, there remain pocketsof practice and education in “sanitary engineering.” For example, the National EnvironmentalHealth Association (NEHA), founded in 1937, exists, “To advance the environmental healthprofession for the purpose of providing a healthful environment for all,” [10], and the AmericanAcademy of Sanitarians (AAS), founded in 1966, exists to, “elevate the standards, improve thepractice, advance professional proficiency, and promote the highest levels of ethical conductamong professional sanitarians in every field of environmental health” [11].In 1998, the final report of the National Science Foundation (NSF)-sponsored meeting,“Research Frontiers in Environmental Engineering,” raised an important question, namely,“Should the non
the Executive Committee for the Computing Accreditation Commission of ABET, and also serves as a program evaluator for the Engineering Accreditation Commission. He is also a founding member and serves as Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions through a standardized rite-of-passage ceremony. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Partnering to Develop Educational Software Applications: A Four-Year Retrospective StudyIntroductionSeveral years ago, a project was added to the first-year programming sequence at Ohio NorthernUniversity that focused on
understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Figure 1. An early version of EC 2000’s a-k student learning outcomes [35].The most significant thing to note about EC 2000 is their overall emphasis on professional skills(see Figure 1). Of the eleven a-k learning outcomes, at least seven, and
specific aspect, the division was made on 0-4 and5-8 years. As the focus of the study was on transdisciplinary engineering design, it was decided that ineach group, representation from different disciplines be ensured to allow for a transdisciplinarydiscussion. Therefore, one representative from each of the engineering disciplines from eachgraduation group was randomly selected and invited to the interview. Table 1 shows that thenumber of focus group participants, their disciplines and graduation year range. The dates for thefocus group interviews were selected through the group vote with alumni in May 2018. Once thedates were set, participants were emailed the arrival instructions. Due to the ethics protocol andconfidentiality agreement, no
Entering Mentoring curriculum. Topics discussed includedAssessing Understanding, Cultivating Ethical Behavior in Research, and Addressing Equity andInclusion.4.4. Weekly meetings and other activitiesThe REU students met weekly with the program leads to discuss progress in their researchprojects and to continue the Entering Research training, covering topics such as the relationshipand communication with their mentors and coping strategies. The meetings took place viaZoom, and the program director, based at Rice, visited the participants at UTEP and ASU tomeet with them in person and conduct the weekly meeting from their facilities.In addition, participants received training from the Rice Center for Written, Oral and VisualCommunication on how to
judgment withinengineering and computing service-learning has focused primarily on the social, political, andcultural impact of technology on society. This emphasis notwithstanding, the EPICS programrecognizes the value of reflective judgment and has attempted to expand the use of criticalthinking skills to include reflections on the community partner (called the project partner), teamdynamics, the design process, and ethics [23]. This approach is consistent with the broader ABET program and the characteristics of theEngineer of 2020 reported by the NAE [26]. Direct contact on projects with groups such as not-for-profit organizations and the reflection on the impact a student is making on these groups,rudimentary in service-learning, are
full suite of modern design application software [31]For more than a decade now, reports from industry and government have called for engineeringstudents to be prepared for leadership roles [3]. In the late 2000’s ASCE established a vision forthe future that frames five critical learning outcomes [4,29]: (1) master builders, (2) stewards ofnatural environment, (3) innovators and integrators of ideas and technology, (4) managers of riskand uncertainty, and (5) leaders in shaping public policy. Based on this vision, there have beenrenewed studies in the last 10 years on capstones to meet current demands. Studies have included: Engineering ethics [24] Leadership skills [3] Integrating technology (for course admin
Paper ID #21574Understanding Engineering and Technology Student Perceptions: Barriersto Study Abroad ParticipationDr. Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University Gregg M. Warnick is the Director of the Weidman Center for Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). His research and teaching interests include leadership, global agility, globalization, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many
they have not officially announced plans to do so otherwise, the question wascompletely changed. Instead, the question was rewritten to reflect planetary protection policies.The rhetoric surrounding planetary protection policies is presently a popular topic of discussionpertaining to current and future space exploration. What makes this issue so controversial andtimely is the ethical debate around the importance of planetary protection policies. These policiesare extremely crucial and timely for deep space travel to distant celestial bodies including theMoon, Mars, and asteroids. Thus, gaining the perspective of the undergraduate participants’opinions on this topic is meaningful to depict future policy initiatives around planetaryprotection.At
States Culture includes reflections wherein participants drewconnections to home by comparing or contrasting their experiences abroad with their experiencesback home (locally or nationally). Many students drew connections to everyday elements of lifeback home, like food, coffee, alcohol, transportation, stores, and universities. Others mentionedbuying souvenirs for friends or family back home, and one participant, Ian, mentioned wantingto bring his family to places he visited. Additionally, Matthew made several comparisonsrelating to work ethic between the countries he visited and the United States. He describeddisdain for the perceived alcohol culture among locals and general “laziness” he observed in thecountries he visited, drawing
; an example of Axis 7: Engineering’s Ethical Implications. These engineeringexperiences and many others like them occurring throughout the rocket module were unique andvaluable for high school students. The general lack of student recognition revealed by theirsurveys that they were, in fact, doing engineering may arise from the conflation of engineeringwith science endemic in schools identified by Pleasants and Olson [2]. The instructor could havedone a better job illuminating for students these “engineering teaching moments” as theyoccurred. Our own research contains examples of advanced projects adapted for high school thatfailed to hold student interest and attention because they were not designed or implemented withthe P-12 environment in
drug [Topol, 2004].Using these back stories, we created a series of scenarios along with questions. We framed eachquestion so as to obscure its origin while potentially allowing the student to draw out and discussa decision error of systems engineering. Why not simply give students descriptions of the failuresand the findings we discussed and have the students evaluate them? First, we wanted to eliminatebias due to students being familiar with a particular failure. For example, the Space ShuttleChallenger accident is a frequent topic in engineering ethics lectures. A learned, in-context,response from a previous exposure would not give us an indication of their abilities in systemsengineering. Second, the point of framing a question around a
, it allows for the solution to viewed as something realistic,usable, and practical, resulting in greater overall success [6]. As an engineer, it is important tolearn about those the project will impact to ensure that the product will meet their needs. Byasking students to consider the needs of others and providing realistic environments to practiceempathy in engineering design challenges, researchers hoped to achieve two outcomes: first,increased retention and initial registration in STEM-based classes after participating in theprogram, and second, greater overall success in designing and creating solutions.The empathy connections made in the program drew heavily from education research, includingNoddings’ ethics of care and Dweck’s growth
welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors 3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences 4. an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts 5. an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives 6. an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw
interrelated. These blocks, which include design, analysis,ethics, and laboratory, serve to fragment rather than integrate the curriculum and therefore thelearning experience and preparation of engineering students. The curricula typically includemany levels of pre-requisites and require students fully understand theory before being permittedto practice application. Rather than necessarily informing each other, these insular blocks,typically taught by different entities within the university structure, serve as individualappendages between which the student must somehow identify connections. The authors argued“… the workload of science and math courses can be so overwhelming that students end uplosing interest in the profession for which they are
range, and include the budget in an appendix to the primary report as well. The limitedbudget forced students to (in some instances dramatically) reconsider their recommendations,now striking a balance between satisfying their client and meeting ethical obligations to deliver asafe final product to consumers.The project as whole reflects a number of innovative pedagogical approaches that dependedentirely on the full integration of instructors, researchers, and librarians: the entirety of thepedagogical case study, including the syllabus schedule, the assignments, the instructionallesson, and the assessment was developed collaboratively. This unique approach provides thebasis for the authors’ results and discussion.Results and DiscussionAt the
○ Secure coding practices, ethical hacking and threat modeling ○ Security architecture ○ Security concepts related to DNS, routing, authentication, VPN, proxy services and DDOS mitigation technologies ○ TCP/IP, computer networking, routing and switching ○ Windows, UNIX and Linux operating systemsWhile the previously listed set of skills are key to organizations looking to fill the CISO position,many organizations included certain certifications they deemed crucial for the CISO position.The next section examines the certifications most organizations indicated as important for theCISO position.Value of IT certifications to the IT security industry to obtain gainful employmentThere are three
of the Predictors of Intentional PersistenceData and MethodsData The stated hypotheses were analyzed through original panel data. We sampled 279students at the University of Toronto - a major Canadian university that facilitates extensiveeducational programming in ML/AI. This includes undergraduate and graduate engineeringstudents. Students in ML/AI courses that were offered as part of an official ML/AI academicspecialization were invited to participate in the survey. The study was reviewed and approved bythe University Ethics Review Office. Data was collected through paper surveys distributed inclasses. The survey was open to students in any year of study but mostly students in Year 3 – 4and in their graduate studies as they
Flint Water Crisis (Table 2). To address cognitive issues, weused two online videos (Online Lesson 13.1 – Flint Water Crisis Overview and Online Lesson13.2 – Flint Water Crisis Chemistry) and an online formative quiz for each lesson. We also usedthree lectures. In the first lecture, we reviewed the chemistry aspects of the crisis, workedthrough example problems, and completed a concept map activity. In the second lecture, wecovered the story of the Flint water crisis, discussing the events leading to the water crisis, howthe crisis was uncovered, and the failures of government employees to address the crisis. Thesecond lecture ended with a minute paper related to engineering ethics and asked students tosubmit “muddiest points”. During the third
, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability.”Student outcome (d) stated “an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams.” Student outcome(g) stated “an ability to communicate effectively.”In fall 2017, ABET Board of Delegate approved several major changes to the general criteriaproposed by the EAC [14] and the implementation of these changes started in 2019-2020accreditation cycle. The revised ABET-EAC general criteria included changes to previousCriterion 3 and Criterion 5. The definitions of the terminologies used in the general criteria wereimproved and expanded. In the new general criteria, criterion 3 consists of seven studentoutcomes. Student outcome 2 replaces SO (c) of the previous general criteria. It states
implementation of students contributing to designing curriculum[31]. This study reports positive results in this innovation, where students are helping educatorswith this lofty task. Co-design as a method is promising in that it affords different perspectivesand motivations yet encourages ethical considerations and a shared understanding of the designoutcome [30]. This method also acknowledges the power dynamics that can arise from differentstakeholders working to design together [30]. In future work, we will have educators, students,and researchers working together to design solutions to the difficulty of creating inclusivepractices and environments in engineering education. As a discipline, engineering education hasused co-design to do curricular
Competencies orientation Negotiation Communication High ethical standards, integrity, and global, social, intellectual, and technological responsibility Cognitive Collaboration Critical Thinking flexibility Curiosity Willingness to take calculated risk Initiative Ability to prioritize efficiently Persistence/grit Project management (supervising
, and social issues surrounding the use of information and access, and use information ethically, wisely, and legally.” Table 2 – Lafayette College FYS General Learning Outcomes Students completing FYS 035 (This Course) should be able to: C1 Describe in a qualitative way how semiconductor circuits function, are designed, and are manufactured. C2 Describe how as semiconductor technology has evolved over time, it has enabled new ways for people to do things (e.g. learn, work, communicate, and control other devices and systems) C3 Elaborate on how technological improvements have enabled 50+ years of “Moore’s Law.” C4 Describe the factors that are likely to limit further technological
their own language. This was done in two rounds to ensure proper alignment ofthe interview questions with the analytic framework described above.1 Active debate regarding the difficulty and ethics of conducting interviews across powerdifferentials, including race, gender and class, continues in scholarly discussions of interviewmethodologies [16-19]. O’Brien [17] argues that race-matching alone is insufficient inaccounting for the multiple layers of difference and power differentials that exist betweenresearcher and interviewee. Instead, she contends that the most important objective for theresearcher is instead to “activate” race by addressing it specifically, indicating to intervieweesthat it is acceptable to discuss race openly (p. 79). In
that they vary significantly in their implementation [33]. From Howe’s work asampling of some of the differentiating characteristics are shown in Table 1 below. Characteristics Representative Examples Duration One to Two Semesters Lecture Topics design process, teamwork, project planning, engineering ethics, intellectual property, etc. Sources of Projects Academic, Student Proposed, Service, Industry, etc. Assessment Methods Project Reports, Design Reviews, Peer Evaluations, Effort Reports, etc. Size of
the program by connecting with the Launch program, asummer bridge for young men joining engineering in the Fall. This program offered financialwellness and financial aid workshops, as well as workshops on ethics, leadership, criticalthinking, grit, and coop/internship opportunities. As a result of combining some of the RAMPand Launch programs, we observed that the RAMP 2019 group became more competitive withthe Launch participants and created a more supportive network among themselves. 4.4: 2019 Focus Group Data AnalysisStudent defined learning goals/aspirations for RAMPSimilar to the 2018 first focus group, 2019 responses to the question, “what are