), ranging fromStatics in Sophomore year, to Entrepreneurship and Statistics in the Junior year, and Three-Phaseand Signals and Systems for the Seniors, among others. Entrepreneurial Mindset was alsoreinforced in Design class and applied in project work.This paper describes the experiences of faculty and students in the implementation ofentrepreneurial mindset modules adopted in our program, as well as preliminary results of thisrapid deployment in an interdisciplinary engineering program. We use a case study format toreport auto-ethnographic stories from both faculty and student perspectives.Early results are promising. After two semesters of simultaneous deployment of entrepreneurialmindset across the curriculum, faculty are engaged and working
multidisciplinary approach aligns well with STEM problem solving. Despite its advantages, implementing education, where hands-on learning is a critical PBL poses challenges. Resource demands, assessment component in fostering engagement and improving complexities, and the need for faculty training can hinder retention [4]. An illustrative example comes from a its adoption. Successful integration requires institutional dynamics course where students struggled with pulley commitment, collaboration with industry, and robust systems. Initially, the concept remained abstract despite evaluation models. Blended learning and online resources have shown promise in expanding PBL’s reach
faculty members (4 mechanical engineers, 2 chemical engineers, and 3 electrical engineers)and approximately 120 students. The department features a broad-based engineering curriculumdevoted to a liberal and integrative engineering education in the context of the University’stradition of the liberal arts and sciences. This mission of the department is explained in themission statement of the department. The Engineering Science curriculum emphasizes an in-depth understanding of the fundamentals of the physical sciences, mathematics, and engineering sciences, which form the foundation for technical work in all fields of engineering. Some specialization is available through elective courses in chemical, electrical and mechanical
for Business Students: Student Retention and Academic Success,” Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 2005, doi: 10.21818/001c.14572.[12] K. C. Ellis, “Ready for college: Assessing the influence of student engagement on student academic motivation in a first-year experience program,” 2013.[13] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott, “An analysis of motivation constructs with first-year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 4, 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01066.x.[14] J. E. Froyd and G. J. Rogers, “Evolution and evaluation of an integrated, first-year curriculum
), curriculum vitae, a personalstatement and an unofficial transcript as a single file. Further, they were asked to request 1-2 oftheir professional contacts to send in a letter of recommendation directly to the program viaemail, by the (relatively late) deadline of April 30th. Collecting application materials via emailwas preferred during year-1, in lieu of generating an online fillable form that had to have certaincompliance checks. Once all of the participant applications were received, they were screenedfor eligibility and completeness. A shortlist of these students was securely distributed to thefaculty mentors, and their selections/preferences recorded. Selection criteria (which were alsocommunicated in advance to the student applicants) included
positions as an Assistant Professor at Villanova University and Delaware State University and an adjunct Assistant Professor at the University of Pennsylvania. His research interests are in radio frequency and analog integrated circuit design, embedded systems, biomed- ical electronics, and engineering education. He received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from MIT.Dr. Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University (Tech.) (MERGED) Dr. Ertekin received his BS degree in mechanical engineering from Istanbul Technical University. He received MS degree in Production Management from Istanbul University. After working for Chrysler Truck Manufacturing Company in Turkey as a project engineer, he received dual MS
own learning [7].” Thefocus here is not so much on the design and deployment of assessment tools, but a shared andmeaningful understanding of assessment results. We should be intentional about usingassessment results in an actionable, impactful way. The tenets of CIPF deem both assessment ofteaching and student learning essential. Assessment is an imperative and integrative componentof critical pedagogy that addresses classroom diversity. If assessment is used properly, it cantransform the hegemonic relationship between students and instructors. One study has shownthat open-minded, approachable, and flexible instructors create an environment where studentsare motivated to learn because such an environment allows students to challenge each
research concerning the effects of flexible learning spaces and formative assessment techniques.Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Associate Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair for Engineering Education Research Programs at University of Michigan (U-M). Dr. Finelli is a fellow in the American Society of Engineering Education, a Deputy Editor of the Journal for Engineering Education, an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education, and past chair of the Educational Research and Methods Division of ASEE. She founded the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering at U-M in
is the local coordinator for the 2019 ASEE-SE conference, which is being hosted by Auburn University. John’s teaching and research interests are in control systems applications.Dr. Victor P. Nelson, Auburn University Victor P. Nelson is a professor and Assistant Chair of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Auburn University. His primary research interests include embedded systems and computer-aided design and testing of digital systems and application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). He is co-author of the textbook Digital Logic Circuit Analysis and Design and a tutorial book on fault-tolerant computing. He has been Chair of the ECE Curriculum Committee, Coordinator of the ECE Graduate Program, and served
coremathematics/science content necessary to understand these concepts, and to adopt educationaltheory based on STEM and the arts integration (STEAM) for far reaching interdisciplinarycollaborations.LiteratureIt is certain that AI will continue to impact human interaction with technology and society [2, 3].The impact will be experienced in many aspects of life such as in healthcare [4, 5], and businessand marketing [6, 7]. Part of the preparation to offer AI knowledge and its use will beadministered in schools, therefore, an examination to learn of the extent to which curriculumshave adopted such content is necessary [8, 9]. The curriculums show integration of AI in variousfields such as computer science, English, Social Studies, problem-solving learning
. (2022, August), IncludingPrinciples of Sustainability in Design by Implementing the Engineering for One PlanetFramework Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN.https://peer.asee.org/40926Woolard, C., Kirkland, C., Plymesser, K., Phillips, A., Gallagher, S., Miley, M., ... & Schell, W.(2022, August). Developing an Integrated Environmental Engineering Curriculum. In 2022ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
Page 15.616.9 Press, Princeton, NJ.5. Brock, T. 2006. “Updating the Miesian Curriculum” in proceedings of the Building Technology Educators’ Symposium, University of Maryland, August 3-5, edited by Oakley, D.J. and Smith, R.E.6. Charles, P. and Dermody, R. 2009 “Linkage: The Undergraduate Materials and Methods Lecture Course and Its Companion Studio” in proceedings of the Building Technology Educators’ Symposium, University of New Mexico, August 3-5, edited by Guling, D. and Armpriest, D.7. Dong, K and Leslie, T. 2006. “Cross-Discipline, Cross-Country: A Collaborative Design Studio Integrating Architecture and Engineering” Proceedings of the 2006 Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education.8
, July 22-23, 2020 (S. Wolf, M. Bennett, and B. Frank, ed.), pp. 191–197, AAPT, 2020.[31] A. Daane, S. Decker, and V. Sawtelle, “Teaching about racial equity in introductory physics courses,” The Physics Teacher, vol. 55, pp. 323–333, 2017.[32] C. Dalton and J. Hudgings, “Integrating equity: Curriculum development and student experiences in an intermediate-level college physics major course,” The Physics Teacher, vol. 58, pp. 545–551, 2020.[33] J. Hoehn and N. Finkelstein, “Fostering inclusion and teaching equity in a Modern Physics for Engineers course,” in Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, June 22-26, 2020, ASEE, 2020.[34] M. Baylor, J. Hoehn, and N. Finkelstein, “Infusing equity, diversity, and inclusion
concepts taught duringthe course lectures and were conducted by students at home using equipment that they ownedindividually. This pedagogical approach of integrating concrete and abstract learning receivedoverwhelmingly positive feedback from students enrolled in the d.c. circuits course and was included asan instructional component during the development of the a.c. circuits course in the following year. Theselaboratories have proven to be very successful.Through these efforts, we now have an integrated approach to providing hands-on experience for studentsbeginning with the spring semester of their freshman year and culminated in the spring semester of theirjunior year with their second electronics course. Despite these significant advances
school statistics Alumni supportOutcomes Cognitive growth Publication citations Skills attained Contribution to the field Attitudes developed Achievement of advisees______________________________________________________________________________*Adapted from Rogers12.The institution should facilitate interaction with other students and lecturers, and, as a result,promote multiple feedback opportunities within the learning process. Guidelines for theapplication of TQM in educational institutions can be summarized as follows7: • Provide training in an integrated system approach using quality management model and ISO-9000. • Show commitment from the top. • Include quality
efficiency can be taught in manydisciplines, including, but not limited to: design, engineering, manufacturing, technology, andmanagement1-14. Either we are focusing here on the issues related to development of the energymanagement or industrial energy course, will also outline how sustainability and energymanagement might be integrated into the curriculum from perspectives of courses and students’research and projects. At the course level, examples of how to integrate the concepts andapplications of sustainability into existing material will be discussed. The current situation andthe demand for a sustainable and efficient use of energy knowledge are more and more requiredand expected by employers. Sustainable development is a contemporary issue for
Co., Visa Lighting Corp., and West Bend Co. for providing equipment andsupplies for the experiments. Finally, the students who worked on the projects deserve much ofthe credit for this project's success: Ms. Colleen Bell, Ms. Christina Wisler, Mr. Austin Schmitt,Mr. Zach Ouradnik, Mr. Todd Murray, Mr. Chad Housner, and Mr. Erik Bauer.Bibliography Page 11.475.111. H.A. Aglan and S.F. Ali, "Hands-on Experiences: An Integral Part of Engineering Curriculum Reform," J. Eng. Education, 85, 327-330, 1996.2. R.M. Felder, "Reaching the Second Tier - Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education," J. Coll. Sci. Teaching, 22
. Scientific American, 2001. 285(2): p. 62-9.22. Montante, R., Beowulf and Linux: an integrated project course. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 2002. 17(6): p. 10-18.23. Hacker, T. and K.M. Madhavan. Developing a Research and Education Laboratory for High Performance Computing and Cyberinfrastucture. in Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Conference. 2009. Austin, TX. .24. Membrey, P., et al., The definitive guide to CentOS, in The expert's voice in open source. 2009, Apress: Berkeley, Calif.25. Team, C., HOWTO: Create an OSCAR package, January 2004.26. Sloan, J., High Performance Linux Clusters with OSCAR, Rocks, OpenMosix, and MPI (Nutshell Handbooks). 2004: O'Reilly
research that aims to advance water justice and sustainability, as well as sociotechnical engineering education research. She previously served as the project manager and lead editor of the NSF-funded TeachEngineering digital library (TeachEngineering.org, a free library of K-12 engineering curriculum), during which she mentored NSF GK-12 Fellows and NSF Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) participants on the creation and publication of their original engineering curriculum. Dr. Forbes is a former high school physics and engineering teacher and a former NSF GK-12 Fellow.Prof. Gordon D. Hoople, University of San Diego Dr. Gordon D. Hoople is an assistant professor and one of the founding faculty members of integrated
-based leadership • Environmental stewardship • Managing with technology As a result of these emphases, the Valpo MBA program has been very successful at attracting engineering graduates to the program, with as many as half of the students in many classes having an engineering or technical background. The MBA curriculum is broken into three sections. Up to 14 credits of foundation courses are required for students without a business background, followed by 26 credits of core courses taken by every students in the program, and finally 12 credits of electives chosen to complement the particular student’s interests and career needs. The following three courses provide an introduction to values-based leadership, environmental stewardship
initiatives to help students bridge the gap between high school and college as well as preparing students for the rigors of mathematics. His research interests include engineering education, integration of novel technologies into engineering classroom, excellence in instruction, water, and wastewater treatment, civil engineering infrastructure, and transportation engi- neering.Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi is interested in first-year engineering curriculum design and recruitment, retention and success of engineering students. He is the coordinator of ENGR101, an application-oriented course for engineering students placed in pre-calculus courses. He has also developed and co
needs and desires might not be fully understood from the perspective ofan American engineer. The lowest level of agreement for NapoNet program outcomes is for the impact onunderstanding engineering in a global sense. One student commented, “The NapoNet project islocalized to one district within Peru, and it is difficult to see how the project impacts the peoplethat live outside of this sphere very much.” This comment points to an area for improvement inthe NapoNet curriculum about increasing student understanding of engineering in a globalcontext. Students could be assigned readings and case studies to augment the mostly appliednature of the project. One note of caution for interpreting the student surveys results is the smallsize (n = 9
contact with instructors, and active engagement inreal world projects. Yet we struggle to find feasible paths to take action. Pressures toincrease enrollment and cut budgets challenge us to find ways to do more with less withoutdiluting the learning experience. Administrators embrace the need to update curriculum toremain current and relevant, yet there is no room to add in a tightly packed four-yearprogram. These tensions require innovative approaches to engineering education andleadership development to meet the challenges of the future.Introduction – An Overall FrameworkThere is general agreement that a renewed focus on leadership development is critical to thefuture success of the engineering discipline (NAE 2004). Our thinking begins to
across the curriculum. Her research and publications focus on reading pedagogy and multicultural literature.Dr. Benito Mendoza, City University of New York Benito Mendoza is an Assistant Professor of Computer Engineering at the New York City College of Technology (CITY TECH). Before he joined CITY TECH, he worked as a Postdoctoral Research En- gineer at ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company. His areas of interest include Multi-Agent Systems, Bio-Inspired Systems, Context and Situation Awareness, Cyber-Physical Systems, and Artificial Intelligence in Education and Intelligent Tutoring Systems. He holds a PhD. in Computer Science and Engineering from the University of South Carolina and an MSc in Artificial
curriculum capstone courses in Civil and other engineering disciplines attempt tofulfill a host of objectives. Most notably, they incorporate design projects and teamwork tofulfill specific criteria of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET).They provide their students with an opportunity for synthesis, employing the technical skills theyhave learned in the program, and introducing elements of professional practice that will easetheir integration into industry after graduation.In order to meet the needs industry has for young engineers, many universities have incorporatedmock corporate environments and real-world clients into the capstone course. Besides familiaritywith a team work environment and real clients, preparation for
- St. Louis Section. He has eight years of formal experience with K-12 engineering education.Dr. Shannon M. Sipes, Indiana University Shannon M. Sipes is an instructional consultant in the Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning at IU. In this role she provides professional development and individual consultation services for faculty with questions regarding their own teaching and student learning. Prior to her current role, she has served as the director of assessment helping faculty members with SOTL projects and classroom assessment. Shannon holds B.S. and M.A. degrees in psychology and a Ph.D. in curriculum and instruction with a focus on higher education.Mr. Jacob W. Benton, Primoris Services Corporation
the benefits of a studio pedagogical model, provide details regardingthe intended course structure, and discuss a series of studio projects to be completed by students.Mobile Studio Design PedagogyThe studio design model is a central part of the curriculum for architectural programs, where it isused to foster creativity and develop a student’s understanding of the design process. The studiodesign model also assists students by integrating other issues such as societal impact and legalrequirements into the design process. Because the design process is core to engineering, studiodesign principles are increasingly being used in engineering curriculums8.Features of the design studio include project based assignments (studio projects) that
’ activities included elements beyond teaching innovation, suchas curriculum design and educational research. Groups range in size from 4 to 10 people withsome members more active than others. Group members include both tenure-line and teaching-only faculty. The group described in this paper is unique in that it also includes graduate teachingassistants as integral members of the group.The Design element of the SIMPLE Design model emphasizes that improving teaching is viewedas an iterative design process. The ideal vision of a SIMPLE group is that members identifyneeds in their teaching and/or student learning, select an approach to addressing the needs,implement the approach, assess the result, and make modifications before implementing it again.(The
Paper ID #25504Elementary Students’ Computational Thinking Practice in A Bridge Designand Building Challenge (Fundamental)Dr. Dazhi Yang, Boise State University Dazhi Yang is an associate professor at Boise State University. Her research lies at the intersection of STEM education and technology-supported learning. Her current research focuses on integrating compu- tational thinking in STEM learning, instructional strategies and online course design, and strategies for teaching difficult and complex science and engineering concepts.Dr. Youngkyun Baek, Boise State University Dr. Baek has been a professor of educational
, graphics, and communication. These oversights may have caused the students to question the relevance of the teamwork activities to their design project, in turn, leading them to label the exercises as “busy work” (a term they use all too readily for many of the assignments in DTC, even those that they come to value later in their undergraduate career). The syllabus also did not explicitly list how the teamwork assignments would be weighted in the final course grade. While they were included as part of the student’s “individual grade,” this only comprised 10% of the final grade, of which, the teamwork assessments were only a small part.2) Adding eight additional exercises to an already crowded curriculum was a mistake. The principal