all engineering studentsenrolled were women, the percentages of women were higher among the underrepresentedminority groups. Among African American engineering students, 33.3% were women, 23.3% ofHispanic engineering students were women, and 24.9% of American Indian engineering studentsare women. 2 Therefore, the renewal of an Office of Minority Engineering Programs (OMEP) in1993 has also helped to recruit, to retain, and to graduate more women engineers. Page 8.1310.5 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for
functioneffectively in a team is even a requirement for accreditation, as stated in ABET’s 2003-2004General Criteria: Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have…an abilityto function on multidisciplinary teams (I.3.d). However, while engineering students aregenerally given a great deal of direction and instruction in the technical aspects of their work,they are often thrown into teams without ample guidance to lead them through the complexitiesof team dynamics. These experiences often do not prepare students for the obstacles thatmultidisciplinary teams meet in industry, research and academia. Good team skills are notlearned merely by placing students in teams 2.The technical problems faced by engineering graduates are complex and often
courses to offer team collaboration activities.Table 5.2 lists survey results for each course that piloted GLASS. Across the three pilotedcourses, student perceptions were overwhelming positive on scale of: {-2 (Strongly Disagree), -1(Disagree), 0 (Neutral), 1 (Agree), 2 (Strongly Agree)}. Foremost, results analyzed usingANOVA indicate the transportability of GLASS across a range of STEM disciplines, includingComputer Science, Industrial Engineering, and Electrical/Computer Engineering. In particular,ANOVA analysis indicated that there were no significant differences among the three courses inmost of the survey questions except the last question: “Etherpad/Cacoo tools were sufficientlyeasy to learn:” whereby F(2, 176) = 4.966, p = .008. While
Engineering”, we now seekto address the questions: "What more needs to be done to improve female students’ interest andpersistence in engineering?" and "How can we better understand the reasons that female studentsleave engineering despite good academic performance?" Our aim is to (1) incorporateinnovations into engineering education that may be more supportive of women students and (2)research the implementation of these innovations in the education environment that is present infoundational undergraduate engineering courses. This dual focus has provided a unique way ofapproaching issues of gender inequity for female students in the Purdue Engineering program.The innovation that we are implementing consists of small technical team, realistic
process that involves participatory practice (Emam et al.2019). It requires teams of individuals working together to achieve a singular vision and a predefined setof goals (Crosbie 1995). In a learning environment, students and faculty need to cooperate to achievecommon goals in a highly collaborative nature consistent with the industry the designed building will serve(Daniels 2002). To equip students with the skills for interdisciplinary collaboration, many accreditingboards of different disciplines require collaboration as a learning criterion, although they do not dictatewhich disciplines should collaborate or in what setting (e.g., studio, seminar or lecture) collaboration shouldbe achieved (ABET 2019; NAAB 2020). Although the Landscape
important to be able to adapt to any different culturalenvironment.Another fact, which is not new, is that many engineering students have a lack of knowledgeabout what being an engineer really means. The first 3 years are particularly intense and hard. Apossible way to improve their perception about the profession is to implement a new kind ofcourse, more enticing and dynamic. This is one of the proposals of COPEC’s engineeringeducation research team: - to embed a course with a more interesting activity for students,sooner, in the first year. It is a short-term workshop in order to show students the possibilities ofperforming as engineers in a global environment – a project developed for a private university inorder to reduce retention rate among
addition, the research mentors provide more regularguidance and feedback on post-visit presentations, publications, and graduate schoolapplications.Research ProjectsThe GWRI fosters collaboration among participants from the colleges of Engineering, Science,Agriculture, and Business. Experts from complementary disciplines within these colleges worktogether to develop innovative and sustainable solutions to existing and emerging problemsassociated with waste and byproduct management. Entrepreneurship is encouraged throughvarious programs and projects. The GWRI has baseline funding (through 2018) and numerousexternally funded projects supporting research and graduate students in three primary areas:pollution prevention and waste management; waste to
direction of the group. Earlydiscussions took the form of four thrusts : engagement strategies, questioning strategies, lessonplanning, and assessment. Today, these four thrusts continue to serve as points of departure forfaculty inquiry, experimentation, and discussion.Early sessions introduce participants to active learning strategies. While there are many reasonsthat prompt faculty to join LEA/RN groups, an often stated reason is the desire to find ways toengage students more actively with course content and issues related to a topic. To this end,initial discussions among faculty explore various ways that instructors can structure learningexperiences for students that promote more student involvement (e.g. activities that providestudents
NSF Research Traineeship (NRT) Preparing professionals in emerging STEM fields vital to the nation Priority research theme: Data-enabled science and engineering• Purpose: create and promote new, innovative, effective, and scalable models for STEM graduate student training and prepare scientists and engineers of the future, particularly in emerging STEM fields vital to the nation.• Anticipated award amount: up to $3M over 5 yrs. NSF-wide Initiative NSF Advanced Computational Infrastructure• Anticipate and invest in diverse and innovative national scale shared resources, outreach and education complementing campus and other national investments.• Leverage and invest in collaborative flexible “fabrics” dynamically connecting
Paper ID #10796An Experiment to enhance Signals and Systems learning by using technologybased teaching strategiesDr. Berenice Verdin, University of Texas at El Paso Dr. Berenice Verdin is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow for Teaching Exellence and Innovation at the University of Texas at El Paso. She graduated with a Master of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Texas at El Paso in 2005. She presented her research results at the UTEP Student Research Expo, the UMET Undergraduate Research Symposium, and the SPIE Symposium on Defense and Security. She also presented her research work to the National
positive results. In Shukla10 lower level math courses were delivered in on-ground(face-to-face), hybrid and 100% online formats. In all cases, completion rates were better for on-ground when compared to online with some students showing a steeper decline than others(males and students with lower prior GPAs). However, in a preparatory algebra class in thissame study, the hybrid version of the class had better outcomes than the on-ground version.While there are some studies comparing online and on-ground courses in STEM disciplines, thenumber of these studies is limited and often focused at the community college or at non-researched focused institutions. One of the reasons that STEM subject areas have been studiedless is that there are simply fewer
pioneer and expert in distance learn- ing and eCommerce. He is also a Kent Fellow on Social Ethics from University of Southern California where he completed his post-doctoral studies. Dr. Tita’s research interests are in exploring the role of the Web in trade development and education and training, in general, for the emerging economies. Other primary teaching and research interests are professional ethics, e-commerce, entrepreneurship, social en- trepreneurship, and strategy in the global economy. Address: D’Amore-Kim School of Business, Northeastern University 360 Huntington Avenue, Rm.219A, HA Boston, MA 02115 Email: w.tita@neu.edu; wtigatita@yahoo.com Phone: 1-617-373-7259 Mobile: 1-508-735-7945
project for a number of reasons, including: • Schedule conflicts with required departmental courses • Graduation • Preference for job experience and/or co-op experience to the “club” atmosphere of SPIRIT. • Completion of the particular portion of the payload the student is working on. • Loss of interest in the objectives of the projectThose who stay are generally responding to: • Commitment to a particular project • Varied opportunities for hands-on experience in a space-related field • Opportunities for responsibility and leadership that seniority brings. • Professional and personal relationships that grow in the context of SPIRIT work.This data has led us to consider the ideal length of a project-based
G. Adams is the Department Head and Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She previously served as Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering at Virginia Commonwealth University and was a faculty member and administrator at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL). Her research interests include: Teamwork, International Collaborations, Fac- ulty Development, Quality Control/Management and Broadening Participation. She is an honor graduate of North Carolina A&T State University, where she earned her BS in Mechanical Engineering, in 1988. In 1991 she was awarded the Master of Engineering degree in Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia. She received her
experience working on collaborative teams, particularly with students of other disciplines.Educators might incorporate industry collaborative organizational structures, but while there aresome aspects of collaboration used in industry that faculty can incorporate, often those modelsare complicated by the need to achieve academic goals. The potential benefits ofinterdisciplinary teamwork include development of communication skills and the incorporationof and exploration of a multi-layered, more creative solution from different viewpoints, whichneed to be balanced with students’ acquiring and incorporating new material and carving time forassignments that demonstrate student outcomes for accreditation. As the College of Engineering,Architecture, and
responsible citizenship and an understanding of ethicalchoices inherent in human development.The Charles W. Davidson College of Engineering is ranked 12th among engineering programsfor master’s-level institutions in the 2009 edition of "America’s Best Colleges" by U.S. News &World Report. Close ties with Silicon Valley industry provide access to scholarships, internships,research projects, and employment for engineering students. Page 22.255.2SJSU ranks comparatively low against similar universities in terms of six-year graduation rates.The first-year retention rate is 81% and the six-year graduation rate is 46.4% which is lower thancomparable CSU
, softskills are commonly associated with social or humanities courses, graduates from engineeringprograms requires to develop these skills. According to previous studies, soft skills could be thekey to increase the employability in higher education graduates. The apparent graduates’weaknesses are in communication skills, team work and the attitude on how to carry themselvesin the community (citizenship) among others23. Moreover, higher education programs areexpected to prepare students for future professional work experience. In contrast students areexpected to learn how to become exceptional professionals ready to handle any kind of challengeassociated with his or her job instantaneously after graduation. Many times these twoexpectations are not
meaningful. The projects also fostered a sense of accomplishment andboosted students' confidence in their problem-solving abilities. The EM approach encouraged themto think creatively and explore innovative solutions beyond what was covered in traditionallectures. Figure 6: Students' perception © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceConclusionThis paper discussed a method to improve engineering design education for undergraduates bycombining mini-prototype projects and an Entrepreneurial Mindset. The approach and engagementstrategy provided practical ways to foster collaboration among college students while
(Mac, PC) and to be reasonably completed both in classrooms with computers at hand and in those with more limited (or remote) computer access. The course can be adapted for a variety of class sizes. Materials are written for classes of approximately 20 students, but indicate options for small (fewer than 10) and large (more than 30) class sizes. Course materials will be available electronically. Courseware decisions will be aligned with current standards but will be forward-thinking. Courseware will offer both learning management functionality and opportunities for collaboration and communication among and across groups (teachers and students
campusfollowing Spring 2009. While one might argue that some students should leave and somestudents only intended to complete the first two years at our university, Figure 1 clearly showsthat the campus is losing academically successful students for one reason or another. Further,the number students are large enough that it warrants further exploration to determine whyacademically successful students choose to leave. Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2010, American Society for Engineering Education 159 Figure 1. GPA of Students Who Did Not Return (Spring
method of assuring individual accountability in cooperative learning is to give individual examinations covering every aspect of the assignment or project. One way is to define a group process monitor rotated among team members in different projects to verify that each team member understands each part of the final report, not just the part for which he or she was primarily responsible. By the end of each problem/project, each team gives a written report and the instructor arbitrarily designates which group member presents which part of the project. The instructor completes the discussion by highlighting important items either missed by students or not addressed by the current problem. In this
severaldisciplines for sound decision-making. Thus a typical technological context will requirethe meaningful collaboration of several experts. Some of this research may serve tosupport changes within traditional academic settings, as the learning objectives of thestudents and the industrial culture changes. Several specific elements comprise the core of the weekend format as described inthis paper. Each of the elements could be the foundation of further research inengineering education. Specifically, the implementation of cohort learning to greaterteam cooperation and industry development would be worthy of empirical validation,along with the “accuracy” of using alternative evaluation methods in combination withthe discussed teaching methods
available to help the team succeed. The objective is tomake sure the strong students realize they can get the instructor to help the weakerstudent. Since oftentimes the weaker student may not seek help, the stronger student canencourage the weaker one to get help. The incentive virtually forces the strong students toseek out the weaker ones. If a student has a reputation among peers for being hardworking, and that student has a poor grade on an exam, they become a much valuedpartner. This encourages all students to be positively interdependent, a key element offunctioning cooperative groups.Assessment Instruments Since one objective of this project is to increase the success rates of students indynamics, the class grades are monitored. To see
program in the Northern Cheyenne community. The results to date throughPhase 2 activities include: increased communication and understanding between the tribal andacademic communities; the definition of clear working relationships and shared organizationalgoals; increased tribal interest in sustainable building technologies; annual sustainableconstruction projects; and the conclusions from targeted and applied research performed byfaculty and graduate students. Page 9.849.7 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004
research in- terests include geotechnical modeling with transparent soils, foundation engineering, and urban geotech- nology. He makes extensive use of sensors and measurement systems in his research studies. Iskander has published 10 books, 100 papers, and graduated six doctoral students, 27 master’s students, 12 under- graduate research assistants, and supervised the research activities of three school teachers and nine high school students. Page 25.1439.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Using Robotics to Promote Learning in Elementary GradesAbstract
, "Attracting Students to Construction Education Programs: An Exploration of Perceptions by Gender," International Journal of Construction Education and Research , pp. 179-197, 2017.[8] S. Michalowski and A. Newman, "Understanding the Low Male Participation Rate in College Now," The City University of New York Research & Evaluation – Collaborative Programs , New York City, 2008.[9] M. Guy, K.-A. Hughes and P. Ferris-Day, "Lack of awareness of nursing as a career choice for men: A qualitative descriptive study," Journal of Advanced Nursing , pp. 4190-4198, 2022.[10] N. Olmedo-Torre, F. S. Carracedo, M. N. S. Ballesteros, D. Lopez, A. Perez-Poch and M. Lopez-Beltran, "Do Female Motives for Enrolling Vary According to STEM
their design behavior and to explore different design options at an early stage, even before the detailed designs are made. In the future, students and graduates will have the capability to design better and innovative products and reason collaboratively at higher levels in the conceptual stages. We hypothesize the nature and type of question asking by the students to the instructor will change. IDEA-Pen also aims to improve engineering learning by providing students (especially in Mechanical and Civil Engineering disciplines) with a natural and an intuitive interface to Page 24.683.12 learn and explore
solutions could progress toward developing final designproposals with more creativity. Gender-balanced teams with high conflict among teammembers could not generate an idea and create innovative final projects. For having moreinnovative solutions in design projects, Fila and Purzer [24] suggested that instructors avoidforming teams only on the basis of gender and that they facilitate teams during teamwork.Ertas et al. [14] tested the transdisciplinary (TD) pedagogy in undergraduate research teams.The authors investigated TD’s impact on the learning outcomes of male Caucasian and maleunderrepresented minorities students. This approach increased the engagement ofunderrepresented students in teams. Due to the engagement, collaboration, and support
-of-the-arttechnologies in its industry and setting a new trend with their global products. From theacademic program perspective, the partnership has provided real-world experience to ourstudents, relevant advice on emerging industrial trends in workplace, and a professional networkfor our faculty and students. From the industrial partners’ viewpoint, they can encourage neededcurricular renovations, leverage an academic program’s research and development expertise, andgain direct access to the most motivated and capable graduates for potential employment.IntroductionDue to ABET accreditation requirements and the increasing emphasis to include professionalpractice in the education program, most engineering departments are actively seeking
university-industry collaboration happens among researchers, there is a growing trendof universities inviting industry panels to participate in curriculum design to make thecollaboration more impactful for students. [8] explored the program advisory boards (PAB) forengineering degrees through interviews with heads of programs at one technical university inSweden. Although the main expectations of this type of university-industry collaboration areon planning, content, implementation, and assessment, programs expressed varying opinionsabout the contribution PAB brought. The needs, wishes, and suggestions of the industry areconsidered, however, the extent of collaboration was confined by university regulations andquality assurance systems. [9] took a