, more recently, filled via “Course Management Learning System”. The universityadministration uses such evaluations to solve agency problems related to the selection and motivation ofteachers, in a context in which neither the types of teachers, nor their effort, can be observed precisely(Becker & Watts, 1999).Truly speaking, students’ evaluations are useful during the hiring process of professors. Particularly ithelps to ascertain the situation whether to promote a professor or not. Some of the educational institutionswhere more research is emphasized on professors, the administration relies fully on students’ evaluationof teaching (Becker & Watts, 1999).Administrators from educational institutions have struggled for a long time with
Aaron S. (2012) Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day, Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education, 2012. Print.[17]. Corporation for Public Broadcasting. (2004). Television goes to school: The impact of video on student learning in formal education[18]. Acharya, S., Manohar, P. A., & Wu, P. (2016). Using Case Study Videos to Effectively Teach Software Development Best Practices (pp. 230-235). The 20th World Multi- Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics (WMSCI) Conference, Orlando, FL, Organized by International Institute of Informatics and Systemics (IIIS).[19]. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning; Creating Excitement in the
Tsegaye, Florida Gulf Coast University Dr. Seneshaw Tsegaye is an Associate Professor in the Department of Bioengineering, Civil Engineering, and Environmental Engineering at Florida Gulf Coast University. He is the Backe Chair of Research for Sustainable Water and Renewable Energy. He has 10 years of experience in the fields of integrated urban water management, water-energy-food nexus, infiltration-based best management practices, flood modeling, and decision support systems for transitioning to vegetation-based stormwater systems. Dr. Tsegaye’s latest research project is focused on the application of Virtual Reality for flood resiliency and engineering education. With many years of teaching and research experience
that community was at the core ofeducational philosophy and practice leading him to believe that learning results fromexperience that is contextually based and socially situated. Lipman (199114) argued that “theProceedings of the 2012 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for EngineeringEducation 11reflective model is thoroughly social and communal” (p. 19). As a result, social presence feltin the classroom can have a direct impact on student learning. According to Swan (200515) In traditional, face-to-face classrooms, educational researchers found that certain teacher immediacy behaviors, such as making eye-contact, smiling
ofplanning performed during the previous steps will impact the implementation. The first six stepsare where most of your time should be spent. This will ensure that the implemented activity hasthe greatest impact.h. Assessing the outcomeAfter the activity has been tested, think critically about what pieces were successful and whichpieces failed. Did students all struggle with one segment of the project? Could better materialshave been provided? Did you have way too much or way too little of any supplies? How did it fitwithin the time frame? How did the wrap-up discussion go? Did the students meet yourexpectations? Ask other staff and even the participants for their perspectives and feedback on theactivity. Facilitators can design a formal assessment
and mentoring awards and the 2006 USM Regents Award for Collaboration in Public Service.Ted Foster, University of Maryland-Baltimore County Ted Foster, Ph.D. is Assistant Dean of the UMBC College of Engineering and Information Technology, where he coordinates accreditation activities and directs graduate programs in Systems Engineering and Engineering Management. Prior to coming to UMBC, he had a 36-year career at Westinghouse and Northrop Grumman, managing research and advanced development in microelectronics and microwave technology for modern radar systems.Dean Sheridan, Glen Elg High School, Howard County Public Schools, Maryland Dean Sheridan has been an engineering design
, Page 22.932.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 and France. He has served at TARDEC for 40 years in various capacities of increasing responsibility. Dr. Bryzik is a Fellow Grade member of the Society of Automotive Engineers(SAE), an editorial reviewer for SAE, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the Combustion Institute. He has been an Adjunct Professor and Graduate Faculty Member of Mechanical Engineering at Wayne State University for 30 years, both continuously teaching graduate courses and performing advanced research. Dr. Bryzik has served as a member of numerous significant National Academy of Engineering (NAE) panels on ad- vanced automotive
students to understand their capabilities to function in multicultural interactions. Meredith has undergraduate and graduate degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. As a student, Ms. Blumthal studied abroad in the Netherlands and had a Foreign Language Areas Fellowship (FLAS) where she studied Quechua and conducted field research in Ecuador during her graduate program.Brian Woodard (Director, Undergraduate Programs)Molly H Goldstein (Assistant Teaching Professor) Dr. Molly H. Goldstein is a Teaching Assistant Professor and Product Design Lab Director in Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering. Dr. Goldstein’s research focuses on student designer trade-off decisions through the study of their
(provided by NSF and an industry partner) to produce graduates with intrapreneurshipcompetencies. A total of 68 scholars in four cohorts were admitted to TIP. Scholars, hiringmanagers, and mentors were surveyed on topics to reveal the efficacy of the program. Bothqualitative and quantitative data were collected. This paper presents data on the growth inintrapreneurship competencies for each of the cohorts of students, data on mentoring practicesthat were integral to the TIP experience, as well as student and mentor perception data on thebenefits of the program.introductionThis paper examines the outcomes of a National Science Foundation sponsored Scholarships inSTEM (S-STEM) program. This S-STEM program (TIP) was designed to produceintrapreneurial
curriculum give students valuable and marketable engineering skillsafter only two years in the program. Our students, with some faculty guidance, are running anengineering consulting practice and working on a myriad of interesting and educational projects.Appropriate projects for student consultants are generally of the following types: diagnostic,development, or design. Diagnostic problems address questions such as “What is the oilymaterial that is contaminating this filter?” or “Why is the flooring material in our factoryfailing?” or “Why does our fiberglass preform process produce scrap during the summer monthsbut not during the winter?” Almost any phenomenon that needs an explanation fits thisChemEngine project profile. Development projects
incorporated in engineering ethics discussions tends to focuson high profile, sensational cases such as the DC-10 plane crash in Paris, the Challenger disaster,and Chernobyl. Haws 10 performed a review of 42 engineering ethics papers from the 1996 to1999 proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education annual conferences. Hawsnoted that high profile cases were identified in the majority of papers that discussed case studies.Alternatively, Herkert 11 has argued that while high profile cases are useful for creating interestin engineering ethics among students, the practicing engineer is more likely to encounter moremundane dilemmas as part of their profession.As educators we can hope and reasonably assume that our graduates will not be at
thatresearch with a faculty member in an area of interest or engaging in a long-term project, as wellas major specific internships provided the best support for students [22]. These were the types ofopportunities that were built into the Rising Scholar Program. Consequently, the research team designed a program that channeled the selected studentsinto significant levels of contact with professional personnel at the university. Students weretaught how to acquire and nurture mentors. They were required to participate in workingexperiences in a faculty member’s laboratory and develop their own research project, inconjunction with a faculty member. The RS pathway during their time at the university is shownin Figure 1. Reporting on the program’s
Paper ID #39625Ethical Implications of COBOT ImplementationC.J. Witherell, Grand Valley State University CJ Witherell is a graduate student studying Product Design and Manufacturing Engineering at Grand Valley State University. Their undergraduate minor in philosophy inspired them to promote deep thinking, ethical reasoning, compassion, diversity, and equity-focused design within the engineering field. As the 2022 Wisner Engineering Fellow, they are developing a new product for Gentex Corporation in Zeeland, Michigan. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Ethical
practices and guide decisions to promote energy-conscious building designs. Thefindings will contribute to theoretical knowledge and improve buildings' energy efficiency.Pedagogical AssociationsThis paper resulted from a graduate student’s research for their Master’s Report in ArchitecturalEngineering. The student is the primary author, while the co-authors are the major professorspecializing in structural engineering and a committee member specializing in mechanicalengineering. The research scope was limited to the carbon footprint of a single-story, single-baystructure with concrete walls of varying thicknesses. Within this research, the student conductedconcrete analysis for foundation members, learned to use the program eQUEST for
practice engineeringdesign and to facilitate the integration of what students have learned throughout theircurriculum”5 ,“to better prepare graduates for engineering practice”6, and “to demonstrate theirabilities to potential employers”7.Shuman et al., broke down the ABET Student Outcomes a-k into the categories of hard skills andprofessional skills. The Student Outcomes that represent professional, or ‘soft’, skills were an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility an ability to communicate effectively the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context a
water quality and wastewater treatment and is involved in outreach and support to K-12 teachers in the use of watersheds as tools in science education while maintaining an ongoing involvement in policy and research in the fields of Environment and Water Resources in the Middle East and Haiti. Page 11.1436.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 WATER RESOURCES EVALUATION FOLLOWING NATURAL DISASTER IN HAITIAbstractThis paper will present a case study of the impacts of a hurricane and the resultantflooding during June 2005 in Deschapelles, Haiti on spring box collection
pertain to all disciplines and/or tie thedisciplines together. Three have been identified. They either already exist in the program or will beadded.Capstone Design: The first is the senior level capstone design course. It offers students anopportunity to focus on a full-scale design project. The course ties each of the civil engineeringconcentrations together and provides student an opportunity to apply their coursework in to a“real world” problem. Students must form an imaginary company, prepare a project proposal inresponse to a request for proposals, prepare design submittals in accordance with a writtenstatement of work, and make presentations to practicing engineers, faculty, and other studentsabout the work that they have done on their
necessary technical writing practice is further exacerbated by thenational trend of the compression of curriculum over time. The prescribed hours in a Bachelor’sdegree have decreased from 137 credit hours in the seventies down to a current value of 128.Despite this contraction, industry and Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology2(ABET) expect universities to adequately prepare their graduates to enter a profession whosesophistication and technological knowledge base are rapidly accelerating. Growing industrialcompetition also demands that new employees require minimal on-the-job training before theybecome productive engineers. This prompts the universal challenge of how one fits the explosionof essential extras into a shrinking
think of others? • Some things, such as a person's forehead, indicate a problem when they are too hot or cold. Can you think of others? • Measuring the temperature of something can indirectly measure something that may be difficult to measure directly. Measuring the temperature of a wire can indicate the amount of current flowing through it. Can you think of other examples?A device providing a quick and inexpensive means of monitoring temperature visually could be used inmany ways in today's world. This module challenges you to create such a device.DESIGN CHALLENGE: As part of a team, you are to design, construct, and test a device that willdemonstrate a practical use for liquid crystals in the form of a
AC 2007-645: SUSTAINING MANUFACTURING WITH INNOVATIVERECRUITMENT STRATEGIESTruc Ngo, San Diego City College Dr. Truc Ngo holds a Ph.D. degree in Chemical Engineering, earned at Georgia Tech in 2001. During her time at Georgia Tech, she has published multiple research papers in major professional journals, including American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) Journal, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Journal of Supercritical Fluids and Green Chemistry. She was a National Science Foundation Research Fellow, President’s Fellow and the Recipient of Waldemar Ziegler Best Paper Award. Dr. Ngo has also spoken at many national and international conferences in the past ten years. For her
that theeducation of the future must be relevant, attractive, and connected to the needs of society atlarge. Considering this paradigm, the U. S. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) in its well-researched ABET Engineering Criteria 20005 (EC2000) proposed that thespirit of technopreneurship be integrated within the curriculum of all programs. It forcesuniversities to develop a process of assessing learning outcomes of programs that are consistentwith the original mission of the institution. The Criteria can be easily adapted to embrace alldisciplines. The desired attributes or outcomes for graduates of a baccalaureate program includean ability to:✔ apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering.✔ design and
9.840.1laboratory exercises, individual and group projects, and field experiences to enable 1451middle and high school students to directly experience authentic learning practices thatrequire them to use higher-order thinking skills; encourage creative problem-solvingskills that require collaborative learning, teamwork, writing, and presentation; cultivatean interest in service learning in which students are active participants, achieve outcomesthat show a perceptible impact, and engage in evaluative reflection; and better motivateand prepare secondary school students for advanced education. The Fellows have beentrained to create and implement these activities by taking
students in areas of progression and transition from undergraduate to graduate studies, research, and study abroad. Her research agenda and commitment to intellectual growth is driven by her life experience. While com- pleting her Master’s degree and for several years after, she worked in a family owned manufacturing firm. As a doctoral student, Shirl was recognized as an AGEP scholar and received the Bilsland Fellowship. Outstandingly, she collaborated in the creation of an innovation course and taught the initial offering. Un- til August 2014, she was a post-doctoral fellow researching entrepreneurship, innovation, and diversity. Today Dr. Donaldson’s research interests include entrepreneurship, innovation
and generated individual reports by each student for each of theexperiments. Four of the experiments were designed to compare experimental data withgenerally accepted correlations. The impact of a jet experiment used an apparatus that wasoriginally purchased from TecQuipment [11] and required the students to compare experimentaldata with data generated from a force balance. The depressurization of a tank experiment wasadapted from the work of Penney and Clausen [12] and the draining of a tank experiment (anoriginal experiment based on the work of Penney and Clausen) also compared experimental datato correlations from the literature and were particularly effective in applying Matlab principlesfrom the department’s Computer Methods course. The
participate voluntarily via the Collaboratory for Strategic Parnternships and Applied Research. His on-going projects include improving flight tracking and messaging systems for small planes in remote locations, and developing assistive communication technology for those with cognitive and behavioral challenges, such as high- functioning autism, or PTSD. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Formalizing Experiential Learning Requirements In An Existing Interdisciplinary Engineering Project CurriculumIn education, experiential learning has become a best practice, high-impact strategy, becauseengaging with real life problems heightens students’ interest, teaches them career
: varying behavior 7. Clearly has demonstrated impact with ideas and oral presentations 8. Takes initiative to assume responsibility 9. Directs program and project for implementation 10. Demonstrates the art of delegating, coaching, and providing follow-up IBM, however, practiced 100% guaranteed employment to their ET managers in 1970-1980 because it believed that today’s best mangers could never be equated as the worst ones nextyear! IBM never used the forced ranking method of bell-curve evaluation because it could not bedefended, until severe crisis hit the company due to external threat of competition as the entry topc became easy and IBM’s global dominance was reduced precipitously. Later researches havenot quite
our mistakes and using these to build a strong foundation. WhileHenry Petroski was concerned about failures in engineering design, I believe the same applies toeducation. “I believe that the concept of failure – mechanical and structural failure in the context ofthis discussion – is central to understanding engineering, for engineering design has as its first andforemost objective the obviation of failure”.1 We also must learn from our past failures inengineering education. How can we justify such low graduation rates?I will take a brief tour down memory lane before looking at where we are today and where we maybe going in the future. Let’s start with the tools we had as engineers. To be an engineering student,you had to have your own slide
bridge the gap between high school and college as well as preparing students for the rigors of mathematics. His research interests include engineering education, integration of novel technologies into engineering classroom, excellence in instruction, water, and wastewater treatment, civil engineering infrastructure, and transportation engi- neering.Mr. Ludvik Alkhoury, New Jersey Institute of Technology Mr. Ludvik Alkhoury is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Newark College of Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT), Newark, NJ. He is currently the Lab instructor of Fundamentals of Engineering Design (FED) 101, a course that reviews the basic concepts of
- dyne (Pratt & Whitney), he helped design the Space Shuttle. As manager of Reactor Safety Analysis, Experimental Engineering, and Fluid Dynamics Technology at KAPL (Lockheed Martin), he conducted research for Naval Reactors. He currently serves as the Walter L. Robb director of Engineering Lead- ership and as an instructor in Engineering Science at Penn State. Erdman has chaired the local Jaycees, Department of Social Services Advisory Council, GE Share Board, and Curling Club; and served on the Human Services Planning Council, United Way, Chamber of Commerce, and Capital Fund Drive Boards of Directors. Erdman has also lectured on leadership topics at Penn State and RPI. He returned to campus frequently as a
after the course if they want tograduate in a reasonable time period (2 years or less). Since we use their topic, the research theyread and report on is relevant to their study.The use of breakout session to discuss problem statements, deliverables, and methodology givethe students opportunities for peer to peer review and critiques. Since the class has some workingprofessionals and a mix of majors, the peer to peer feedback is diverse and seems to positivelyimpact quality.RecommendationsThis approach can work well with mature, motivated graduate students. Use this approach withundergraduates is questionable. The approach only works for those well grounded in both thetheory and practice of the course topic and try to stay current via readings