to monitor or control any aspect of cognition, forexample, memory, attention, communication, learning, or problem-solving.Metacognition is also about learners’ ability to set goals, consider the nature of a taskand reflect on their learning [7]. In the context of technology education, successfullearning also involves the intentional use of strategies, techniques or heuristics thatcan help in the process of problem-solving and invention.The motivational aspect of SRLT refers to students’ intrinsic satisfaction from beingengaged in challenging assignments and their self-efficacy beliefs about their abilityto accomplish a task [8]. According to Bandura’s [9] socio-cognitive theory, self-efficacy beliefs are determined by previous positive
first two exams for study.For the first step of the exercise, students need to correct the mistakes on their exam. I allowthem to use any resources to find an acceptable answer, including discussions of the problem withother students and asking me for advice. If the problem is not reworked correctly, no credit isallowed as the follow-up steps are likely to be invalid.The second part of the exercise challenges student performance; finding what “caused” themistake(s). Students need to recall and reflect on their own thinking during the exam. They alsoneed to think about their study habits and learning styles. There is a tendency for all of us to avoidthinking about our failures. We can help students to be more comfortable about reflecting on
ethicalconsiderations before completing the main assignment. Following a class-wide lecture on ethics,it begins with an individual task to identify personal biases; next, it branches out into otherethical perspectives with a team-based task more realistically representing the viewpoints foundin real-world settings. Along with each task, students are required to reflect on their choices andethical positions.In the first, orienting task, a more traditional approach is taken wherein the students are guidedthrough a discussion of the classic trolley problem [12] as applied to the development of self-driving cars. Once students have responded to the question, “Would you save five people bychoosing to kill one?” the students are shown the TED talk, What moral
for students, midpoint and endpoint focus groups withstudents, and interviews with students’ mentors. Separately, Deters (Author 2) asked the cohort toparticipate in additional data collection for research purposes. The cohort was asked to do weeklyself-reflection with given prompts, and upon their return, each IRES scholar will be interviewedabout their IRES experience. These data will be analyzed in-depth over the next year. Preliminaryfindings from the student reflections are provided below.FindingsStudents’ reflection: what they learned by conducting research in JapanFor their final report, the IRES students, who are co-authors on this paper, were asked to reflectwhat they learned by conducting research in Japan, and what the biggest
historical context using a variety of instructional modes and pedagogicalinnovations.This paper presents the experience of developing and teaching MMW for the first time in 2020 inthe midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. MMW was designed and co-taught by an interdisciplinaryfaculty teaching team from the departments of history, theology, and environmental science. As adesignated “Complex Problems” course, a type of first-year interdisciplinary Core course, MMWoffered 70 students the opportunity to satisfy BC’s Core requirements in Natural Science andHistory through three linked pedagogical components: lectures, labs, and reflection sessions. Ourgoal was to integrate engineering, the history of science and technology studies, and ethical andmoral modes of
technical skills.Although these are necessary for career success and productive work, students must also developcapacities for authentic engineering practices within authentic engineering communities.Specifically, they must develop practices for engaging ill-structured, ambiguous problems, andnavigating complexity and uncertainty through careful, creative application of deep knowledgethat characterize engineering design1. And they must do so in collaboration with others,communicating successfully with diverse stakeholders in formal and informal settings2. Finally,they must cultivate the ability to reflect on the quality of their innovation and communicationefforts3.The NSF and other sponsors fund research experiences for undergraduates (REU
. Establishing an environment of trust (362) 2. Creating an empowering space (362-363) 3. Setting a Clear Focus (363) 4. Creating an open space (363) 5. Encouraging Collaboration (363)These five values reflect our objectives in integrating a community mapping and participatorydesign methodology into our project. We assumed that our student participants (like the youthAmsden and VanWynsberghe engaged with) were seldom invited to shape the design ofprograms or engage in bottom-up critique. We created an iconographic mapping in lieu of acommunity map as an invitation to discuss/critique the whole gamut of places and people thatcomprised their experiences in the [engineering school].The iconographic map (see Figure 1) functioned much like a
targeting the motivation and engagement of the students.Presented here are those changes and the associated findings.Design Project (Original Implementation)In 2018 there was a celebration for the 200th anniversary of the novel Frankenstein [8]. Asreported previously [7], in collaboration with faculty in the humanities department, the designproject for a first-year mechanical engineering course was altered to incorporate an explorationof themes from the novel. The students were required to read/listen to the text and to extractthemes that would then be incorporated into a robotic display. The students were led through theprocess with periodic “reflections” that they were to write after completing a certain portion ofthe text. Once a theme was
on these choices and to exercise control over the self and the environment” (p.5),may be used to understand and examine how motivation and self-direction are realized. Beingthat the focus of the study is on non-traditional students, the utilization of properties of humanagency as described by Bandura (2006) will help reveal the motivations and interests, goals andoutcomes, action plans and self-regulators, as well as self-reflection and evaluation of these non-traditional students who are pursuing a doctorate while working full-time.Methodology This study seeks to identify factors that impact the agency of individuals pursuing theirgoals in dual roles, as doctoral students and higher education administrators, by analyzing theirlived
combinetheory and practice, and design to establish knowledge base in system thinking concepts andtools, and focus on the unique challenges for management, governance, communication, andpolicy in the FEW nexus. Course grading includes reflections and analyses, creating systemcomponent maps with Loopy (a free online tool for thinking in systems), and a final project, anintegrated system map. All assignments are individual assignments. The NRT external evaluatordesigned an annual NRT survey that assesses the NRT program at our university, including theimpacts of the NRT Integrated FEW Systems course. Student ratings about their perceivedability to perform interdisciplinary systems tasks improved from the beginning to the end of thecourse, from ‘somewhat
is certainly not a new one.Various institutions have aimed to formalize how they develop their student’s non-technicalskills. These are skills that institutions deem important for their students’ future. For example, theUniversity of Central Oklahoma (UCO) relied on the theoretical base of transformative learningto develop their Student Transformative Learning Record (STLR) [1]. The transformativelearning theory is based on the work of Mezirow which argues that in order for authentictransformation to occur, learners need to reflect on their relationships with themselves, others,and the world they live in. Learners may have transformative experiences if they are willing toexplore other ways of thinking [2]–[4]. The STLR focuses on six tenets
trunk.The simulated reflection response (S11) of the antenna is plotted in figure 2, which indicatesdifferent resonance frequencies for different stages of RPW infestation. Note a damaged tree turnksuperstrate with r=50.7 caused the antenna to resonate around f=0.83 GHz. For a partially damagedtree trunk with r=35.3 the antenna resonated at around f=0.863 GHz and for a healthy tree trunkwith r=30.3 the antenna resonated around f=0.923 GHz. Note that the change in the dielectricproperties of the infected tree trunk is mainly caused by increasing wet oozing discharge within theinfested trunk. The simulation results can be made more accurate by carefully adding water contentsto the simulated model. This novel approach can be integrated with
engineers relating events in their careers. e. Student product is a reflection about the sectors that appeal most to them. 2. Explore the 14 NAE Grand Challenges (GC). a. Description of each with an example of a solution being pursued. b. Students reflect and record their thoughts on groupings of 3-4 GCs. c. Student product is a passion reflection about the GC that appeals most to them. 3. Address college life such as balance/wellness, time management, and teamwork. a. Describe the life change about to occur and how to prepare. b. Share some studying strategies within a time management structure. c. Note the importance of building teamwork skills. d. Student product is their
programwith career professionals (mentors) and undergraduate college students (ambassadors). Duringprogram activities youth from underrepresented groups are paired with a mentor employed in aSTEM-related agriculture field. Cultivate ACCESS ambassadors are University of Nebraska-Lincoln students who study a STEM-related major. Mentors and ambassadors are recruited fromdiverse backgrounds that reflect the demographics of high school scholars. Scholars receivementoring from an adult and a peer who physically looks like them and can share personalstories of overcoming obstacles and facing adversity that youth may have encountered.Participation in mentoring experiences aids students in gaining scientific knowledge and engagesthem in career exploration and
year 3Background and Context• STEM Teaching Fellowship: – Teachers apply in school teams of 3-4; typical composition includes both science and mathematics teachers, mostly middle school – Three main strands: STEM Integration, Core Teaching Practices, Schoolwide STEM Strategic Plan 4Background and Context• Approach to STEM Integration Strand – Experience STEM integration as learners – Reflect and unpack as educators – Introduce tools, strategies, and templates to empower teaching fellows to engage their students in STEM Integration• Summer 1: Platform Design• Summer 2: Flint Experience
Feedback e Research from other fields suggests the practice of video recording presentations andreceiving feedback yields even greater gains in communication skills. The use of video to recordpresentations and review for feedback has been referred to as the “gold standard” ofcommunication education, and is widely used in professional education in the “helpingprofessions” such as education, medicine, psychology, and social work[13]. Video recordingallows for students to reflect on their presentation at a distance, and offers a realistic picture oftheir abilities[14]. Furthermore, the video medium offers the ability to parse out specific aspectsof communication, such as
a data-intensive approach to study one of the most fundamental research topics inlearning sciences and engineering education: “How do secondary students learn and applyscience concepts in engineering design processes?” We have collected data from over 1,000middle and high school students in Indiana and Massachusetts through automatic, unobtrusivelogging of student design processes enabled by a unique CAD tool that supports the design ofenergy-efficient buildings using earth science, physical science, and engineering scienceconcepts and principles of design. Data collected includes fine-grained information of studentdesign actions, experimentation behaviors, electronic student reflection notes, and virtual designartifacts. These process data
career. In academia, thus, understanding anddesigning programs to enhance professional identity is vital to the successful placement ofgraduates into industry. This study will use Higgs’ [1] definition of professional identity as aperson developing “the attitudes, beliefs and standards which support the practitioner role andthe development of an identity as a member of the profession with a clear understanding of theresponsibilities of being a… professional.”As students apply and intentionally pursue a degree in a specific discipline towards becoming aprofessional, they are acting as agents per Bandura’s [2] social cognitive theory of agency intheir own future and make decisions according to their self-reflections, identified desires
perceptions of the peer review process.The study was implemented over two semesters with iterative revisions in instruction madebetween semesters based on initial findings. Results suggest that peer review can increasestudent performance, as long as reflections are used to prompt student revision, regardless of theclass delivery method or assignment type.IntroductionEarly in their careers, engineers spend 20-40% of their time writing; as they move to middlemanagement, the writing requirements increase to 50-70% of their day; finally, engineers insenior management spend 70-95% of their days writing [1]. Despite job requirements for writingthat cut across professions [2], in most disciplines writing is rarely emphasized outside of Englishcomposition
integrating mechanical, chemical and quantum devices into circuits and communication links. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Relating Level of Inquiry in Laboratory Instructions to Student Learning OutcomesAbstract -- This research paper will describe the results of an experiment in which the level ofinquiry in a laboratory manual is varied from guided inquiry to open inquiry by reducing thespecificity of the instructions in the lab manual. The hypothesis is that less specific instructionswill cause students to reflect on their actions in lab and, as a result, circle further around Kolb’sexperiential learning cycle during each step of the lab. This should result in improved recall andbetter
students in reflecting on experience, how to help engineering educators make effective teach-ing decisions, and the application of ideas from complexity science to the challenges of engineeringeducation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Engineering with Engineers: Revolutionizing a Mechanical Engineering Department through Industry Immersion and a Focus on IdentityAbstractThe Mechanical Engineering Department at Seattle University was awarded a grant by theNational Science Foundation (NSF) Revolutionizing Engineering and Computer ScienceDepartments (RED) program in July 2017. This award supports the development of a mechanicalengineering program where
-specific self-efficacy revolves around social support in the sense ofencouragement and constructive feedback – elements of a community of practice supported by the situatedlearning framework and PBL. This process can be guided by “cognitive apprenticeship,” which is a means oflearning-by-doing where the thinking process underlying complex, problem-solving skills is made visiblethrough teaching methods such as modeling, coaching, scaffolding, articulation, and reflection 10-11.CPBL vs PBLCollaborative Project-based Learning (CPBL) is a revised PBL model developed by Dong and Warter-Perez 12to address the specific learning needs of under-prepared minority students. It has been implemented in severalengineering courses and a positive impact on
, record, and use their own data design challenge mathematics to an authentic engineering• Solve a problem with a fictional • Observe, measure, and record their own design challenge character while actively participating in data • Observe, measure, record, and analyze the story • Solve a problem with a fictional friend their own data• Collaborate and reflect on their solution while actively participating in the story • Solve a problem for a fictional business • Collaborate in a team using real-world trade-offs
. Inaddition, a subset of the students in the course present their own experiences with the course andhow their participation has affected their view of engineering and their future careers. Thesestudents first reflected on their own unique experiences with the course, specifically focusing onworking in a multidisciplinary and vertically-integrated team, the development of teamwork andtechnical skills, and the impact of the course on their view of engineering. After reflecting, eachstudent analyzed the reflections of the other participating students and the commonalities anddifferences in the experiences were identified and are presented, with implications for similarcourses/programs.Background:One of the significant issues facing engineering over the
processes when peers were willing and able to providesupport. Kolodner and colleagues4, 5 developed ritualized activity structures that facilitate peerinteraction. The purpose of the present mixed-methods study was to investigate how middle-school students’ respond to communication challenges during a set of design-reflect-designprocesses associated with collaborative engineering design. Two questions guided analysis: RQ1: What do learners’ written reflections reveal about their perceptions of their group’s communication patterns, and how do these perceptions shift across the two design challenges? RQ2: What are learners’ perceptions of the quality of their individual-level interactions, and how do these perceptions
considerations in our core courses. I reflect on lessons learned from twoassignments in two different core courses, each implemented in the larger context of engineeringat a liberal arts college. Here introducing a social justice dimension of sustainability was a smallpart of a larger effort to integrate liberal education into core courses.One module introduced students in a first year Mass and Energy Balances course to the tool ofLife Cycle Assessment (LCA) for developing and analyzing green products and processes, whilesimultaneously offering a critique of green consumerism which was incorporated into studentLCA projects. A key learning outcome was that students understood not only the promises of thetool but also its limitations and when it is and is
" but provides little emphasis on "thinking." Assuch, little is known about how to incorporate competency-based education into traditionaland professional bachelor degree programs such as engineering, which requires a greaterfocus on knowledge and skill integration. The purpose of this paper is to highlight a newapproach to learning that goes beyond the proverbial "checking boxes" to provide anapproach for demonstrating the integration of abilities and reflection. This innovative andexperimental approach offers three unique attributes. First, it is competency-based in thatstudents are required to demonstrate mastery of meeting core innovative competenciesthrough submission of an artifact (“transdisciplinary-doing”) and reflection
Perspectives requirement, introduces students to a variety ofmetacognitive issues and practices including: developing a growth mindset; Bloom’s and Perry’staxonomies for content and intellectual development; inaccuracy in self-assessment; lateral andlongitudinal transfer of knowledge and experiences; and the benefits of self-reflection. Over200 students in five years have taken the course, with very promising results. Retention ofIMPRESS 1st-generation and DHH students into their 2nd, 3rd and 4th year are all above 80%,at or exceeding the institutional average. IMPRESS student demographics are inclusive: 35% arewomen; 32% from identities historically excluded from STEM disciplines; and 17% Deaf or Hardof Hearing (DHH). Retention results are consistent
reflect on how ethics instruction can be modified to incorporate imaginationconcepts. Examples of modifications to an ethics curriculum that is currently in use for thesenior-level engineering class, Design of Steel Structures, in the Department of Civil andEnvironmental Engineering at the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States arepresented to initiate discussion.We invite educators to engage with the questions of moral reasoning and reflect on the role ofimaginal capacity in designing and developing pedagogies. Treating imagination in connectionwith fantasy and images of the impossible downplays the significance of its importance inreasoning and understanding, as illustrated by the scholars whose works we briefly review in
teachers using their traditional teaching methods. The experimental sections of the studybegan the course with a grand challenge focusing them on determining the strengths andweaknesses of the different tools and computer software engineers might use. Instructors thenintroduced three challenges that helped students learn the content goals listed above for thecourse in addition to focusing continually on the strengths and weaknesses of the tools andcomputer software packages.Three types of data were used in this study: survey responses, answers to test questions, andreflective responses. The surveys were required of students in all eleven sections of this course.These surveys were completed on-line and submitted to a database. The reflection