perceived by students as reinforcing rather than redundant. Examplesof such experiences include field trips, hands-on laboratory exercises, modeling, technicaldesigns, experimental designs, independent laboratory research projects, and research papers.This paper links the U.S. Military Academy Environmental Engineering curriculum, ABEToutcomes a-k, and ABET Environmental Engineering Program Criteria to selected noteworthyexperiences. Assessment results are presented, which attempt to evaluate the effectiveness ofsignificant experiences. The drawbacks associated with omission of several desired experiencesfrom the curriculum are also addressed.Introduction Besides providing a discipline-specific undergraduate education, the United
substantial exposure to digital/tactile activities,upper level engineering students actively engaged in several project based courses during thecourse of their undergraduate engineering experiences that might have provided insights abouttheir learning preferences, as it relates to digital and tactile experiences. This research stemsfrom a multi-institutional collaboration between Penn State University and the University of Page 24.1215.2Maryland, where we aim to gain a deeper insight into the preferences of the next generationwork force prior to their graduation and highlight the professional work environment thatmay/may not align with students
teamwork, ethics, social context, and other broadconsiderations. The need to teach design has traditionally been addressed in Capstone courses.There is a trend to introduce design earlier in the curriculum such as through first-yearintroduction to engineering subjects or through required design “cornerstone” subjects2.A difficulty frequently observed in design projects is that students begin work too late. This hasbeen referred to as “time scallop” -- as deadlines are approached, effort levels rise rapidly andfall back to low levels repeatedly2. A challenge to implementing early design experiences inengineering programs is the readiness of the student population for hands-on design work. Fewstudents have been exposed to manufacturing equipment in
communication instruction to students as they progress through the senior capstone project and develop relationships with project stakeholders in industry. She also supports engineering communication program development, research, and implementation. Her Ph.D. research interests include social justice pedagogies; promoting diversity, equity and inclusion in higher education; service learning; program design and leadership; and qualitative research.Jacob Field, Oregon State UniversitySierra Kai Sverdrup, Oregon State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Report on a Student Community of Practice Program's Impact on Career Preparednessand Sense of Belonging Among Underserved
Paper ID #42820Incorporating an Entrepreneurial Mindset, Bio-Inspired Design, and STEAMApproach to Enhance Learning in a Computer Aided Design and ModelingClassDr. Thomas Aming’a Omwando, Simpson University Dr. Thomas Omwando holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee. He is an Assistant Professor and Director of Engineering program at Simpson University. His teaching interests are in statistical quality control, manufacturing processes, engineering/project management, engineering economy and production and operations analysis. His research interests are in sustainable manufacturing
fundamentals of analyzingstructural behavior, as well as, designing members. Varying topics are covered in these courses across bothundergraduate and graduate offerings. One topic that is not regularly covered is the pre-stressed concretedomain. Programs that do offer pre-stressed concrete frequently offer it at the graduate level where theemphasis frequently revolves around more theoretical behavior. Often missing, a critical emphasis area ofpre-stressed concrete, is practical post-tensioned (PT) concrete design and construction practices. In asearch of Civil (CE) and Architectural Engineering (AE) programs, only a handful offer PT, whichconsidering how many buildings and infrastructure projects use PT systems, is surprising. One factorimpacting the
during a yearlong capstone experience by adoptingtechnology as the binding medium. Here, this paper will discuss what software can support thenon-technical calculation aspects of a team, how software can be leveraged to promoteintegration and how to tie software into assignments. When collaboration, communication andmanagement technology is adopted, this study found that student teams are capable ofestablishing a cohesive and integrated design solutions. This capstone experience was scoped inthe context of buildings being used for projects; yet, results presented should be easily translatedto other infrastructure-based projects in Civil Engineering (CE).Keywords: Software, Capstone, Design Process, Communication, Collaboration
. As withmost 2020 summer programs, the SCR2 program was challenged by the novel corona virus(COVID-19) pandemic, which hit the United states during the recruitment period of theproject. Consequently, the project leadership team decided to offer the summer program remotely(on-line) rather than bring students to the participating three campuses across which the programis distributed. The planning and execution of the program during a global pandemic has broughtkey insights into techniques, methods, and technologies for effective cross-site communication,faculty advisor/mentor involvement, participant engagement, and leveraging the strong networkthat connects the participating schools. Essentially, a multi-site remote only combined REU
, there has been noshop training provided to the students to teach them safe and effective fabrication skills eventhough the projects require a wide range of fabrication techniques. Around 320 students areenrolled in the fall semester, 2007. These students are distributed into different lab sections. Eachof the labs consists of 30 students divided up into two different design teams of 15 studentsrespectively. Each lab is run by an instructor with the help of two undergraduate studentassistants (SAs). During the spring and fall semesters of 2007, a hands-on fabrication shop andspecialized training program was developed and implemented by the undergraduate teachingstaff. They applied the Total Quality Management (TQM) approach from business to
, Opportunity Identification, and Value Creation into Problem-based Learning Modules with Examples and Assessment Specific to Fluid MechanicsAbstractA variety of pedagogies have become well-established and widely used in engineering educationincluding problem-based learning (PBL), project-based learning, case-based learning, andinquiry-based learning. All of these classroom techniques certainly emphasize skill-basedlearning outcomes (e.g., determine the size of a pump), but they do not always emphasizemindset-based learning outcomes (e.g., identify an unexpected opportunity). Incorporatingelements of the entrepreneurial mindset into these pedagogies, sometimes referred to asentrepreneurially minded learning (EML), can
Institute and for the last seven years, he has also directed McCormick’s well-known freshman design course, Design Thinking and Communication, formerly En- gineering Design and Communication.Mrs. Stacy Benjamin, Northwestern University Stacy Benjamin has 20 years of experience specializing in innovation strategies, ideation, and user- centered engineering design. She worked for nine years at IDEO, in the Boston and Chicago offices, where she led projects and innovation workshops across a broad range of industries including medical, business, industrial, and consumer products. Stacy currently directs the Segal Design Certificate program at Northwestern University and she is a member of the Executive Committee for the
, several UAH MAE senior design teams have been able to work with NASA engineers on projects that are relevant to NASA’s mission. In April 2011, Dr. Carmen was selected as a Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award recipient.Mr. Ben Groenewald, Cape Peninsula University of Technology Ben Groenewald is Head of the EECE Dept. at CPUT in South Africa. He holds a Master of Science in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the University of Cape Town and is currently studying towards his PhD. He is a panel member of the organizing and editorial committee of the Domestic Use of Energy and the Industrial and Commercial Use of Energy conferences. He is a reviewer for both of these conferences
enterprise mission critical and capital projects. His research interests are in the field of engineering management and technology transfer, specifically on the economics and commercialization of renewable energy tech- nologies. His intellectual work has been published in international engineering management and systems engineering journals. His professional experience includes more than 10 years of work on industrial automation, dynamic systems control, reliability, six sigma, lean manufacturing, continuous processes improvement, and project and operations management. He obtained a bachelor degree in automation en- gineering from La Salle University in Colombia, a master’s degree in industrial processes’ automation
opportunity to teach the course. The curriculumdeveloped by the students was created to focus on three major disciplines: leadership identitydevelopment, innovative thinking, and hands on skills. These disciplines were taught in a studioenvironment through group discussions and interactive individual and group projects. This redesign effort by students not only resulted in a refined curriculum for the E-Leadprogram, but also improved the course by increasing the feeling of community for incomingstudents and thereby increased retention in the course from 60% to 92% (measured by the ratioof students that completed the course to those enrolled as of census day). More importantly, thisexperience of being placed in the curriculum development driver
Paper ID #25848A Systematized Literature Review of the Characteristics of Team MentalModels in Engineering Design ContextsMrs. Eunhye Kim, Purdue University, West Lafayette Eunhye Kim is a Ph.D. student and research assistant in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interests lie in engineering design education, especially for engineering stu- dents’ entrepreneurial mindsets and multidisciplinary teamwork skills in design and innovation projects. She earned a B.S. in Electronics Engineering and an M.B.A. in South Korea and worked as a hardware development engineer and an IT strategic planner
AC 2012-5106: ON INTEGRATING APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY RE-SPONSIVE TO COMMUNITY CAPABILITIES: A CASE STUDY FROMHAITIDr. William Joseph Frey, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez William Frey teaches business, computer, and engineering ethics at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez. For several years, he directed the university’s Center for Ethics in the Professions. His interests, besides practical and professional ethics, include moral pedagogy and moral psychology. He is active in the So- ciety for Ethics Across the Curriculum and the Association for Practical and Professional Ethics and has presented and participated in workshops at ASEE since 2000. He is also a Co-investigator on the project Graduate Research and
, P.h.D., P.E., is the professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Mas- sachusetts Lowell and has previously lectured at University of Pennsylvania’s EXMSE Program and at the University of California Irvine. He is the coordinator of the Design and Manufacturing Certificate, the Quality Engineering Certificate, the ME senior Capstone Projects and COOP education at UML. He is a past chairman of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) Robotics/FMS and a founding mem- ber of the Massachusetts Quality Award. He is the founder of the New England Lead Free Consortium. He is the author of several best-selling books on Concurrent Engineering, Six Sigma, Green Design and Engineering Project Management. He
team projects, iPodia students require dynamic forms of communication to facilitate remote collaboration that is more intimate and hands-on than a full classroom meeting. Utilizing web conferencing tools (e.g., such as Adobe Connect, WebEx, and Blue Jeans), student teams have the opportunity to interact via private chat rooms during class and self-organize project meetings after class to discuss research and share works as if they were meeting in person.(c) Connectivity after Class: Upon the social networking platforms, iPodia students actively share media content that they find interesting and relevant to the course with each other. Such social interactions outside the classroom in turn facilitate new discussions inside
likelihood of theirsuccess in a conventional programming class in a future semester. Equally significant, the coursemaintains student participation in the technical curriculum and will therefore be likely toimprove student retention. Other students seeking Matlab instruction, additional problem-solvingdevelopment, or an introduction to elementary game programming are also invited to enroll. Thecourse has also been accepted as a technical elective for non-engineering majors but is notapplicable toward the college’s Engineering Technology or Engineering Science degrees.The structure, curriculum, and class project used in the initial offering of the course are presentedin this paper. The real centerpiece of the course was a collaborative class project
design of bipolar devices are de-emphasized, but not eliminated. Similarly, we retainbasic coverage of discrete-component design. We add coverage of integrated circuitprocessing and the design of basic analog and mixed-signal circuits at the transistor andlayout levels.In the lab, students start with traditional exercises using operational amplifiers, discretecomponents, and circuit simulation. They next undertake integrated circuit projects thatinclude the design and layout of basic logic gates and differential pairs. The labconcludes with a capstone project where students design, lay out, and simulate complexcircuits based on material found in IEEE technical publications.The resulting course sequence gives ECE students a better understanding
Session 2213 The Vertical Integration of Design in Chemical Engineering Ronald J. Gatehouse, George J. Selembo Jr., and John R. McWhirter The Pennsylvania State UniversityAbstractThe purpose of this project is to better prepare chemical engineering students for their seniordesign course and for industry by exposing them to more design-oriented problems much earlierin their undergraduate careers. The feature that distinguishes engineering from the purelytheoretical sciences is that of synthesis. Any meaningful synthesis requires two basiccomponents, one that arises from the order of our scientific knowledge and
often either like STEM courses or artsand humanities courses. The goal of our program is to capture students’ perceived interests andsupport them in coming to see the relationship between the creative and performing arts andbroader STEM concepts. This goal was accomplished through the design, development, andimplementation of a variety of inquiry-based labs. These labs, which were developed primarilyby undergraduate and graduate engineering students, focused on a diverse set of topics includingimage processing, robotics, bioinformatics, and audio processing. Project staff implementedthese labs to students in an arts magnet school that is part of a large urban school district. In this paper, we discuss preliminary results from the first
. Participants were expected to take part in the afterschool program for two-years,beginning in their seventh grade, thereby providing for an in-depth year-round experience. Thiseffort is part of a three-year National Science Foundation (NSF) sponsored project under theInformation Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) program. Middleschool students took part in a long-term in-depth afterschool program over two-years thatincluded both school year and summer experiences where they engaged in a variety oftechnology-rich project-based challenges. Site selection met the NSF ITEST program objectivesof targeting underrepresented populations in the STEM fields. A purposeful selection strategywas used to select cohorts from four middle schools
Associate through the Eval- uation Consortium at the University at Albany/SUNY and Gullie Cnsultant Services/ZScore. She was the principal investigator in several educational grants including an NSF engineering grant supporting Histor- ically Black University and Colleges; ”Building Learning Communities to Improve Student Achievement: Albany City School District” , and ”Educational Leadership Program Enhancement Project at Syracuse University” Teacher Leadership Quality Program. She is also the PI on both ”Syracuse City School District Title II B Mathematics and Science Partnership: Science Project and Mathematics MSP Grant initiatives. She is currently the principle investigator on a number of grants including a 21st
evaluation. He is presently working on several project including the Environmental Protection Agency, Health and Human Services Administration on Aging and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, as well serving as the lead evaluation consultant to seven national centersEugene Brown, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Eugene Brown is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech. In addition to the Virginia Demonstration Project, he has worked on a number of STEM outreach programs and has published several papers describing these activities. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in thermodynamics and fluid mechanics.Gail Hardinge, College of William and Mary
that provide a significant design experience. While most engineering programs around theworld introduce design at distinct points in a curriculum, such as freshman and capstone design courses,we present the concept of a “4-D” design pedagogy, where design is integrated across courses, semesters,years, and extra-curricular activities. This pedagogy, or framework, may be implemented in whole or inpart in any engineering program.Building on this design pedagogy, we present the context of designiettes in terms of educational theories,the I-Engineering, and assessment. We then explore the strategic development and use of designiettes,and present a literature review on small scale design project efforts as they relate to the concept ofdesigniettes
AC 2012-3389: SYSTEM ENGINEERING COMPETENCY: THE MISSINGCOURSE IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONMr. Charles S. Wasson, Wasson Strategics, LLC Charles Wasson is an engineering textbook author, instructor, and consultant for Wasson Strategics, LLC, a professional training and consulting services firm specializing in systems engineering, technical project management, organizational development, and team development. In 2006, Wasson authored a new sys- tems engineering text entitled System Analysis, Design, and Development: Concepts, Principles, and Practices as part of the John Wiley & Sons’ System Engineering and Management series. The text re- ceived the Engineering Sciences Book of the Year Award from the International
. IntroductionThis is the fourth of four invited papers prepared for the special panel session of the ASEE-National Collaborative Task Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform. This paperaddresses the importance for federal government and U.S. industry to invest in a nationaldemonstration project with innovative universities across the country to accelerate thedevelopment of professional master of engineering and doctor of engineering programs that meetthe needs of engineers in industry in bolstering U.S. technological innovation for the nation’sfuture economic growth, global competitiveness, and national security.1.1 Benchmarking National StrategiesToday, as the United States competes in the global economy, its industries are facing
(STEM).Dr. Tamara Ball, University of California, Santa Cruz Dr. Tamara Ball is a project-scientist working with several education and research centers at the Univer- sity of California, Santa Cruz. Her work with the Institute for Science and Engineer Educators focuses on informing efforts to redesign undergraduate STEM education to reflect workplace practice and engage stu- dents in authentic scientific inquiry and problem solving through design. Her work Sustainable Engineer- ing and Ecological Design (SEED) collaborative at has focused on developing programmatic structures to support interdisciplinary and collaborative learning spaces for sustainability studies. She is the program director for Impact Designs
Paper ID #14844Facilitating Learner Self-efficacy through Interdisciplinary Collaboration inSustainable Systems DesignDr. Tela Favaloro, University of California, Santa Cruz Tela Favaloro received a B.S. degree in Physics and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the Univer- sity of California, Santa Cruz. She is currently working to further the development and dissemination of alternative energy technology; as project manager of a green building design initiative and researcher with the Center for Sustainable Engineering and Power Systems. Her background is in the development of characterization techniques and