engineering program mustdemonstrate that graduates have: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering -- TDC participants apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering in the development of the designs to meet NASA requirements (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data -- TDC participants must analyze and interpret data that results from their design trade studies in order to choose from design alternatives (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health
outcomes[6]. ‚ The engineering community became increasingly aware of the broad response in the academic community to Boyer’s authorship of Scholarship Reconsidered[1] and efforts by the US Department of Education along with the National Research Council to a) define rigorous education research[7] and b) gather evidence and highlight the significance of recent findings on how people learn and the significance of those findings for education[8], and ‚ Engineering education began a transition from cycles of “reform” to exploring use of a rigorous research base to inform the shape and content of the undergraduate engineering curriculum[9].As a result of these events, the engineering profession
meters, b is the width in meters and d is the height in meters. FL3y max ? (15) 48EI where F is in N, L is in m, E is in N/m2, and I in m4.For a rectangular cross-section: bd 3I? . (16) 12 where I is the moment of Inertia and b is the width in meters and d is the height in meters.In order to minimize the deflection then, both E and I must be as large as possible. SinceI is proportional to the height cubed, it is much more efficient then to add height than toadd width to a brace. A ukulele brace can not be too thin though or
Education, American Society of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No. 2, pp 193–197, April, 2001. 99. Kwinn, M. J., Pohl, E. A., McGinnis, M. L., and Carlton, W. B., “Capstone Design in Education: Systems Engineering and the West Point Way,” Proceedings of the12th Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), 2002, Las Vegas, Nevada.10. ABET EAC Committee, “Summary of Accreditation Actions for the 2002-03 Accreditation Cycle for the United States Military Academy,” 15 August 2003.11. Brown, S., Cho, J., Collier, N., Hill, N. and Kwinn, M. J., “Taking a Systematic Approach to the
Education, American Society of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No. 2, pp 193–197, April, 2001. 99. Kwinn, M. J., Pohl, E. A., McGinnis, M. L., and Carlton, W. B., “Capstone Design in Education: Systems Engineering and the West Point Way,” Proceedings of the12th Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), 2002, Las Vegas, Nevada.10. ABET EAC Committee, “Summary of Accreditation Actions for the 2002-03 Accreditation Cycle for the United States Military Academy,” 15 August 2003.11. Brown, S., Cho, J., Collier, N., Hill, N. and Kwinn, M. J., “Taking a Systematic Approach to the
, where ψ (⋅) represents a complex conjugation term. The total 3D waveletrepresentation is obtained by following combination matrix11: ♠ψ a ( x, y, z ) ≡ ♠1 −1 −1 −1≡ ♠ψ1 ( x, y, z ) ≡ ↔ψ ( x, y, z ) ≈ ↔ ≈↔ ≈ ↔ b ≈ = 1 ↔1 −1 1 1 ≈ ↔ψ 2 ( x, y, z ) ≈ ↔ψ c ( x, y, z ) ≈ 2 ↔1 1 −1 1 ≈ ↔ψ 3 ( x, y, z ) ≈ (7) ↔ ≈ ↔ ≈↔ ≈ ←ψ d ( x, y, z ) … ←1 1 1 −1… ←ψ 4 ( x, y, z ) …From this matrix, four DDWT trees containing a total of 4 low sub-bands and 28 highsub-bands are obtained. It is very important to point out that, due to this over
about a variety of topics, sothat we may engage our students and ourselves in a continuous cycle of improvement.References1. Brelin-Fornari, J., Homsher, B., and Sullivan, L. “Kettering University’s Bioengineering Summer Program for High School Women”. ASEE Annual Conference. Salt Lake City, UT. 2004.2. http://www.kettering.edu/futurestudents/precollege/lite/lite_courses.jsp3. Eccles, J.S. (2007). “Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering.” In S.J. Ceci & W.M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren't more women in science? (pp. 199-210). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.4. National Highway Transportation Administration, US Department of Transportation, Traffic
developmentin MPLAB IDE and also could perform the simulation of the software as well. The othercommercially available C Compilers are: 1) HI-Tech PICC v.9.50. 2) IAR EmbeddedWorkbench v.2.21. 3) Forest Electronics C Compiler v.14. 4) B Knudsen CC5X and CC8E CCompiler and 5) Source boost C Compiler. Page 13.482.3Course Hardware Design and Development ToolsThe authors have designed an in house hardware development platform, whose schematic isprovided in Figure 1. The development board provides headers for accessing all the ports alongwith VDD and VSS. It has also a Serial port interface to access the PC and communicate viaRs232 port for down loading the
and demonstrations for the class is listed below. Page 13.912.8 a. Measurement of fluid flow parameters b. Verification of basic fluid statics principles c. Investigation of fluid friction principles d. Application of fluid power for specific force and motion function e. Design and development of functional fluid power system f. Operation and control of a fluid power systemInitial demonstrations and hands on practices IME2840 class are designed to engagestudents in learning the theoretical fundamentals, will be accompanied by simpleapplication programs in Visual Basic and Excel. After students are acquainted with thephenomenon, these
York: Academic Press.2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of control. NewYork: W.H. Freeman.3. Dugger, W.E., and Gilberti, A. F., Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology,International Technology Education Association (ITEA), 20024. Kasarda, M., Brown, E., and Brand, B., 2007a, “Teaching Capstone Design in a Service Learning Setting,”Proceedings of 114th Annual ASEE Conference and Exhibition, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 24-27, 2007.5. Kasarda, M., Brand, B., and Brown, E., 2007b, “An Engineering Capstone Design Course Taught in a Page 13.1282.10Collaborative University/High School Setting
2008 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference Copyright © 2008, American Society for Engineering EducationThe sixteen questions cover concepts carefully selected to encourage students to prepare forSolid Mechanics by reviewing necessary prerequisite knowledge, primarily from Statics.Examples of prerequisite skills are: a) Calculation of the force in a structural member of a simple two or three member truss. b) Calculation of the shear force at an arbitrary location in a beam. c) Calculation of the second moment of area with respect to the centroid. d) Understanding the concepts of static determinacy and static indeterminacy. e) Prediction of the shape of a bending
. 17, No. 2, 2001, 189-196.9Paulik, M. and M. Krishnan. "A Competition-Motivated Capstone Design Course: The Result of a Fifteen-Year Evolution." IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2001, 67-7510 McMasters, J. and S. Ford. "An Industry View of Enhancing Design Education." Journal of EngineeringEducation, Vol. No. 79, No. 3, 1990, 526-529.11 Culver, R., Woods, D. and Peggy Fitch. "Gaining Professional Expertise Through Design Activities."Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 79, No. 3, 1990, 533-536.12 Ernst, E., and J.R. Lohman. "Designing Undergraduate Curricula." Journal of Engineering Education,Vol. 79, No. 3, 1990, 541-547.13 NcNeill, B., et al. "Beginning Design Education with Freshman." Journal of Engineering Education,Vol
focus its teaching to the students? • How the University guarantees and improves the quality of its Faculty personnel? • How the University manages and improves its facilities, material resources and services? • How the University analyses and takes in account the results of its action plans? • How the University publishes the curricula information?A summary of the ANECA guidelines are herein described: a) The University must consolidate a culture of quality, supported by a known formal policy and objectives of quality, publicly available. b) The University must implement mechanisms that allow it to maintain and to improve its educational offering, developing methodologies for periodical approval, control
of the nature of science in science education. In Ed. W. F. McComas. The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.10. Finson, K. (2002). Drawing a Scientist: What We Do and Do Not Know after Fifty Years of Drawings, School Science and Mathematics, 102, 335-345.11. Robinson, M., & Kenny, B. (2003). Engineering Literacy in High School Students. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 23, 95-101.12. Carroll, D. R. 1997. Bridge Engineering for the Elementary Grades. Journal of Engineering Education, 86 (3), 221-226.13. Grose, T. K. (2006, October). Trouble on the horizon. ASEE Prism , 16 (2), 26-31.14. Lyons, J., & Thompson, S
designated learningobjectives. What is urgently needed is systematic research efforts focused on three basic areasdesigned to provide data on: (a) what specific individual difference variables inlearners actually make a difference in student achievement in the teaching learningprocess, (b) which of these individual difference variables interact significantly withdifferent kinds of visualization used to complement oral/printed instruction, and (c)what is the extent of the range within specific individual difference variables thatare accommodated by the use of specific types of visualization 5.Once we can describe what makes a particular visual successful to us, we can apply thisknowledge to the design of completely new visuals. In instruction
Engineering, University of Brighton, UK. He received his BS from Kabul University and his M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the Universities of Salford and Brighton respectively. He has been teaching at University of Brighton since 1989. He has conducted a survey for the Afghan government and UNDP about the current state of Technical, Vocational Education (TVE) and Engineering Institutions in Afghanistan in 2004. In addition, he has been actively involved to help higher education in Afghanistan, especially Kabul University since 2005. He has published several papers and reports on improving higher education in Afghanistan. Since December 2006, Dr. B. Baha has been helping
developing802.11s, a set of standards defining wireless mesh distribution systems. These standards wouldgreatly benefit this research, but are currently unfinished and a proprietary solution had to beutilized.Proxim AP-4900M access points were utilized for this research. These models supported allthree types of distribution systems (wired, WDS, and mesh) and are equipped with two separateradios. One of the radios was dedicated to 802.11b/g traffic, and one was dedicated to 802.11atraffic. There was no WEP/WPA security on any access points, and the AP was set to openauthentication. The client utilized was a Dell Latitude D620, utilizing the built-in IntelPRO/Wireless 3945ABG 802.11a/b/g card with version 10.5.1.72 of the manufacturer’s drivers.In each
AC 2008-205: ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY AND THE 75TH ANNIVERSARYRETROSPECTIVE OF ABETLawrence Wolf, Oregon Institute of Technology Lawrence J. Wolf is a professor of the Oregon Institute of Technology and a distinguished service professor of the Oregon University System. After experience in the army and the aircraft, petroleum, and chemical industries, he began his academic career in 1964 as the founding head of the MET program at the St. Louis Community College at Florissant Valley. As a research fellow he completed his doctorate in engineering at Washington University and then became an associate professor at the University of Petroleum and Minerals in Saudi Arabia from 1972 to
technological development, and (b) provide a rudimentaryunderstanding of the social, political, economic, and cultural impact.The content of this course explores innovations and inventions associated with ancienttechnologies, agriculture, weapons, time measurement, industrialization, transportation,communication, and the environment (Loendorf7, 2004). These encompass every aspect of Page 13.259.2engineering and engineering technology including mechanical, electrical, industrial, civil, andenvironmental. By understanding the development, use, impact, and consequences of pasttechnologies, students are better equipped to tackle the challenging problems the
understood on entering the university. In addition, thecourses address a number of the ABET (a) through (k) outcomes; the outcomes specificallyaddressed include: a. Apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering b. Design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data d. Function on a multi-disciplinary team f. Understand professional and ethical responsibility g. Communicate effectively, and k. Use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice Page 13.1300.13
Page 13.1134.13Appendix A – Raw Data (continued) Page 13.1134.14Appendix B – Sample Statistical Analysis for Research Question 1 Page 13.1134.15Appendix B – Sample Statistical Analysis for Research Question 1 (continued) Page 13.1134.16
(SeeFigure 1). Although successful academic programs depend on many good characteristics,Zhang7 finds two characteristics to be notable; they are, “…(a) facilitates critical thinking and (b)recognizes a variety of intellectual styles” (517). Page 13.1155.2Figure 1. Staircase to Critical and Creative Thinking4As demonstrated in Figure 1, remembering or retrieving information, although the first steptowards higher-order skills, is not evidence of unique perspective and exploration of situationswith questions and assessments. Instead, proficient critical thinkers go beyond constructing newmeanings by mixing new material with existing ideas (Understand
b: characteristic length a: speed of sound Mach Number Ma = V / a V: speed of airplaneAn efficient wing has a large lift-to-drag ratio CL / CD. The lift force Lf of an airfoil can be alteredby changing the angle of attack α. This actually represents a change in the shape of the object, andthese shape changes can be used to alter the lift when desired. Various types of airfoils have beendeveloped over the years in response to changes in flight requirements. Typical shapes of airfoildesigns are sketched in Table 2 and the corresponding experimental lift coefficients CL
boundaries between engineering and technology, it became clear that engineers were not adequately prepared in laboratory techniques. ‚ By late 1990s ABET EC2000 appeared, requiring institutions to develop mission and objectives for each program, to develop outcomes that could be periodically assessed, and to continuously improve programs’ offerings.The new EC2000, referred to engineering laboratories as a significant part of engineeringeducation in 4 places; Design of experiment (3b), Use of modern tools (3k), Facilities (newcriterion 7), and Support (new criterion 8). Outcome 3.b, in particular, states that engineeringprograms must demonstrate that their students attain: an ability to design and conductexperiments, as
eye opening experience.” - Student A “This is the first time in my life that I have traveled overseas, let alone to Africa.” - Student B “One thing I didn’t expect is that we couldn’t find a waste basket anywhere in the hotel. All drinks are served out of bottles, which are recycled. There were no napkins, but we washed our hands before and after meals with water and a rag. Any food or items purchased were not packaged in any cardboard or plastic. There is almost no waste produced here.” - Student C “Before our meeting with the District Chief Executive (like a mayor
AC 2008-510: ASSESSING THE OUTCOMES OF TWO SUMMER CAMPS AT NKUSeyed Allameh, Northern Kentucky University Seyed Allameh is a full graduate faculty of Northern Kentucky University. Prior to joining NKU, Dr. Allameh conducted research at Princeton University for 5 years in the areas of MEMS, nanotechnology and advanced materials. He has served as a guest editor/editorial board of journals including Journals of Materials Science. Dr. Allameh holds a PhD from The Ohio State University. He has published over 70 scientific papers/book chapters.Thomas Brackman, Northern Kentucky University Thomas B. Brackman is the Physical Science and Pre-Engineering Recruiting Director at CINSAM, Northern
teaching practice, and what would count as an effective use ofinformation about learners. The review also raises questions about how these various ways oftaking learners into account map to the extent and the ways in which practicing engineeringeducators currently take learners into account, questions that we address in this paper.Research questionsThis paper addresses the following questions: a) To what extent are engineering educatorscurrently taking into account learners in their teaching? b) How do engineering educatorscharacterize their learners when they do take them into account (what information, how is theinformation organized)? and c) Where do engineering educators get their information about theirlearners? In the next section, we
thinking. Tasks which could be completed by sequential steps generated low engagement and collaborative thinking.3. Include accessible assessment criteria in each task. The criteria are accessible if the students Page 13.1102.14 can easily employ them to assess the quality of their solution as they create it. Students were observed using four different sources of assessment criteria: a. Physical reasoning to determine if an activity was physically possible or not. b. Constraints within the stated problem. c. Calculated values to compare one design to another. d. Optimization rules to compare a design to an ideal.4
Graduates,” Journal of Cooperative Education, 27(3), 1992, pp. 16-26.[6] Parks, D. K., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Cash, S. H., “Development of a Measure for Predicting Learning Advancement Through Cooperative Education: Reliability and Validity of the PLACE Scale,” Journal of Cooperative Education, 36(1), 2001, pp. 23-31.[7] Weston W. & Rogers, B., “A Survey of Recent Engineering Graduates: The Relationship of Cooperative Education to Job Factors,” Journal of Cooperative Education, 23(3), 1987, pp. 33-39.[8] Eames, C., “Researching in Cooperative Education: How a Practitioner Met the Challenge!” in Linn, Miller & Adams (Eds.), Handbook for Research in Cooperative Education and Internships, Mahwah, NJ
andare currently preparing a proposal for a minor in entrepreneurship.As part of the Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN) Program sponsored by theKern Family Foundation, UDM is developing a number of entrepreneurship case studies whichare being integrated into existing engineering fundamental courses. These case studies areintended to illustrate how entrepreneurs have capitalized on their knowledge of specificengineering topics. The aim is to provide routine exposures to successful engineeringentrepreneurs and principles of entrepreneurship throughout the curriculum. The ideal, long-termvision is that each engineering course would have one or more corresponding case studies. Thispaper will summarize the three cases which have been