Session 1161 Implementation of Ethics Education Throughout an Engineering College Robert H. Wolverton, Janet Bear Wolverton United States Air Force Academy/Oregon Institute of TechnologyI . IntroductionThe engineering community is rediscovering its roots of professionalism. During the past decadeengineering education moved beyond single minded devotion to science and technology byembracing multidisciplinary studies. To complete the transition from engineering scientists backto engineering professionals, education for the next decade is focusing on incorporating ethics andsocial responsibility into the curriculum
that changes are needed in theengineering classrooms, and the need to think about women as a diverse group. Femaleundergraduate engineering students are typically studied with little attention paid to theintersection of race/ethnicity and gender. Some researchers consider this dual minority status tobe a “double-bind 1” while other researchers look at how attributes of certain underrepresentedracial backgrounds offer advantages to female students in Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics (STEM) fields 2. Despite continued calls for disaggregated data on race and gender,few datasets have detailed information on student experiences with sufficient representation ofunderrepresented minorities to facilitate statistical analysis 3.Using
classrooms.Mr. William F. McKenna, University of Texas, Austin Bill McKenna received his master’s of mathematics from the University of North Texas about 10 years ago, and, after a brief career in acoustical test enclosures, he is working towards a doctorate in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. McKenna’s current research focuses on high school engineering students. In this work, he strives to connect student participation in authentic discourse prac- tices, student understandings of the content under study and the process of effective communication, and the products they are designing. He is also pursuing the relationships between professional engineering practices and the ecology of high school
the students to choose a major if they were undecided or to solidify their decision about their major.• Very few students thought that the seminars strongly affected their study skills or use of the library or technology.• Some students learned about internships, co-ops and career opportunities in their seminars.On-going interactions with students and faculty Page 6.900.9 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education• The amount of student-to-student interaction was limited in the seminars
ecological processes throughout history. We havealtered many aspects of nature. Some believe, or even insist, that nature will restoreitself, if we stop intervening with its processes (List, 1993). Without commonly heldphilosophy and belief systems, society must use various governmental problem solvingmechanisms for consensus development. Values are not necessarily right or wrong.Achieving a consensus requires identifying and balancing values of the group. The growing environmental and societal concern about engineered productscreates a compelling need to consider these factors in the design phase. Direct andindirect impacts of modern technology on environment and human society and qualityof natural resources likewise creates compelling need
Paper ID #41063Teaching Engineering Information Literacy with INCLUSIVE ADDIEMr. Paul McMonigle, Pennsylvania State University Paul McMonigle is the Engineering Instruction Librarian at the Pennsylvania State University. He graduated from Syracuse University with a MS-LIS degree in December of 2018 and from the Pennsylvania State University with a BA degree in History in 2017. His research interests include information literacy instruction for STEM students, student engagement and outreach programs (especially military and veteran students in STEM), and the early history of libraries and collections.Ms. Denise Amanda
the student encounters.Administrative problems can be solved with appropriate levels of funding. To successfully usecommercial tools like the Cadence products, a high-end workstation laboratory with enough seatsto support engineering courses is required. Although it is possible to run these Cadence tools on aSparc II, it is recommended that as least a Sparc 5 is used with 32MB of memory. The laboratorywill require systems administration for maintenance and software upgrades. Cadence providesCNU with regular upgrades as part of our annual agreement which costs $5,000/year. Usersshould plan regular upgrades to keep current with EDA technology, but be careful not to upgradeduring the semester in case something goes wrong.The learning curve
preferred answer as being a matter of taste, much like one’schoice of a preferred flavor of ice cream. Beyond that, the student begins to select andjustify answers using values consistent with their professional community.In the context of our Persistence outcome, the student would start at level one andprogress toward level 4. A student who lays in-between level 2 and level 3 would be ourgoal for the typical graduate. Level 2 is a minimal goal for a graduate. Level 4 isaspirational. These levels are:Level 1: Understands that technological change and development have both positive and negative impactsLevel 2: Identifies and evaluates the assumptions made by others in their description of the role and impact of engineering on
Engineering Education (AAEE).Prof. Frank Bullen, University of Southern Queensland Frank is currently an Honorary Professor at the University of Southern Queensland and an Adjunct Pro- fessor at the University of the Sunshine Coast. He was previously the Executive Dean of the Faculty of Engineering and Surveying and the USQ Pro Vice Chancellor Research at USQ and Professor and Head of Engineering at the University of Tasmania. Frank has also held a research chair at the Queensland Uni- versity of Technology and was the Regional Executive of the Australian Asphalt Pavement Association. He has retained his Charted Professional Engineer status and is a Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Australia. Frank holds a BSc
-snippet.avi.RICHARD JERZDr. Richard Jerz is the Director and an Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering at St. Ambrose University inDavenport, Iowa, where he has interest in teaching industrial engineering and computer related courses. He has aB.S. degree from Illinois Institute of Technology, an MBA from St. Ambrose University, and a Ph.D. in IndustrialEngineering from The University of Iowa. In 1995, he was awarded a predoctoral fellowship from the United StatesDepartment of Energy (DOE) in “Integrated Manufacturing.” He has more than 15 years manufacturing engineeringexperience primarily with John Deere, and 12 years teaching experience
of the freshmanprograms, a summary of changes accomplished, and the retention statistics for the College ofEngineering.IntroductionIn 1988, at The Ohio State University the retention of engineering students to the junior yearranged between 40 and 50 percent. See Figure 1. This followed the national norms. In the early1990’s the Ohio State College of Engineering became part of the NSF funded GatewayEngineering Education Coalition. The other members of the Coalition were Drexel University,Columbia University, Cooper Union, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University ofPennsylvania, University of South Carolina, and Florida International University. One focus ofthe Coalition’s efforts was to improve retention to the junior year by using
result, the United States needs to fill this void by importing them from foreign countries. This has the potential of jeopardizing the quality of undergraduate engineering education as well as putting the United States at a technological disadvantage in comparison with other countries. ASEE needs to help promote the importance of graduate level engineering education.I hope that the Society will accept Gerry’s challenge and find multiple opportunities in itsCouncils, Divisions, and meetings to explore, debate, and formulate appropriate actions on thisimportant topic. However, any discussion needs to be well grounded in the data which concernsthis topic. With this end in mind, to stimulate discussion of the trends in
athttps://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/turningpointdigitalcurricula.pdf on March 1, 2024.[28]. LibreText, https://Libretexts.org[29]. Pressbooks, https://pressbooks.com/[30]. OpenStax, https://openstax.org/[31]. Lumen Learning, https://lumenlearning.com/[32]. J.P. Holdren and E. Lander. “Engage to Excel: Producing one million additional collegegraduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics”, edited by PCASTechnology, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC, 2012. Accessed athttps://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-2512.pdf March 3, 2024.[33]. Bumphus, W. G., A. P. Gallego, K. M. McCleney, and J. S. Thornton. “Reclaiming theAmerican dream: Community
Paper ID #8751The Traditional Engineer vs. The Innovative EngineeerDr. Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is the recipient of three NSF awards supporting research in engineering education. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University and Associate Director of the Inter-professional Studies Program and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology. His research interests include engineering innovativeness, entrepreneurial engineering, teamwork, and mindset changes and learning strategies of both engineering students
Integrating Project Management Knowledge Modules in Engineering Education Vijay Kanabar, Carla Messikomer, Boston University, Project Management InstituteAbstractA survey of twenty-two programs by Project Management Institute (PMI) in 2013 revealed thatthere is an opportunity to strengthen undergraduate project management (PM) education inengineering schools and colleges. In response to this need PMI sponsored a “for academics byacademics” global curriculum project to baseline undergraduate PM competency. This newcurriculum framework was launched in February 2015. It was the result of five exploratoryworkshops involving eight-five faculty as well as a
Paper ID #22068Additive Manufacturing Studios: a New Way of Teaching ABET StudentOutcomes and Continuous ImprovementDr. Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Technological University Currently, Dr. Fidan serves as a Professor of the Department of Manufacturing and Engineering Tech- nology at Tennessee Technological University. His research and teaching interests are in additive man- ufacturing, electronics manufacturing, distance learning, and STEM education. Dr. Fidan is a member and active participant of SME, ASEE, ABET, ASME, and IEEE. He is also the Associate Editor of IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing
Paper ID #36241Mixed Reality Game for Active Geotechnical Engineering LearningDr. Ying Tang, Rowan University Ying Tang received the B.S. and M.S. degrees from the Northeastern University, P. R. China, in 1996 and 1998, respectively, and Ph.D degree from New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, in 2001. She is currently a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) at Rowan University, Glass- boro, NJ. Her research interests include virtual reality and augmented reality, artificial intelligence, and modeling and scheduling of computer-integrated systems. Dr. Tang is very active in adapting and devel
junior engineers’ responsibility to reshape companies’ goals to address environmental and social impacts of their technology/product? - What is your opinion?Several qualitative questions focused on students’ actions. Students in their 1st year were askedquestion 1 but not question 2 because the team assumed they would not have had time toaccumulate enough experiences within the institution at that point. 1. Is there a time when you acted to improve some situation? Please explain. 2. Which projects with a social or environmental aspect have you participated in while at “our school” (in class, in projects)? Please list.Question 1 will not be discussed in this paper because coding of the answers proved verychallenging. In
(steering and speed) by way of Bluetooth (BT)commands sent to the robot. A very basic lab would be to navigate between or along orangecones to reach a destination. This is also a lab which can be undertaken in a short period (1.5 to2 weeks) by students using low-cost hardware and traditional laptops running MATLAB.Although the video frame rates are generally slow in this configuration (5 to 10 fps) the goal ofsystems integration of an AI deep learning system with a mobile robot is achieved.Figure 4: Block Diagram for Deep Learning Integration Project with Mobile Robot4. ConclusionsUsing the proper educational resources, deep learning technology is very accessible tool whichcan be successfully utilized in projects by undergraduate engineering
Professor at Texas A&M Qatar. He teaches in the program of Chemical Engineering.Reza Tafreshi Reza Tafreshi received the B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees from K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, in 1991 and 1995, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, BC, Canada, in 2005. From 1995 to 1999, he was with PoloDej Company, Iran. From 1999 to 2000, he was a Research Engineer at the Department of ECE, UBC. He was a Visiting Assistant Professor at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, in 2006. In 2007, he joined Texas A&M University at Qatar, Doha, Qatar, where he is currently an Assistant Professor. His research interests
www.slayte.com Engagement in Practice: The University of Maryland’s Get Out and Learn (GOAL) Engineering Kit InitiativeUndergraduate engineering education often reinforces an arbitrary sociotechnical divide thatattempts to isolate technical skills from their embedded social environments (Cech & Sherick,2015). Engineering curriculum focuses primarily on developing technical skills, often withoutconsideration of the social (e.g., cultural, political, economic) contexts within these technologies,skills, or training are situated. Service-learning opportunities for engineering students and facultyrepresent one opportunity set for bridging social and technical knowledge and skills. Furthermore,service-learning courses can
University). He has developed and/or taught courses in systems engineering, systems modeling & simulation, integration, testing, & evaluation, production systems engineering, construction engineering, engineering economics, engineering probability & statistics, project engineering, engineering optimization, risk & failure analysis, reliability engineering, and engineering research methods. His current research interest includes modeling, analysis, and optimization of complex operational systems and infrastructures susceptible to disruptions.Kellie Schneider Dr. Schneider is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Management, Systems, and Technology. Her research interests are in engineering
continuous assessment of the program outcomes. One of thebiggest obstacles in assessment is the inability to engage students in the awareness of programoutcomes and their importance in the curriculum. Many students see them as overly generalizedstatements that have no bearing on the concepts they need to pass a given course. Thus,dissemination of the notion and value of program outcomes is a major challenge for the faculty.Examples of freshman class assignments and projects that address specific program outcomes ina mechanical engineering department are presented. IntroductionIn the mid-1990’s, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) developeda new set of criteria for accrediting
’ academic program tobe reinforced at a higher level of competency during their senior year.This course also enabled engineering faculty to integrate a core course for all engineering studentsmeeting standards set by the engineering accrediting board, Accreditation Board of Engineeringand Technology (ABET) [9]. Some of these learning outcomes are the ability to communicateeffectively with a range of audiences, the capability of developing and conducting appropriateexperimentation, and analyzing and interpreting data [11]. This course focuses on experiment-based technical writing assignments that enhance the students’ communication and teamworkskills. Students learn to produce high-quality functional texts while also gaining technicalunderstanding in
, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary research focus is on engineering pedagogy at the undergraduate level. She is particularly interested in the teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics. She is also interested in active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, and in the ways hands-on activities such as making, technology, and games can be used to improve student engagement.Dr. Deborah L Sills, Bucknell University Deborah is an Assistant Professor in the Civil &
received his MSc in Mechanical Engineering from the AGH-University of Technology in Krakow, Poland and his PhD in Technical Sciences from the University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland. For more than 35 years he has been working at universities mainly in Poland and Botswana. He specializes in engineering mechanics and teaches courses in this area. He has particular interest in engineering education. He is currently a visiting professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the Utah State University.Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University
comprise 57% of allstudents taking the courses in the past 30 years, a clear demonstration of the usefulness of thesecourses from the student perspective. Note that the course evaluations are not mandatory;students are encouraged to provide a response, but there is no method for insuring that thestudent evaluates the course.Industrial scientists and engineers familiar with the program were polled in 1998 regarding theiropinion of the CPS Program. This was a group of industrial scientists and engineers, includingsome CPS Advisory Board members and some alumni from industrial corporations; both groupshad hired students from our program. Their comments are summarized below: • “…our products and manufacturing technology must remain at the forefront
know what engineers do1. They know the stereotype better thanthe reality and perceive engineers to be people lacking interpersonal skills with an interest inthings. In reality, engineers are creative people who work in teams to create solutions for manyof today’s problems, such as water purification and creating medicines to cure diseases. Studieshave shown that students respond positively to engineering when they understand its historicalcontributions and social relevance. Engineering is the application of science, technology andcreativity that has led to inventions such as iPods®, computers, telephones and airplanes2.The Graduate Teaching Fellows in K-12 Education (GK-12) program from the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) provides fellowships
Session 1626 Integrating Wind Engineering Research to Curriculum Through Multimedia Partha P. Sarkar, Kishor C. Mehta, James R. McDonald, Ernst W. Kiesling Texas Tech University ABSTRACTA courseware development project, which aims to transfer the research results to curriculum through themultimedia technology in the multi-disciplinary area of wind cngineenng, is discussed in this article. Thiscourseware, containing four modules, is designed to supplement certain senior
major contribution to Knovel’s success was application of this experience in the development of information products for applied scientists and engineers. Page 14.866.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Mathcad Enabling of Engineering e-Content on KnovelAbstractKnovel recently released Mathcad-enabled Roark’s Formulas for Stress and Strain and(Hicks) Handbook of Civil Engineering Calculations. The release of these titles represents aquantum leap from Knovel’s standard interactivity such as tables, to a full scale engineeringsolution. Desktop 3rd party software (Mathcad© from Parametric Technology Corp