichprompts students to reflect on their learning for the last week, the utility values of the learningstrategies they used for the prior week, and monitor their learning progress as well as makenecessary adjustments. The learning journal assignments (through Google Form) weremandatory up to week 5, and became extra credit assignments later in the quarter, as feedbackwas received from
libraries; they store knowledge for the long term. Cardcatalogs tell us where to find books, just like a FAT or an index block tells us where to find filesegments. Library stacks provide organization much like directories. Some books reside in the“restricted section” just like some files have access restrictions. (This analogy is Galilean in thatlibraries are generally read-only whereas files are frequently read-write.)AssessmentsEach topic was covered on either a midterm or final exam to assess student learning. We use thestudents’ grades on the relevant exam question to assess their understanding of the specifictopic.Data CollectionTable 1 documents the dates of the lessons in which the analogy topics were covered. For eachtopic, it also
disciplinesSupporting LiteratureWithin colleges of engineering, a fair amount has been written over the past several decadesabout designing and incorporating interdisciplinary elements [4]. The importance and relevanceof interdisciplinary education and perspectives is gaining traction; the evidence is seen throughample studies in engineering journals and conference proceedings. New courses and programsdiscussed in the conference proceedings arena alone include Waidley and Bittner [5], Cone, et al.[6], Kurtanich, et al. [7], Backer and Bates [8], and Cho, et al. [9]. The peer-reviewed literatureand other conference proceedings offer more and innovative examples of how to includeperspectives, knowledge and skills across engineering curriculum.However, among
research focuses on the role of curriculum on student access, success, and persistent.Prof. Hyoung Jin Cho, University of Central Florida Professor Hyoung Jin Cho is the Associate Chair of the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Central Florida. He coordinates two undergraduate programs – B. S. Mechanical Engineering and B. S. Aerospace Engineering. He has published over 130 peer-reviewed journal and ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Paper ID #47611proceeding papers. He has 12 and 6 patents granted in the U.S. and Korea, respectively, in the areas ofsensors
measured in four intervals from project release to project completion.consistently higher than their peers who choose not to attend. While this trend occurs to somedegree in Figure 6 as well, the grades are closer together and the standard deviation is widerdespite the smaller sample size in the Winter semester. There are of course outliers– the scores ofstudents who visited 6-15 times for Fall 2024’s Project 4 experienced a spread that did not followthis trend. Additionally, in both terms it appears that while rare, attendance over 15 times for oneproject did yield higher scores, but that scores at or higher were attainable by students notattending this many times. On all but the first project, the students in the Fall 2024 semester whoattended
communication skills through practice. 4- Innovative engineers also encourage one another through peer instruction, professional associations, and group work. 5- Finally, the education of innovative engineers involves sympathetic mentors who provide resources, inspiration, and awareness of the contribution of previous generations.The Framework aims to provide explicit instruction to help students acquire the skills in this list,including skills not explicitly taught in the traditional engineering classroom. Consistent with the valuesof the Framework, students need practice to develop the self-direct learning skills of reading andnotetaking. While pedagogical research has shown some benefit to video resources for class preparation[13], [14