Paper ID #15279Understanding ”Failure” is an OptionDr. Hansel Burley, Texas Tech University Dr. Burley is a professor of educational psychology. His research focus includes college access, diversity, and resilience in youth. Recently he has served as the evaluator for multiple STEM projects.Mr. Casey Michael Williams, Texas Tech University I am currently a second year PhD student in educational psychology. I spent 2 years teaching environ- mental science, chemistry and biology to high school students in Kansas City through Teach For America. My interests lie with designing educational initiatives that highlight the
engineeringprograms do not explicitly address it throughout their curricula. For instance, there are manycompetitions, challenges and opportunities for the demonstration of design skills, but most areoptional or extracurricular, catching only a portion of engineering graduates in a somewhat adhoc manner and at variable or even random places and times. As Walesh states, "Yes, we couldindividually and collectively rely on accidental creativity and innovation, those wonderful butrare out-of-the-blue events. However, why not complement accidental creativity and innovationwith the intentional kind?"11(pxviii) Making development of creativity skills a deliberate part ofengineering curricula is vital. If we do not integrate the development of these important skills
. For those with a good background in differential calculus, and the desire for atheoretical orientation, Calculus IIB is recommended. Calculus IIIA and section two of Calculus IIIBare for freshmen with strong preparation in both integral and differential mathematics. The mostdedicated and experienced can take Calculus IC. Their courses are impressive on paper butineffectual in practice. The A-sequence is designed to teach applied mathematics; it suffers from students taking thecourse description too literally. Freshmen, particularly engineers in Calculus A have virtually nointerest in mathematics per se; they view calculus as a tool for use in the physical or socialsciences and desire only to learn how to use it. Yet the A-sequence employs
assess this way of teaching courses. This is especially the casewith very short time periods like one, two, and three week intervals. Not only do we needcontributions from educators on specific courses, but we need much more contributions frompsychologists, behavioral experts, and policy makers among others.Aside from a few and sporadic comments from students, there is very little research wherestudents evaluate this educational technique. The opinions of students who are currently takingshort term courses may be biased for various reasons. Opinions of students at a later stage likefive, ten and fifteen years after graduation are important and needed.That is, there is a strong need to investigate this topic holistically. Nonetheless, this should
of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2003 Dr. Sheppard was named co-principal investigator on a National Science Foundation (NSF) grant to form the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE), along with faculty at the University of
Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received Best Paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is Chair of the IEEE Curriculum and Pedagogy Committee and an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Dr. Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Monica E. Cardella is the Director of the INSPIRE
Dr. Yan is an assistant professor of Foreign Language Institute at Nanjing Forestry University, and she got her Ph.D. degree in Jackson State University with a constant interest in developing and implementing best practices in STEM education and language acquisition.Dr. Justin R. Allison, Jackson State University Justin Allison, Ph. D. is currently an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Computer Science at Jackson State University. His research interests include instructional design, educational technology, educational psychology, and distance education.Dr. Zhenbu Zhang, Jackson State University Dr Zhenbu Zhang is a full professor of the Department of Mathematics and Statistical Sciences at Jack- son State
Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering and Mechanical Engineering) and six research centers. It has more than 2,100 students and approximately 55 full-time faculty. In 2007- 2008 the College received more than $2.5 million in external grants and contracts for research and program administration and graduate student support. In addition to his duties at San Diego State University, Dr. Hayhurst serves on the Workforce/Education Committee of the San Diego Economic Development Corporation, and is a member of the Board of Directors of CONNECT and of the Engineering and General Contractor Foundation. He has been active in K-12 outreach and facilitated the designation of San Diego State
objectives. Attainment of these outcomes prepares graduates toenter the professional practice of engineering. There are seven student outcomes: 1. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics 2. An ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors 3. An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences 4. An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of
and Anxiety Best Practices in SI ProgramsThe success of the program during the fall of 2012 allowed it to expand once again for the springof 2013. At this time, the School of Engineering offered SI support in all sections ofmathematics through differential equations, all sections of chemistry, all sections of physics Iand II, all sections of CIVL 202, all sections of CIVL 309, all sections of Computer Applicationsfor Electrical Engineers (ELEC 206), and all sections of Circuits II (ELEC 202). Similarofferings were held for the fall 2013. Table 1 contains a complete listing of the number of allrelevant freshmen, sophomore, and junior courses and the number of sections that contained SIfor fall 2012 through fall 2013. Figure 4
with the necessary skill-set ofnew students, recruited by existing project team leaders to fill positions that becomeavailable as students graduate or as the project progresses. While effectively matching theinterest of upcoming students with project needs, the competitive approach also shiftsresponsibility for selections more fully to both student leaders and recruits, who live andwork with these choices. Beyond its immediate practical value, the competitive processexposes students to some dynamics of a real job search, better preparing them for their post-graduation career job search. It also provides an opportunity for students to practice at leastthree of the ABET Student Outcomes: functioning on interdisciplinary engineering teams(d
Peripheral Jigsaw Activities to Engage Students’ Entrepreneurial Mindsets Stephanie G. Wettstein Chemical and Biological Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USAAbstractThroughout a student’s undergraduate career, oftentimes the only engagement they have withengineering professionals is during internships and their senior-level design course. However,research indicates that students value these interactions for their engineering development.Through Kern Entrepreneurial Education Network (KEEN) Fellowship funding, four chemicalengineering alumni created jigsaw activities that were presented in a junior-level
-lead design competition, and scholarships for study abroad. Inaddition, the student-led groups run week-long activities for September orientation. Facultymembers take on a collaborative role rather than one of supervisor-subordinate.Giving students responsibility in and out of the classroom has led to significant participation inthe educational process, as well as innovative, responsible, and well-rounded students ready toaccept challenges and overcome adversity.IntroductionMcMaster University is a comprehensive research-intensive university located in Hamilton,Ontario. It prides itself on being student-centered and focused on both undergraduate andgraduate education. The Faculty of Engineering was founded 50 years ago and has anenrollment of
joining Michigan Tech, he worked as a Design Engineer at Caterpillar Inc.Mr. Datta Sandesh Manjunath, Michigan Technological University Mr. Datta Sandesh Manjunath, is currently pursuing his Masters in Mechanical Engineering at Michigan Technological University. He has graduated from Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, India with a B.Tech degree in Mechanical Engineering. He is currently doing his report, on Impact analysis of a pick up truck having a non-cylindrical, non-conformable CNG Tank using Finite Element Modelling. His academic and research interests are in the areas of Solid Mechanics, Composite Materials and Finite Element Methods. He also works as a Student Coach in the Engineering Learning Center. After graduation
Education 2program accreditation. Namely, the faculty should all participate in the continuous improvementprocess which is a requirement for accreditation. In some cases, ABET reviewers have asked basicquestions about the accreditation process to a wide range of faculty, especially new AssistantProfessors, who have taught core engineering courses. These courses invariably have a linking ofthe course objectives, course learning outcomes and the ABET student outcomes. These coursesmay not be Senior Design, but they do contribute to the attainment of student outcomes that areexpected by the time of graduation. The skills, knowledge and behaviors that students acquire arethroughout the engineering
individualizing programs, modifying the physical environment, curriculum andinstructional approaches [25]. Buffer and Scott’s seminal work assisted technology educators inidentifying, understanding, and adapting instructional practices to better respond to the needs ofthe special education population [26]. Though there are studies citing situated cognition, a formof contextualized learning, as a means of improving success for special needs technologyeducation students [27] and the implementation of game design to assist special needs students inthe classroom [28], a dearth of quantitative research remains in assessing the success of thesemethods.Also limited are studies on ethnic minority students in technology education programs. Johnsoncites
Page 10.1268.10 does diminish the quality of the office hours experiences of students, as the reviewer reasonably suggests, it may lead more female students to attrite from these majors than male students. For departments with gender parity as a priority, this suggested relationship between student-faculty ratio and the Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education disproportionate impact of student-faculty interactions on females could provide sound footing for seeking additional faculty lines.STEPHEN M. LANCASTER is a graduate student in mathematics at the
. Washington D.C: George Washington university, School of Education and Human Development, 19912. Davis, B. G. Tools for Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 19933. John C. Bean. Engaging Ideas. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 20014. Valora M. Johnson. Integrating composition in Math, Science and Engineering courses. Document, http//fie.engrng.pitt5. Richard J. Light. Making the most of college, Harvard, UP, 2001.6. Drenk, D. “Teaching Finance through writing.” In C. W. Griffin (ed), Teaching writing in all disciplines. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 12. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.7. Rivard, L. A Review of Writing-To-Learn in Science: Implications for Practice and Research. Journal of Research in Science
science and advancement of materials, such as concrete and cementitious materials, glass fibers, and composite materials. Dr. Torres’ research interest also extends to the classroom, where he is constantly evolving his courses to provide the best education to his students.Dr. Vedaraman Sriraman, Texas State University, San Marcos Page 26.1262.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Project Based Learning in Concrete Industry Project Management Abstract A Project Based Learning (PBL) method has been implemented in a
graduate womenengineers. Regardless of the reason, a comprehensive study into the sociological, cultural andpsychological reasons for the lack of persistence has not been completed. The field has been leftwith an incomplete scope that has yet to provide understanding of the underlying issues or theculture of engineering programs.Once the experience of women in undergraduate engineering programs is more understood,universities and the field can make steps to alleviate the discrepancy in attainment rates betweenmen and women and broaden participation. The use of a critical lens and qualitativemethodology will allow for a basis of understanding from which leaders in the field can examinetheir own practice, and authentic, deep, meaningful discussion
± 0.64environmental problems * 6. Problem formulationInstill a responsibility to serve the 10. Societal impact;needs of society and protect the 8. Sustainability; 13. Professional 3f, 3h, 3j 4.49 ± 0.99planet in an ethical manner & ethical responsibilitiesLife-long learning 15. Lifelong learning 3i 4.48 ± 0.83Integrates research to develop 2. Design and conduct experiments 3. Modern engineering tools;independence and communication 14. Communication; 3b; 3g; 3k 4.44 ± 0.63skills 18. LeadershipChanging nature of preparationrequired
misinformation beliefs. His research and academic service work center on critical STEM education, sociotechnical thinking, critical study of misinformation, and systemic change theory and practice. ¨Desen Sevi Ozkan, University of Connecticut Desen is an assistant professor at the University of Connecticut in the Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Department. She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research focuses on sociotechnical engineering education and how people make sense of complex sociotechnical energy infrastructure and systems. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Maintaining Hope Amidst Critique: The Role of Social Change
simultaneously the objectives of financial success while operating in an environmentally sound manner and a socially responsible way.3.2 Attracting Minority Students to EngineeringThe same caliber of research on women is not readily available on minority career motivatorstoward engineering. In fact, Black, Hispanic and American Indian/Alaskan Native men may beattracted to engineering at the same rates as white men, but the retention and graduation rates arepoor.18 As already shown, overall college enrollments are low to begin with. Much of the focusfor minority students is on readiness for college, obtaining solid math and science foundations,and paying for college. 9, 19, 20 The National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) Pre-CollegeInitiative
. The authors’ research into existing entrepreneurship case materialsrevealed a large number of cases, but several factors led us to develop our own case studiesrather than try to adopt those existing cases. These factors include: • The focus of the case studies is mainly on the business and entrepreneurship aspects as opposed to on application of engineering principles in an entrepreneurial venture (though many of the products are highly technical in nature). • The desire for the author’s to engage area technical entrepreneurs to begin to build relationships with that community. • Many of the cases are quite long (i.e., would take more class time than the authors envision being available – at least before the idea
-STEM Award (#2030665) which hastaken this into consideration by developing regular family gatherings designed to includescholars’ families in supporting their students’ degree completion.Summer bridge programs are often cited as one of the best practices for increasing first yearstudent retention and thus we are not surprised with the change in identities that we found inscholars upon completion of Engineering Ahead. Not only did all scholars self-report a change inidentity from that of a high school student to a college student, but they also all identified asengineering college students following the summer bridge program. This change in identityseemed to develop from a combination of the opportunities they had to engage in
engineering. Thereafter,we will study whether their use has impacted industrial engineering education. We willalso examine some commonly used websites to determine how important the knowledgeof buzzwords is for potential employers of industrial engineering graduates. Finally, wewill attempt to determine whether buzzwords confuse students or help them gain a clearvision of industrial engineering. Based on our analysis, we will formulate our ownrecommendations for use of buzzwords in industrial engineering curriculum. While wehave used the word “buzzword” we realize that this word has emotive overtones, and wecontinue to search for a replacement.IntroductionBuzzwords or buzz phrases within the scientific and management community can beloosely defined
Engineering Education Systems and Design Ph.D. program. He is also the immediate past chair of the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN) and a deputy editor for the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Unpacking Engineering Faculty’s Discrepant Views of Mentoring through the Lens of Attachment TheoryAbstractThe term mentorship can be interpreted in a variety of ways. This research paper examines theinterpretation and individual mentoring experiences of three engineering faculty across ranks tocapture their
be compelled to use all styles. Individuals whose preference for a givenstyle is particularly strongcan determine the niches within which they will be more likely to succeed. According to Wankat andOreovicz51, accommodators tend to move toward management, sales and marketing; divergers movetoward personnel and creative positions. Convergers tend toward hard-core engineering jobs such as plantoperations, design, and construction. Assimilators gravitate toward research, development, and planning. Page 6.486.9 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
, and creatively and energetically working for our dreams of what could be”to produce both more socially responsible engineering and, potentially, increase the recruitmentand retention of female students.18 Researchers at Worcester Polytechnic Institute have recently Page 24.1375.8reported the results of a study in which female engineering graduates between 1974-2011reported greater long-term impacts of project-based learning on their worldviews and personaland professional impacts than males in this cohort.19 In their discussion section, authors Vaz, etal (2013) indicate that these results “are consistent with Busch-Vishniak and Jarosz’s
University of Hartford, . At the same time, he began to pursue a Masters in Electrical and Computer Engineering and is looking forward to continuing a future in Electronics.Dominick Gerard Lauria, University of Hartford Dominick Lauria is currently an adjunct professor and graduate student in Electrical Engineering at the University of Hartford. He earned a BS degree in Audio Engineering Technology from the University of Hartford. He has two years of industry experience including: rigid-flex PCB design for submarine communications systems and professional audio equipment repair and manufacturing. Dominick Lau- ria’s research interests include: audio equipment design, PCB design and manufacturing, communication systems