societalimpact and to align with ABET standards, the Webb Communication Program at the WoodruffSchool has established a guiding framework that defines our understanding of what effectivecommunication is. Specifically, this framework names appropriateness and responsiveness as thefoundation of effective communication. These are defined in the following ways: 1. Appropriateness: The quality of a prepared message that reflects its suitability in addressing the specific context, audience, and purpose, resulting in a communication that is ideally curated and positioned for maximum effectiveness. 2. Responsiveness: The quality of being adaptable and receptive to the evolving dynamics of a communication context, enabling timely and
finalized codebook. Table 2 defines the four S’s alongside the transition types in the study context. We organized the results by the type of transition and highlighted how students' experiences map to the four S’s of Schlossberg’s transition theory. . TrustworthinessEReporting on the quality, credibility, and validation of qualitative research are best practices to ensure the study's trustworthiness[33]. In engineeringeducation, Walther et al.[34]provide validation strategies to ensure the quality and trustworthiness of qualitative research. heoretical validation of a study should reflect the complexity of the lived experience underTinvestigation. This can be validated through the use of an opposing case
is because knowledge and ways of knowing play a rolein power dynamics and control such that the hegemonic majority maintains dominance over thecultural narrative [42]–[44]. The hidden curriculum in engineering reflects the epistemic originsof the profession, which assert the values and norms upheld in engineering learning spaces aswell as the field. These engineering epistemologies are unspoken and unacknowledged (hidden),which can serve to limit underrepresented and underserved communities in engineering learningenvironments. We identify the hidden epistemologies that emerge from the teaming experiencesof African American females and recognize their role in impacting these students’ experiences asengineers.MethodsMethodologyWe performed
, technologies used for teaching, pedagogical strategies, student engagement, andpotential cognitive demand [32]. Data was recorded every two minutes for every category usinga set of established codes. Along with the codes, thorough notes were taken at each time interval,and an analytical memo was created after every observation. Given that every class had a similarweekday schedule, another important element was the class timetable. For the pilot study, theresearcher performed two classroom observations. She observed each section at a different time.This helped the researcher to compile an analytical memo reflecting on the observation.Semi-structured interviewThe main goal of employing semi-structured interviews for gathering data was to learn moreabout
qualitative studies and useful for examining the perspective of participants. Weemployed Braun and Clarke's [45] six-phase method for thematic analysis, which encompassedfamiliarizing yourself with data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing,defining, and naming the themes, and creating the report. Though the method is presented asbeing linear, we took an iterative and reflective process that involved constantly moving backand forth between phases [45], [46] and enriched with deep discussions among the coders todevelop themes. Agreements and disagreements were discussed through deep conversationsamong multiple researchers at different stages [47].The triangulation of data and following the trustworthiness criteria suggested by
comprehensive intervention aimed at helping students develop self-regulation andsuccess skills. It focuses on goal setting, community building, academic development, andpersonal development. The program covers student development topics in a first-yearengineering course/lab/seminar, and students are asked to design their own process for successand write a reflective, comprehensive report. For the Fall 2023 term students were asked to writefour reflective homework assignments (~1000 words per assignment) and a reflectivecomprehensive report (~4000 words). Since there is no institution wide policy regardinggenerative AI use in courses, the following syllabus statement was used:The Use of AI such as ChatGPT, Google Bard etc.You can utilize AI technologies
itscapabilities, limitations, and ethical implications in different contexts. A visual representation ofthe participants’ perceptions is shown in Fig 1. Fig 1. Visual representation of students’ perceptions of ChatGPTQ2. How do you see ChatGPT evolving in the future and what impact do you think it will haveon education?In analyzing the responses to this question, we employed NVIVO to auto-code the responses.Through this process, a diverse array of themes reflecting various perspectives on ChatGPT'sfuture evolution and its potential educational impact. The question itself bifurcates into two distinctaspects: one regarding future developments and the other pertaining to its educationalramifications. To streamline our analysis, we initially
graduatestudents during this time period. The pronounced rise in publications during these years, with overhalf of the total articles between 2020 - 2023, suggests that the pandemic may have intensified thefocus on graduate student mental health, reflecting an obvious and heightened scholarly responseto a critical aspect of student life exacerbated by the global crisis.Figure 1: Temporal trends showing the number of publications before, during, and after the COVID-19global pandemic.Mental health-related terminologies. In our examination of the 616 identified peer-reviewedarticles, we cataloged the terminologies employed to discuss mental health. We conducted adetailed review of the abstracts from each paper and counted every mention of a mental health
NSFGraduate Research Fellowship. Some of these experiences were directly facilitated by the effortsof STEM CONNECT. For example, one Scholar applied and accepted an internship to Hudl aftera local tour, and other Scholars have received extensive feedback on application materials andletters of recommendation from project leaders. A total of twenty university Scholars havegraduated in computing and mathematics-related majors, with an average GPA of 3.66. Ten ofthese Scholars graduated with distinction. Further, 85% were either first-generation, women,and/or URM.The project consistently positioned Scholars as worth investing in. One community collegeScholar reflected on the importance of this positioning: I find it very encouraging knowing that
diversityof member views regarding the proposed ABET changes, summarize them, and present them forfurther discussion at that year’s Interdivisional Town Hall [3].By 2018 a set of “Town Hall Guiding Principles” had been created by the Ad Hoc Committee:Atsushi Akera (LEES), Chair, Alan Cheville (ERM), John Estell (First-Year Programs), SusannahHowe (DEED), Mark Killgore (Civil), and Joe Tranquillo (Biomedical), Chair-Elect, with theunderstanding that not every town hall meeting would be able to focus on all of the followingcriteria: A great Town Hall meeting will: ● Address a Big Question ● Build community by allowing ASEE members to mix across divisions ● Foster self-reflection among the members of the ASEE community
marginalized groups,including Black, Hispanic/Latinx, and Indigenous students in STEM, is imperative to maintainthe U.S. standing as a global leader in innovation.We reported on the development procedure for a multi-factor organizational climate survey forengineering doctoral student retention. Engineering doctoral graduates account for a large shareof the innovation workforce [2], but the engineering doctoral pipeline does not reflect thediversity of the U.S. population. For example, in 2022, women earned 26.2% of the engineeringdoctoral degrees awarded in the U.S., with fewer than half of those women being U.S. residents.Of those degrees, American Indian women earned 0.1%, Black women earned 5.0%, multiracialwomen earned 5.3%, Latina women earned
superintendents reflected on how students were impacted directly: “Yes, it [COVID] has had a negative impact. Although teachers provided options, resources, links, etc., students really had to take some initiative to fully dive in. Students were not exposed to as many concepts, experiment opportunities, lessons, etc. as they were prior to the pandemic.” “COVID prevented inquiry based hands-on experiences.”Theme #2: Teachers recognized what was missing during the pandemic, namely studentcollaboration, hands-on investigations, and using the school’s STEAM Lab.Several teachers commented on the lack of hands-on collaboration among students due toCOVID-19 social distancing and time constraints. One 2nd grade teacher even shared
limit how much educators can help students prepare, it may be worthproviding training to faculty. Whether through industry partnerships to offer workshops or todirectly administer mock interviews, providing such experiences for educators could ultimatelyhelp to foster empathy for what the hiring process may entail and could raise awareness of theexpectations for those who may be unfamiliar with it. Education can be valuable and canempower and equip faculty to better aid their students as well.7 Limitations and Future DirectionsThe study conducted a focus group of a subset of individuals across the United States. However,the experiences and voices represented may not be reflective of all institution types or of alleducators
students’ experiences of, access to, and desire for sustainability-focused activities, as wellas the degree to which they feel empowered to promote the kinds of changes they would like thesee in the engineering education system.Autoethnography is a technique that combines the personal reflection of autobiography with theexamination of cultural relations, values, and beliefs that are characteristic of ethnography[12]. Itmay be argued that the qualitative nature of autoethnography runs counter to the more dominantquantitative epistemology in engineering. However, the socio-cultural insights it elicits can beboth insightful and instructive when seeking to understand and support change in the engineeringeducation system because systems change is, at
and responsibilities via presentation of technical course material. Overall, this casestudy investigates nuclear engineering for its curricula-embedded epistemological foundationsand offers reflections on the relevance of beliefs about knowledge to engineering problemsolving.2 Introduction The term “engineering”, linked in origin to both “ingenious” and “engine”, describes aprofession linked to the virtues of originality and innovation as well as the artifacts and processesdeveloped to enhance human flourishing. We take these elements (production of tools, originalinnovation, and the commitment to human welfare) to be foundational (though incomplete) dueto their ubiquity and use this as a starting point for our analysis [1], [2
this mindset is often dampened or diluted by otherengineering mindsets and ideologies [1]. This reason points to why student agency as a form ofresistance against and liberation from the hegemony of dominant ideologies and social structuresis so commonly invoked [15]. Building off bell hooks [15] work, Secules and colleagues [13]identified a form of student agency that emerges from theorizing narratives about one’sexperiences encountering dominant mindsets and ideologies [1-2, 5] of an engineering program.They explored the experience of a student from a historically marginalized underrepresentedgroup in engineering and found that “constructing and reflecting on narratives about [student]experiences and relating them to cultural narratives
techniques that accurately reflect the varied ways in whichstudents learn. Starting from this, new evaluation methods are being sought that better fit the wayof learning of each student, so our research will focus on finding a new form of evaluation basedon frequent unannounced evaluations to improve student learning. and contribute to academicintegrity. This new method was applied in civil engineering and architecture courses, along withactivities that develop student learning.Background/FrameworkAcademic integrity within the student environment is related to honesty, responsibility, andrespect, and implies that students must follow rules and regulations, demonstrating theircommitment to responsibility and ethics against frowned upon activities
CHALLENGING CALM(HCP). The module consists of a short introductory video and three lengths of interactivelectures with embedded pop-up low-stake questions for students to choose. Then students areguided to CMR questions as described earlier. Based on their performance, students may bedirected to a set of short supplemental interactive videos. All students then continue with a morehands-on simulation instructional tool (3D Crystal Builder,https://conceptwarehouse.tufts.edu/cw/crystalVL/) and reflection activities before beingpresented with a resources review page. Lastly, students work on adaptive summative assessmentwith various difficulty levels of concept questions and a survey. More details of the structure andcomponents of the CALM was previously
focused on STEMinterests while the Group Work Skills Questionnaire Manual Survey is centered on studentcollaboration. The results of Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests indicated positive significant impactson 21st-century learning, Group work, student’s expected class performances (in Math, Science,Engineering, and English) and student’s plan to take advanced courses in the future (in Math,Science, and Engineering). Additionally, daily reflection surveys were administered tounderstand the impact of individual activities students participated in each day. Results wereanalyzed to identify activities that positively improved domains in student interests, whichprovided additional context to the meaning of the results from the pre- and post-survey
% of the U.S. population, marking a substantialincrease from previous decades (U.S. Census Bureau, 2020). This demographic shift is driven byfactors such as immigration, higher birth rates among Hispanic communities, and naturalpopulation growth. The growth of the Hispanic population in the U.S. not only reflects thenation's increasing diversity but also has significant implications for various aspects of society,including education, the workforce, and political representation. As this trend continues, itunderscores the importance of addressing issues related to diversity, inclusion, and equitableaccess to opportunities to ensure that the changing demographics are accompanied by sharedprosperity and representation for all demographics of the
environments,universities in the US have increasingly prioritized equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI)initiatives, reflecting a broader societal commitment to equity and social justice [1]. Thisparadigm shift has prompted universities to engage in numerous initiatives aimed at creating amore inclusive environment for students. The benefits of EDI efforts in higher education arewell-documented, ranging from enhancing innovation to improved academic performance andretention rates among underrepresented student populations [2], [3]. As the US grapples withshifting notions of equity and justice, recent Supreme Court decisions in SFFA v. Harvard andSFFA v. UNC which have effectively eliminated affirmative action have added a significant layerof
according to somearticles in the literature, there have been changes in the definition of engineering over the yearsto reflect a simple fact that defining engineering is not as simple as it may look and sound [7].Recently, there are numerous calls to further modify the definition of engineering to be in linewith its continuing and systematic advancements as well as ever-changing societal norms andvalues. For instance, John Anderson in the Bridge: a National Academy of Engineers platformsuggested creating definitions with more “operational” key terms [8]. There are calls to includeother aspects in the definition of engineering like culture and ethnicity amongst other factors asstated in the 2020 virtual ASEE annual Conference [9].Steib records that
, connecting new information to prior knowledge, and refining problem-solving strategies.Additionally, Jones et al. [40] note that teachers often learn alongside their students, especially incollaborative and technology-driven contexts, where roles can shift, allowing students to becomethe teachers and teachers to become the learners. Hence, we decided to adopt this framework toexplore students’ perceptions of their faculty mentors' roles in an undergraduate researchenvironment, to determine if it reflects an engaged learning experience. For this study, we thusfocused on what the students said about their mentors and juxtaposed it against the indicators inthe framework.Table 1: Faculty Role for Engaged Learning (adopted from [40
is readily available” [22]. Making use of library resources thus has benefits tomany students beyond providing a no-cost IM source.There were two notable absences in the responses related to information sources for IMselection. No respondents mentioned using book reviews, in spite of this recommendation madein at least one STEM instructional guidebook [2]. Also, none of our respondents indicated thatlibrarians were a resource for selecting IM. This may reflect a belief that librarians do notprovide support or have expertise in this type of information search and evaluation. However,there are many efforts and studies in library and information science about supporting thecreation and use of OER [8], [23] and OA materials [24]. Several of our
, or design.Alex also shared going beyond to work as a designer to give critical feedback to others andbecome a facilitator in brainstorming and organizing review sessions with other team members.US-based students highlighted that the development of confidence and comfort in engaging withother disciplines was a significant aspect of these students’ shifts in mindset as a result ofpursuing interdisciplinary education. Emily reflected on this, stating, “So if you were to describeyourself as an interdisciplinary scholar, then you would be comfortable working with otherdisciplines”. Additionally, one U.S.-based student expressed the shift in self-identification as aninterdisciplinary researcher through working across bodies of knowledge. Ricardo
Virginia Tech. Prior to joining VT, Dr. Pitterson was a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University. She holds a PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University and othDr. Emily Dringenberg, The Ohio State University Dr. Dringenberg is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Ohio State University. She holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering (Kansas State ’08), a M.S. in Industrial Engineering (Purdue ’14) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. Her current career purpose is to learn about and reveal beliefs that are widely-held as an implicit result of our socialization within systems of oppression so that she can embolden others to reflect on their assumptions and advance equity
ouruniversity being a second choice, so maybe we might be getting bumped up to a first choice with[changes to legislation] happening the way they’re happening.”We grouped responses from participants into the following subcategories: increase in usage ofstandardized testing; decrease in sense of belonging among students from minoritized groups;decrease in awareness of support for applying; and decrease in enrollment of students fromminoritized groups. We also add some further reflection on admissions.4.1.1 Increase in Requiring Standardized TestingParticipants mentioned several ways that their institutions attempt to lower obstacles to applyingfor admission, such as removing application fees and moving towards test-optional applications.However, Jean’s
, communication & use of media, assessment &evaluation, tolerance for ambiguity & uncertainty [10]; and interpersonal relations &collaboration [11]. A summary of survey development and its validation are discussed in thenext section. III. METHODSA. Survey development A comprehensive and systematic approach has been used to develop the surveys thataccurately reflect the research goals of this project. Although a detailed description andapproaches used for survey development and its validity assessment are available in Hang [8],we present a summary of the survey development process in this paper for continuity. The 3primary goal of the surveys is to
transitions in thiscollaborative autoethnography work.3. MethodsAutoethnography (AE) can be described as a study of the self, where the self acts as a window tothe world, society, or culture. AE, where the researcher acts as both participant and researcher,oftentimes gets critiqued for being self-absorbing and mere naval-gazing. To overcome thelimitation of AE, in Collaborative Autoethnography (CAE), a team of researchers workscollectively to collect, analyze, and interpret data to “gain a meaningful understanding ofsociocultural phenomena reflected in their autobiographical data” [11, p. 24]. By allowing eachresearcher to share their narrative in a way that resonates with others, collaborativeautoethnography is regarded as a transformative process