20 Post-‐test 10 0 Group-‐A Group-‐B Group A-‐ Scored an average of 60% in pretest
. Thomson and Marie Dillon Dahleh, Theory of Vibration with Application, Pp 18, 30 and 51, Fifth Edition, Prentice Hall, 1998. Page 22.361.8Appendix A1: Hand calculations for a typical problem on static equilibrium of a particle. Page 22.361.9Page 22.361.10Appendix A2: Excel program for the problem in Appendix A1 Page 22.361.11Page 22.361.12Appendix B: Excel program for iterative design calculations of the Design Factor, N (Problem 5-19 of Reference 4).Given: A simply supported beam
: a)programs and courses in entrepreneurship that are offered to engineering students, b) where theseprograms and courses are located within the university, and c) extracurricular learning opportuni-ties and resources for entrepreneurship (e.g., centers, incubators, entrepreneurship contests, fund-ing in entrepreneurship, etc.). To achieve completeness, data collection and verification was ac-complished by three researchers. Cluster analysis was conducted using PASW Modeler to groupinstitutions into like categories. Several algorithms were tested with the two-step algorithmyielding the best results in terms of cluster quality; and we were able to identify important clusterpredictors. In this paper, we provide two types of clusters related to
learning materials and teaching strategies based on virtual laboratories: A. Enhance the Virtual CVD laboratory by including interactive reflection tools (e.g., interactive lab notebook, a virtual supervisor), improved treatment of variability and cost, non-radial symmetry, and a new module on statistical process control. B. Using an analogous instructional design, develop a virtual laboratory of a bioreactor, the Virtual Bioreactor laboratory, a process in a different industry. C. Develop level appropriate assignments to use at the high school and community college levels. 2. Develop faculty expertise and implement the virtual laboratories at the BS and graduate
. Vanides (Eds.) International Society for Technology and Education. Washington DC (2011, in press).4. L. Gazca, E. Palou, A. López-Malo, and J. M. Garibay. Capturing Differences of Engineering Design Learning Environments by Means of VaNTH Observation System. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference. Austin, TX (2009).5. F. Kowalski, S. Kowalski, and E. Hoover. Using InkSurvey: A Free Web-Based Tool for Open-Ended Questioning to Promote Active Learning and Real-Time Formative Assessment of Tablet PC-Equipped Engineering Students. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference. Honolulu, HI (2007).6. R. Anderson, R. Anderson, L. McDowell, and B. Simon. Use of Classroom Presenter in Engineering Courses. Proceedings of the 35th ASEE
joined ALCOA's Wear-Everconsumer products division in 1972 after graduating from UD and then moved to Cutco in 1975.He guided the company through a management buyout from ALCOA in 1985 and continuedgrowth and acquisitions of other companies.Alfred B. England; 1982 BSET; One of the principals of Strandex Corporation, a company thatlicenses proprietary extrusion processes that use wood fibers and a variety of resins to producecomposite materials for deck board, and special extruded shapes used primarily in the buildingconstruction industry. He started his career with Milacron Company, where he rose to high levelmanagement positions and where he demonstrated creative approaches to the improvement ofextrusion processes.Daklak Do; 1989 BSET
problems,in laboratory assignments, and in key projects. Qualitative assessment tools such as surveys andfocus groups are also being used for assessment purposes.The program uses direct and indirect measures to determine the attainment of programeducational objectives. The key methods used are: a)periodic alumni surveys, rating theirpreparation and the importance of program emphasis, their salaries, and their level ofprofessional and personal development activities. b) Employer Data: Surveys and focus groups,as well as advisory board panels provide feedback on employer satisfaction. c) Graduate Schooland professional school performance – including placement and graduation rates, as well assubsequent employment. This paper is focused on the results
overview b. Relates lesson to previous lessons/activities c. Assesses prior knowledge d. Uses science notebooks* e. Uses graphics** Scale: 1 Present 0 Absen t*Notebooks use will be addressed in detail later on in protocol.**Graphics will be addressed in detail later on in protocol II. EVENT LOG/SYNOPSIS: Instructions: Create an event‐driven synopsis for the class period describing both teacher and student actions during each event. Shorthand codes for modes of instruction and teaching materials can be found in the table below the log. Refer to graphics as Graphic A, B, etc., as these
on a deep and fundamental level [W]e all know that you can get an A or a B in a class and not understand it. You can know it, but not understand it…And as a practicing engineer I know you have to KNOW it, you have to understand it fundamentally in order to use it in practice. So my goals now are to understand…you know that you need to know it. Period. And get it in your head and understand it. Fundamentally. So you can change any knob and understand what’s going on.Catherine recognizes that, in the workforce, engineers face problems that they never explicitlylearned to solve in their coursework. By understanding material thoroughly, they are able toapply concepts to situations far outside of anything that
point A to point B when you have different things to deal with and different personality types to deal with, like architects and engineers.”Professional and Ethical Judgment Though the developmental and social reform perspectives were identified equally as the most important teaching perspective when teaching professional and ethical judgment, all of the perspectives were closely identified as important. One study participant stated, “Professional and ethical judgment goes along with students being able to develop critical thinking skills. I think using the developmental style works because it takes students time to learn and acquire those skills.” Another participant stated, “Teaching
integrated manner than currentpractice, and (b) to introduce team- and project-based software engineering activities in a lowrisk, high student involvement setting in order to create a smoother learning curve for students.This paper contributes: • A discussion of the learning theory foundations for our approach, based on experiential learning targeted at increasing student motivation; • A minimally disruptive framework for better integrating software engineering education within a computer science curriculum by elaborating our course design plan, and providing a description of areas that required particular care; and, • A presentation of quantitative and qualitative evaluation results, based on student surveys, evaluation based
Page 22.502.12 2010.7. H. Arslan. “A Wireless Communication Systems Laboratory Course.” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Engineering Education & Training, April 9-11, 2007, Kuwait.8. C. B. Dietrich, F. E. Kragh, S. M. Hasan, C. Aguayo Gonzalez, A. A. Adenariwo, H. I. Volos, C. C. Dietrich, D. L. Miller, J. Snyder, S. H. Edwards, J. H. Reed. “Implementation and Evaluation of Laboratory/Tutorial Exercises for Software Defined Radio Education.” Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, 2010.9. H. Arslan. “Teaching SDR through a laboratory based course with modern measurement and test instruments.” Proceedings of the SDR Forum Technical Conference, November 2007.10. S. Bilen. “Implementing
: Cambridge University Press.11 Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20: 1, 37-46.12 Forzano, Lori-Ann B., Gravetter, Frederick J. (2009). Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.13 Cohen, J. (1960).14 Drummond, J., Kim, J. (2011).15 VanLehn, K., Graesser, A., Jackson, G., Jordan, P., Olney, A., and Rosé, C. (2007). When Are Tutorial Dialogues More Effective Than Reading?. Cognitive Science, 31: 1, 3-62.16 Mazzolini, M., and Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide, or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers and
computer assembly industry,” International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 202 – 212, 2003.12. Kwon, Y., Rauniar, S., Chiou, R. & Sosa, H., “Remote Control of Quality Using Ethernet Vision and Web-enabled Robotic System” J. of Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 35-42, 2006.13. Richard Chiou, Michael Mauk, Sweety Agarwal, and Yueh-Ting Yang, “Development of E-quality Laboratory Modules for use in Engineering Quality Control Courses,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX, June 14-17, 2009.14. G. Al-Kindi, B. Shirinzadeh, Y. Zhong, “A Vision-based Approach for Surface Roughness Assessment at Micro and Nano scales,” ICARCV
energy transfer generator. Page 22.621.5 B. Solar Pathfinder Laboratory ExperimentThe solar pathfinder laboratory experiment was designed for students to obtain knowledge aboutdetermining criteria for true north, declination angle, sun path diagram and being able todetermine the best location for maximum percentage of solar energy available at a specificlocation throughout the year. The laboratory kit consisted of the following components; tripod,angle estimator, sun path diagram, chalk, dome and plastic brief case13. Each group of studentswas assigned a specific location around the building for analysis of sun exposure throughout
://moonbuggy.msfc.nasa.gov/compete.html[7] http://etidweb.tamu.edu/faculty/hung/ASEE/competition.html[8] http://www.sme.org/cgi-bin/getsmepg.pl?/communities/techgroups/ddm/ddm_competition.htm&&&SME&[9] Cox, J., Lutty, A., Hatok, C., Toman, J., Mathers, B., 2009 SAE Baja Series Design Report for Milwaukee,Wisconsin.[10] Cox, J., Mathers, B., 2010 SAE Baja Series Design Report for Greenville, South Carolina. Page 22.137.9
[2] L a a yw W W Figure 1 a) Case Study with Spring-Pulley b) Case Study with Spring-Pulley Pivoted Beam Configuration Configuration• Spring-pulley systems are excellent candidates for classroom demonstration at this pre- knowledge level.• Spring-pulley systems require applications of concepts, including, but not limited to free- body diagrams, static analysis, Hooke’s law, algebraic and trigonometric concepts, and pulley movement concepts.• The system can
installed. While this was a strong white paper, the student opted to pursue a different product for her elevator pitch in SEC II.These examples illustrate the intended spirit of the assignment.Each white paper was graded by one writing instructor and one engineering instructor. Amongthe most common shortcomings of white papers observed in fall 2008 were: Presenting an interesting idea but only cursory research. Failure to locate readily available and clearly relevant literature or patents. Presenting an existing product as if it were a new product. Presenting notions, but not a clearly defined product.For the fall 2009 offering of SEC I, new grading rubrics, shown in Appendix B, were introduced,along with an explicit
of using the screenFDSWXUHVRIWZDUHDQGSURGXFLQJWKHYLGHRLVVWLOOLQVWUXFWRU¶VIXOOUHVSRQVLELOLW\. The instructor isrequired to make the time investment needed to learn and use the software, and very often time isa very valuable commodity for faculty members.Finally, another strategy involves creating videos by combining animated slides and pictures onan audio narrative that serve as WKH³VSLQH´RIWKHYLGHRSURGXFWLRQ7. In addition video clip can beincluded in this structure. We found this strategy as effective due to its two major strengths: a) The faculty was able to fully control the instructional materials that were the focus of the produced video; b) This strategy facilitated a better division of labor. The faculty member
biology examples(iii) Web-based course modules and exercises.Course assessment:It is obvious that the traditional assessment methods and criteria cannot be used for assessing thiscourse. However, some parts of the ABET “a to k” program outcomes were found to be relevantand hence were adapted for evaluation this course. A few criteria from biology education wereincluded to evaluate the lesser quantitative aspects. A modified ABET ‘a to k’ outcomes forevaluation of this course is given in Table 2.A few ABET outcomes could not be used for evaluating this course. Outcome ‘b’ can be added ifa lab module (virtual or real) is included. Outcomes ‘c’ and ‘d’ are at present irrelevant to this
(outstanding) or second-highest (above average) selections. Thecombined average of the 5-point questions was 4.79B. Assessment of student performance (grade distributions, etc.)It appears that the technical evaluation of the two Topics in Fluid Mechanics (MENG 494)courses was quite similar. For the semester-long course taught at the home institution, the gradedistribution consisted of 4 As, 3 Bs, and 1 C with an average GPA of 3.4. For the CIE course, 3As and 1 B were given with an average GPA of 3.7. The GPAs are relatively high in bothcourses. There are two main reasons for this: first, both courses were senior electives and onlystudents with a strong interest in the topic enrolled in the course. Second, due to the smallstudent numbers in both
technical information exchange. We hope that in the future these twocourses may excite more students to pursue advanced studies and careers in this area of growingimportance. Page 22.1062.6AcknowledgementsThe authors greatly acknowledge the financial support for the equipment of this work by thestarting fund from the College of Engineering, California State University, Long Beach. Theauthors also thank Professor Sergio Mendez for his proofreading and suggestions.References1. M. A. Burns, B. N. Johnson, S. N. Brahmasandra, K. Handique, J. R. Webster, M. Krishnan, T. S. Sammarco, P. M. Man, D. Jones, D. Heldsinger, C. H. Mastrangelo, D. T
team (A). “Whereas in A I have, you know, a lot of people who can help and like conflicting opinions are usually a good thing when you working on a project like this scale because Page 22.1447.9 there I mean usually if we work something out it is going to be the best solution. Where if I only have 3 people who can tell me what to do in Team B then I feel like I am going to get a much worse solution.”Communication, trust, and mutual respect were also important components of the students‟discussions of interdisciplinary engineering teams. Sarah, for example, described, “I think as long as there is mutual
and the reasons we use them was discussed as wellas the impractical and unlikely potential of removing hydrates from our environment. On dayfour, the students began to build their own environments using plasticine clay and plasticshoeboxes. These environments were filled with water and later polluted using dirty motor oil. Avariety of measurements were taken and mathematically tracked, as is described in Appendix A.Additionally, pictures of students’ environments are provided in Appendix B. Before simulatingan oil spill, the students developed a plan and brainstormed methods for cleaning theirenvironments using materials that they would be responsible for bringing to class. The last day ofthe lesson, Megan led a class discussion on what the
., Arguello, J., Pai, C., Carey, R., Zaiss, Z., Rosé, C. P. (2005). Towards a Prototyping Tool for Behavior Oriented Authoring of Conversational Interfaces, Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Educational Applications of NLP, June 25-30, Ann Arbor, MI.14. Jordan, P., Hall, B., Ringenberg, M., Cui, Y., Rosé, C. P. (2007). Tools for Authoring a Dialogue Agent that Page 22.1597.14 Participates in Learning Studies, Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education, July 9-13, Los Angeles, CA.15. Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., Sewall, J., & Koedinger, K. (2006). The Cognitive Tutor Authoring Tools (CTAT
AC 2011-452: RIGOROUS EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH IN CIVIL ENGI-NEERING:Brock E. Barry, U.S. Military Academy Dr. Barry is an assistant professor and course director in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engi- neering at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. He predominately teaches in the area of engineer- ing mechanics. His current areas of research include professional ethics, economic factors influencing engineering education, identity development, and non-verbal communication. Dr. Barry is a licensed professional engineer with multiple years of consulting experience.Kathryn Purchase, United States Military Academy Major Kathryn Purchase is currently an Instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical
exercises. Each student was asked to follow a defined protocol of contacting the faculty member to ask for cooperation in this exercise, distributing the publication, and arranging for a 30-45 minute interview time. Students interviewed their assigned faculty member using a set of prepared questions for guidance. Students were instructed to ask that they be able to take notes in order to complete the class assignment. The student informed the faculty member that a summary of the interviews may be shared with the class. The question set and suggested interview format is provided in Appendix B. The students were asked to complete a post-interview summary form which is provided in Appendix C. These summary forms were summarized for discussion during a
using hot blocks of metal as an energy source. One option is to use one metal block at a temperature of 200 C and a second option is to use two metal blocks each at a temperature of 100 C. All the metal blocks are made from the same material and have the same weight and surface area. Which option will melt more ice? a. the 100 C blocks b. the 200 C block c. either option will melt the same amount of ice d. can’t tell from the information given because: e. 2 blocks have twice as much surface area as 1 block so the energy transfer rate will be higher when more blocks are used f. energy transferred is proportional to the mass of blocks used and the change in block temperature
- Conversion andDelivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century, pp. 1 – 7 (2008).5. Datar, M.T., Rao, M.N., and Reddy, S., “Vermicomposting - A Technological Option for Solid WasteManagement”, Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, v 24, n2, May, 1997, p 89-93.6. Davis, Karen C., Perkey, Megan L., Harth, Nicholas B., and Dees, Nathan, “STEPing into the Classroom: AnAlternative Capstone Experience”, Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland,June 2005. Page 22.1240.9
, D. (1995) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York; BasicTools.[8] Creswell, J. (1994) Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative approaches. Calif: Sage.[9] Silverman, D. (2005) Doing Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition: A Practical Handbook. London : Sage.[10] Doyle, B. (2010) Lighting Controls & their Associated Problems; Lambert Academic Publishing,Germany.[11] Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (2003) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. UK; Sage.[12] Robson, C. (2002) Real World Research 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science.[13] King, N.(Template Analysis) in Symon, G. & Cassell, C. (1998) Qualitative Methods & Analysis inOrganisational Research. London: Sage