intensive one-year preparation to inaugurate this new NuclearCertificate in the fall 2008 academic semester. With the planning of seven new nuclear plants inTexas we feel this new program will go a long way to help fulfill the needed workforce.Course Development Overview The four required undergraduate courses will include Introduction to Nuclear PowerSystems, Nuclear Safety and Security, Nuclear Environmental Protection, and ReactorOperations. Introduction to Nuclear Power Systems is already in place, covers basic nuclearreactor theory, and will be the gateway course for the Certificate Program. Some modificationsto this class will be implemented to address the needs of the Certificate Program. Nuclear Safety and Security will
are also recounted. Lessons learned by the faculty advisors andsuggestions for other schools planning to participate in this program are summarized. Page 13.1414.2 Introduction Over the past eight years, a hands-on Microgravity Research Team (MRT) two-semester project course sequence has been developed and offered at West VirginiaUniversity (WVU). This course can fulfill a technical elective requirement in either theAerospace Engineering or Mechanical Engineering curriculum. The primary course goal is toprovide students with a hardware-oriented, open-ended, hands-on research projectexperience. Each fall
improved their academic standing. This wasattributed to the immersion of the students in a residential study center and the constantavailability of other mechanical engineering students as study partners. This program is now inits second year, and assessment data from this year is used to further support our conclusionsregarding the effectiveness of this study-abroad model.IntroductionIn 2004, Grove City College selected a cross-discipline, multi-level team whose goal was todevelop a strategic plan which will propel the College into the future. Administration, faculty,staff, students, alumni, members of the local community, and Trustees were represented on theteam. After a year of intensive investigation and discussion, a plan was submitted for
√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ ME 4523 Dynamic Systems and Control √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ ME 4603 FEA in Mechanical Design √ √ √ √ √ √ ME 4702 Mech. Systems/Controls Lab √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ ME 4802 Thermal/Fluid Lab √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ ME 4811 ME Project Planning Lab √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ ME 4813 ME Design Project √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √Technical Elective Courses ME 3323 Dynamics of Mech. Systems √ √ √ √ √ √ √ ME 3823 Machine Element Design
was 0.848demonstrating the fitted model possessed excellent ability to discriminate between these twoeducational outcomes. The significant variables were overall BY math proficiency; BY sciencequartile; family composition; language minority status; frequency of parental discussions withthe student regarding post high school plans; parental expectations of the student’s advancement;student expectation of personal educational attainment; parental marital status; type of highschool the student planned to attend; the father’s highest level of education; the number of hoursper week the student worked for pay; the student’s ability groups for math and science; thestudent’s math and science grades from grades 6 to 8; ACT math score; SAT math and
• Prepare to Present Design at Level III ~4 wks after Level II Presentation Showcase • Final Technical Report • Program Evaluation • Present a STEM concept to • Outreach Report $$ Option EPO Activity any audience or community • K-12 Lesson Plan Area I group. • Photo Documentation Option • Present project work in a • Presentation Report
responsible for providing vision, direction, planning and implementation regarding the use of technology in instruction of mathematics and science. Mark's research interests are in theories of cognition, how these theories inform the design of instruction, how we might best design instructional technology within those frameworks, and how the research and development of instructional technologies can inform our theories of cognition.Thomas Wolff, Michigan State University Dr. THOMAS F. WOLFF is Associate Dean of Engineering for Undergraduate Studies at Michigan State University and a faculty member in Civil and Environmental Engineering. In the fall of 2005, he was a member of the ASCE Levee Assessment
decision, why aspects of the experience were or were notimportant to them, how one concept or meaning they discussed related with otherconcepts or meanings they discussed, and how one priority, reflection point, orexperience compared to another. While general ways to follow-up with participants maybe the most important part of the interview for achieving the outcomes of aphenomenography2, 4, 9, often follow-up prompts cannot be pre-planned because theydepend upon what the participant says during the interview.The development of the interview protocol in this study was governed by the focus ondesign as the particular aspect of the world being investigated. The goal of the questionsin the protocol was to prompt participants’ discussions on their
’ environment. This research work aims to set up an onlinecontrol engineering experimentation platform in the field of robotics. The aim was and is toexpand the set of online experiments in the Control Engineering field while introducingnewbies to robotics. The set of online experiments which this research work would put up arebased on a robotic arm.Three experiments have been set up at the Obafemi Awolowo University by this researcheffort. The experiments are: 1. A simple slider control experiment 2. An effect of gravity experiment Page 14.39.2 3. A trajectory planning experimentII. ReviewA lot of work has been done in the development of online
complete design to include procedures used, lessons learned,hand-drawn plans and material costs must be part of the lab report. Students are informedabout the need to draw plans for their final design project using PC paint or somethingequivalent. Many teams choose to draw the plans of their bridges using a drawingpackage even in this first laboratory. Some students will take apart a working bridge ifthere is time left to go for a more efficient design that carries the full 7 books…passionateengineers, future civil engineers? Most student groups focus their lessons learned on thefact that triangular shapes are more stable and stronger, shorter members make thestructure more stable, and connection design is critical (note: the purple connectors
provided a strong foundation of findings, one limitation was that the studypredominantly focused on science students and not engineering undergraduate researchers.Our own prior work 7 on undergraduate research experiences previously focused on socialcognitive aspects of an NSF funded Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) program,finding that the experience positively impacted participants’ academic and career plans,especially for doctoral level work. We utilized a mixed-methods approach to gain in-depthinformation about the impact of the undergraduate research experience, and particularly the roleof graduate student mentors, on participants’ self efficacy
involved in department level planning and decision-making, completelaboratory setup and training, computer software setup and training, infrastructure assessment,faculty hiring, supply acquisition, and student development. Many of these critical, additionaltasks were unfamiliar to us, since they are typically done by other senior administrators or bythose in specialized jobs within our department. We were also challenged with ensuring NMAAinstructors could adequately explain material to those for who English is a second language,convincing them that our advice was in the best interest of student learning, and continuallymaking changes on the fly. This paper will detail the challenges we faced and investigate thecorrelation that exists between our
17% MS/ BS PhD 20% MS, BS 60% PhD MD 38% BS 65% 11% 9% (a) (b) (c) Figure 1. Distribution of ultimate or planned education levels of (a) the entire Peppas laboratory undergraduate population; (b) the Peppas laboratory undergraduate researchers surveyed; and (c) other undergraduate researchers.One key question we sought to address
as research/teaching collaborationswith several foreign universities. In developing the plan for this exchange program, the OUfaculty team sought to draw upon its numerous professional and personal contacts andcollaborators at a number of different universities in China and paid visits to a number of theseuniversities. For the 2008 trip, it was determined that Beijing Jiaotong University would providethe best fit for this program in terms of the compatibility of their research with that of the OUfaculty team, and their ability to host U.S. students and provide them with a rich educational andcultural immersion experience.Founded in 1896, Beijing Jiaotong University is one of the oldest Universities in China. BJTU isa multidisciplinary
their curriculum. This paper provides a first year update of this twoyear project and includes a description of each of the nine newly developed modules, theassessment plan, and the results of the assessments to date.Project Introduction and Objectives East Carolina University (ECU) is a large regional university that serves eastern ruralNorth Carolina and the eastern region of the United States. The industries and businesseslocated among the small towns of eastern North Carolina have a need for a broadly skilledgeneral engineer. The rationale for a general engineering program at ECU is made byKauffmann et al.1 “Instead of the traditional engineering disciplines, these operations requireengineering generalists with a strong theoretical
is now working with Jason Foster, Engineering Science Design Educator, on integrating SD concepts into the Engineering Science design Praxis Series of courses from curriculum planning through to implementation as a TA for some of these courses. Page 14.1216.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Praxis III – promoting an interdisciplinary approach to solving global problems through a course focusing on sustainable development and engineering designAbstractThis paper will discuss how Engineering Science, a
situations. October 9-10, 2008. ≠ Marketing in Technology-Driven Industries. Getting your product out to your customers and effectively communicating its benefits is only part of the challenge of marketing. Choosing the right group of customers to approach first, ensuring those customers will be delighted with your offering and formulating a plan of attack for follow-on waves of customer acceptance are key to the long-term success of your venture. You’ll leave this module with a step-by-step approach for each of those phases as well as a strong “elevator pitch.” You will also gain a deeper understanding of why branding matters in the high-tech arena. October 31, 2008. ≠ Innovative Product Design &
of a paper and use the checklist to rate it. Another method is to have studentsrate the same example and then discuss it. In this way, the professor is training or “calibrating”the reviewers. For those interested in more intensive calibration of student peer reviewers,Carlson and Berry discuss the Calibrated Peer Review√ online system.11Student FeedbackAs part of the course requirements, at the end of the semester ES 210w students rate theirknowledge gained in meeting course instructional objectives. The instructor uses thisinformation to plan for the next semester. Students respond to an anonymous self-assessmentinstrument, rating how much they knew about the objectives when they entered the course andhow much they now know after taking the
hidden parts of the design process. We still teach freshmen hand drawingnot because we think the skill of drafting is important but because we recognize the importanceof thinking through the process of plan, section, elevation, and axonometric without themediation of technology. Thinking with just a pencil in many ways is an extension of our fingersand hands and in this sense is completely transparent. McCleary’s example gives us a clear ideaof how technology mediates our experience and transforms the process so the parallels appliedseem clear to us in the design development process in architecture. An example of CAD designautomation here is the auto-roof design featured on Autodesk® Architectural Desktop 3.3. SeeFIGURE 1: Time Comparison of
validate engineering principles encountered in lecture coursessuch as system dynamics or fluid mechanics.From conversations over several years with colleagues from various institutions, we note thatmechanical engineering (ME) laboratory courses like ours often suffer from neglect and a lowlevel of student engagement. In a previous paper [1] we describe a plan to improve ME labs byimproving student engagement and by more closely meeting the learning objectives appropriateto engineering laboratories. The purpose of this paper is to present our accomplishments to datein the measurements course.Prior condition of the measurements courseOur version of Mechanical Measurements is a two credit-hour, junior-level course that meets forone lecture hour and
Page 11.21.2studying outside the classroom; (c) on paid-jobs; and (d) on leisure activities.The actual sample included students in an electronics program at a four-year university campusat Chicago, and the students in a comparable electronics program at a four-year universitycampus at Beijing. The research found that electronics students sampled in China spentsignificantly more time on attending classroom lectures and scheduled labs, on studying outsidethe classroom, and on leisure activities than their counterparts in the United States. However, theresearch also found that electronics students sampled in China spent significantly less time onpaid-jobs than their counterparts in the United States.Two-way ANOVAs (analyses of variance), planned
2006-433: STREAMLINING THE WORKFLOW OF AN ENROLLMENTMANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT THROUGH INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERINGCONCEPTSSreekanth Ramakrishnan, SUNY Binghamton Sreekanth Ramakrishnan is a doctoral student at the Department of Systems Science and Industrial Engineering at Binghamton University, State University of New York at Binghamton. His research interests include Enterprise Resource Planning, Business Process Reengineering and Simulation-based Frameworks. Currently, he is a research associate with IBM Enterprise Learning, Poughkeepsie, NY. His email address is sramakr1@binghamton.edu and his webpage is http://bingweb.binghamton.edu/~sramakr1.Justin Sturek, SUNY Binghamton Justin Sturek
of underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM). The first year of the program was spent strategizing and planning toaccomplish this goal with an outside Advisory Board that was developed with nationallyrecognized academicians and industry leaders in science and engineering. Their assistance wasused in identifying curricular and co-curricular changes needed in STEM undergraduateeducation that would result in qualified and capable engineers and scientists of the future.Curriculum could not be ‘watered down’ to improve student retention and graduation rates.Instead, other solutions were sought.Ideas for change in engineering education at UTEP began forming during the proposal stage andfirst phase of MIE
Page 11.1423.1 JOHN MCLAUGHLIN – Dr. McLaughlin is a senior consultant in strategic planning, performance measurement, and program evaluation. He is presently working on several projects including the Environmental Protection Agency, Health and Human Services Administration on Aging and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, as well serving as the lead evaluation consultant to seven national centers.© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Page 11.1423.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 VDP--A Mentor-Focused Middle School Outreach ProgramAbstractThe Virginia Demonstration Project (VDP) is a science and math
most educatorswould admit that planning and time management are often not an explicitly addressed element ofthe Computer Science and Engineering curriculum. Rather than teach students how to managetime, most instructors do the work themselves, incorporate the results into the time frames anddeadlines documented in the course syllabus, and assume that students will allocate their timeaccordingly. In reality, many students, especially those with weaker performance, do not knowhow to do this, or do not realize the consequences of not taking deadlines seriously. We showthat a brief periodically administered self-assessment survey that requires students to state howmuch time they have allocated on class tasks helps students better manage their time
mechanism must be constructed ONLY with the provided materials. Two launches were allowed for distance (counting only the furthest distance) and four launches at the target (counting each of the four launches for accuracy). The ping pong ball had to be launched by one selected team member from the constructed mechanism, which had to be free standing and not taped to the launching table or floor starting position. Thirty minutes was allocated for the design, planning and construction phase. – The materials provided were: • 3 plastic cups • 10 tongue depressors • 8 rubber bands • 1 plastic spoon • 8 thumb tacks
fromclassroom and extracurricular projects.This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the content of the research instrumentused in a pilot study in three undergraduate classes at the University of North Dakota during the2005 fall semester. Tabulated results and observations/interpretations are presented in Section 3.Section 4 examines the possibility that service-oriented innovations generated by students at theuniversity may have greater commercialization potential on a shorter timeline than patentableinventions. A summary is provided in Section 5, along with future plans for developing andadministering this research instrument on a much larger scale.2. Student-Generated Intellectual Property Research InstrumentThe research instrument
anticipated that the results of assessment will be used for future courseimprove ment and cross-culture studies.Introduction This course covers a wide range of subject matters from cultural impact on humanbehaviors to space perceptions and designs. The comparisons are focused on several topics suchas palace architecture, houses, gardens, temples/churches, city planning of the Eastern and theWestern. The comparisons were between same types of buildings that were built during the sametime period. Since it is very hard to find a textbook, which covers all subject matters in thiscourse, writing a student manual becomes the first task. The student’s manual was developedbased on the course syllabus total about sixty pages. Each part of the manual
successful that ENTC gained three more grants tocontinue its distance learning development. The trial run validated many of the concerns facultyhad about adapting technical curriculum to this medium but it also brought about solutions. Noteverything went as planned and one unexpected problem in particular caused the department torethink its strategy. This paper will examine the ENTC distance learning model and how itattempts to meet the needs of a two-year engineering technology program and the community itserves. The paper will discuss strengths and limitations of the equipment and software and willprovide critical comment on the course management strategy used. Finally, the paper will discusshow the model was redesigned into what is now a
presentation skills? Why or why not? What could be done to improve your oral presentation skills? ABET Criterion 3h: the need for abroad education necessary to understand the impact ofengineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context is met throughCSM’s system and stem courses and many of the junior and senior PE courses. Minimalsupporting evidence is necessary or provided in the supplemental document. ABET Criterion 3i: a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-longlearning is demonstrated based on six data sets including the preparation of “Individual Life-Long Learning Plans” by students, alumni surveys, research activities, student involvement instudent professional groups