Paper ID #10526Curriculum Development for Embedded Systems SecurityDr. Janusz Zalewski, Florida Gulf Coast University Janusz Zalewski, Ph.D., is a professor of computer science and software engineering at Florida Gulf Coast University. Prior to an academic appointment, he worked for various nuclear research institutions, including the Data Acquisition Group of Superconducting Super Collider and Computer Safety and Re- liability Center at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. He also worked on projects and consulted for a number of private companies, including Lockheed Martin, Harris, and Boeing. Zalewski served as a
learning environment and “real"environment, and making available training of “real world” situations that are difficult tosimulate in a hands-on lab environment. Traditionally for teaching technology-based courses,laboratory experiments were offered using a hands-on approach. With the miniaturization ofintegrated circuits, it is becoming very difficult to construct a PC board or assemble surfacemount chips in a lab environment. This shortcoming of the hands-on approach has led professorsand teachers to incorporate simulation in place of hands-on in technology-based lab courses. Page 24.701.2 In spite of the advantages of simulations, hands
Engineering, PaperEngineering, and Engineering – Undecided; Engineering Design Technology, EngineeringManagement Technology, Manufacturing Engineering Technology; and Computer Science. AGraphic and Printing Science degree program has not been a part of this effort, as it is notrecognized by the National Science Foundation as a STEM discipline.A typical College graduate profile, as gathered from senior exit survey and from employersurvey, is a student who worked part-time while attending classes and took 10.5 semesters tograduate. The students enjoyed the practical hands-on side of engineering which they learn atthrough projects, laboratory, design-build competitions, and involvement in applied research.Employers rated College graduates as highly
in Engineering Technology.Courses such as Robotics and Mechatronics, Quality Control, Manufacturing Materials,Microcontrollers, and Applied Mechanics can benefit from the laboratory experience inapplications of sustainability and eco design as well as material and processes selection. As wellas helping in the teaching of various courses, such experience benefits students who are pursuingdegrees in the engineering field. Students in the Mechanical, Electrical, Industrial andBiomedical fields along with many others can learn many new skills from case study projectssuch as designing and fabricating various consumer products, machines and equipment. Suchprojects show students how to use different types of technology, and demonstrate how
Paper ID #9966Introducing High School Students to Biomedical Engineering through Sum-mer CampsDr. Mansoor Nasir, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Mansoor Nasir received his B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from University of Cincinnati and Ph.D.in Bioengineering from University of California-Berkeley. Thereafter, he pursued his research interests first as a postdoctoral associate and then as a Mechanical Engineer at the US Naval Research Laboratory in Washington DC. He has several publications in the areas of microfluidics, chemical and biological sensors and MEMS technology. He is also is passionate about
Paper ID #10406Introducing Nanotechnology into an Undergraduate Microelectronics CourseProf. Chung Hoon Lee, Marquette University Chung Hoon Lee is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.Dr. Susan C. Schneider, Marquette University Susan Schneider is an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI. She is also the Director of Undergraduate Laboratories for the Electrical Engineering program. Dr. Schneider is a member of ASEE, the IEEE, Sigma Xi and Eta Kappa Nu.Mr. Trevor
increase retention of students by enabling them to build a community of learners(the opposite of a “weed out” course). Biological Engineering (BE) 1252: Biology inEngineering is a 2-credit hour (1 hour lecture, 3 hours laboratory per week) second semesterfreshmen core course. The description is as follows: effect of variability and constraints ofbiological systems on engineering problem solving and design; engineering units; engineeringreport writing; oral report presentation; laboratory demonstration of biological engineeringanalysis. The mean enrollment in this course is 50 students (enrollment has exceeded 60 studentsin the past four years).Because biological engineering students are interested in many different problems at theintersection of
capstone courses between Xer faculty members;otherwise, one professor will have a lock on a course for more than two or three years. Further,when an Xer professor begins teaching a new course, that course should not be a basic course,but a secondary (higher level) one utilizing the basic course as a prerequisite. After teaching oneor more of these secondary courses, the more experienced professor is assignable to the basiccourse.This concept of having the senior, Boomer, professors primarily teaching basic courses whileleaving the more advanced courses for the Xers is reinforced by the learning differences in Mil-lennials and Xers. As noted previously, the Millennials are concrete/linear learners who learnwell in physical laboratories supporting
execution of the project, while the instructor had supervisory andmonitoring roles. This approach enhanced the learning process. This paper outlined theelements of this approach, and it explained its effectiveness. Other instructors who teachsimilar or other engineering technology courses are encouraged to use this approach.However, they have to be aware of its limitations.Bibliography1. Ogot, M., Elliot, G., and Glumac, N., An Assessment of In-Person and Remotely Operated Laboratory, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 92, No. 1, pp. 57-63, January 2003.2. Foulds, R., Bergen, M., and Mantilla, B., Integrated Biomedical Engineering Education Using Studio-Based Learning, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, Vol. 22
19th century, the American engineering systemparalleled the French model, but also incorporated elements of the hands-on traditions of theBritish approach. The continuation of shop work requirements and the development of co-operative education in most engineering curricula distinguished American engineeringinstruction from the French method.The twentieth century witnessed a rapid advancement of Engineering and Technology education.Applied laboratories coursework and formal co-operative experience enhanced the growingeducational programs. In addition, ABET accreditation introduced criteria to make engineeringand technology programs well balanced with mixes of basic sciences courses, technical theoryand laboratory courses, and a breadth of
mathematics, science, engineering, and technology. 3.5 3.75 4.0 4.25 4.5 OUTCOME COURSE ASSESSMENT VALUE 4.10 ET 200, “Graphics Communications” 4.03 CET 201, “Plane Surveying” 4.04 CET 242, “Civil Engineering Materials – 3.83 Concrete & Bituminous” ET 323, “Mechanics of Materials Laboratory” 4.31 CET
were muchmore clearly understood. Samples of student coursework were compiled, all advising proceduresand transfer policies were updated, and student files were all reviewed for completeness.Compliance with professional component requirements and faculty qualifications were ensured.All laboratory equipment was determined to be functional and up-to-date. Documentation ofadequate facilities and institutional support was updated and made available. It was ensured thatall discipline-specific program criteria were met.Outcome of the EC 2000 Accreditation VisitThe ABET site visit in October 1999 identified two weaknesses: one under Criterion 2 (ProgramEducational Objectives) and one under Criterion 3 (Program Outcomes and Assessment). ABETgranted
educational programs that addressethical issues in science and engineering, professional responsibilities, and ethical issues in researchpractice and science more generally. She is a laboratory-trained neuroscientist whose research interestsnow focus on the ethical, legal and social policy implications of scientific research, especially in the area ofneuroscience. Her theoretical and laboratory training have been complemented by work in areas of ethicaland legal philosophy.Dr. Bird has taught in her areas of expertise at M.I.T. including both courses designed to examine variousaspects of the responsible conduct of research, and those that consider the ethical and social policyimplications of technology. Dr. Bird has written numerous articles on
laboratory redesign or updating as frequently as yearly. The attendant financialcosts and time invested by the faculty to provide well-designed laboratory experiences canbecome overwhelming. For example, in teaching a class related to modern computer operatingsystems involving, say the Windows and Linux operating systems, it is probable that at least oneof them will go through significant changes as often as once per year, particularly if the varioustools that are used to work with them are also considered. Updating lab configurations to reflectthese changes requires changing lab computer software, and possibly hardware too.In this changing environment it is highly desirable to explore paradigms of thought andmethodologies which enable technology
from the University of Wyoming and Ph.D. in Engineering (MechanicalEngineering concentration) from North Dakota State University. He holds P.E. registration and worked in industryfor over eight years.THOMAS M. HALL, JR.Tom Hall is Professor and Head of the Department of Engineering Technology at Northwestern State University.He holds a BS degree in Engineering from the United States Military Academy, an MBA from the University ofUtah, the MSEE and Engineer degrees from Stanford University, and an Ed.D. in educational technology from NSU.He retired as a Colonel from the US Army after serving 26 years. His research interests are in using simulationsoftware in lieu of hardware laboratories in electronics engineering technology laboratory
students and have been instrumental in the success of Center-sponsored events,organizing volunteers, initiating special study sessions and countless other ways that havedrawn our diverse group of students together.All graduate students are housed together in the Student Office Space in the IntegratedManufacturing Systems Laboratory and are assigned desks based on their research ThrustArea affiliation. As a result, students within each Thrust Area consult with their peers ona daily basis and assist each other. This space helped in creating the “ERC spirit” amongstudents and was highly beneficial for team development. In the words of Dr. ShirleyJackson, president of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, “it takes a village comprised ofintergenerational
. Each of the other goals from Table 1was addressed chiefly through use of a design project, which was the focus of laboratory work aswell as several supporting class lectures. The specific goals of this project, and their relationshipto the course goals, is given in Table 3. A further characteristic of this project was that, becauseit occurs early in the semester, it should be non-discipline specific and require no more than themath and physics skills the students have developed after 2-3 weeks in those courses.Table 3: Module 1 Project GoalsGoal Teaching Course Goal Assignment medium medium (Table 1)Work on an ill 1 course lecture 4
1991 and places onaverage 75 teachers per year in 6-8 week research positions in academic and industry labs. GIFTparticipation by teachers in the four primarily minority STEP high schools since 2001, whenSTEP begin, is shown on the following page in Figure 1. These internships, where teachers Page 10.1135.8form close personal relationships with faculty, graduate students, and other laboratory staffmembers, lead to numerous spillover benefits. Teachers gain new and cutting edge STEM Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American
experiences.These classes will involve a diverse set of topics such as scaling issues, micromachining,interfacial phenomena, and thin-film energy transport. The students will participate in formalclassroom and laboratory training, industrial and government laboratory internships, a monthlyinterdisciplinary seminar, and international educational experiences.Throughout the duration of the fellowship students participated in small group (3-4 members)projects that were intended to complement the coursework. Projects were microsystems focusedand designed to encourage the involvement of an interdisciplinary design team. Projectprogression was intended to track with the coursework with the goal of applying class learning toa complex project with no clear solution
Analysis," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 39, Aug 1996, pp. 287-296.[9] Lu, Han-Pang Huang and Chiou-Hwa. "Java-Based Distance Learning Environment for Electronic Instruments," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 46, Feb 2003, pp. 88- 94.[10] Titcomb, S.L. "Computer-Based Interactive Tutorials for Electrical Engineering Laboratory Instruction," presented at 27th Annual Conference Frontiers in Education Conference, 1997. Proceedings ’Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change’. 1997.[11] Gronhovd, Sudhir Ι. Mehta and Sandy M. "Instrumentation and Communication Modules on CD-ROM’s for Enriching Engineering Education," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 39, Aug. 1996, pp. 304-308.[12
projects.• A group of 4 – 7 students works on issues of an industrial enterprise, typical 6th, 7th and 8th semester projects. Cases from the specialisation Industrial Technology: • Co-operation with a larger enterprise on 6th semester. The starting point is a manufacturing and quality point of view in connection with two automated TIG welding processes was carried out in the laboratory with the 14 critical parameters on which a profound theoretical examination was afterwards based. An advanced mathematical model was developed together with development and programming of a neural network. • Co-operation with a small enterprise on 7th semester: After profound analyses of the company’s order
with new situations in industry.Assessment MethodologyStudent attitudes towards new technology used in a learning environment are an important factorin the assessment of student learning. An extensive survey was developed to assess studentattitudes toward the Tablet and use of the Tablet in the classroom, laboratory, and outside ofclass. Significant research has been conducted to study student attitudes toward the integrationof information technology in the classroom. Many of the survey questions were taken from theseprevious surveys. Doolen, Porter and Hoag used a survey to measure six areas related to PDAusage – anxiety, confidence, liking, usefulness (general), usefulness (course), and enthusiasm3.This PDA study used constructs from a
. Anothermathematics related project, Adventure Engineering, uses engineering-based curricula in middlegrade science and mathematics classes.2 The Adventure Engineering project focuses on problemsolving and the engineering design experience. A third project saw engineering graduate studentsassisting high school mathematics teachers in developing hands on approaches for algebra andtrigonometry classes.3 These laboratory activities were incorporated into the normal lesson plan.Both high school students and teachers benefited from using laboratory activities to demonstratespecific principles such as linearity and trigonometric functions.Adding new engineering courses to the curriculum is a luxury that most school systems can notafford. With the addition of so
recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. We thank Chet Plank, Chris Davis, Clay Hamblen, Daniel Seaton, Justin Cochran, Nadja Bliedung,Sean Cook, Ven Raju, and Srinivas Kumarasetty who developed the STEM connections to the case study CD-ROMdiscussed in this paper. All these undergraduate and graduate students were part of the LITEE project.Biographical Information Shivram K. Sankar worked as a undergraduate research assistant at the Laboratory for InnovativeTechnology and Engineering Education (LITEE) during Summers 2002 and 2003. He is a senior at the Weinberg
Coordinator for the Integrated Teaching andLearning Program’s K-12 Engineering Initiative at the University of Colorado at Boulder. A former middle and highschool math and science teacher, she received her MAT in secondary science from Johns Hopkins University andher MS in civil engineering from the University of Colorado at Boulder.JACQUELYN F. SULLIVAN is a founding co-director of the Integrated Teaching and Learning Laboratory andProgram. She received her Ph.D. in environmental health physics and toxicology from Purdue University. She spentthe first 13 years of her career in leadership positions in the energy and software industries, and served nine years asthe director of a CU water resources engineering simulation and optimization research
Chemical Engineering, Washington University. He received M.S. from WashingtonUniversity in 2003 and has been nominated as a web page designer for Association of Graduate EngineeringStudents at this University.Dr. PRATIM BISWAS is the Stifel and Quinette Jens Professor of Environmental Engineering Science and Directorof the Environmental Engineering Science Program at the Aerosol and Air Quality Research Laboratory atWashington University in St. Louis. His major research interest focuses on the examination of particle formationand growth dynamics in high temperature environments. He has published extensively in his field and has made
attacks and countermeasures. Emphasison laboratory experiments.Course Learning Objectives:Upon completing this course a student will: • Understand the ethics of using hacking tools • Be able to describe the TCP/IP network protocols and the effect of an open network protocol on security • Be able to snoop traffic from a network and decode the data • Be able to describe methods to counter traffic attacks like snooping, spoofing, redirection, and flooding. • Understand the importance of passwords and methods to select good passwords • Be able to crack passwords and understand the importance of authentication • Understand the issues of social engineering when used to discover passwords • Be able to describe
description is given below: Prerequisite Courses: M 115 (precalculus), a laboratory science course; co-requisite: M 117 (Calculus I). Students will be introduced to typical problems encountered in various branches of engineering and will gain experience using computer tools to solve these problems numerically. This course will require extensive use of a spreadsheet program and the development of programming fundamentals. Topics include simple statistical methods, logical and numerical functions, solving sets of algebraic, differential and difference equations, regression, interpolation, integration, data types, assignment and conditional statements, program flow control, passing parameters, returning
the work. Our assessments are made therefore by interviews and demonstrations ofthe work in the laboratory where these skills can be observed and brought out in to the open byoral examination, as well as by examination of written Engineering reports, where the studentsmust express their design process on paper. In addition Engineers usually work in teams so ourprojects are often undertaken in teams, and the interviews and demonstrations are presented bythe Design team, while staff examine group members individually to give a fair assessment.Confidential peer evaluations are used to monitor group dynamics and unequal efforts bystudents.The themes in design projects take students through each phase. The problems given to studentsare not fully
sometimes significantly simplify the VHDL specification andcombinational logic.4. Illustrative Design ProjectsIn the fall semester of 2003, an “Advanced Digital Design” course was offered to the senior andgraduate classes at Bucknell University. This course consisted of two components, includinglectures and laboratories. The lectures were comprised of three modules. First, logic synthesiswas taught. The issues covered included Quine-McClusky method for two-level logicminimization 11, 13, 14, multiple-level logic optimization 4, technology mapping for FPGA andstandard-cell implementation 10 as well as finite-state-machine synthesis. The second modulecovered the VHDL language 2, 3, 7, including the syntax and semantics of the language as well asthe