. Overall, students enjoyed completing theOEMPs with 27 of the 36 respondents (75%) saying they agreed or strongly agreed with thestatement “I enjoyed completing the open-ended problems” (Figure 3). Figure 3. Students enjoyed the open-ended problemsTo assess the degree to which students enjoyed the OEMPs, we asked “I like the open-endedproblems more than the typical [course] homework problems.” 20 respondents strongly agreed oragreed with that statement (55.5%), 8 strongly disagreed or disagreed (22.2%), and 8 remainedneutral (Figure 4). This mix of responses is reflected in the open-ended comments, wherestudents said they enjoyed the problems but experienced some frustration because they wereunsure about the correctness of
wish to thank T.J. Nguyen for his work on the CyberAmbassadors project. We alsoappreciate the support and engagement of the many organizations partnering with theCyberAmbassadors project, including Tau Beta Pi, ACI-REF, CaRRC, the Carpentries, NRMNand CIMER. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundationunder Grant No. 1730137. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] H. Neeman et al., “The Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Research and Education Facilitators Virtual Residency: Toward a National Cyberinfrastructure Workforce,” in Proceedings of the
gradeis based off of two criteria: a) students identifying mistakes in their original submission andmaking corrections, and b) a metacognitive response to each problem where students outlinetheir solution process, identify points of misconception and think critically about their ownunderstanding of the material. As long as a student engages honestly and critically in themetacognitive response, they again receive full credit for their resubmission.At no point on either submission are students graded based on the correctness of their answers,removing one of the main incentives for turning to solution manuals. Instead, the student isrewarded for timely effort (initial submission) and for reflecting on what they learned from eachexercise
nature.Through analyzing the data collected in the study and conducting self-reflection on theworkshop, we suggested the following to BME design learning educators. To promote user-centered thinking, information should go beyond the statement of medical needs and includedetails on the circumstances where the solution would be applied. Instructors thus would becrucial to helping students develop self and social awareness during their design thinkingprocess. This would create an opportunity to improve student skills of thinking broadly about thedesign context and recognizing their responsibility for promoting better engineering practices.This initial attempt of the instrument development will pave the way to detailed refinement ofthe study protocol scaled
´erieur D’Ing´enieurs en G´enie Electrique) at Rouen, France in 2009, and his B.S. in Systems of Telecommunication at Polytechnic University of Madrid at Madrid, Spain in 2006. Ar´ıstides’ research interests include the role of empathy and reflection in learning in engineering education and practice contexts, and professional development in global environments.Amanda Johnston, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Amanda Johnston is a PhD candidate in engineering education at Purdue University.Prof. Tamara J Moore, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D., is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education and Interim Executive
traditional (face-to-face, instructor present) classroominstruction and by distance learning (video/ web-based) modalities. The core of the course isexpressed through its learning exercises, of which 60 percent are analysis/ reflection (written)assignments, 20 percent consists of the half-length Mock FE Exam, and 20 percent is a take-home final exam over professional and ethics aspects of the Texas Engineering Practice Act andRules [9]. In addition to these required assignments, the course design allows for several bonuslearning activities, both to earn extra credit and/or to replace missed assignments.Assessment of Course Objectives and Outcomes How successful has CE 4200 been in achieving its intended learning objectives andunderlying student
qualities they havethat are not reflected in quantitative measures like SAT scores or high school GPA.Next, we review the applications and look for other signs of academic potential and leadership.To us, leadership potential is signaled by significant participation in a student organization or asports team or a volunteer effort. Admittedly, this is not simple to determine, but generally, weare looking for signs of initiative, growth mindset, and working effectively on a team as we readthe applications.Finally, after the application stage we make a short list and interview those selected applicants.Most of these interviews are done on a campus visit day for prospective students. This interviewis not designed to determine if the applicants deeply
Paper ID #30213Curri: A Curriculum Visualization System that Unifies CurricularDependencies with Temporal Student DataDr. Stephen Michael MacNeil, University of California San Diego Stephen’s research focuses on how people collaboratively make sense of complex, ’wicked’ problems. Wicked problems are dynamic and constantly changing. They involve multiple stakeholders, often with conflicting requirements. To address these challenges, Stephen develops sociotechnical systems that col- lect, organize, and use data to support reflection and collective action. He received his Ph.D. at UNC in Charlotte and is currently a
impossible. Table 2. Cyber Policy, Compliance and Ethics Course Description The world of cyber is complex and full or questions. This course is designed to delve into some of these questions and challenge students to explore their value system in a digitally connected world. The course is designed in two parts. Part one provides students with some understanding of information assurance in the context and the myriad laws, rules, regulations, and guidelines that impact compliance. Part two provides students an opportunity to build on their foundation in ethics by applying lessons learned in the cyber domain. This course will give students a chance to reflect on the social and professional impacts of computer technology by focusing on the
-profile with the advent of the spaceprogram starting in late 1950s. DBER combines expert knowledge of a science or engineeringdiscipline with the challenges of learning and teaching in that discipline, and the science oflearning and teaching generally to address discipline-specific problems and challenges. A widelyrecognized definition of DBER comes from the National Research Council [15], “DBER isgrounded in the science and engineering disciplines and addresses questions of teaching andlearning within those disciplines… DBER investigates learning and teaching in a discipline froma perspective that reflects the discipline’s priorities, worldview, knowledge, and practices. DBERis informed by and complementary to general [educational] research on
–capture indicatorsof transfer-in learning. The structure of our pilot assessment items were, in part, derived fromexemplar categories of PFL student behavior and expressions of transfer-in thinking,36 as well asthose represented in established assessment strategies reflected in extant PFL assessmentinstruments, especially in prior research projects like those of Arena37 and Grover, Pea, andCooper.38 However, when appropriate, we also remained open to incorporating new categoriesof interpretation grounded in evidence based on student response patterns to PFL prompts.VII. Development and Implementation of a PFL Assessment InstrumentOur initial effort at designing a PFL assessment produced an instrument focusing in a broad,exploratory manner on
NTP analogy, the telnet protocol offers a network administrator aquick way to set up a text-based console connection between a computer and a network deviceuses port 23. It can be shown visually as an individual (I) being able to establish a quick andconvenient connection with a network hardware device. The Network News Transfer Protocol(NNTP) uses port 119. It would seem like a problematic port number to memorize; however, ifone imagines looking at this number reflected in the mirror, it would be “911” -- which forreasons yet unclear to the author -- is what most news these days is. An open newspaper showsthe 119 port number with images and text regarding the news of the day. Email is an extensiveglobe-spanning system which can be shown by a
are located after the narrated lectures. The advantage of the example videos is that students can watch them repeatedly the week they are released and again while doing their homework or studying for the exams. 5. PowerPoint™ presentation with all examples without solution. 6. PowerPoint™ presentation with all examples with solution. 7. Assessed activities such as assignments and exams.Alignment of critical course componentsThe term alignment is used as the “interdependence among the critical course components thatensure that students achieve the desired learning objectives for the course” [13]. Each moduleprovides a set of specific learning objectives that are reflected on each learning or assessedactivity and support the
that the population in the United States is nolonger as diverse as it once was[5]. As people have emigrated from all parts of the world,cultural groups are represented in much different percentages than 10 years ago. Over the lastcentury much of the diversity evident in the early 1900’s has assimilated into what is referred toas a melting pot, constantly changing. However, universities do not reflect the type and level ofdiversity of the current population[2, 3]. Both of the engineering and engineering technologyprograms, despite higher levels of one underrepresented group or another, still has much higherlevels of white students. Thus the general population that was once in the minority are moving toa more balanced number as related to the
20258 which states that civil engineers are “Entrustedby society to create a sustainable world and enhance the global quality of life, civil engineersserve competently, collaboratively, and ethically…”9. The CIVIL Department adopted thefollowing Student Outcome in response:Student Outcome #15: Apply standard of professional and ethical responsibility to determine anappropriate course of action.With this student learning outcome in place, it was easy to incorporate the requirements of theQEP into the existing curricular design. The curriculum design is as follows: 1. Freshmen – describe the ASCE and the NSPE ethical canons and reflect on them using a vignette. 2. Sophomores – explain the ASCE and the NSPE ethical canons; description of
Paper ID #23465Faculty Perceptions of the Teaching and Learning Experience in Fundamen-tal Mechanical Engineering CoursesMs. Michelle Soledad, Virginia Tech, Ateneo de Davao University Michelle Soledad is a PhD candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research interests include faculty development and data-informed reflective practice. Ms. Soledad has degrees in Electrical Engineering (BS, ME) from the Ateneo de Davao University (ADDU) in Davao City, Philippines, where she continues to be a faculty member of the Electrical Engineering Department. She also served as Department Chair and was
, phone call), appreciating the differences amonggenerations. The conversation then turned to key attributes for leaders, and this groups stated,keywords such as consistent (stable), fair, open-minded, willing to question everything, and tocorrect errors early (which requires courage & trust), and recognize mistakes. This groupsuggested that to teach these attributes, the team needs to meet often and debrief after a project –take time to reflect on the process and make suggestions for improvements. Instructors couldcomplete this process through role-playing at the undergraduate level.A partner at a construction firm quickly mentioned the importance of self-awareness and socialawareness as key attributes of new hires as well as seasoned
Each CourseFaculty were divided into three math focus groups (leaving College Algebra for the end) wherethey specifically addressed main learning outcomes for the course, the core ideas upon whicheach course is grounded, and the supporting concepts that make up the core idea(s). Thisapproach builds upon a theoretical framework resulting from the work of numerous groups (i.e.,Mathematical Association of America - [MAA]) and individuals, such as Bransford et al., (2000)who, in his National Research Council commissioned book, How People Learn, providedrecommendations based on extensive work addressing learning and teaching in mathematics.Guiding their discussions were a series of questions such as (a) does the course outline reflect thedesired
.” “EduGuide helped me to learn how to concentrate.” “More positive about things and better relationships.” “I learned how to keep encouraging myself and others like my friend especially my family.” “It has helped me personally with relationships with family and friends as well as improvement on my school work.” “It helped me stay on track.” “It helped me to reflect on what I have overcome. It has also motivated me to keep trying and help others along the way.” “(It) helps keep a positive mindset.” “I have been more conscious on what I want to do, on what I do and what I don't do. This has helped me improve in my personal and professional aspects.” “I feel like I have gotten a bit more motivated especially
; Profes- sional Diploma in Architecture (1991). Currently teaching at South Dakota State University, Construction Management Program (2010-present). Area of interests: Sustainable Building Design and Construction Materials. Professional experience: Architecture in the U.S.A., and Bulgaria, the E.U.Prof. Byron G. Garry, South Dakota State University BYRON GARRY is Associate Professor and Undergraduate Program Coordinator in the Department of Construction & Operations Management in the Jerome J. Lohr College of Engineering at South Dakota State University. He has been a member of ASEE since 1998. As SDSU ASEE Campus Rep., his goal is to help fellow College of Engineering faculty to be reflective teachers
minimum standard Raise Program Standing in matriculation standards/expectations process Establish std. processes Improve communications Support Course options E102/E102 and E201 Maintain connections E122 Intentional reflection E144/E145 Active advising Proactive intervention Early identification
mostly as an archive and is useful when reflecting on the current state of the project or when planning the next stage of the project. In Scrum, these would be called "sprint retrospective" and “sprint planning” stages, respectively. 7. Journal: This is used to keep track of dates of meetings and decisions made. It helps the team and instructor(s) track their activity. There should be at least one in-person team meeting outside of the classroom (lecture or lab time). It can be done using online tools, e.g., Hangouts, Skype or similar.Depending on the details of a project, more columns can be added. However, having too manycolumns can make information more obscure so this should be used with care.2.4. Trello CardsOnce
looking athomogeneous groupings of mid-year engineering majors at similar institutions [6], [32], [33].Cluster 3 mimicked the all high scores (high F, PI, FoP) of previously documented sugarstudents, reflecting clearly developed future goals, high sense of instrumentality of currentcoursework, and a feedback loop between future goals and present actions. Cluster 1 (wafflestudents), featured lower average F, PI, and FoP scores than Cluster 3 (sugar students). Thewaffle students’ scores appear lower on average due to their (often two) conflicting views of thefuture and thus less concrete sense of instrumentality (lower PI) and impact of the future on theirpresent actions (lower FoP). Finally, Cluster 2 encompassed cake students, who have
students and practitioners with regard to the benefits of the industryinvolvement. This paper also describes two successful capstone design projects and culminatessuccess drivers from the reflection of instructors teaching these courses.IntroductionThe profession of engineering takes the knowledge of mathematics and natural sciences gainedthrough study, experience, and practice and applies this knowledge with judgment to developways to utilize the materials and forces of nature for the benefit of all humans1. The engineerapplies his or her knowledge to design and develop usable devices, processes, and structures.The Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) formal definition ofengineering design states that it is “the process of
theGeneralized Observation and Reflection Protocol (GORP),45 which was developed by the Centerfor Educational Effectiveness at UC Davis and is intended for capturing classroom activities andinstructor pedagogies in real time. The platform is completely modifiable, and therefore, we foundit very convenient for this data set. In using the tool, we found it most convenient to “play” thereal-time screen capture recordings on a desktop computer with a large monitor and have theGORP tool on a touch screen tablet, so that as the data played, the researchers could click-on/click-off of the activities that were or were not happening.The GORP tool outputs time-series data into an excel spreadsheet, which we then uploaded intoMATLAB46 for data analysis and
sticks, and other common materials (Figure 1). Within one year, Arduinosand three-dimensionally printed parts are used to realize the projects (Figure 2), opening upbroad possibilities that can be incorporated into the design. The raters all noted the markedimprovement in the designs between the freshman and sophomore years, and this is borne out inthe data. By the time students become seniors, they have more experience programming, usingmore complicated three-dimensionally printed parts and have developed machine shop skills tocomplete even more sophisticated projects. These observations are also reflected in the data.Across each course, the data gives relatively constant values from semester-to-semester, and allof the variations are within the
method, University of Albany [6] quotesfrom Rudyard Kipling’s poetry, which reads “I keep six honest serving men (They taught me all I knew); Their names are What and Why and When; And How and Where and Who”University of Albany has given a four-step methodology for the case study method,which is paraphrased as follows: a. Preparing a Case for Class Discussion - A case assignment requires conscientious preparation before class. One definitely cannot contribute or get much out of hearing the class discussing a case that he hasn’t read and prepared. Preparation includes studying the case, reflecting on the situations presented, and developing
questions (highest interest) by sex. Both sexes are interestedin mixing material (expected) but less so on how diseases like cancer work (not expected).Absent is mathematics interest for girls (expected) and space interest for boys (not expected):Figure 7 and Figure 8. Top Six STEM Interest Questions by Sex.By category, for some of the demographics, the mean scores reflect similar ranges as theresponses to the perception question “Do girls belong in engineering.” Note that the sample sizesfor different ethnic demographics are very small and can only serve as food for thought andfuture study, not for making claims. For example (Fig. 9), African American students score low,whereas Pacific Islanders and Whites score higher. Note Asian American and
-12 curriculums. As computational thinking (CT) coursesbecome common in K-12 education [11]–[18], some higher education institutions also startedoffering computational thinking courses to students from any majors [4], [19]. At its heart, thismovement reflects that computational thinking is everywhere and for everyone [20]. Various studies reported using text-based computer-programming- [13], [21]–[25], visualcomputer-programming [26]–[28], and puzzle instructional approaches [11], [29]–[31] to teachcomputational thinking. Most of these studies reported a positive impact on learning computingprinciples and an increase of interest in computer science in male and female students [12], [26],[28]. On the other hand, one study argues that
intended to elicit or measure this type of response. % relative to the number that attempted. We anticipated that scoring responses from a scaffolded version of the task would beeasier and take less time than responses from an open version, but our limited observationssuggest otherwise, at least for this initial administration of Parachute. While we did notsystematically record the amount of time raters spent on scoring the two tasks, severalobservations reflect the relatively more challenging than expected nature of scoring responses forthe scaffolded version. A single training session was required to prepare raters for scoring theresponses to the open version and scoring was completed in much less than a day. After theinitial