AC 2009-1862: “ENGINEERS WHO HAPPEN TO BE GAY”: LESBIAN, GAY, ANDBISEXUAL STUDENTS’ EXPERIENCES IN ENGINEERINGErin Cech, University of California, San Diego Erin Cech is a doctoral student in Sociology at the University of California, San Diego and received bachelor's degrees in Electrical Engineering and Sociology from Montana State University. Her research examines the role of gender schemas in the reproduction of labor market gender inequality, the intersection of technology and social justice, and inequalities in science and engineering.Tom Waidzunas, University of California, San Diego Tom Waidzunas is a doctoral student in Sociology and Science Studies at the University of
Paper ID #32622Progress Towards Educating the Engineer of 2020Col. Jakob C. Bruhl, United States Military Academy Lieutenant Colonel Jakob Bruhl is an Associate Professor and Civil Engineering Program Director in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, M.S. Degrees from the University of Missouri at Rolla and the University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign, and Ph.D. from Purdue University. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Missouri. His research interests include resilient
is to engage all students in participation that ranges from improving documentation to submitting patches. Learning to teach students how to participate in HFOSS is an ongoing process. As part of the continuing efforts to pursue that knowledge Becka is a graduate of the 2013 and 2016 POSSE workshop and has trained to be a facilitator.Heidi J.C. Ellis, Western New England University Heidi Ellis is a Professor in the Computer Science and Information Technology department at Western New England University. Dr. Ellis has a long-time interest in software engineering education and has been interested in student participation in Humanitarian Free and Open Source Software (HFOSS) since 2006.Dr. Gregory W Hislop
“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”III. Role of Civil EngineersClough (2000) states, “Today, most of the buzz is about biotechnology and informationtechnology, but the future of our society also rests on technologies that are more basic to itsfunctioning. The combination of a growing world population with the human tendency to delaydealing with infrastructure and environmental needs until they have reached crisis proportions,means that our profession will become more essential than ever before.” Clough acknowledgesthat there are emerging fields where most research money is being poured, and urges
AC 2010-2414: THE ENGINEERING PROFESSOR OF 2020: THE FORGOTTENVARIABLELueny Morell, Hewlett-Packard Lueny Morell, M.S., P.E., is Program Manager in the Strategy and Innovation Office staff of Hewlett Packard Laboratories (HPL) in Palo Alto, California. She is responsible for facilitating external research collaborations for HPL and lead initiatives focused on R&D talent development, collaborating with external partners (government entities and other corporate labs) to pursue strategies and initiatives of benefit to the research community. In the past, she was in charge of developing engineering/science curriculum innovation initiatives worldwide in support of HPL research and technology
Paper ID #21277m-POGIL (modified-Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning) based Plas-tics LaboratoryDr. Spencer Seung-hyun Kim, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Dr. Spencer Kim is an Associate Professor in Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Technology Department (MMET) at RIT, and serves as Associate Director of American Packaging Corporation Cen- ter for Packaging Innovation at RIT. He previously worked in the semiconductor industry. Dr. Kim, as a PI or Co-PI, received grants and sponsorship from NSF, SME, SPE, universities, and industries. In 2009 and 2013, he was nominated for the Eisenhart Award for
AC 2008-1487: ENGINEERING AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT TOENHANCE LEARNINGMarilyn Barger, University of South Florida MARILYN BARGER is the Principle Investigator and Executive Director of FLATE, the Florida Regional Center for Manufacturing Education funded by NSF and housed at Hillsborough Community College in Tampa Florida. She earned a B.A. in Chemistry at Agnes Scott College, and both a B.S. in Engineering Science and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering (Environmental) from the University of South Florida, where her research focused on membrane separations. She has over 20 years of experience in developing curriculum for engineering and engineering technology for elementary, middle
teachers’ beliefs and expectationsabout high school pre-engineering instruction and preparation for students’ future successengineering, we hope to contribute to the wide scale efforts currently in place to expand andimprove engineering education and foster a more technologically advanced society.IntroductionEducation research shows that instructional practice and teacher decision making are influencedby teachers’ beliefs about learning and instruction1, 2, 3. The primary goal of this current study isto develop a statistically reliable survey instrument that documents teachers’ beliefs andexpectations about high school pre-engineering instruction and preparation for students’ futuresuccess in college engineering programs and careers in engineering
had only a bachelor’s degree with very littlescience beyond the sophomore year. To create the needed advanced technology to wage the war, Ph.D’s inscience were enlisted to work on undersea warfare technology, radar and nuclear weapons. Then there wasSputnik. Both World War II and Sputnik served as wake-up-calls to the universities to do something aboutengineering education, that is, a shift in the education of the engineering student to emphasize the scienceunderlying engineering. Not only courses, but research as well, reflected this change. Beginning in the 1970s through to the present, there was the realization or perception that America wasfalling behind Japan and other nations in manufacturing and in general, in relating science
AC 2009-385: FIBER OPTICS COURSE FOR UNDERGRADUATE ELECTRICALENGINEERING STUDENTSLihong (Heidi) Jiao, Grand Valley State University Page 14.630.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Fiber Optics Course for Undergraduate Electrical Engineering StudentsAbstract This paper describes in detail the course objectives, outline, and assessment. The courseintroduces students to the fundamentals of fiber optics, properties of optical fibers, passive andactive optical devices, and optical communication systems design. In completion of the course,students will be able to apply knowledge of mathematics and physics in the area of
subject of fine artfrom a perspective where technology-oriented students would have an advantage, rather than ahandicap; to exploit the experience so as to reinforce some aspect of engineering science byreviewing it in a new context; and to place the engineering students in an environment composedmostly of others in the same discipline.BackgroundAlthough many engineering students would argue otherwise, an exposure to the arts is anessential part of every undergraduate's curriculum. This is underscored by its de facto inclusion,in some form, in the required "distributional elective" hours imposed by virtually every degreeprogram in the United States. Educators recognize that many young people who selecttechnology as a career objective at an early
to Joining the University in 2004, Hanan was the co-founder and Chief Technology Officer at Ceyba, an optical long-haul networking company that employed 250 people at its peak. Hanan also worked at Nortel Networks in different positions conducting pioneering research in various areas of photonics, rang- ing from device physics to optical networking. She has numerous journal and conference publications and patents. Hanan’s current research interests include Biophotonics, Innovation and engineering educa- c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #18165 tion.Her passion is to help
- sional development programs on student achievement and attitudes.Dr. Carrie Obenland, Rice University Dr. Obenland is the Assistant Director for Outreach and Research at the Rice Office of STEM Engage- ment. She as her PhD in Chemistry from Rice University, as well as her Masters. Her graduate work was focused on chemical education. She earned her BS in Chemical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 NanoEnvironmental Engineering for Teachers (Work in Progress)An increasing number of teachers are not properly trained or prepared to effectively teachscience, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) subjects [1]. Most teachers
, Fundamentals of Space Flight Systems, Astronomy, and Sr. Capstone Sequence. He was Department Chair for six years in the start-up of the Engineering Physics program. He enjoys mentoring undergraduate students in aerospace, sensors, and energy-related research projects. Some of the research areas include spacecraft nano-satellite technologies, satellite payload instrumenta- tion, High Altitude research Platform (HARP) experiments, wave particle interactions in space, space- flight X-ray imagers, construction and renewable energy engineering and architecture, and philosophy of science. Dr. Voss has worked as PI on many NASA, Air Force, Navy, NSF, and DOE research grants and has published over 120 scientific papers. hnvoss
, including papers in such diverse journals as the IEEE Industry Applications Magazine and the Hungarian Journal of Telecommunications. She received the President’s Award for Excellence in Mathematics, Science, and Engineering Mentoring program award in 1999 and individual award in 2007. She was recognized by the IEEE with an EAB Meritorious Achievement Award in Informal Education in 2009 and by the YWCA with an appointment to the Academy of Women for Science and Technology in 2008. Her program received the WEPAN Outstanding Women in Engineering Program Award in 2009. In 2011, she was recognized as the Women of the Year by the Women’s Transportation Seminar in the Research Triangle and as the Tarheel of the Week. Her work
AC 2012-4088: INTEGRATING INNOVATIVE PEDAGOGIES INTO EN-GINEERING ECONOMICS COURSESDr. Naveen Seth, New Community College at CUNY Naveen Seth is a founding faculty member in business at the City University of New York’s New Commu- nity College. He has also taught at Pratt Institute in the Construction Management Program. At Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology, he headed the Aviation Management programs and also taught engineering economics in the B.S. program in engineering.Prof. Donald P. O’Keefe, Farmingdale State College Donald P. O’Keefe has 15 years experience teaching at the college level. He taught courses in engineering graphics, quality control, and project management
through digitallibraries. Faculty members attempting to create materials for collections of engineeringeducation content in a digital library face several challenges. Lack of training in soundpedagogical practices, a shortage of training in the effective use of educational technology, shortsupply of required development resources and time to produce completed and tested works, anda lack of emphasis on improving teaching in the university faculty rewards systems are the majorobstacles to materials development. To remedy this situation, this project endeavors to create anactive, engaged, and sustained virtual community of engineering educators who energeticallycontribute to and share materials from a common collection of courseware.New members of
in developed countries (National Project ImplementationUnit, 2011). Several educational institutions in India have obtained World Bank funding and Page 22.833.2have recruited U.S. educators to improve the quality of education to help them (NationalProject Implementation Unit, 2011; NIT Trichy, 2011). Two researchers from the Laboratory for Innovative Technology and Engineering Education(LITEE), Auburn University, were invited to use LITEE multi-media case studies to trainengineering students at the National Institute of Technology, Trichy, during summer 2008, andto train several educators and students in a workshop at the National Institute of
implement DBEE in Statics and Dynamics courses at the three engineering colleges inIdaho. The implementation and evaluation of DBEE in an Internet-based environmentwill be presented and discussed, and results will be critically assessed. The evaluationprocess used in our study can easily be adapted to measure the effectiveness of otherinnovative teaching methods. Page 3.322.1 1 INTRODUCTION Rapid advances in computer technology and software development continually increasethe effectiveness and availability of very powerful simulation software. However, there are few
engineering education. We use the entire college ofengineering as a source of technical focus courses, the MBA core from our school of business forkey management courses, and specialized engineering management courses to prepare leaders intechnology and business. This low cost approach allows us to attract a wide variety of technicalspecialists into our program that are welcomed by our university affiliates.The key strategy that is working for us is to use technology to allow collaboration amongstudents and faculty. The increasing complexity of engineering design that demandscoordination of many diverse technical disciplines requires engineers and managers to usecollaboration tools that can also be used in educational environments. This paper
beennewly developed and briefly discussed with each case example of the class projects.Keywords: design education, engineering education, mechanical engineering1. Introduction Nowadays global technology leaders in industrial field emphasize the importance of seamlessProduct Lifecycle Management (PLM), an integrated, parametric-based approach to all aspectsof a product‟s life–from its design inception, through its manufacture, marketing, distributionand maintenance, and finally into recycling, disposal and reuse/sustainability [Stark, 2006]. In1949, Duetsch reported that mutual cooperation between students, rather than the competitioninvoking negative effects on the relation, could bring a positive independency between them sothat they might be
Scratch programming as a central tools, this workshop promotes the use of technology, electrical circuits and programming to develop a sense of creativity and design thinking in kids. In a collaborative effort between the University of Arizona’s Colleges of Education and Engineering and local school districts, a middle school workshop with accompanying lesson plans were designed to help teachers develop the skills and ability Page 18.6.3 necessary to teach innovative engineering and programming inside or outside the classroom. Through hands-on activities, this workshop aims to improve teacher’s abilityCreative
educationalestablishments into implementing technological platforms, the programs of companies’innovative development, into creating local and regional innovation complexes.In 2012, the Presidential Program of Engineering Personnel Development for Years 2012-2014(hereinafter – the “Program”) was adopted. It became the key document indicative of theinevitability, necessity and efficiency of the parallel participation of the state, education andbusiness in building up the professional engineering elite. The Program’s implementation was by2/3 funded by federal budget. The enterprise funded 30% of the Program costs, or 50% of budgetcosts, including covering the expenditures related to sending attendees to the training location.The Program structure included teaching
students had the necessary requisites forengineering courses. Since that time the method has been refined and has become apowerful tool for advisement and curriculum development. This paper will explore someof the advantages of using such a process by presenting both qualitative and quantitativeanalyses.IntroductionThe forever changing and increasing demands of a technology hungry society has theacademic community straining to keep pace with developing engineers that are ready andable to get the job done. Engineers are expected to have a much more extensive tool setwhen dealing with today’s technical and non-technical challenges. Employers are askingengineers to work more and more in teams consisting of members from dissimilardisciplines and often
Paper ID #41585Board 424: What Works: Intra-Institutional Partnerships and Processes forS-STEM RecruitmentDr. Tamara Floyd Smith, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Dr. Tamara Floyd Smith is a Professor of Chemical Engineering and Dean of Engineering and Sciences at West Virginia University Institute of Technology.Dr. Kenan Hatipoglu, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Kenan Hatipoglu is the chair and professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at West Virginia University Institute of Technology. He completed his Master of Science degree in Electrical Engineering at the
Research & Technology Corporation 351 West Tenth Street Indianapolis, IN 46202 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering at IUPUI 723W Michigan Street Indianapolis, IN 46202Abstract:The multidisciplinary activities within the MURI (Multidisciplinary Undergraduate ResearchInitiative) program conducted at IUPUI campus require departmental and school collaborationfrom across the campus. A research project model is described here to emphasize researchelements from physics, electrical and computer engineering, and mechanical engineering thataddresses issues related to thermal sciences
offers a solution to vital challenges, in conjunction withappealing to our youth (Oswald Beiler and Evans 2014). Furthermore, as of 2015 the AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has recognized the importance of sustainability forstudent outcomes and in engineering curriculum; ABET criterion three and five have been updatedto include engineering designs that meet desired needs within realistic constraints, such as sustain-ability, and curriculum that includes principles of sustainability (Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology 2015).2 FALL 2017ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONUtilizing Civil Engineering Senior Design Capstone
challenged by these projects, which required higher-level thinkingskills than solving well-defined problems from the textbook. Using ASTM standards as the basisof experimental plans taught students about current engineering technologies, even whenequipment was not available to run the experiments. The experimental design projectscontributed to 8 out of 11 student outcomes required by the ABET 2000 criteria.3Bibliography1 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 13.01, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.2 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 15.07, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.3 ENGINEERING ACCREDITATION COMMISSION, 2002-2003 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs
mass(kg) benefiting those who had light-weighted their design effectively.To assess student learning outcomes, students were asked technical questions related to their knowledge ofprosthetic technology components, manufacturing techniques, and sustainability prior to the start of theproject and again at the end of the semester. Additionally, this module assessed EOP learning objectives (1)Systems Thinking, Core 3, (2) Responsible Business & Economy, Core 2, (3) Material Selection, Core 5and Core 6 (4) Social responsibility, Core 4, (5) Design, Core 1 and Core 2, and (6) Communication andTeamwork, Core 6 [13].2.3 Junior Module: Waste Reduction in Medical DevicesJunior engineering students were exposed to a sustainability module focused on
Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and MS and PhD in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Notre Dame. He is currently a post- doctoral teacher and researcher at Notre Dame. Page 22.52.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A Large Scale Analysis of First-Year Engineering Student Essays on Engineering InterestsAbstract:There is an increasing demand for qualified engineers in the workforce, and a decreasing interestin engineering educational and professional pathways into the field. This has prompted manystudies of engineering