Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 1231 - 1260 of 2102 in total
Conference Session
Computers in Education Division Technical Session 4: Digital Learning Part II
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Fadi Castronovo, California State University, East Bay; Jesus Oliver Ph.D., California State University, East Bay; Andrew Stanciulescu, California State University, East Bay
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
learning in mathematics​. ERIC Clearinghouse, 2003.[8] X. Xia, C. Lu, and B. Wang, “Research on mathematics instruction experiment based problem posing,” ​J. Math. Educ.,​ vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 153–163, 2008.[9] M. Wang, B. Wu, N.-S. Chen, and J. M. Spector, “Connecting problem-solving and knowledge-construction processes in a visualization-based learning environment,” ​Comput. Educ.​, vol. 68, pp. 293–306, 2013.[10] J. Piaget, ​Piaget’s theory.​ Wiley, New York, NY, 1970.[11] L. S. Vygotsky, ​Thought and language.​ MIT press, 2012.[12] D. A. Kolb, ​Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development.​ Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1984.[13] N. M. Dixon, D. Adams, and R. Cullins, “Learning style
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Major Choice
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Michelle E. Jarvie-Eggart, Michigan Technological University; Amanda Marie Singer, Michigan Technological University; Jason Mathews, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Considerations in STEM Fields.” Proceedings of 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX. June 14-17, 2009, AC 2009-517. [4] Dorie, B. L., Jones, T. R., and M. E. Cardella. “Parents as Critical Influence: Insights From Five Different Studies (Other)” Proceedings of 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, June 15-18, 2014. Paper ID: 10554 [5] Carnasciali, M., & Thompson, A. E., & Thomas, T. J. (2013, June), “Factors influencing students' choice of engineering major.” Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. June 23-26, 2013. https
Conference Session
Approaches to Assessment and Student Reflection
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Sabrine Griffith, Harvey Mudd College; Spencer Rosen, Harvey Mudd College; Eleanor Byrnes, Harvey Mudd College; Laura Palucki Blake, Harvey Mudd College; Matthew Spencer, Harvey Mudd College
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
hover their mouse cursor over thequestion text to see the answer. In ​Figure 1​b, students were invited to click on multiple choiceanswers until they found the correct one, receiving immediate feedback on each click. Studentswere asked to record these responses in the submission sheet required for each practicum.The treatment group received a lab manual with more interactive questions than the controlgroup. The control group received a manual that was similar to those used in previous years: itcontained instructions with a few basic interactive questions. The number of additionalinteractive questions was different in each lab: practicum 2B included 13 more questions in thetreatment manual, Practicum 2C included 4 more questions, Practicum 2D
Conference Session
Community Engagement Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Romeo Ballinas-Gonzalez, Tecnologico de Monterrey; Benjamin Sanchez, Tecnologico de Monterrey; Miguel X. Rodriguez-Paz, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM); Juan Arturo Nolazco-Flores, Tecnologico de Monterrey
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Community Engagement Division
of Writing Lab, TecLabs, Tecnologico deMonterrey, Mexico, in the production of this work.References[1] S. Ghanta, "Augmenting soft skills in engineering students," J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control. Syst., vol. 11,(Special Issue 6), pp. 1720-1722, 2019.[2] M. Debnath et al, "4 - Role of soft skills in engineering education: students' perceptions andfeedback," pp. 61-82, 2012. . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-645-6.50004-5. 9[3] M. Abdous, B. R. Facer and C. Yen, "Academic effectiveness of podcasting: A comparative study ofintegrated versus supplemental use of podcasting in second language classes," Computers & Education,vol. 58, (1), pp. 43-52, 2012. . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016
Conference Session
ECCD - Technical Session 2 - Solar Energy
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Saeed Sean Monemi, California State Polytechnic University Pomona
Tagged Divisions
Energy Conversion and Conservation
actuators to track the sun so the solar face canhave optimal light exposure. The Arduino was used to code the relationship between thephotoresistors and the actuators. So the code focuses the actuators towards the resistor receivingthe highest voltage. See Figure 11. Fig. 11. PhotoresistorsV. Integration and test results A. Battery charging Had a battery with low voltage plugged in since we know that battery would be low on chargeand we can check that it charged by checking the voltage. Normally for a battery used you wouldneed a coulomb meter to see how many electrons were available to be used B. Voltmeter Easily we compared the readout of a known working voltmeter to our own. It varied
Conference Session
Design Teams 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Peter Schuster, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Lauren Anne Cooper, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Eltahry Elghandour, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Eileen W. Rossman P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Sarah Harding, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
. This is exacerbated when the project work extends over multiple termsand teams have unique projects. Giving students some agency in team and project selection isone way to improve their project experience. This paper examines two key questions: (a) Whatis the best way to incorporate student interests into the team-forming process? (b) What impactdoes the team-forming process have on the student experience throughout the project?We consider two different approaches to giving students agency in the team formation / projectselection process that have been implemented in our capstone course. One approach has facultyforming teams outside of class based on student surveys of project interests, skills, timeavailability, and team preferences. The
Collection
2020 ASEE North Midwest Section Annual Conference
Authors
Arielle True-Funk, Iowa State University; Cristina Poleacovschi, Iowa State University; Gloria Jones-Johnson; Scott Grant Feinstein; Meghan Berger M.A., LCMHCA, NCC, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
. ReferencesBalsam, K. F., Molina, Y., Beadnell, B., Simoni, J., & Walters, K. (2011). Measuring multiple minority stress: the LGBT People of Color Microaggressions Scale. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17(2).Bruning, M. J., Bystydzienski, J., & Eisenhart, M. (2015). Intersectionality as a framework for understanding diverse young women’s commitment to engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 21(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014007345Camacho, M. M., & Lord, S. M. (2011). "Microaggressions" in engineering education: Climate for Asian, Latina and White women. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 1-6. https://doi.org
Conference Session
Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Alyson Grace Eggleston, The Citadel; Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel
Tagged Divisions
Military and Veterans
Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, vol. 9, (S1), no. 4, 2017.[3] A. Barr, K. Bird, B. Castleman, and W. Skimmyhorn, “A comparison of postsecondary outcomes for Army service members, veterans, and civilians,” EdWorking Paper, no.19-50, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://edworkingpapers.com/ai19-50 2019. [Accessed May 1, 2020].[4] J. Coll and E. Weiss, “Military culture and veteran transition.” Caring for the Military, Abingdon, UK: Routledge, pp. 10-19, 2016.[5] K. Jones, “Understanding transition experiences of combat veterans attending community college,” Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 107-123, 2016.[6] D. Perkins, K. Aronson, N. Morgan, J. Bleser, D. Vogt, D., L. Copeland
Collection
2020 St.Lawrence Section Meeting
Authors
Katherine Gascon; Steven Weinstein; Michael G. Antoniades
systematic error by both lab sections as evidenced by thenon-random distribution of the data around accepted values. The origin of this error is apparentby inspection of Figure 3, where the slope of the student data just below the CMC is not as steepas the corresponding slope exhibited by the literature data.11 This deviation produces a decreasein the surface excess value and an equivalent increase in the surface area per molecule value asseen in Figures 4(a) and 4(b). A possible explanation for this result is that surfactant is not fullyadsorbed to the air-drop interface. To dispense a drop, students apply pressure to the bulb of apipette via their fingers. It is difficult to maintain a drop in its critical configuration beforedetachment for a
Conference Session
Capstone, Undergraduate Research, and Projects in ECE
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Rod Blaine Foist, California Baptist University; John Butler, California Baptist University; Gibson Fleming, California Baptist University
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
here.The questions given to the IEEE club are given below. Note that the “a” questions (1a, 2a, etc.)are “generic” to courses (and associated labs), while the corresponding “b” questions (1b, 2b,etc.) are specific to the big_blinky lab/tutorial. Very similar “a” questions were used for the EGR101 students, except modified to refer to “this course” instead of “my courses”, and using“engineering” instead of “ECE”. But the “b” questions were identical.1a. The lab work I do for my courses is relevant to my learning.1b. The big_blinky lab/tutorial was relevant to my learning.2a. Doing the labs from my engineering courses is interesting to me.2b. Doing the big_blinky lab/tutorial was interesting to me.3a. The labs for my courses show me how to problem
Collection
2020 Gulf Southwest Section Conference
Authors
Randall Manteufel; Amir Karimi; Pranav Bhounsule
on Reducing Student Complaints”, ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE2019-26575, Tampa, FL, June 16-196. Manteufel, R.D., and A. Karimi, 2012, “Assisting Adjunct Faculty Using Committee Exams”, ASEE Annual Conference, AC2012-4742, San Antonio, TX, June 10-13.7. Ryan, T., B. Steffensen, and C. Janeiro, 2017, “Curing the Cheating Epidemic? A Multi-site International Comparison of Perspectives on Academic Integrity and the Way we Cure by Teaching” ASEE2017-19706,8. Shepard, T., A.B. Hoxie, and M. Anderson, 2014, “I Did Not Anticipate This: Experiences for the Early Years”, ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE2014-9506, Indianapolis, IN, June 15-18.9. Luks, C.P., 2012, “My War on Cheating”, ASEE-Midwest Annual Conference, Rolla, MO.10. Khalid, A., B
Conference Session
Faculty Development Research
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Petra Bonfert-Taylor, Dartmouth College; Christopher Miller, Dartmouth College
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division
, s=1where 1, there exists b ∈ S s.t. as,i = ab,ia Zs,i = 0, elseS is the set of all students, as,i indicates the response of student s to question i, and ia is the associatedquestion for restrictive question i.Isolation QuestionsIsolation questions allow users to prevent groups in which students with a specified majority responseoutnumber other students. For example, studies in STEM courses have shown that female students reporthigher self-confidence and are more likely to major in a course’s subject if placed in groups with a higherpercentage of women, and student outcomes for all students in a group improve as the percentage ofwomen in
Conference Session
Computers in Education Division Technical Session 7: Advanced CS courses
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Sabahattin Gokhan Ozden, Penn State Abington; Omar M. Ashour, Penn State Erie, the Behrend College; Ashkan Negahban, Pennsylvania State University, School of Graduate Professional Studies
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
explored on a 2D display or via a VR headset (if available); b. Processes in the virtual (simulation) environment that include multiple stations, and com- prise technical as well as organizational aspects; c. A set of products or entities that flow throughout the virtual environment and are processed (e.g., manufactured, assembled, stored, transported); d. A didactical concept that comprises formal and informal learning, enabled by own actions of the learners during and after virtual site visits/field trips based on remote active-learning instead of on-site learning. These represent problems/projects inspired by real-world situa- tions that the learner may face at future workplace.Since I-SBL essentially involves PBL
Conference Session
Design Methodologies 1
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Aaron Justin Joya, Georgetown University; Khadijah Jordan; Miranda Nicole Washington; Grace Barar, University of Washington; Alison Gray, University of Washington; Rylie Sweem; Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT), a professor in Human Centered Design & Engineering, and the inaugural holder of the Mitchell T. & Lella Blanche Bowie Endowed Chair at the University of Washington. Dr. Atman is co-director of the newly-formed Consortium for Promoting Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE), funded by a $4.4 million grant from the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. She was director of the NSF-funded Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE), a national research center that was funded from 2003-2010. Dr. Atman is the author or co-author on over 115 archival publications. She has been invited to give many keynote addresses, including a
Conference Session
Cooperative and Experiential Education Division Technical Session 1 - Skill and Competency Development through the Co-op Experience
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Katherine M. Ehlert, Clemson University; Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University
Tagged Divisions
Cooperative and Experiential Education
more motivated to complete multiple rotations.Future WorkFuture work is to expand this data beyond a single institution to look for other contextualinfluences on student views. This will help build better descriptions or find additional uniquegroups. Additionally, this expanded work can help identify how institutional or corporatecultures could be impacting the co-op experience.References[1] R. S. Lindenmeyer, “A comparison study of the academic progress of the cooperative and the four year student,” J. Coop. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 8–18, 1967.[2] B. F. Blair, M. Millea, and J. Hammer, “The Impact of Cooperative Education on Academic Performance and Compensation of Engieering Majors,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 333
Conference Session
Experimentation and Laboratory-oriented Studies Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Natasha Smith P.E., University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies
Paper ID #30319Scaffolded Laboratory Sequence: Mechanics LabDr. Natasha Smith P.E., University of Virginia Dr. Smith is an Associate Professor at the University of Virginia c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Scaffolded Laboratory Sequence: Mechanics LabAbstractLaboratory courses are a platform for students to practice skills essential to the engineering pro-fession. They also foster lower-level learning (e.g. understanding of fundamental concepts) andhigher-level synthesis and creativity. The undergraduate programs for Mechanical and Aerospace(MAE) Engineering at the University of Virginia
Conference Session
Green Energy Manufacturing and Sustainable Energy Management
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Richard Chiou, Drexel University; Toshika Fegade, Drexel University; Yu-Chieh (Jamie) Wu, Drexel University ; Tzu-Liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas at El Paso; Michael G. Mauk, Drexel University; Irina Nicoleta Ciobanescu Husanu, Drexel University
Tagged Divisions
Energy Conversion and Conservation, Manufacturing
. Virtual reality providesimmersive and collaborative technique for students to take part into and work as a group on whatthey learnt in the course class.3. Modeling with SolidWorksSolidWorks is a computer aided design and engineering software used to create and simulate 3Dmodels. Students were instructed to design a small-scale wind turbine in SolidWorks consisting offive different parts: base, stem, turbine, axil and blade. Students decide on their respective modelsafter experimenting with different number and various shapes of turbine blades as shown in Figures2-4. Figure 2 shows wind turbine designed by students with 3 blades. Figure 3 shows wind turbinedesigned by students with 6 blades. Figure 3 (a) design is turbine with flat blades and (b
Collection
2020 First-Year Engineering Experience
Authors
Victor Alonso Bradford, University of Missouri - College of Engineering; Tojan Rahhal, University of Missouri - Columbia; Hani Salim P.E., University of Missouri - Columbia
Tagged Topics
Diversity
% 80.0% 0.0% 75.0% 2018 1 Year COE 2018 1 Year MU 2019 1 Semester COE 2019 1 Semester MU Retention Rates Retention Rates Retention Rates Retention Rates 2018 ESBP Cohort (45) Pre-Engineering Students (171) 2019 ESBP Cohort (40) Pre-Engineering Students (187)Figure 1. 2018 cohort 1-year retention rates within COE and MU (a) & 2019 cohort 1stsemester retention rates within COE and MU (b)Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, MU moved all summer 2020
Collection
2020 Fall ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Meeting
Authors
Jeremy David Paquin, United States Military Academy; Matthew Louis Miller, United States Military Academy; Jes Barron, U.S. Military Academy
found that the majority of the “A” students “preferred using the sheet” whilethe majority of the “C” and below students “preferred having the security of the whole textduring the exam” [11]. Hamed found that “a survey of the 44 students” conducted two weeksafter a physics exam, “revealed that 25 preferred having the text with exams, 17 liked sheets, andtwo were undecided.” Hamed notes that underlying these preferences that “the majority ofstudents receiving an A grade preferred the sheet, and the majority of students receiving a C andbelow preferred the text,” while students “receiving a B were split equally between the twochoices, and the two undecided students were in the B group.” Notably of those students in theresearch that preferred the
Conference Session
Design Teams 1
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Ardeshir Raihanian Mashhadi, University at Buffalo, SUNY; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Education Conference, Kansas City, MO, 2000, vol. 2.[15] D. Narayan and P. Petesch, "Agency, opportunity structure, and poverty escapes," Moving Out of Poverty: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Mobility, pp. 1-44, 2007.[16] D. A. Kolb, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press, 2014.[17] M. E. Jordan and R. R. McDaniel Jr, "Managing uncertainty during collaborative problem solving in elementary school teams: The role of peer influence in robotics engineering activity," Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 490-536, 2014.[18] V. Svihla, T. B. Peele-Eady, and Y. Chen, "Agency in framing design problems " in AERA Annual Meeting, Toronto, ON
Conference Session
Experiences of Underrepresented Students in Engineering
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Oleksandr Kravchenko, Old Dominion University; Konstantin Cigularov, Old Dominion University; Phillip Dillulio, Old Dominion University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
, before starting their engineering studies, reported coming from one ormore of the following: a) military, b) vocational / technical school, c) full-time job, d) part-timejob, or e) another academic major at ODU.Materials The current study adopted a demands-resources conceptual and measurement framework[15] to examine perceived demands and resources to success of engineering students. Theanonymous, online survey contained measures of personal/school demands and resources, as wellas outcomes of interest. Personal demands. Personal demands were measured with eight variables consisting of26 items. The personal demands of difficulties with time management, difficulty stayingorganized, difficulty paying attention, difficulty prioritizing
Conference Session
First-year Programs: Cornucopia #1
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Joshua L. Hertz, Northeastern University; Richard Whalen, Northeastern University; Constantine Mukasa, Northeastern University; John Sangster P.E., Northeastern University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
thesepopulations are created at random—can easily mask these effects. Future research isrecommended to look more specifically at disciplinary versus general engineering designtopics, as well as student perception and grades on particular content areas as opposed tothe overall course.References[1] M. J. Seiler, V. L. Seiler, and D. Chiang, “Professor, Student, and Course Attributes thatContribute to Successful Teaching Evaluations,” Financ. Pract. Educ., 1999.[2] R. B. Bausell and C. R. Bausell, “Student Ratings and Various Instructional Variablesfrom a Within-Instructor Perspective,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 167–177, 1979.[3] T. M. Heckert, A. Latier, A. Ringwald, and B. Silvey, “Relation of Course, Instructor,and Student
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Lisa R. Volpatti, Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Kara Rodby, Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Gurleen Kaur Singh, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Bianca Kaushal, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ; Kelley Marie Adams, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Paula T. Hammond, Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Sarah Rankin
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
indicate a useful aspect or takeaway of the training.Figure 1. Trainings were perceived well by participants in immediate post-training surveys. a) Extent ofsatisfaction of training content (n = 483), level of interaction (n = 484), facilitators (n = 487), and trainingoverall (n = 484). Percentages indicate the sum of “good,” “very good,” and “excellent” responses. b)Perceptions of amount of interaction (n = 490), level of content (n = 490), and length of training (n =485).Follow-up Survey ResponsesThe online follow-up survey was sent to the target population (graduate students, faculty, andstaff in the department) ~6 months after the last training. A total of 104 people completed thesurvey, 97 of whom participated in the training (although the
Conference Session
Capstone Pedgagogy
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Joyce Blandino P.E., Virginia Military Institute; Jon-michael Hardin P.E., Virginia Military Institute
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
follow-on group. It would providevaluable experience to the students if more clients could be recruited from the community.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the following ME students who participated in this project: Arlint,A., Durbin, T., Hayes, T.S., Jefferson, S., Jewett, S., Maltbie, J., Mihalec, B., Milne, S., Richards,T., Ward, M., and Willard, J..References[1] R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, C. D. Sorensen, B. R. Swan, and D.K. Anthony. “A survey ofcapstone engineering courses in North American,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 84,pp.165-174, April 1995.[2] A. J. Dutson, R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, and C. D. Sorensen. “A review of literature onteaching engineering design through project-oriented capstone courses,” Journal
Conference Session
STEM Issues in ET II
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Meher Rusi Taleyarkhan, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Natalie Hobson, Sonoma State University; Therese M. Azevedo, Sonoma State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
,” American Institutes for Research, 2007.[3] A. Andrews, and J. Brown, “The effects of math anxiety,” Education, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 362-370, 2015.[4] K. W. Choe, J. B. Jenifer, C. Rozek, M. Berman, and S. L. Beilock, “Calculated Avoidance: Math Anxiety Predicts Math Avoidance in Effort-based Decision-making,” 2019.[5] G. Ramirez, E. A. Gunderson, S. C. Levine, and S. L. Beilock, “Math anxiety, working memory, and math achievement in early elementary school,” Journal of Cognition and Development, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 187-202, 2013.[6] C. Holden, “Female math anxiety on the wane,” Science, vol. 236, pp. 660-662, 1987.[7] S. L. Beilock, E. A. Gunderson, G. Ramirez, and S. C
Conference Session
Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 13
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Luciana Debs, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Yunfeng Chen, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jiansong Zhang
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
for each iteration per group) – see appendix A • Handouts with options for (a) semi-truck transportation; (b) routes from prefabrication factory to construction site; and (c) site hoisting equipment for on-site assembly. Handouts (a) and (b) are for the second iteration, and hand out (c) is for the third iteration (one hand-out per group).Summary of activity procedures: Students are given a short presentation on prefabrication and modular construction andthen asked to work in pairs during the activity. If a mixed age group is present for the activity, itis suggested to pair students so that older students work with younger students to help themthrough the process. • Initial prompt: with site plan and
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: EM Across the Curriculum I
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Matthew Garett Young, Arkansas Tech University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Paper ID #29720WIP Adopting the Entrepreneurial Mindset in an Upper Level EngineeringElectromagnetics CourseDr. Matthew Garett Young, Arkansas Tech University Matthew G. Young received his B. Sc. in Electrical Engineering from Arkansas Tech University in 2009. He obtained his M. Sc. in Microelectronics-Photonics at the University of Arkansas in 2012. For his M. Sc. studies, he focused on the growth of silicon nanowires via plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. In August of 2016, he joined the faculty at Arkansas Tech University as an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering. His Ph.D. was completed at the
Conference Session
New Media for Ethics Education
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Joshua Gargac, University of Mount Union
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
and ethics trainings (question 2),thoughts about morality (question 3), and the ethical dilemma presented in the episode (question4). Table 1: Personal Reflection Work Sheet The Office "Business Ethics" Personal Reflection Questions. 1. At the start of the episode Holly implies that her meeting won’t be interesting because she’ll have to read from a binder. a. What are your expectations for our ethics module? b. What do you think we’ll talk about? c. Are you excited? How would you rate your excitement on a scale of 1 (low) to 10 (high) 2. Dunder Mifflin initiates the ethics seminar after misconduct from its corporate leaders. a. Are you familiar with real-life
Conference Session
Integrating Sustainability and Resilience Concepts into Courses
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Benjamin Sanchez, Tecnologico de Monterrey; Romeo Ballinas-Gonzalez, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM); Miguel X. Rodriguez-Paz, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM); Juan Arturo Nolazco-Flores, Tecnologico de Monterrey
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
example of evaluation of the damages of a dwelling in Chietla. The evaluationwas developed by the students and supervised by professors with knowledge in the field. a) b) Figure 2: Evaluation of the damages on the dwellings: a) student developing a survey, and b) structural damages on the building.4.1.2 Objective of the projectThe objective of this project is to develop a sustainable building design of a residential unit thatincorporates the elements of bioclimatic design and it is designed according to the socioculturalcharacteristics of the community. This project aims to provide a design that implements passivestrategies for thermal comfort optimization, such as
Conference Session
Assessment of Learning in ECE Courses
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jinhui Wang, University of South Alabama
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
evaluation data are shown in Table 1 and listed in Fig. 1. They arerespectively about (a) the instructor had clear policies (e.g., grading, attendance, and assignments);(b) the instructor provided useful feedback on my progress within the course; (c) the instructor waswell prepared for in class meetings; (d) examinations and other assignments reflected stated courseobjectives and course material; (e) the instructor was successful in clarifying difficult concepts; (f)the instructor was well prepared for online class sessions and activities.Strongly disagree 1 ----- 5 Strongly agree INSTRUCTOR HAS CLEAR POLICIES INSTRUCTOR PROVIDED FEEDBACK 2018 Fall 2019 Spring