-InstitutionalStudy,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, 2004, pp. 313–320. [3] Felder, R.M., Brent, R., “Understanding Student Differences,” Journal ofEngineering Education, Jan., 2005, pp. 57–72. [4] Seymour, E., and Hewitt, H., Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave theSciences, Boulder, Colo.,: Westview Press, 1997. [5] Packard, B. W. l., and Nguyen, D., “Science career-related possible selves ofadolescent girls: a longitudinal study,” Journal of Career Development, Vol 29, No. 4, 2003, pp.251-263. [6] Husman, J., and Lens, W., “The role of the future in student motivation,”Educational Psychologist, Vol. 34, No. 2, 1999, pp. 113-125. [7] Lang, F. R., and Carstensen, L. L., “Time counts: Future time
. Luntz, E. Almeiada, D. Tilbury, J. Moyne and K. Hargrove, “The distributed reconfigurable factory testbed(DRFT): A collaborative cross-university manufacturing system testbed,” Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference,2006.[10] R, Bartz, S. Engell, C. Schmid, H. Roth, N. Becker and H. M. Schaedel, “Project-oriented internet-basedlearning in the field of control engineering,” Proceedings of ASEE/SEFI/TUB Annual Colloquium, 2002.[11] J. Rehg and B. Muller, “Teaching PLCs with the IEC 61131 standard languages,” Proceedings of ASEE AnnualConference, 2005.[12] D. Wang, and H. Peddle, “System approach for design and construction of PLC training laboratory,”Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, 2001.[13] K. H. Johansson, et al. (2005). “Vehicle
with 3.3-Volt and 5-Volt whichallows interfacing to older TTL technology.2.2 ispM4A5 64/32The educational development board presented in this paper is designed around the ispM4A5 64/32 44pin PLCC device. The block diagram for the chip is shown in Figure 1. The ispM4A5 has four PALblocks labeled A, B, C, and D. This is roughly equivalent to having four of the 1978 era PAL deviceson one chip. The PAL blocks are interconnected by the central switch matrix shown in the center of thediagram.In each PAL block, the AND logic array connects to the central switch matrix. The AND logic array isthe first level of the sum-of-product expression. The AND array feeds into the OR array contained inthe logic allocator block which completes the sum-of-products
AC 2007-83: THE ROLE OF EDUCATION IN THE PROGRESSION FROMTECHNOLOGIST TO GENERAL MANAGERLarry Bland, John Brown University Page 12.1460.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 The Role of Education in the Progression from Technologist to General Manager: A Qualitative StudyAbstractA qualitative research study addressing looking at educational interventions in the careerdevelopment of engineers moving from technologist to general manager. For this study“education” is defined on a four-part continuum of formal, non-formal, informal, andincidental/experiential. Formal and non-formal education is an intentional and systematicenterprise while
additional information. At this stage of the project, this role was fairly easy since we’re really moving forward on our design. Everyone came to the meetings with a pretty clear idea of what we needed to do and the motivation to work on it making my job fairly easy. The only blotch on my record was failing to call when I was quite sick and couldn’t come to the meeting. Our attendance policy states that we need to notify the group, and I just forgot. I would grade myself a B- on my role as not quite a solid “good,” but more like a “not half bad.” Person 2: This portion of the semester I had the role of leader. I feel I did a good job for the most part. I am comfortable taking
, P.A.; King, E.A.; Letourneau- Wagner, J.; and Shapiro, K. (1998). A Problem Based Learning, Case Study Approach to Pharmaceutics: Faculty and Student Perspectives, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Vol. 62(4): 398-401. 2. Carlson, L. and Sullivan, J. (1999). Hands-on Engineering: Learning by Doing in the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program. Int. J. Engng. Ed. Vol. 15(1): 20-31. 3. Eyerer, P.; Hefer, B.; and Krause, D. (2000). The Reformation of Technical Education through Project- Orientated Education (TheoPrax®), Global J. of Engng. Educ., Vol.4, No.3. 4. Dong, Z.Y. (2005). Improving Learning in Undergraduate Control Engineering Courses using Context- based Learning Models Int. J
Energy Program3 provides some of the most lucrative rebatesfor renewable energy system installations in the nation, and this clinic experience allowedengineering students to directly participate in a growing renewable energy market while learningmore about the electrical design of PV systems. In order to assure that their PV systems wouldbe economically feasible and well designed, the City of Ocean City (OC) and the OC Board ofEducation hired Integrated Systems (a consulting engineering group) to determine appropriatedesigns and plans for each of the twenty buildings they were considering. The feasibility studydetermined that ten buildings were good candidates for the PV systems. The consultingcompany (acting as an industry affiliate to the
1006 848 1208 1858 219 5139 % of Sample 19.6% 16.5% 23.5% 36.2% 4.3% 100.0% Total Count 1262 1346 1723 2416 219 6966 % of Sample 18.1% 19.3% 24.7% 34.7% 3.1% 100.0%GenderGender differences were insignificant (p=.612), with both populations being split roughly 50- Page 12.640.450%.Free and Reduced LunchThe Control sample has a significantly higher proportion of students receiving free or reducedlunch (Goodman & Kruskal Tau-b p=.000). 69.1% of the Control sample reporting receives freeor
teach with cases, which allows studentsto think critically beyond their field of expertise and the subject matter knowledge of theircontent area? Page 12.1394.3 2Herreid12 stated that teaching with cases could be classified into four major types: (a) individualassignment; (b) lecture format; (c) discussion format; and (d) small group format. The discussionformat and the small group format seem to be the most appropriate methods for using cases asthey provide opportunities for students to be active and engaged in making the ethical
professors from different cultures and academic traditions.Up until the end of year 2006, there used to be three main International Activities at KetteringUniversity: a) Study Abroad for Kettering University students, b) Study at Kettering Universityfor Foreign Exchange students and c) Matriculating foreign students at Kettering University.The first of these activities used to occur in the Academic Services Office on the Academic sideof Kettering University. This office deals strictly with the preparation and organization of studyabroad programs. At Kettering University foreign students used to be handled out of a separateoffice called the Office of International and Governmental Affairs. This office is responsible forthe preparation and
. Todd, R. and Magelby, S. “Creating Successful Capstone Programs by Considering the Needs of Stakeholders” Journal of Engineering Education, 19934. Kirschman, J. and Greenstein, J. “The use of groupware for collaboration in distributed student engineering design teams,” Journal of Engineering Education, Oct 20025. Latcha, M. and Oakley, B. “Toying with a capstone design course,” Journal of Engineering Education, Oct 20016. Hargreaves, D.J., "Addressing Transition to Tertiary Education in Engineering," European Journal of Engineering Education, 1998, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 79-89.7. Hansen, J. and Andersen, A., “Engineers of Tomorrow and Beyond: Knowledge, Insight and Skills Needed to Work Across Borders”, Proceedings of
theprofessional development sufficiently prepared the teachers to teach the engineering unit.The teachers took pre- and post- content tests before and after the professional developmentworkshop (see Appendix A). They also took a pre- and post- confidence survey to assess howconfident they were with engineering and technology (see Appendix B). The teachers were alsointerviewed approximately one month after the workshop and before they began teaching theunit in their classroom.The students also took pre and post content tests and attitude surveys before and after their in-class experience with the curriculum. The content test included modified questions from theMassachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS). The test questions (see AppendixC
Science Programs Effective for Evaluations during the 2007-2008 Accreditation Cycle”, http://www.abet.org 2 M. Hagenberger, B. Engerer, D. Tougaw, “Revision of a First-Semester Course to Focus on Fundamentals of Engineering” Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual conference and Exposition (2006). 3 National Association of Colleges and Employers website: www.naceweb.org. 4 J.T. Earle, Engineering Design Graphics, 11th. Ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, 2003 5 T. Sexton, Engineering Graphics., Schroff Development Corp., 2006 6 F.E. Giesecke, et al, Engineering Graphics 7th Ed., Prentice Hall, 2004 7 J. Bethune, Engineering Graphics w/Auto CAD 2007 1st. Ed., Prentice Hall, 2007 8 G.E.Vinson
plant model is assumed (see Equation 1) for the transferfunction from applied voltage (Va) to motor speed (y), and data from a step response is used toselect the poles and system gain. As only 3 parameters must be estimated (2 poles and a DCgain), students generally find the poles through trial and error after calculating the gain fromsteady-state values. y K ? 1 Va s - as - b 2Gathering the open-loop response data is a good exercise as the motor system’s control law mustbe modified to create the step input in voltage—the open-loop control law is that the
Engineering Education Annual Conference andExposition.[10] Cockayne, W.R. J. M. Feland III, and L. Leifer, “Teaching the “how” of engineering innovation,” InProceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.† By Entrepreneurial thinking we mean “the process of a) identifying opportunities others do not see, b) assessingthose opportunities – identifying necessary human, financial, and other resources necessary to exploit theopportunity, c) evaluating and managing the inherent risk in the new opportunity and d) persisting in pursuing of theopportunity to realization.” Page 12.681.12
; Exposition, Jun 2-5 1997, Orlando, FL, USA.7. Hirleman, E.D.; Atkinson, D.; Groll, E.A.; Matthews, J.; Xu, L.; Allert, B.; Hong, W.; Albers, A.; Wittig, S.L.K.;Lin, Z.Q.; and Xi, L.. GEARE: A comprehensive program for globalizing engineering education. ASEE AnnualConference Proceedings, ASEE 2004 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2004, p 6067-6076. Page 12.1240.148. Doerry, E., Doerry, K.; and Bero, B. The global engineering college: Lessons learned in exploring a new modelfor international engineering education. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, ASEE 2004 Annual Conference andExposition, 2004, p 6181-6195.9. Rojas-Oviedo, R
each of the following categories. You may use duplicate scores within a category. These evaluations will be held in strictest confidence, and your evaluations will not be shown to any other student. Rating Scale: 1 – (F) Minimal or no participation, and/or ineffective or no contribution. 2 – (D) Marginal participation or sporadic attendance at group meetings/classroom work sessions. 3 – (C) Participation was reasonable at times, but missed some meetings and/or deadlines. 4 – (B) Good participation, very supportive. This is the minimum expected level of participation. 5 – (A) Participation above and beyond what could be expected. Team
challenge and the opportunity towork in projects of their personal interest.References1. Beyerlein, S., Cordon, D., Davis D., Leise, C, and Apple D., “Hierarchy of Cognitive Domain Learning Skills to Guide Activity Design, Classroom Facilitation and Classroom Assessment.” ASEE Annual Conference, 2004.2. Felder, R.M., “The ABC’s of Engineering Education: ABET, Bloom’s Taxonomy, Cooperative Learning, and So On.” ASEE Annual Conference, 2004.3. Martin, J. (2001). Bloom's learning domains. In B. Hoffman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Technology. From http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/Articles/Blooms4. Rosa, A.J., “A proven Different Approach to Teaching Linear Circuits.” ASEE Annual Conference, 2004.5. Bransford, JD, Brown, AL, and
(2), pp. 24-33, 1986. 3. Bertoline, G.R., “The implications of cognitive neuroscience research on spatial abilities and graphics instruction”, Proceedings ICEGDG, 1, Vienna, pp. 28-34, 1988. 4. Sorby, S. A., Baartmans, B. J., “The development and assessment of a course for enhancing the 3-D spatial visualization skills of first year engineering students”, J. of Engineering Education, July 2000, pp. 301-307. 5. Miller, C.L., “Enhancing spatial visualization abilities through the use of real and computer-generated models”, Proceedings, 1990, ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE, 1990, pp. 131-134. 6. Pleck, M.H., “Visual literacy – An important aspect of engineering design”, Proceedings, 1991, ASEE Annual Conference
been justified byour analysis of the literature and the history of engineering practice in humanitarian activities andwas re-written in the form of a question in order to encourage students to reflect critically on andassess technology and/or engineering work. The set of HEE criteria is as follows: Page 12.1488.9A. Does this engineering work promote the good of all humans independent of nationality,religion, class, age, or sex? [Justification: Humanitarianism as an ethical tradition historicallyrejects the significance of such distinctions.]B. How might this engineering project be related to the protection and promotion of humanrights
AC 2007-2403: ENCOURAGERS AND DISCOURAGERS FOR DOMESTIC ANDINTERNATIONAL WOMEN IN DOCTORAL PROGRAMS IN ENGINEERINGAND COMPUTER SCIENCEMary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University MARY R. ANDERSON-ROWLAND, PhD, is the PI of three academic scholarship programs and a program for transfer students. An Associate Professor in Industrial Engineering at Arizona State University, she was the Associate Dean of Student Affairs in the Fulton School of Engineering at ASU from 1993-2004. She received the ASEE Minorities in Engineering Award 2006, the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005 and won the National Engineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by the AAAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished
/Why America Needs a Refresher Course on Energy. In National Environmental Education & Training Foundation: Washington, DC, 2002.7. NOWCAST, U.S. Public in the Dark on Climate Change Issues. American Meterological Society 2005, June 2005, 775.8. Riecken, G.; Yavas, U., Energy Conservation Awareness. Ball State Business Review 1979, 9, (2), 2.9. Ritchie, C. A.; Steinbrink, J. E., Knowledge, Attitude, and the Energy Ethic. Social Education 1984, 48, (2), 149-52.10. Barrow, L. H.; Morrisey, J. T., Energy Literacy of Ninth-Grade Students: A Comparison Between Maine and New Brunswick. Journal of Environmental Education 1989, 20, 22-25.11. Farhar, B. C., Energy and the Environment: the public view. Renewable Energy Report
. The latter are listed as close as possible to the solutionorder as best determined by the team. A generic design project DSM is shown in Figure 5. Notethat the sub-problems may also be listed along the diagonals to make the matrix easier to read.Reading across rows, Xs indicate column sub-problems that provide direct input tocorresponding row sub-problems. For example, reading across row D sub-problems B and Cprovide direct input to sub-problem D and are therefore marked with Xs. Likewise, reading downcolumns, Xs indicate row sub-problems that directly receive input from a particular column sub-problem. For example, reading down column D sub-problems E and F are marked. This meansthat E and F receive direct input from D. Sub-problems
AC 2007-1541: USING PHENOMENOGRAPHY TO INVESTIGATE DIFFERENTWAYS OF EXPERIENCING SUSTAINABLE DESIGNLlewellyn Mann, University of Queensland LLEWELLYN MANN is a PhD student in the School of Engineering at the University of Queensland and a member of the Catalyst Research Centre for Society and Technology. He has a Bachelor of Engineering (Mechanical & Space) and a Bachelor of Science (Physics) from UQ, as well as a Graduate Certificate of Education (Higher Education). Major research interests include; Engineering Education, Sustainability, Teaching and Learning, Engineering Design, Technology and Society.Gloria Dall'Alba, University of Queensland GLORIA DALL'ALBA teaches and
computer and sensor networks, signal and image processing, and engineering education. He was a co-recipient of both the Myril B. Reed Best Paper Award from the 32nd Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems and the 1986 Best Paper Award for Authors under 30 from the Signal Processing Society of the IEEE. He has served as an associate editor of the IEEE Transactions on Circuits and systems and was an elected member of the Board of Governors of the IEEE Circuits and Systems Society. He was the general chair of the 1997 IEEE/EURASIP Workshop on Non linear Signal and Image Processing. Dr. Coyle is a Fellow of the IEEE and in 1998 was named an Outstanding Engineering Alumnus
pick up any new pieces of information while viewing thesame content in a different delivery method. Here are some of the responses given bythese students:Student A: “With this list of objectives students will have a means of self-assessmentwhich promote confidence, and encourage progress. Also, self-assessment is furtherreinforced in the exercise component imbedded within the module. All of this makes thestructure of the course very suitable for independent study and skill acquisition.”Student B: “I think that someone who is very computer knowledgeable should have aneasy time with this lesson. I think that I personally got more out of having you explainand demonstrate the lesson in front of me while I was following along on my computer
Technology Education Teachers”. Journal ofTechnology Education, vol. 17(2), 2006.9. Danielson, S. “Knowledge Assessment in Statics: Concepts versus Skills”. In: Proceedings of the AnnualConference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education, Session 1168, Salt Lake City, UT,June 2004.10. Streveler, R. A., B. M. Olds, R. L. Miller, and M. A. Nelson. “Using a Delphi study to identify the most difficultconcepts for students to master in thermal and transport science (conference paper)”. In: Proceedings of the AnnualConference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education, Session 2430, Nashville, TN, June2003, pp. 1-8.11. Edgren, G. “Developing a competence-based core curriculum in biomedical laboratory science
) (B) (A/B) 1980-1986 61 149 40.94% 1987-1992 18 39* 46.15% 1993-1998 50 120 41.67% 1999-2004 105 236 44.49% Total 234 544 43.01%*- The course was not offered in any semester for academic years 1988-89 and 1989-90. Table 2. Survey Respondents by Time Period when they graduated Percent Percent of
field of engineering had become, a paper “Education forFactory Management” was presented by Hugo Diemer in 1903. He was on the faculty atPenn State and he played a pivotal role in the development of the first IndustrialEngineering program the country at that institution in 19084. Frank B. Gilbreth joinedS.P.E.E. in 1911 and he held a Symposium on Scientific Management in 1912. Anotherfounding father of Industrial Engineering, Frederick W. Taylor received an M.E. degreeat night from Stevens Institute of Technology in 1883. He died suddenly of pneumoniaon March 21, 1915 and his obituary appeared in the S.P.E.E. journal5.The Constitution of S.P.E.E. required that a group of members that desired officialrecognition be first formed as a Committee
Winch Electromagnet Weight Negative Rail Figure 4. Prototype systems for electromechanical project in Spring 2006. (a) frame for vehicle, (b) powered rails, (c) prototype vehicle.Four Tenets for Teaching DesignThe Rowan faculty recently explicitly stated a number of tenets for teaching design andcommunication in a project based setting. Four of these are discussed below. Student courseevaluations, informal discussion with students, formal class discussions, objective and anecdotalassessment of student designs, and the literature on communication and design have informedthese