context in engineering design, and the use of reflection to support learning.Soraya Grace BararDr. Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington Dr. Jennifer Turns is a full professor in the Human Centered Design & Engineering Department in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co-director of the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE, funded by the Helmsley Charitable Trust), a member
they liked or disliked them. They were asked to provide theiroverall comments and thoughts on improving the experience. The educator who attended thefield trip also completed a post-trip survey and provided further feedback during a follow-upmeeting two months later.Project Context: An On-Site Laboratory Experience for High School EducatorsOur outreach effort was made to Riverside High School (RHS), a Durham, NC Public School(DPS)-supported Career and Technical Education (CTE) pathway institution. RHS offersPLTW’s Pathway to Engineering (PTE) and Computer Science (CS) curricula, emphasizingScience, Engineering, Technology, and Math (STEM) in all aspects of its engineering education.In an effort to focus on what the school educator most needed
Mid-Career Advancement (MCA) award. She is passionate about Engineering Education and experienced in developing inverted classroom lectures and facilitating students’ learning through authentic engineering problems. She was the Co-PI for the NSF Revolutionizing Engineering and Computer Science Departments grant awarded to the Mechanical Engineering department at Seattle University to study how the department culture changes can foster students’ engineering identity with the long-term goal of increasing the representation of women and minorities in the field of engineering.Dr. Kathleen E. Cook, Seattle University Kathleen Cook, Ph.D. is a Professor in the Psychology Department at Seattle University. Dr. Cook
Paper ID #41264A Wellness Course for Engineering StudentsGlaucia Prado, University of California, Davis Glaucia Prado is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in Chemical Engineering at University of California Davis. She began her career in food engineering from the University of Campinas (Brazil) before earning a PhD in chemical engineering from the University of Alberta. She teaches a variety of courses such as thermodynamics and senior design and developed a new food engineering elective course for chemical engineering students that consists in applying engineering concepts in the context of food processing. Her
that are directly applicable to professional work such as writing emails, making valuable presentations, presenting data in an easy way so people can understand it. Little things that I constantly practiced in my EWB undergraduate career that I didn’t necessarily know would be valuable in my career. I think those day-to-day activities, the leadership component. I don’t think the people skills I learned I thought would be as valuable until post-grad. (Crystal)Communication was also pointed out by James. I think I do value the communication and how some of our meetings went, because I can kind of see that when I'm in meetings now, I know how to lead a meeting better. I'd never really done that
assigned new advisers who were faculty basedon their chosen emphasis areas representing their career interests who would then advise themthrough graduation. In the AE program, students were advised by a faculty adviser for the firsttwo years. Following professional admission, AE students were assigned to other faculty advisersbased on their chosen emphasis areas.In the AST program, students were assigned to multiple faculty who advised them from entry tograduation. AST students reported positive feedback to having the same adviser throughout theprogram highlighting the importance of the cohesive norm in academic advising. However, notall AST advisers had the bandwidth to learn and use the new advising and student successplatforms that were
, “Work in Progress: Development and Facilitation of aNew Certificate/Class for Undergraduate Teaching Assistants in Engineering and ComputingPrograms,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Baltimore, Maryland,USA: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/44221[2] D. Lopatto, “Undergraduate Research Experiences Support Science Career Decisions andActive Learning,” CBE-Life Sci. Educ., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 297–306, Dec. 2007, doi:10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039.[3] S. Kaul, C. W. Ferguson, P. M. Yanik, and Y. Yan, “Importance of UndergraduateResearch: Efficacy and Student Perceptions,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & ExpositionProceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016
in interactive activities that apply quality engineeringprinciples, the program ensures they not only understand these concepts but can also effectivelyapply them. The curriculum's emphasis on Statistical Process Control, Lean Six Sigma, andadvanced quality tools equips students with the knowledge and tools necessary to drive qualityexcellence. This intensive, hands-on approach serves as a launchpad for their careers as qualityexperts.The primary objective of the Quality Engineering Boot Camp is to empower participants with theknowledge, skills, and confidence to excel as quality engineers in today's rapidly evolvingindustrial landscape. To achieve this overarching goal, the curriculum objectives aremeticulously designed to gain competence
-technicalaudiences, such as users, managers, and other professionals. Therefore, in addition toengineering coursework, technical oral and written communication skills help prepare studentsfor their future careers. The Society for Technical Communication defines technicalcommunication as “a user-centered approach for providing the right information, in the rightway, at the right time so that the user’s life is more productive” [2]. Over the past two decades,many institutions have established technical communication labs to guide and train students inthese technical communication skills, emphasizing oral and written communication for business,engineering, and the sciences over the humanities. Compared to technical communication labs, writing centers
, students’ certainty in their choice of major significantlyincreased from the beginning to the end of the semester. Based on the survey results, a modulewas added to the course to familiarize students further with job opportunities associated withvarious engineering/computer science majors. This work provides context for recruiting studentsinto engineering and computer science majors and for integrating information on careeropportunities into first-year courses.IntroductionThe major students select before or during the first year of their studies at the university impactsthem significantly for the rest of their careers [1], [2]. These impacts include job satisfaction,socioeconomic status, and career success. Therefore, investigating the factors
research activities outside the classroom, such as participatingin summer research internships, fellowships, programs, and guided research projects.Undergraduate research experience serves as a valuable platform for fostering students' interestin research, attracting more individuals to pursue advanced degrees in Science, Technology,Engineering, and mathematics (STEM)-related fields, and cultivating a well-trained and diverseworkforce in STEM careers. The impacts and benefits of the REU program have been confirmedby several large-scale surveys [1-6].Recognizing the importance of involving undergraduate students in meaningful research andscholarly activity alongside faculty members [6], numerous REU sites have garnered supportfrom various agencies
pursuing environmental justice for these communities is urgent. Many URMfaculty engage in CER and work to help their communities, and these faculty are seen as trustedallies to enhance the adoption of EnvE technology [24],[25],[26]. CER requires intrinsicallymore holistic approaches that challenge the typical engineering culture that views itself as expert,technophilic, depoliticized, and disengaged from public welfare [27],[28],[29]. Evidencesuggests that URMWF who utilize CER methods often have the rigor of their scholarly activitiesquestioned or discounted as service [30], which can have deleterious consequences for early andmid-career faculty. Thus, it is of concern that research methodology and focus choices might addto other biased practices
institution’s IRB was obtainedbefore any survey data was collected. The survey included four open-ended questions, sevenclosed-ended questions, and questions about demographic information. The open-ended questionstarget students’ conceptualization and relationship with engineering design. To begin, studentswere asked the following four open-ended questions: 1. In your own words, what is engineering design? 2. Describe up to two components of engineering design that you consider to be especially challenging. 3. Describe up to two components of engineering design that you consider to be straightforward or simple. 4. How and to what extent do you think you will use the engineering design process in your future career?The closed-end
construction courses where the XR framework can be included asin-class activities to promote knowledge retention and lays out modules of XR activities. The paperprovides an overview of how students can understand the fundamentals of utilizing advanced toolsin their classroom, which helps them graduate career ready. Overall, with this innovative XRframework, higher education institutions can provide an immersive and effective learningexperience while meeting the stringent requirements of accrediting bodies.Keywords: XR framework, Construction technology, Student learning outcomes, constructionaccreditationIntroductionConstruction Management (CM) is a popular and well-established degree program offered bynumerous institutions in the United States and
AC 2011-2472: MAKING A COLLEGE-LEVEL MULTIDISCIPLINARYDESIGN PROGRAM EFFECTIVE AND UNDERSTANDING THE OUT-COMESShanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Research Scientist in the College of Engineering and the Design Science Pro- gram at the University of Michigan. Her research focuses on teaching and learning design and innovation strategies in interdisciplinary contexts.A. Harvey Bell, University of Michigan . Harvey Bell, IV was appointed Professor of Engineering Practice and Co-Director of the Multidisci- plinary Design Program on September 1, 2010 after a 39 year career in the automotive industry with General Motors. During his career with General Motors some of his significant positions
opportunities and specialchallenges to the incorporation of engineering into the traditional school day. Lessons learnedover six years through several federal, state, and corporate-sponsored programs show that:blending research-based engineering curricula and professional development with scienceinquiry and support for science content learning for teachers has significant impact on teacherlearning and student learning; that elementary teachers, students, and other stakeholders embraceengineering once initial concerns are allayed through professional development and evidence onlearning gains; that awareness of engineering careers and engineering/technology contributionsto society increases; and that addressing the particular needs of various partners
AC 2011-630: THE ACADEMIC EFFECTS OF COOPERATIVE EDUCA-TION EXPERIENCES: DOES CO-OP MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN ENGI-NEERING COURSEWORK?Caroline R. Noyes, Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Caroline R. Noyes is the Assistant Director of the Office of As- sessment at Georgia Tech. Caroline received her A.B. in Psychology from Randolph-Macon Woman’s College, her M.A. in Student Affairs and Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the University of Geor- gia. After a faculty career teaching psychology, she changed career paths to focus on assessing student learning and institutional effectiveness.Jonathan Gordon, Georgia Institute of TechnologyJoe Ludlum, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Ludlum
with poorly developed andmarginally developed spatial skills. Variables to be examined include: grades in graphics,mathematics, and science courses and retention rates.BackgroundSpatial cognitive skills have been an area of educational research over the past century. In 1964,Smith1 reported that there were at least 84 careers (mostly in the Science, Technology,Engineering and Math (STEM) fields) for which spatial visualization skills play an importantrole. Given the explosion of “new” technical careers since 1964, it is likely that this number ismuch higher today. Others have examined the role of spatial skills in career success. Norman2,found that a person’s spatial skill level was the most significant predictor of success in his/herability
Industrial Engineering Universidad de Piura, Peru 1994Reynaldo Villar, Universidad de Piura Principal professor. Universidad de Piura-Per. Industrial engineering Universidad de Piura 1978-1984 Page 22.1321.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Statistical approach for measuring the effectiveness of a remedial program for low-achieving undergraduate engineering candidates in PerúAbstractIn Perú most University students who choose an Engineering career do not meet the minimumacademic standards required to succeed during the first semesters of their undergraduate studies.Therefore
distinguished career in IT education, and has made significant contributions to the field of IT. He acquired his PhD degree in Computer simulation of high speed communication networks from University Of South Florida, USA. He has over 20 years of experience in teaching/ research and development in IT related fields and has published over 100 research papers in prestigious international Journals/conferences. Some of his notable research works include: Design of Opto Electronic Interconnect System for next genera- tion super computers, a project funded by Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA) USA; Sensitivity enhancement of long-haul optical fiber communication systems funded by Graduate School University of South
to theEET curriculum several years ago. The demographics of the particular student population and theirimmediate careers suggested that most students would not pursue graduate studies in computerengineering, nor would they seek employment related to design and manufacture of IntegratedCircuit components. As a result, a much broader and deeper study of modern digital designmethodologies has not been a necessity. The informal feedback received from recent graduates inthe industry has validated the adopted approaches while those pursuing graduate studies appreciatethe depth of the curriculum as well.At undergraduate level, digital designs described in HDL can start at two main different abstractionlevels: at the schematic level, or at the
expectations about theirSTEM interests and abilities before they enter middle school. Little research explores the ways inwhich parents and elementary teachers, whose science and math skills are often lacking, mightsubtly (or explicitly) influence children’s interest and achievement in science and math.Research and intervention projects since How Schools Shortchange Girls1 indicate patterns ofprogress in improved instruction and innovative learning opportunities.2 Still, many brightstudents, particularly women and minorities, choose not to pursue engineering careers.3 AsHalpern et al.4 assert the differences in male and female expectations and choices regardingSTEM learning are much more complex than previously assumed. So too, the perceived gendergap
encourage K-12 students to explore engineering andresearch careers, and 2) to enhance the communication and research skills of graduate fellows.To achieve these goals, during workshops teachers participate in a wide range of researchexperiences designed by fellows to introduce and update teachers to their research areas.Graduate fellows conduct Master’s thesis research in Computer Science, Computer/Electrical Page 22.574.2Engineering, Bioinformatics, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, CivilEngineering, Biology, Chemistry, Physics, and Math. CSULA faculty train fellows through apreparation course and workshops in order to improve
articulation of several reasons why remainingon quarters would be increasingly difficult to sustain.Reasons precipitating a calendar conversion at RIT include the following: Difficulty in facilitating student transfers, Misalignment of calendars with the majority of other academic institutions in the U.S. and abroad, Messy and confusing academic credit conversions, Barriers to facilitating global education – most particularly in study abroad and exchanges of various types for students and faculty, and Obstacles in hiring students for careers and cooperative (coop) educational experiences.Ultimately, a decision to convert the academic calendar from quarters to semesters at RIT cameinto the sharpest focus when
AC 2011-1903: ASSESSING FIRST-YEAR PROGRAMS: OUTCOMES, METH-ODS, AND FINDINGSMarie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an associate professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center. Her research focuses on communication in en- gineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, and design education. She was awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study expert teaching practices in capstone design courses na- tionwide, and is co-PI on several NSF grants to explore gender in engineering, design education, and interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering design.Kelly J Cross, Virginia Tech University
sponsors both REU sites and REU Supplement for NSF-funded research projects. REU is getting more and more attention from educators. One of themain benefits of REU that has been extensively discussed in literature is its impact on a students’decision to pursue a graduate degree and a career in the science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) workforce3,4,6,8,11,32. Other benefits include student retention15, researchskills learned by students8, and learning other skills such as teamwork, communication, andpresentation7. Hackett7 studied several impacts of undergraduate research and compared it withcooperative educational experiences for engineering students. Boylan3 provided an informativesurvey on undergraduate research. While there is
, improving access to clean water, and enhancing virtual reality. In itsreport, “Educating the Engineer of 2020,” the NAE contends that solving problems, such asthose posed in the Grand Challenges, will require more than just providing students withtechnical training. An engineering education must, it is argued, produce graduates who combinetechnical excellence with a multitude of other skills including communication, teaming, ethicalreasoning, and contextual analysis1. Yet, without exposure to real-world applications in thecontext of a technical education, students may neither develop these important skills nor gainsufficient motivation to pursue careers in engineering. A key finding within the currentengineering education literature is that
language (English),and a large practical component. Neither the industry nor the alumni expected thatBachelor’s degree graduates would be able to operate in research and development.Instead, they would act as assistants, laboratory or test bed supervisors, ordesigners; to be responsible for technical documentation or customer care. Only aMaster’s degree would qualify them to become fully fledged engineers who couldbear project responsibility and work autonomously on new technological researchand development.Two further questions were also significant in the design of the new curricula: How important and useful was the knowledge gained in a diploma degree of study for the graduates when starting their career? How important and useful was the
context of current high school science classrooms that sufferfrom many problems: 1) state standards typically require many different topics to be reviewed ina time-frame that is unrealistic; 2) students may not appreciate why the material is relevant toeveryday life or their future careers; 3) many teachers do not fully understand the content theyare teaching; and 4) many teachers have weak inquiry-based pedagogical skills 5.To change this situation, we must have teachers do more than create a few lectures or demosbased on their summer research experiences and we must provide a large amount of support forteachers to help them create powerful learning experiences in their classrooms. Our curricularapproach is 6-to-8-week-long DBL experiences that
environment and the on-goingchanges in affirmative action offer little to remedy the situation. After attending technicalsessions and panels, many students indicated a change in their self-confidence and their approachto the engineering profession. They expressed a belief that they better understood therequirements and qualifications necessary for the next step in their career. I was also invited to a private party with FMC. I got a chance to talk to several representatives. The atmosphere was very laid back and everyone was having fun. The representatives were impressed that a freshman was so interested in a career so young. When I finally left the party I felt really good about myself and that I had accomplished something