topic inquestion both in order to help them develop a deeper understanding of the topic and in order tohighlight problem areas that need further elaboration by the instructor. We discuss the theoreticalbasis behind the work, provide some details of the prototype implementation of an on-line tool thatenables such structured discussions, and describe our plans for using it in an undergraduate courseon software engineering and for assessing the approach.1. IntroductionThe most widely accepted definition of the flipped classroom is one where “events that have tra-ditionally taken place inside the classroom now take place outside the classroom and vice versa”,see, e.g., Lage et al. 1 . Thus the knowledge transfer that the traditional lecture tries
day of researchwas dedicated to the elaboration of a “wish list,” as well as the planning of the 7-weekexperience. The student was free to include any ideas he ideally wanted to cover or implement.This list was then reviewed and arranged in order of importance by the faculty advisor and theundergraduate student. Being relatively new to programming on Arduino and with the concept ofcontrol and signal processing, the student started the experience by tackling multiple easyindividual tasks in order to get more familiar with the material involved in this mechatronicproject. The initial wish list included such tasks as adding LEDs to the car to provide visualchecks to the user; creating a smartphone application for wireless user input
more broadly aboutour mentoring agenda.As we were completing the survey and focus group analysis, an unusually high percentage ofwomen in the 2012 cohort of new STEM faculty (5 out of 8) presented the WISE@OU programwith a unique opportunity to test out different mentoring models and have a lasting impact onthis and subsequent faculty cohorts (Table 1). Therefore, in parallel with making plans to initiatea formal mentoring program, one-on-one, peer-to-peer and group mentoring activities wereorganized by the WISE@OU leadership team, first for the 2012 cohort and then expanded toinclude the 2011, 2013 and now 2014 STEM faculty hires. Some of these activities include one-on-one review of practical grant-related information, peer-review of
Student Opinion of TeachingSurvey. In fall 2013, the results encouraged further development of both hardware and softwarelabs, which we continued in fall 2014. Course enrollment also increased by 60% in fall 2014,from 13 to 21 students. Favorable teaching evaluations and comments from fall 2013 encouragedeven more classroom interaction, which led us to the “flipping” model. The fall 2014 course hasbeen evaluated with a new Teaching Survey, supplemented with custom questions about theflipped classroom. We further evaluated this flipped classroom for the degree of instructor-supported active learning and problem solving and student interaction, and for impact on studentfinal exam performance. The results were mixed, and we discuss plans for future
Topics (learning objective) First half of semester Second half of semester Expectations Class Management (3,4) Introductions (1) Personal Development (3,5) Keys to Success (3) Diversity (7) Pre-Calculus, Trigonometry (3,4) Well-being (5,6) Engineering Profession (2) Design Project Planning (7) Learning and Teaching Styles (5) Teamwork (7) Career Fair (2,6) Design Project (7,8) Professors and Other Resources (6) Reflection Paper (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) Advising (3,6)The course began by providing supplemental instruction for
graduate classes areoffered either on-site or on-line, and span five schools and one college: the schools ofEngineering and Computing, Business and Management, Education, Health and HumanServices, Professional Studies, and the College of Letters and Sciences.With the large number of courses offered monthly, and over 100 academic programs,managing program scheduling is quite labor intensive. As in traditional universities, staffmembers work with department chairs to plan program and course offerings for students.A series of sequential course offerings is called a program string, and students who enrollin a string together form a cohort. Additionally at National University, faculty serve asprogram leads and are responsible for managing the
years, the MAX scholarship program has engaged in a continuousimprovement process. The students provide feedback at least once per semester through onlinesurveys and, most recently, reflection essays. The faculty mentors and graduate assistant observewhat is working well and where improvement is needed during the weekly seminars. Theydiscuss and reflect on continuous improvement ideas at their weekly planning meetings and anannual reflection and assessment meeting at the end of the year. This process is guided by theorganizational goals and implemented through interventions to the supporting structure of MAX(See Table 1). Some examples of changes include annual retreats, common reads assigned overwinter break, and formally assigning primary
materials. 8. Demonstrate how to navigate through LMS packages such as Desire-2-Learn. 9. Student advising.With the OEOE model, faculty support student learning through facilitation in the EngineeringTechnology lab, mini-lectures, and validation of competencies through lab assignments andassessments.The proposed faculty loading formula is: 26 hrs/wk in the Engineering Technology labs at the ATC 7 hrs/wk of office hours in a dedicated office/cubicle at the ATC 7 hrs/wk of flexible planning timeThis staffing model required two enabling technologies, 1) A LMS that permitted sharedinstructor access to all ET courses so that the instructor on duty can answer online inquiries orassist students arriving in the open-lab with their
teams towork independently in the required labs depending on their product selection; however, severalcourse sessions and meetings with the course instructor were planned in order to promotecreativity including lessons and selected exercises that provided a number of techniques to helpthem generate innovative solutions to the correctly defined problem. These techniques includebrainstorming, vertical and lateral thinking, analogies, TRIZ (Russian acronym for ResheniyaTeoriya Izobretatelskikh Zadach, that translated literally is “theory of the resolution of invention-related tasks”), and SCAMPER (acronym for Substitute, Combine, Adapt, Modify, Put toanother use, Eliminate, and Reverse) 2.In this context, a creativity test at the beginning and end
valuable part of the scientific community Entrepreneurship • Knowledge about • Self-Awareness (ability to management methods, how to reflect) write business plans and get • Accountability (take financing, instruments to responsibility) protect intellectual properties • Emotional coping (cope with • Knowledge about product problems) design and development, • Risk taking (tolerance for
participants found this experience emotionallyrewarding as well. Participant 4 felt, “everything coming together, it’s nice, you finally,everything, I don’t want to sound tacky but everything you’ve read about and dreamed about, itactually exists, it’s a real thing.” While sometimes frustrating, participants also mentionedtroubleshooting and learning how to deal with problems as valuable outcomes of their summerresearch experiences. Participant 6 explained: There was a lot of trial and error and it got me to think outside the box. I was running samples and they weren’t really working out as planned and I didn’t know what was going on so I had to rule out multiple things. I added a third bar to make sure solution was equally
Paper ID #16992Mixed Method Study of the Evolution of Leadership Traits during a Leader-ship ExperienceMs. Luisa Ruiz Mendoza, University of Texas - El Paso Luisa is a recipient of the Gates Millennium Scholarship since 2009. In May 2013, Luisa graduated from Texas A&M University with a degree in Business Management. Then, in December 2014 she received a master’s degree in Higher Education Administration from the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). Ms. Ruiz plans to pursue a doctorate degree in Educational Leadership and Foundations with a concentration in Engineering Leadership at UTEP. She would like to work on a
Biomedical engineeringstudents follow the “Biodesign: The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies” by Paul Yocket. al.16 LTU requires 3 and 2 credits, while UDM requires 2 and 3 credits (respectively). Table 1: Approximate milestones and project timeline TABLE 1: COURSE MILESTONES Pre-Semester Nursing students self-select and register for directed study Week 1 Introduce all students to the program plan. BME students self-select Week 2 Form teams via CATME tool, conduct all-hands kick-off meeting Week 4 Introduction to clients, students plan project Week 6 Complete project plan Week 12 Complete product definition Week 16: Complete
approval of the degree byWashington’s Higher Education Coordinating Board (HEC Board)[1] and the Board of Regents ofthe University, a faculty committee was formed to lay the foundation for the EE degree anddevelop the goals, educational objectives, and desired student outcomes for the program.Of key concern to this committee, chaired by the author, was obtaining ABET accreditation assoon as possible1. Therefore, much of our planning was focused on creating a robust BSEEdegree from the outset. Particular attention was given to the Capstone Experience. According toABET, students in an accredited EE program must have a Capstone Experience: Students must be prepared for engineering practice through a curriculum culminating in a major
relevant information from a variety of sources. Engineering studentswill apply this information to Plan and Implement (POD-PI) a solution and create a prototype,and draw conclusions and make decisions about the fit of the solution based on the prototype’sperformance in Test and Evaluate (POD-TE). The remaining indicators in the framework arepractices necessary to engineering, but are outside of POD and may also relate to otherdisciplines. Students apply science, engineering, and mathematics (SEM) by learning fromproblems that stress the interdisciplinary nature of these subjects. Engineering Thinking (EThink)is a mindset that students strive for by problem-solving, critically examining challenges,managing uncertainty, and using
chose to follow the more modern student learning framework for developingand teaching our IoT course.A Pilot Course on the Internet of Things Our first planning meeting for our pilot course occurred only three weeks before the courseregistration period and eight weeks before the actual course was to be taught. Most of oursubsequent discussions occurred by email. We agreed on the following guidelines for the pilotIoT course:● It should be multidisciplinary with multiple majors enrolled.● Enrollment should be limited to eight students and by invitation only. We wanted to make sure students were “early adopters” already committed to learning about IoT.● The student work in the course would revolve around completing a single project.● We would
on their executive committee as Director for International Chapters and has organized local Fort Laud- erdale chapter events for over 20 years.Dr. Diana Mitsova, Florida Atlantic University Diana Mitsova has a background in research design, statistical and spatial analysis, as well as environ- mental planning and modeling using geographic information systems, and interactive computer simula- tion. Her primary area of research involves the impact of urban development on ecosystems and other environmentally sensitive areas.Her recent publications focus on the impact of climate-related stressors on coastal communities and the implementation of planning approaches related to enhancing coastal re- silience to natural
include motion planning and localization of ground robots. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A Workshop for Integration of Internet of Things into Green Energy Manufacturing AbstractThis paper describes enhancement of green energy manufacturing subjects using a project basedlearning workshop with Internet of things (IoT). The Internet of things is a collection of all physicaldevices that are controlled or monitored over the Internet. The evolution of IoT has led to thediffusion of wireless personal devices, such as smart mobile phones, personal computers andwearable devices, designed to operate over the Internet. It is
used by multiple faculty in different courses. A morerobust comparison would require an interrater reliability study to fully ensure that the assessmentrubrics designed are being consistently used. In addition, variations due to class size were notinvestigated. Segmenting the data collected based on class size may reveal whether learningeffectiveness is compromised in large classes.At the University of New Haven where students are taking multiple modules, we plan to aggregateacross modules to assess an overall EM Learning Index, 𝑖𝑒 , based on all modules students take thatwould be a measure of average student learning of EM Learning Outcomes by completing multiplemodules. This overall index can be computed by Equation 4
desire to design and build anything on earth need to be familiar withgeotechnology as a result, the engineering geology must be required as a core civil engineeringcourse subject. Lack of knowledge in geotechnical engineering leads insufficient knowledge andunderstanding of large or small scale civil engineering projects’ needs. Thus, the civilengineering students might lack the minimum requirement for an ABET accredited civilengineering program. Hopefully, the article serves the purpose to inform pertinent college anduniversity administrators to become aware of the need and importance of geotechnics in theircourse planning and curriculum development and improvement.Virtually all construction projects on earth have to be built or on the ground
ofthe most commonly used approaches for term weighting (Aizawa, 2003) and is describedfurther in Section 4. Such term frequency analyses have been used in numerouseducational contexts, from examination of Master’s thesis and PhD dissertations toidentify common topics (Rivera & Larrondo-Petrie, 2017), to engineering term languagegaps between professors and students in freshman-level engineering courses as a barrierto learning (Variawa et al., 2013; Variawa & McCahan, 2012).2. Course Description and Student DemographicsOur university’s onsite course focuses on the selection, design, and implementation ofdecentralized systems for water reclamation and reuse. Topics include process analysisand system planning, engineered and natural system
interpretations or meanings towards academicdifferent situations. Assumptions activities. The different collective importance or reputation that faculty and Values administrators attribute to the academic activities. Process Design The planned steps to enact instructional change.Change Management: Factors
(seeemergent codes above in Table 4 for examples). Going forward, although further validation isrequired, it is expected that the elements within the Faculty Innovation Canvas will be easilyunderstood and recognized by faculty and administrators using the canvas tool to plan ordocument their own innovation.The participants’ responses also helped further contextualize some Faculty Innovation Canvaselements within the everyday realities of faculty members’ experiences, particularly those relatedto Key Resources and Costs / Constraints, and Fulfillment / Recognition. Participants generallyseemed unconcerned about the availability of funding, perhaps because they did not perceive agreat need for, or shortage of it. By contrast, and in line with prior
to advance its mission through well-planned communication strategies and impactful in- dustry partnerships. She received the College of Engineering Outstanding Administrative Professional Staff Award in 2010 and 2017, respectively, and the Colorado State University Distinguished Administra- tive Professional Award in 2017. Leland holds a Bachelor’s of Science in Organizational Communications and Marketing from the University of Central Missouri.Dr. Laura B. Sample McMeeking, Colorado State University Laura B. Sample McMeeking is the Associate Director of the CSU STEM Center. She earned a Master of Science degree in Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology and a Ph.D. in Education and Human Resource Services from
increase student learning. These benefitscould include more opportunities for teamwork, an avenue for collaborative learning intraditional lecture-based courses, development of professional skills by preparing and deliveringtechnical presentations to diverse audiences, curricular integration, and engineering identityformation. The benefits of teamwork are well established and updated ABET criteria includespecific language on teamwork as an outcome: ‘Establish goals, plan tasks, meet deadlines,manage risk and uncertainty, and function effectively on teams.’ [2]. Furthermore, a previousstudy focused on a single institution showed that their engineering graduates valued ABETcriteria related to teamwork highly [3]. This teamwork facilitates a
external evaluation plan was prepared and implemented. The evaluators readily identified the students as “engaged in creative problem solving”.Group assignments and tests can also be used to promote cooperative activities in the classroom.For example, inquiry-based learning activities (IBLA) consist of presenting teams of studentswith a physical situation and asking them to predict what will happen. Self et al. developed oneof the first Inquiry-based learning activities (IBLA) for a Dynamics course, which involves thedirection of friction and motion for a rolling object and assigning quizzes the day before theactivity/experiment [11]. They encouraged students to think about the situation before coming toclass, and to make predictions about
, depending on the round ofstakeholder feedback and commensurate to the time commitment required. We plan to expandour recruitment efforts in 2019 to increase survey participation/completion numbers frommarginalized students. In the remainder of this section, each step of the instrument developmentprocess is summarized briefly. For a more detailed description of the process see [10].Theoretical Constructs and Item Bank DevelopmentThe initial item bank was based on the MCCS, which was developed from a multi-site case studyof student support practitioners and students involved in six different student support centersserving STEM students across four U.S. universities [1],[9]. For the development of an itembank, we leveraged the theoretical constructs
communication is important for presentations and meetings that engineers will often take part in. Presentations should be informative well-planned, and brief in order to hold the attention of the room. Graphical communication is important as well because engineers deal in numbers and physical objects. Numerical data can be confusing and unhelpful if not presented well. Diagrams and sketches of physical parts need to be accurate and standardized so they can be understood by people who fill different roles on a project.”Q2: What skill(s) do you think you need to work on most and WHY?When coding the results to this question we foundalmost every student felt the need to choose one skill SKILLS STUDENTS SELFthat
Technology at Oklahoma State University has strategically planned a shifttoward an interdisciplinary senior design focus and dedicated extensive resources to achieve it,they are having to adjust previous course models. The paper will discuss the structure of onelong-standing interdisciplinary architectural engineering senior design class within the college inthe architecture department, called the Comprehensive Design Studio (AE-CDS), and compare itto developments of the last three semester of the newly developing engineering InterdisciplinarySenior Design projects (ISD) from the perspective of an architecture faculty member who hastaught both courses. In examining these courses, some important characteristics regardinginterdisciplinary team
of the course basedon student knowledge and attitudes towards a variety of aspects of teaching. Finally, we providerecommendations for others looking to develop similar courses at other universities.MethodsCourse Improvement ApproachImprovement of the pedagogy course was funded by an Instructional Improvement Grant andincluded phases of consultation with experts, literature review, course materials review, anddevelopment of refined lesson plans and course website.The faculty instructor and graduate student researcher consulted with experts on active learningand inclusive teaching. Michael Prince, a professor and scholar in active learning withinengineering education, provided a workshop on active learning for faculty, post