everyday life and career choices of engineers. Key words: Engineering ethics, ethics and technology, first year students.IntroductionEthics, often viewed as a boring and fusty topic abounding with arcane phrases and eye-rollingphilosophy, has become a matter of almost daily concern and public interest. From Enron toVioxx with skewed or mis-reported data, to insulation breakdowns in defibrillators [1], NewOrleans levee failures, and with microelectronics manufacturers and plastics processesexperiencing difficult solvent choices [2][3], there are many issues for engineering decisionmakers. Ethics are also closely associated with the “rules and standards governing the conductof members of a profession.” [4]Ethics embraces more than the “Golden Rule
THE MAKING OF ENGINEERS: THE ROBOT CHALLENGEBy Neville JacobsINTRODUCTION The purpose of this presentation is to describe two IEEE initiatives that we believe can raise theinterest of students in technology and engineering, counter the influence that television has exerted inglamorizing careers in other fields, such as medicine, law and high finance; and introduce students to thefun of getting involved with engineering challenges . We all know that engineering can be very excitingand rewarding, but we need to bring this to the attention of our pre-college students, so as to obtain alarger proportion of them going on to Engineering schools.TWO SYMBIOTIC PROJECTS:TISP - TEACHER IN-SERVICE PROGRAM This is an enrichment program
THE MAKING OF ENGINEERS: THE ROBOT CHALLENGEBy Neville JacobsINTRODUCTION The purpose of this presentation is to describe two IEEE initiatives that we believe can raise theinterest of students in technology and engineering, counter the influence that television has exerted inglamorizing careers in other fields, such as medicine, law and high finance; and introduce students to thefun of getting involved with engineering challenges . We all know that engineering can be very excitingand rewarding, but we need to bring this to the attention of our pre-college students, so as to obtain alarger proportion of them going on to Engineering schools.TWO SYMBIOTIC PROJECTS:TISP - TEACHER IN-SERVICE PROGRAM This is an enrichment program
electro- chemical energy storage systems.Dr. Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles Corin (Corey) Bowen is a postdoctoral researcher in the College of Engineering, Computer Science and Technology at California State University - Los Angeles, where she is working on the NSF-funded Eco- STEM project. Her engineering education research focuses on structural oppression in engineering sys- tems, organizing for equitable change, and developing an agenda of Engineering for the Common Good. She conferred her Ph.D. in aerospace engineering from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor in April 2021. Her doctoral research included both technical and educational research. She also holds an M.S.E. in aerospace
Paper ID #36420Weaving Students into Engineering, not Weeding Them OutDr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University Dr. Carpenter is Founding Dean of Engineering at Campbell University. She is 2022-2023 President of ASEE and past President of WEPAN. She is a former NSF ADVANCE PI and was a co-recipient of the 2022 National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard M. Gordon Award for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education for her role in launching the Grand Challenges Scholars Program. She is an ASEE PEV for General Engineering, Dr. Carpenter regularly speaks at the national level on issues related to the success of
their designs on the world around them. This is so important that theAccreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) requires that engineering studentshave “an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs withconsideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social,environmental, and economic factors” as well as “an ability to recognize ethical and professionalresponsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider theimpact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts.” [2]These requirements necessitate an understanding of engineering design as well as ethicalreasoning to make the appropriate
of enhancing learningthrough service learning activities. The initial motivation for increasing student engagement inthe industrial engineering program was to satisfy the criteria for accrediting engineeringprograms by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. The more recentdevelopment is the establishment of PACCE at UW-Platteville. The paper presents a summary ofPACCE service learning projects and student reflections. INTRODUCTION TO IE PROGRAM AT UW-PLATTEVILLE The College of Engineering, Mathematics, and Science consists of seven departments:Chemistry and Engineering Physics, Mathematics, Civil and Environmental Engineering,Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Software Engineering, General
types of minds and every person needs to be literate in engineering and technology. She is an ASEE and IEEE Fellow and PAESMEM awardee. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Enhancing Diversity through Explicitly Designed Engineering OutreachThe Engineering Place at NC State University was founded in 1999 and grew as an extension ofthe Women in Engineering Program with the desire to attract more women to engineering byreaching out to younger students. It was soon evident that any efforts to attract women toengineering would also be beneficial for underrepresented populations and all students. Workingin the preK-12 space also highlighted the need to inform the public about the true nature
23 Copyright ©2019 American Society for Engineering Education Session CPDD 444 Continuing (Engineering) Education in Nordic countries/ Norway My university, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2018: Two Working Groups on the development of LLL/ CE: 1. Strategy/ organisation/ business models and financing 2. Develop CE in the area of digitization + establish NTNU CE Office in Oslo (capital) Group members: deans, vice deans; faculty leaders of the institution (goal: to make them understand/ discuss Continuing Education) Resulted in two
recruiting faculty andstudents, as well as decision support systems. Corporate diversity officers, human resourcespecialists and university relations officers will benefit from information on recruitment,outreach, and trends; foundations, corporations, and associations interested in collaborating onsolutions to the issues associated with the success of women in engineering, as well as directorsof engineering education programs interested in improving programs and performance.Collaborating with WEPAN on this project are a variety of other national organizations,including the Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology, the American Societyfor Engineering Education, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science’sCenter for
)techniques for motivating students unsure of “why they need…”, and (4) a better understandingof where their future students are coming from.The North Texas-STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) center is a partnership ofour university and a Dallas Independent School District (DISD) that establishes a center forSTEM education that will research, create, and provide information on best practices forinnovative teaching and learning. Our strategy is to create campus design teams, bringingtogether school administrators, teachers, students, STEM professors, STEM business partners,community-based informal STEM institutions such as museums and existing science networks inorder to provide opportunity for interaction between all of these
AC 2009-1377: CIVIL ENGINEERING COURSES TAUGHT WITHINDIVIDUALIZED STUDENT ASSIGNMENTSAhmet Zeytinci, University of the District of ColumbiaPhilip Brach, University of the District of Columbia Page 14.323.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 CIVIL ENGINEERING COURSES TAUGHT WITH INDIVIDUALIZED STUDENT ASSIGNMENTSAbstractOne of the problems confronting the present day instructor is that of students cheating. While itis reasonably possible to control student interaction on quizzes and exams taken in class, it is noteasy to prevent students from doing other assignments collaboratively. While it is important andencouraged that students work
teach engineering economy within theirrespective colleges/universities. The surveys, containing some dozen questions, were completed and returned tothe author during the fall semester of 1995 — the names of those who participated in the survey are given inAppendix A. The results of the individual questions from the survey are given below:QUESTION: Which department(s) Teaches Engineering Economy at Your School? Entity No. of Answer Entity No. of Answer That Teaches Responses Frequency That Teaches Responses FrequeIndustrial Engineering 26 54.2% Industrial Technology 1 2.1%Engineering
student engagement and how they can be used to improve diversity within engineer- ing. LaMeres received his Ph.D. from the University of Colorado, Boulder. He has published over 80 manuscripts and 2 textbooks in the area of digital systems and engineering education. LaMeres has also been granted 13 US patents in the area of digital signal propagation. LaMeres is a member of ASEE, a Senior Member of IEEE, and a registered Professional Engineer in the States of Montana and Col- orado. Prior to joining the MSU faculty, LaMeres worked as an R&D engineer for Agilent Technologies in Colorado Springs, CO where he designed electronic test equipment.Prof. Jessi L. Smith, Montana State University Jessi L. Smith is Professor
data and the ethnographic datawill be available in the future. ReferencesAmerican Printing House for the Blind (2015). Distribution of eligible students based on the federal quota census of January 6, 2014. Available: http://www.aph.org/federal- quota/distribution-2015/Beck-Winchatz, B. & Riccobono, M. (2008). Advancing participation of blind students in science, technology, engineering, and math. Advances in Space Research, 42, 1855- 1858.Jones, M.G., Monogue, J., Oppewal, T., Cook, M.P., & Broadwell, B. (2006). Visualizing without vision at the microscale: Students with visual impairments explore cells without touch. Journal of Science Education and Technology
Paper ID #13395Assessing the GRIT of Incoming Engineering StudentsDr. Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University Dr. Laura Bottomley, ASEE Fellow, is the Director of Women in Engineering and The Engineering Place for K-20 Outreach and a Teaching Associate Professor in the Colleges of Engineering and Education at NC State University. She teaches an Introduction to Engineering class for incoming freshmen in the College and Children Design, Invent, Create, a course for elementary education students that introduces them to engineering design and technology as well as various electrical engineering classes. In 2009 Dr
Paper ID #27879BOOSTing preparedness through engineering project-based service learningDr. Deborah Won, California State University, Los Angeles Deborah Won is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at California State University, Los Angeles. Her specialization is in Biomedical Engineering and her scientific research area focuses on neuro-rehabilitative technology. Her educational research interests include use of Tablet PCs and tech- nology to better engage students in the classroom as well as pedagogical and advisement approaches to closing the achievement gap for historically under-represented minority
today’s engineers at themultidisciplinary level. Literacy in graphics includes the ability to read the graphics dialectacross the engineering disciplines, create drawings as they are applied in the field includinginstrument and computer drawings, and to transfer mental images to a graphic design, which isthe beginning of the creative design process.IntroductionThe Accrediting Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) sets the criteria for a broadbased engineering graphics program to include: “an ability to function on multi-disciplinaryteams”; “an ability to communicate effectively”; and “an ability to use the techniques, skills andmodern scientific and technical tools necessary for professional practice”.1 A multidisciplinarygraphics program
, American Society for Engineering EducationAcknowledgementsOhland’s work was supported by NSF DGE-9809663, “NSF Post-doctoral Fellowship inScience, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology Education.” He also notes the mentors whohave helped him bridge the worlds of education and engineering—Tim Anderson (his post-doctoral mentor at the University of Florida), Marc Hoit (his Ph.D. advisor), and the entireSUCCEED leadership, particularly Rich Felder and Carl Zorowski.Palmer would like to thank the sponsors of RPI’s Electronics Manufacturing, his PhD AdvisorsMartin E. Glicksman and Krishna Rajan; and those who mentored him during the post-doctoralposition: Don L. Millard and Robert W. Messler Jr.Author BiographiesMATTHEW W. OHLANDis an Assistant
understanding ofthe course material. He does not abuse the modern technologies such as Power Point to cover ahuge amount of material, or even worse, show page after page of the textbook through Page 8.1011.2presentation viewers.Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright© 2003, American Society for Engineering Education The number of waking hours has not changed for either Efed or his students. Hence, hedoes not supplement but complement the course with new tools. For example, if he wants toassign projects in a course, he knows whether use of tools such as mathematical
and Computer Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. His primaryresearch is in the design of analog and mixed-signal VLSI circuits for modeling neurobiological systems. Page 2.14.8
AC 2010-509: DESIGN EXPERIENCE IN A MANUFACTURING ENGINEERINGPROGRAMJahangir Ansari, Virginia State University Jahangir Ansari is an Associate Professor of Manufacturing Engineering in the Department of Engineering and Technology at Virginia State University. He received his M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering in 1979 and Ph. D. degree in Mechanical Design and Production Engineering in 1983 both from Seoul National University. He joined the faculty at VSU in 2002. He has over 18 years of industrial experience in different areas including shipbuilding and cement plant industries. His research interests include Structural Vibration, FEM, CAD/CAM/CNC, and Computer Integrated
also highlighted the widespread optimism for the future of OER [6].OER in Engineering:Given the decentralized nature of creating and hosting OER, it is challenging to quantify theexact number produced. One of the most commonly used reference libraries, The Open TextbookLibrary [7], lists a total of 1,361 resources as of Jan 1, 2024. As seen in Figure 1, most OERshave been written for the Humanities, followed by the Natural and Social Sciences. WhileComputer Science has 116 developed OER, other Engineering & Technology branches have onlydeveloped 70 OER. Furthermore, 48 of the OER in Engineering & Technology have been writtenfor either general Engineering & Technology or Electrical Engineering. This leaves only 22 OERin the Open
fundamentals of theengineering design process.Over the past four years the author has been responsible for teaching the introductoryengineering course for students on the Missouri State University (MSU) campus who areparticipating in the Cooperative Engineering Program operated by Missouri University ofScience & Technology (Missouri S&T) in cooperation with MSU.During that time, a number of different ideas and topics have introduced in the course. Somewere successful but others failed for a variety of reasons. This paper discusses both thesuccesses and failures and offers suggestions for other teaching similar courses.IntroductionOn August 21, 2006, the Governor of the state of Missouri, along with the Curators of theUniversity of Missouri
part, “with more than 50,000members, the National Federation of the Blind is the largest and most influential membershiporganization of blind people in the United States. The NFB improves blind people’s livesthrough advocacy, education, research, technology, and programs encouraging independence andself-confidence. It is the leading force in the blindness field today and the voice of the nation'sblind. The NFB has affiliates in all fifty states plus Washington D.C. and Puerto Rico, and overseven hundred local chapters.” [7]An important component of the work of the NFB has been their engagement with technology.The have worked with many engineers, including the inventor and designer Raymond Kurzweil,on his breakthrough Braille readers and
Research and Lifelong Learning Skills in Engineering Education Beckry Abdel-Magid Yunsheng Xu Professor Assistant Professor Composite Materials Composite Materials Engineering Engineering Winona State University Winona State University Beckry@winona.edu yxu@winona.eduAbstractResearch is an integral part of undergraduate education and researchexperience is becoming essential in engineering where technology is giving riseto unprecedented speed and efficiency in the use of complex scientific methodsin engineering applications. Similarly
Paper ID #39587Designing Instruction to Promote a Riemann Sum-Based Understanding ofthe Definite IntegralDr. Caleb D Holloway, West Virginia University Institute of Technology I am an assistant professor of mathematics at West Virginia University Institute of Technology. My formal education is in functional analysis, but for the last several years I have been working in the field of math education. My current interests are students’ conceptual development of calculus and precalculus concepts, and the use of open educational resources in math education. ©American Society for Engineering Education
2006-535: VIRTUAL AND DISTANCE EXPERIMENTS: PEDAGOGICALALTERNATIVES, NOT LOGISTICAL ALTERNATIVESEuan Lindsay, Curtin University of Technology Euan D. Lindsay is a Lecturer at Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia. He has recently completed a PhD in Engineering Education at the University of Melbourne, Australia, investigating the effects of remote and virtual access to laboratory hardware upon students’ learning outcomes. His research interests include engineering education, telecontrol (particularly internet-based telecontrol), animatronic puppetry, and technology-mediated interfaces for deaf-blind communication.Malcolm Good, University of Melbourne Malcolm C. Good received the
Paper ID #11503Student and Faculty Perceptions of Attendance Policies at a Polytechnic Uni-versityDr. Loraine Lowder, Southern Polytechnic State University M. Loraine Lowder is an Assistant Professor in the Systems and Mechanical Engineering Department at Southern Polytechnic State University. She received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, M.S. in Mechanical Engineering, and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Dr. Lowder’s research interests include image processing, computer-aided engineering, and cardiovascu- lar biomechanics. She is also interested in performing research in the area of
Paper ID #39895Addressing Engineering Reductionism by Reimagining ABET OutcomesMarie Stettler Kleine, Colorado School of Mines Marie Stettler Kleine is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering, Design, and Society. She conducts research on engineering practice and pedagogy, exploring its origins, purposes, and potential futures. Marie is especially interested in the roles of values in engineers’ pursuit to ”do good.” Marie received her B.S. in mechanical engineering and international studies from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and M.S. and PhD in science and technology studies (STS) from Virginia Tech