Session 3120 Virtual Laboratory for Machine Tool Technicians – Concept, Development and Examples Xueshu Song1, Radha Balamuralikrishna1 & Philip Pilcher2 Northern Illinois University/Rockford Abilities CenterOverviewThis paper is an outcome of an NSF sponsored project designed to pave the way for an Internetbased learning tool for training machine tool operators and technicians (Song et. al., 2000). Theobjective in using this novel approach is to accelerate and improve the process of learning anddevelopment of skills in machine tool technology. We present concepts using
Session 2559 A Laboratory-Based Instrumentation Course for Non-EE Majors Stephen C. Crist Department of Electrical Engineering Western New England CollegeAbstract An instrumentation course that is required of second semester sophomores majoring inmechanical and industrial engineering at Western New England College is described. It isintended that students completing this course can easily learn to use more sophisticatedelectrical and computer-based measuring systems in junior and senior level mechanical andindustrial engineering labs, and if
period = 10 ms. Page 7.784.10 “Proceedings of 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Education“developed in-house, using the visual C++ programming environment and has incorporated componentobject model, multi-thread programming, socket programming and ActiveX control. The Lab@Homestation is expected to enhance the control laboratories in the Faculty of Engineering at the University ofManitoba. Considering the large number of engineering students who are enrolled in core controlcourses, this innovative approach to teaching is
Session 3268 The Los Alamos National Laboratory Dynamics Summer School – A Mechanics Motivator Phillip J. Cornwell, Charles R. Farrar Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology/Los Alamos National LaboratoryAbstractA unique summer educational program focusing on engineering dynamics has been developedand implemented at Los Alamos National Laboratory. The purpose of this summer school is toexpose a select group of students to the broad field of engineering dynamics with the hopes thatthey will be motivated to pursue this area of research in their graduate studies. The summerschool activities
Session 1109 Rabbit Season – A Battery Based Laboratory Exercise for Engineering Students Charles S. Tritt, Ph.D. Milwaukee School Of EngineeringA laboratory investigation suitable for college freshmen is provided (see Appendix A). In thisexperiment, students investigated the performance of ordinary consumer batteries underspecified discharge conditions. The discharge conditions were those described in a internationalstandard for battery performance.1,2 The experiment was intended to introduce students theimportance and utility of
Session 1520 Advanced Technology Laboratories: A Crucible for Technology Enhanced Learning Jeff Nadel, Dan Walsh College of Engineering California Polytechnic State UniversityAbstractA partnership among industry, academia and government has led to the construction anddevelopment of a facility which provides a capstone experience for engineering students. Thepurpose of the ATL is to provide a vehicle that enables partnerships between industry, faculty, andstudents. This partnership is designed to produce
Session 3551 Building the Better Oil/Water Separator An Environmental Engineering Design Laboratory John W. Duggan, Ph.D. and Francis J. Hopcroft, P.E., L.S.P. Wentworth Institute of TechnologyAbstractThis laboratory was developed as an introductory Capstone Design module. The four-weeklaboratory requires students to apply process design, fabrication and performance evaluationconcepts to one of the most fundamental unit operations of environmental engineering, anoil/water separator. Results of the laboratory have been used to identify areas in need ofimprovement in the
AC 2010-2118: COLLABORATIVE LABORATORY FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARYSTUDY - CASE STUDY SPRING 2009Brian Vuksanovich, Youngstown State UniversityDarrell Wallace, Youngstown State University Page 15.285.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 COLLABORATIVE LABORATORY FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY STUDY - CASE STUDY SPRING 2009AbstractFor the past couple of years, a disconcerting and repeated criticism by the engineering industryof recent college engineering graduates is the inability to creatively solve problems coupled withineffective communication with workers in other disciplines or trades. Additionally, a lack ofdiscipline has also been noted. Typically, these
1 Laboratory- and Project-Based Courses in the Engineering Technology Curriculum V. Genis, W. Rosen, R. Chiou, W. Danley, J. Milbrandt, G. Marekova, S. Racz, T. Kitchener, and B. LaVay Goodwin College of Professional Studies, Drexel University Philadelphia, PA 19104AbstractDrexel University’s Goodwin College of Professional Studies has offered a co-op-based AppliedEngineering Technology (AET) major since 2002. The program comprises three concentrations inElectrical, Mechanical, and Industrial Engineering
1 Pedagogical Advantages of a Multi-phase Undergraduate Laboratory Project Holly T. Frederick, Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Wilkes University, Wilkes-Barre, PA ‘noun’ and idea based syntax to a ‘verb’ and action based [2].Abstract— A four phase laboratory project has been developed The ideas can be applied to different disciplines and even toand used in an undergraduate environmental
Paper ID #22412Reinforcing Information Fluency: Instruction Collaboration in Senior Cap-stone Laboratory CourseDr. William W. Tsai, California State University, Maritime Academy Dr. William W. Tsai is an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Califor- nia State University, Maritime Academy (CSUM). His research background is fluid mechanics and heat transfer and is examining research topics in laboratory education in those fields. Prior to CSUM, Dr. Tsai was a Member of the Technical Staff in the Fluid Mechanics Group at The Aerospace Corporation. Dr. Tsai earned his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. at the
AC 2008-1705: ENHANCING THE SOFTWARE VERIFICATION ANDVALIDATION COURSE THROUGH LABORATORY SESSIONSSushil Acharya, Robert Morris University Sushil Acharya, D.Eng. Assistant Professor of Software Engineering Acharya joined RMU in Spring 2005 after serving 15 years in the Software Industry. With US Airways Acharya was responsible for creating a Data Warehouse and using advance Data Mining Tools for performance improvement. With i2 Technologies he led the work on i2’s Data Mining product “Knowledge Discover Framework” and at CEERD (Thailand) he was the product manager of three energy software products (MEDEE-S/ENV, EFOM/ENV and DBA-VOID) which are currently in use in 26 Asian and 7
AC 2012-4044: FACTORIAL DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS FOR LABO-RATORIES INCORPORATING ENGINEERING MATERIALSDr. David R. Veazie, Southern Polytechnic State University David Veazie received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Southern University in 1986, and his M.S. and Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Tech in 1987 and 1993, respectively. He worked for AT&T Bell Laboratories in New Jersey as a member of the technical staff and was a National Research Council (NRC) Postdoctoral Fellow at the NASA Langley Research Center. In 1994, he joined Clark Atlanta University’s Department of Engineering, and was the Director of the Mechanical Testing Labora- tories (MTL) and Associate Director of the NASA-funded High
Robotics and Automated Manufacturing (IRAM) Laboratory, the studentsget a chance to experience the actual integration and utilization of mid-sized industrial robots andautomated equipment that is used to manufacture customized parts. Overall, the newly updatedand improved IRAM laboratory enhances student learning at the university and helps to improveSTEM education within the curriculum in the IE department, as well as, help to meet theNational Robotics Initiative previously mentioned.Other researchers at various universities are using robotics education in undergraduatecurriculums as well. Touretzky discusses how various computer science (CS) departmentsaround the country utilize robots to help teach and promote computer programming7. AtCarnegie
boom and a budget not to exceed$15 per group. Results of this project will be presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference.Final remarksWhen the Mechanics Based Design Laboratory course was first developed in 2012, assessmenttools were not included in the curriculum to provide information on the effectiveness of thecourse. Anecdotal comments from the students and from the teaching assistances (several ofwhom had taken the four-credit course prior to 2012) indicate that the laboratory course isdelivering the hands-on experiences and the machine design instruction that was missing prior toits inception.Reference 1 Nagurka and Anton, “Discovery learning experiments in a new machine design laboratory,” Proceeding from the 2013 ASEE
Session XXXX Creating Power Engineering Laboratory Experiences for Distance Education Students Vinod K. Yedidi, Brian K. Johnson, Joseph D. Law, Herbert L. Hess University of IdahoAbstract:A virtual laboratory for outreach (or off-campus) electrical power engineering students using thepersonal edition of PSCAD/EMTDC, a time domain electromagnetic transients program, ispresented. The lab experience starts out with a video tour of the lab the on-campus students willuse, including a description of the equipment in the lab. Five lab experiments covering: threephase
Laboratories”, Journal of Engineering Education, April 1995, pp. 205.5. Waitz, I. A. and Barrett, E. C., “Integrated Teaching of Experimental and Communication Skills to Undergraduate Aerospace Engineering Students”, Journal of Engineering Education. July 1997, pp. 255- 262.6. Mahendran, M., “Project-Based Civil Engineering Courses”, Journal of Engineering Education, Jan. 1995, pp. 1-5.7. Dally, J., Zhang, “A Freshmen Engineer ing Design Course”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 82, Page 7.642.12 No. 2, April 1993.8. http://www.rit.edu/~rjreme/ “Proceedings of the 2002 American
Development of Heat Transfer Laboratory Experiments Utilizing Student Design Teams Robert F. Harder, Ph.D. Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering George Fox University Newberg, OR 97132AbstractTeams of students designed and developed experiments for a new four-credit course in heattransfer at George Fox University as a part of their initial laboratory experience. Over the pastthree years, students have developed eight experiments that cover a broad range of conduction,convection and radiation phenomena. The new heat transfer
Session 1526 On Laboratory Development for a Curriculum in Particle Technology Rajesh N. Dave, Jonathan Luke, Robert Pfeffer, Doris Yacoub, Ian S. Fischer, Anthony D. Rosato New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102AbstractThis paper discusses the development of laboratory facilities for use with an on going NSF-CRCD project that will establish a three-course concentration in particle technology at NJIT,offered across the engineering curriculum. The main objective of the NSF funded project is toaddress the urgent need for undergraduate and graduate education in this vital field
class.” “This virtual lab was useful in helping me learn at my own pace. It gave me options to keep doing genome sequencing or if I was comfortable with it, I could progress to the next step.” “I think the overall concept of this lab was simply hard to grasp.” Laboratory Technique DevelopmentThis theme captures references to technique development within the virtual laboratory. Itencapsulates feelings of accomplishment with learned techniques and confidence in theability to replicate techniques in the VR labs. Learners highlighted the effectiveness of theVR labs in teaching about laboratory practices in a way that enhanced understanding beyondthe classroom sessions. They specifically mentioned techniques like cell
Mechanics. For the last thirteen years, she has been a professor at York College of Pennsylvania where she teaches thermal sciences, freshmen design courses, and computer programming.Dr. Timothy J. Garrison, York College of Pennsylvania Timothy Garrison is Chair of the Engineering and Computer Science Department at York College of Pennsylvania. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Laboratory Structured to Encourage Thoughtful, Task-Based ExperimentationAbstractIn the classic laboratory format, students follow detailed instructions to perform a lab and thenturn in a formal report the following week. Typically, the students blindly collect data with
Session 3268 Laboratory Exercises for Statics and Mechanics of Materials on a Shoestring David Hall, Paul Hadala, Freddy Roberts Louisiana Tech UniversityAbstractThis paper outlines the design, construction, and fabrication of seven laboratory exercises and adesign project for a sophomore level integrated statics and mechanics of materials course. Theacademic setting in which the course was created is given along with an overview of the coursecontent. Each laboratory and design project is described in detail, including photographs,drawings of the
which the serious students may develop a much deeper appreciation of the subjectmatter as well as the design and development process in a realistic environment. Equally important, itwould enhance their chances for receiving Research/ Teaching Assistantship or Full Scholarships ingraduate engineering programs. The following case studies reflect on the promising nature of thisapproach/model.VI - CASE STUDIES1. Universal Combined Stress Apparatus (UCSA) and an Example of Team WorkWhile most commercially available apparatuses provide data for a single type of load, no sucheducational apparatus for generation of (simultaneous) Combined Stresses existed. Creation ofsuch an apparatus would be a remarkable addition to the engineering laboratories at
, including a variety of transducers, linkedwith information processing and the management/decision makers back at the “home office”must be linked. SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) systems combine remotemonitoring, control, and evaluation of system performance. Just as in the consumer productmarketplace with its microwave ovens, toasters, and other products equipped withmicroprocessor units, “intelligence” is increasingly a component being provided in civilengineering systems.(d) IT uses in Education (including “IT to teach IT”) – The use of IT in the classroom, includingfor distance education, has properly received much attention in the engineering education
teaching principles, and process, an environment to practice the applicationof these principles. Even though the content and process articulated in the T4E model hadevolved and been passed down through participation in ISW, they were very consistentwith the literature which included Lowman’s 3 two-dimensional model of teachingeffectiveness and Wankat and Oreovicz’s 4 compendium of learning principles. The T4E workshop eventually consisted of teaching pedagogy seminars,demonstration classes, and laboratories where the participants presented two classes totheir peers acting as students and assessed by a senior mentor. The seminars presented inT4E covered the following principles: use structured organization of content to guide thelearner; use
Page 22.502.12 2010.7. H. Arslan. “A Wireless Communication Systems Laboratory Course.” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Engineering Education & Training, April 9-11, 2007, Kuwait.8. C. B. Dietrich, F. E. Kragh, S. M. Hasan, C. Aguayo Gonzalez, A. A. Adenariwo, H. I. Volos, C. C. Dietrich, D. L. Miller, J. Snyder, S. H. Edwards, J. H. Reed. “Implementation and Evaluation of Laboratory/Tutorial Exercises for Software Defined Radio Education.” Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, 2010.9. H. Arslan. “Teaching SDR through a laboratory based course with modern measurement and test instruments.” Proceedings of the SDR Forum Technical Conference, November 2007.10. S. Bilen. “Implementing
the IEEE Cincinnati Section, and in 1997 he received the IEEE Professional Achievement Award. He has held several research and management positions in industry working for such companies as Battelle’s Columbus Laboratories, Rockwell International, and Claspan Corporation. He joined the University of Cincinnati in 1985.Max Rabiee, University of Cincinnati Max Rabiee earned his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Kentucky (UK) in 1987. He has taught electrical engineering and electrical engineering technology courses full-time & part-time for 28 years; and he is currently Professor and ECET Program Chair in the School of Electronics and Computing Systems in the College of Engineering and
projects designed for a junior levelundergraduate communications course. The course is traditionally a lecture course with nolaboratory component. The authors aim to add a laboratory component to the course to helpstudents to better understand and analyze the theory taught in lectures. The laboratory componentis structured by following effective teaching strategies which aids reinforcement and retention ofinformation.Background and MotivationAn introductory communications course is the essential foundation to learn advancedcommunications topics. At Missouri University of Science and Technology, the Electrical andComputer Engineering (ECE) department offers a junior level undergraduate course:Communication Systems I. The course is presently a three
their mentors, otherparticipants, and graduate and undergraduate student researchers at the host institution.2.2 Teaching/research/mentoring The faculty team used the Paideia method in developing the instructional and researchpart of the program. Paideia14 method includes three techniques: didactic teaching, coachingwith scaffolding, and seminar opportunities for independent proficiency. The organization ofthe 10-week research program consists of a two-week technical tutorial followed by an eight-week research project with weekly seminars and weekly meetings between student team andtheir mentor. The technical tutorials and hands-on laboratory, such as introduction to analog and digitalcommunications, introduction to software defined radio
Paper ID #17510A Comparison and Evaluation of Aeronautical Engineering Learning Out-comes using an Airborne Flight Laboratory and a Flight Simulator Labora-tory.Mr. Raymond Colin Lewis, University of New South Wales at the Australian Defence Force Academy Commenced flying career in the Australian Defence Force; became an Airline Pilot; returned to university to inform work as a Human Factors facilitator for the airline. Worked in Middle East as pilot before commencing as a Senior Lecturer for the University of New South Wales (Canberra) in 2001. As well as teaching, operated University aircraft for Aeronautical Engineering