AC 2008-319: THE FORMATION OF CONTEMPORARY ENGINEERClaudio Brito, Council of Researches in Education and Sciences Claudio da Rocha Brito is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering; President of Council of Researches in Education and Sciences (COPEC), President of Fishing Museum Friends Society (AAMP), President of (Brazilian) National Monitoring Committee of "Internationale Gesellschaft für Ingenieurpädagogik" (IGIP) and Vice-President of Organization of Researches in Environment, Health and Safety (OPASS). He is Chairman of Working Group "Ingenieurpädagogik im Internationalen Kontext" and Member of International Monitoring Committee in IGIP, Council Member of "International
enjoyed all of the guest lectures. I hope to take moreclasses throughout my four years at Vanderbilt in the field of Rehabilitation Engineering”.Another student has applied for a summer internship in Rehabilitation Engineering at theUniversity of Pittsburgh based on her newfound interest in the field.One student was so affected by the course that she is now considering career in RehabilitationEngineering. She wrote “I started out in BME thinking it would be a good Pre-Med track, butbecause of your class I think I've changed my mind. I wanted to be a doctor because I wanted tohelp people. And I wanted to be an engineer because I love math and science and, in general,fixing things. But then, when I started to learn about all the different ways to
Paper ID #7375Information Graphics and Engineering DesignProf. Marjan Eggermont, University of Calgary Associate Dean of Student Affairs Marjan Eggermont works within the Schulich School of Engineering at Calgary. Eggermont is also the interim associate dean-international, the senior instructor design and communication, for mechanical and manufacturing engineering and the editor/designer of ZQ | zqjour- nal.com. Page 23.749.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
, the undergraduates have to consider many different issueswhen creating activities. The activities must be easy enough for the students to recreate and they Page 8.1218.2must also be inexpensive and easy for the teachers to understand. Because they work with a “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society of Engineering Education”variety of grade levels and schools, undergraduates must keep these concerns in mind whencreating activities. For the circuit activity, to keep costs down a three-way switch was created outof a small
AC 2010-166: INNOVATION IN ENGINEERING DESIGN AND EDUCATIONHoward Eisner, George Washington University Page 15.738.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 INNOVATION IN ENGINEERING DESIGN AND EDUCATIONAbstract This paper explores innovative approaches to both the engineering design process as well aseducation regarding engineering design. First, the engineering design process is discussed as adistinct two stage procedure involving (a) architectural design, and (b) subsystem design. Thesteps in these two stages are articulated and examined. Innovative aspects of the engineeringdesign process are then discussed in terms of some of the ways of “thinking outside the box
concentrate on the K-12 valves since thefirst valve, elementary school, has the largest impact on the quantity of the output, the middleschool valve has the second largest impact, and so forth. However, the valves over which we(the university) have control are at the university-level: first year experience, sophomore, juniorand senior-level valves. Thus, from our standpoint, we achieve the largest impact by focusing onthe first valve at the university-level: the First Year Experience (FYE).However, we also recognize that the K-12 valves have far greater potential to affect the totalflow rate. With this in mind, at UNR the College of Engineering is partnering with the Collegeof Education on all aspects of this project. Thus, while we are focusing on
2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for EngineeringAlthough in some cases the boundaries between Service Scholarship and Scholarship ofTeaching and Learning and the Scholarship of Research and Discovery are not clearly definedand may overlap, it is necessary to keep in mind that those boundaries are artificial as all thescholarship activities of faculty members follow a continuum. From the point of view ofpromotion and tenure, the deciding committees have mostly given a very low priority to theservice activities. Even new faculty member are strongly encourage to limit the extent of thistype of activities. However, by adding the
Using Tablet PCs in Engineering Education Joseph G. Tront Bradley Department of Electrical & Engineering Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA 24061-0111 jgtront@vt.eduAbstractThis paper describes the experiences of using Tablet PCs along with associated software, such asClassroom Presenter and OneNote, in a course entitled Introduction to Computer Engineering.Twenty tablet PCs were distributed in a classroom of 40 students. Students used the tablets on adaily basis throughout the semester to take notes, to respond to in-class exercises, and to performwork
additional content that would bring the course in line withcurrent trends. Weaknesses in the existing course were: • Little reinforcement of concepts • Tenuous linkage to real-world engineering problems • No exposure to commercial softwareWith these weaknesses in mind, the multidisciplinary course has been updated to include twosoftware packages commonly used by today’s practicing engineers, Excel, by Microsoft, Inc.,and Matlab, by The MathWorks, Inc. The basic concepts, such as root finding, simultaneousequations, optimization, curve fitting, and numerical differentiation and integration, are coveredas before, in traditional methods. In addition, each topic is now augmented with lecture materialand demonstrations on Excel and
Professor, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, 2002.12. Wankat, P.C. and Oreovicz, F.S., Teaching Engineering, McGraw-Hill, NY, 1993. Free at .13. Rogers, G. M. and Sando, J. K., Stepping Ahead: An Assessment Plan Development Guide, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN, 1996.14. Light, R. J., Making the Most of College. Students Speak Their Minds, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001.15. Katehi, L., Banks, K., Diefes-Dux, H., Follman, D., Gaunt, J., Hahgighi, K., Imbrie, P. K., Montgomery, R., Oakes, W., and Wankat, P., “Development of Graduate Programs in Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, (in press). Biography: PHILLIP C
Globalization of Engineering Ethics Education Nael Barakat, Ph.D., P.Eng., Assistant Professor, Mechanical Engineering, Matthew C. Carroll, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, Lake Superior State University 650 W. Easterday Ave., Sault Ste. Marie, MI. 49783 Voice: 906.635.2031 – Email: nbarakat@lssu.eduAbstract Borderless ethics and the attempt to develop a global engineering code of ethicshave formulated significant driving forces behind trends in engineering ethics education.This is because engineering is no longer limited by borders and therefore the differencesin culture and values from one country to another become
BUSINESS AND ENGINEERING PROJ ECT INTERACTION Don Bowie, Anthony Donaldson, Don Peter , J im Rand Seattle Pacific Univer sityAbstract ́ As a result of industry feedback and the ABET 2000 criteria, Seattle Pacific University(SPU) has introduced a multidisciplinary interactive experience between the business school andthe electrical engineering department. This paper reports the way this interaction wasimplemented through a teaming effort undertaken between the School of Business & Economicsand the Department of Electrical Engineering,utilizing professors from both departments who allpossess considerable industry experience. A primary objective is to provide the student
SESSION 3153 Pr oject Planning & Development for Engineer ing Fr eshman Bouzid Aliane, Michael A. Collur a, Samuel Daniels, J ean Nocito-Gobel School of Engineer ing & Applied Science, Univer sity of New HavenAbstr actThe nature and background of students seeking an engineering education has changeddrastically in the last decade, as has the expectations of industrial employers. Manystudents lack the organizational skills needed for academic success. Similarorganizational skills, although more advanced, are required for managing engineeringprojects. A new course was developed by the faculty at the School of Engineering andApplied Science
CURRENT SITUATIONto become a leader in engineering and technologyeducation by implementing distance education in When most people think of distance educationtheir curriculum in an effort to meet the changing today, the first images that come to mind aredemands and needs of today’s student, plus enhance traditional correspondence courses, and the ever-so-enrollment and student diversity in the programs popular Internet courses, where the student has thetheir institution offers. sole responsibility for success or failure concerning the material being taught. There is no interaction (orINTRODUCTION
Session 2620 BattleBots and the Electrical Engineering Education Barry E. Mullins, Brian S. Peterson Department of Electrical Engineering / Air Force Institute of Technology United States Air Force Academy, CO / Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OHAbstractThe use of robotics as a learning tool within computer/electrical engineering as well as computerscience curriculums is ever increasing for a variety of reasons including stimulating interest inengineering. This paper describes the educational experiences gained through the design,construction, and competition of two robots called
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationCore CoursesAs discussed earlier, most other programs require a certain number of core courses to add morestructure to the degree. This should be kept in mind for the redesigned MSEM program. Thecourses that would be likely candidates for this include:· Engineering Management· Intermediate Engineering Economy· Productivity Improvement· Cost Estimation Models· Decision Models· Production Planning & Control (Analysis of Inventory Systems for BSIE graduates)· Project Management· Technology Forecasting & CommercializationThese courses represent 24 hours of
AC 2012-3512: STUDENT PERSPECTIVES OF ENGINEERING DESIGNEDUCATIONRichard J. Aleong, Queen’s University Richard Aleong is a master’s of applied science candidate in the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. His research interests are in engineering design, qualitative research methodology, and teaching and learning in higher education.Prof. David S. Strong, Queen’s University David Strong joined Queen’s as the NSERC Chair in Design Engineering in March 2003 and is currently in his second term as Chair. In this faculty-wide appointment, his goal is to enhance student’s engineering design and professional skills by working collaboratively on educational
, additional person resource semi-qualified for the company/company has the opportunity to instruct and in turn gain fresh ideas forcing us to look at processes differently.• Help provide valuable experience and exposure to the student; was a symbiotic relationship for the student and company.• Having the opportunity to bring fresh ideas and young minds into our organization, along with their level of enthusiasm. Page 25.1219.11What aspect of the sustainable engineering internship needs the most improvement, if it wereto be offered again?• Involve company rep in student selection process• Increase time frame
Session 3453 Toys, Tinkerers, and Tomorrow: Growing Engineers Paul Palazolo, Anna Phillips, Charles Camp The University of MemphisAbstractThis paper presents the findings and recommendations resulting from a pilot program aimed ateducating and interesting middle school students in the fields of math, science, and engineering.“The Joy of Engineering” was piloted in the summer semester of 2000 and included a staff ofthree multidisciplinary instructors supplemented by 7 middle school teachers from the localschool system. There were two one-week sessions offered with a total of 64
creative minds of Paine and Peale. Paine’s was developedindependently of the Schuylkill project while he lived in England and was documented in hispatent description of 1788 (3). Peale’s was presented in a formal proposal to address the statedPhiladelphia need, and its documentation exists in what appears to be the first American book onbridge design (4). His design is shown in Figure 1 on the next page.Through their research the students learned about two engineers who were complex men and attimes contradictory human beings. For example, the following was taken from the specificationsin Paine’s patent description. Whereas His most Excellent Majesty King George the Third, by His Letters patent under the Great Seal of Great Britain, bearing
Session 2560 Managing Global Experiences for Engineering Students Natalie A. Mello Worcester Polytechnic InstituteAbstractWorcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) has long embraced a project-based curriculum that nowextends to the four corners of the globe. With established programs in Europe, the Far East,Latin America, Australia, the US and new initiatives in Hong Kong and Taiwan, WPI providesopportunities for undergraduates to complete meaningful off-campus experiences. WPI offersstudents the freedom to complete degree requirements away from campus in a professionalexperience under the
betweenengineering and the concepts and processes of science, pedagogically and in content areas.The nature of engineering is to create, to solve problems of great variety subject to constraintsand specifications. This is an output-driven discipline. The solution and the inputs will vary,utilizing the skills, knowledge and creativity of the designer. Parallel to science, engineeringrequires the application of ideas employed in the process of engineering. Children’sengineering uses the engineering design process to create solutions. It uses the learning styleadvocated by Piaget and others to foster understanding of concepts. It engages students inactive hands-on, minds-on activities that inherently contain reflection.Engineers are creative problem solvers
engineering student has a memento of the time they spent working towardstheir undergraduate degree. Brass Hex Stock $4.87 Hammer Handle $2.84 Cutters + $2.78 Total $10.49 Figure 3. Cost of a HammerIV. Purdue cardholderA cheaper more simplified project is the Purdue cardholder project. Again this project was developedwith two criteria in mind. First, the project need to be easily accomplished in one to two hours, andsecond, the students should have something that they can be proud to take with them. This
Session 1692 Engineering Students in K-12 Schools Laura J. Bottomley, Elizabeth A. Parry, Sara Washburn, Amy Hossain, Rachel Meyer North Carolina State UniversityAbstractThere is a wealth of knowledge and information to be shared between elementary, particularlyK-5, students and college engineering students. Increasingly, children are deciding on thosesubjects they like and dislike (and therefore do and don’t do) as early as elementary school.Anecdotal evidence suggests that females, in particular, lose interest in math and science in mid-elementary school
course combinesa number of creative approaches, including visits to a wide range of engineering sites in thecommercial, academic, and government domains; a multidisciplinary team of faculty; andinvolvement of a larger segment of the home campus through a set of Internet web pages.Students achieve a number of important outcomes: discerning cultural differences, cultivatingnon-technical interests, developing critical thinking, and understanding global markets.IntroductionThe liberal arts component of an engineering education is important. Engineering educatorsknow it. Working engineers know it. Engineering managers know it. Unfortunately,engineering students do not. In the student’s mind, liberal arts courses are mere obstacles to beovercome in
the course. Students are required toidentify key variables in the problem and design a testing program with practical limitations ofthe variables in mind. The students are required to relate their test program and selection of Page 4.211.3experimental variables to practical civil engineering design applications.The projects conducted so far can be identified as one of four main categories of testingprograms: fundamental material behavior, optimizing engineering products for economy,sustainable infrastructure design practices, and interfacing with research projects at LawrenceTech University. Examples of project topics, with the variables of the
involve, but also provide a rationale forthe detailed study of mathematics and science that are typical in the lower division years.Concluding that it is not possible to cram all the knowledge that an engineer will needthroughout his or her career into a four year curriculum, engineering faculties areproviding flexibility and diverse paths for individual students – while making sure thatthe fundamentals such as analytical problem solving , critical thinking and designmethodology are included.Recognizing that many of today’s engineering students will choose to start their ownbusinesses at some point in their careers, some engineering education programs arestimulating entreprenaurship and commercialism in the minds of their students – andproviding
recommendations for changes in curricula and program content, context, andcontinuity. In addition to specific recommendations for science education, a large portion of thedocument posed recommendations and implementation plans for changes to all disciplines ofengineering education. To produce engineers with a Sustainable mind set, engineering education must allow formore environmental topics to be taught in all disciplines. These topics provide essentialbackground and knowledge for sustainably sensitive design or development, and will provide thebasis from which sustainable societies can be produced. Such topics should include: populationdynamics, basic biology, the chemistry of natural systems, the fate and transport of pollutants inthe
to consider and design with ethical, equity, andsocial justice implications in mind. Further, there is still a general lack of diversity ofstakeholder parameters in early engineering design classes. Introduction to systems engineeringcourses lack integration of current thinking on community engagement ethics and that absencecan be seen across the systems engineering curriculum, as well. We ask: How do we createlearning opportunities/engineering interventions that are technically sound, and also prioritizecommunity voice, cultural appropriateness, and contextual efficacy? In this paper, we reviewthree methods of stakeholder analysis taught in system engineering courses and identify whereand how one can integrate community voices through a
the population is dependent on others for helping them‖, ―lawlessness‖, and―emotional distress‖ are priorities for engineers to consider. These may not initially be whatcome to mind when thinking about engineering priorities in a natural disaster. This is especiallyintriguing and leads to better understanding the influence of cultural milieu on engineering Page 15.733.8experiences.The final qualitative question prompts respondents to include their perspectives about the waysthat engineers can address the challenges facing developing countries. A range of ideas from―cheap and clean water supplies‖ to ―develop biodegradable but safe waste