strategy (J2), which contained 5sketched features, 4 copy features, one hole and one edge feature. Two additional parts weremodeled to determine whether the feature types would affect the complexity index calculations.Part A, shown in Figure 6, was modeled using only extrusions for A1, and a combination of Page 24.1093.6revolve and extrude features for A2. Part B, shown in Figure 7, was modeled using onlyextrusions for B1 but included a blend feature for B2. Results of the complexity calculations forparts modeled with these alternative strategies are shown in Table 1. Note that parts K and J weremodeled using the same collection of features for the
). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 4. Cox, M.F., London, J.S., Ahn, B., Zhu, J., Torres-Ayala, A.T., Frazier, S., & Cekic, O. (2011) Attributes of Success for Engineering Ph.D.s: Perspectives from Academia and Industry, 2011 Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (10 pages). 5. Ahn, B., Zhu, J., Cox, M.F., London, J.S., & Branch, S. (2013). Recommendations for Engineering Doctoral Education: Design of an Instrument to Evaluate Change. 2013 Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, Oklahoma City, OK. 6. Pruitt-Logan, A. S., Gaff, J. G., Jentoft, J. E. (2002). Preparing
rubric for assessing engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 2004. 93(2): p. 105-115.29. Borrego, M., et al., Using concept maps to assess interdisciplinary integration of green engineering knowledge. Advances in Engineering Education, 2009. 1(3): p. 1-26.30. Segalàs, J., D. Ferrer-Balas, and K.F. Mulder, What do engineering students learn in sustainability courses? The effect of the pedagogical approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010. 18(3): p. 275-284.31. Carew, A.L. and C.A. Mitchell, Characterizing undergraduate engineering students' understanding of sustainability. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2002. 27(4): p. 349 - 361.32. Hayles, C. and B. de la Harpe. A study of student
Proceedings of 2014 Zone 1 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE Zone 1) RFID-based Localization System for Mobile robot with Markov Chain Monte Carlo Hui Zhang, Joseph C Chen, Kai Zhang technologies for localizing mobile robots in indoorAbstract ---This paper proposes a robust and precise environments.localization system for mobile robots with the aid of Radio For localization, Ultra-wideband (UWB) and ultrasonicFrequency Identification (RFID) technology and the
succeed in the 21st Century. Aaron also holds a bachelor’s degree in English from the University of Cambridge, and a Masters in English and American literature from Stanford University.Mr. Eng Seng Ng, Stanford UniversityStephanie Bachas-Daunert, Stanford University Page 24.440.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014Grade Level: 6-8Authors: Shelley Goldman, Maureen Carroll, Molly B. Zielezinski, Stephanie Bachas-DaunertAuthor Contact Information: sgoldman@stanford.edu, mbullock@stanford.eduNext Generation Science Standards: MS-LS2-5 Ecosystems: Interactions, Energy, and DynamicsActivity
this project, we use Fig. 3. Schematic view of 8-bit static CMOS full adderCadence OrCAD PSPICE to build the circuit. The PSPICEschematic design of the one-bit CMOS full adder is shown There are 28 transistors in each block, so there are totallyin Figure 2. 224 transistors in the 8-bit CMOS full adder. In the simulation, I give 8 patterns to both input A and input B. The input A: a0a1a2a3a4a5a6a7 = ‘01111000’, ‘01101010’, ‘11101100
: The equation of Mixing Efficiency: where Ci is the mole percentage of the No. i dot in a certain area, n is the number of style points in a certain cross section,is the ideal mole percentage, Ci is a number in range from 0 to 1. When Ci is 0.5, it indicates A fluid and B fluid are mixed completely. The Intensity of Segregation and Variation
(3) I J L m I J Tenterprises must meet the requirements of stable production or ∑∑∑∑ cijkltm xijklt ≤ ∑∑ cijm , ∑ xijklt ≤ X ijkloutput orders; b. quality, enterprises must control the scrap i =1 j =1 l t i =1 j =1 t =1rate or product failure rate within a certain percentage; c. costsor expenses, enterprises take profit and efficiency as thecentral tasks, so the economic indicators like the input and III. MODEL ALGORITHMoutput must be controlled to a feasible extent or the cost
it all into motor rotations for the robot. For more challengingtask, the robot was required to start in Zone A, touch Zone B, and finish in Zone 3. These threezones were spread out on the board. This taught them about turning, program modularity, errorchecking, and the importance of testing small portions of code.The second project was a video project. The campers were asked to identify a real-worldproblem and design a solution using robotics. Using the Linkbots, they then had to create a videoto explain the problem and their solution. This project was designed to show them how they canuse their skills in engineering, computing, and robotics to solve problems, something girls seemto identify with. They were also able to use their seemingly
issues leading to loss of data are of utter importance.encoding technique in order to perform an expedited search Proper implementation is essential at all stages for theover encrypted text ensuring the security enhancements in medium to be secure. We emphasize securing the clustersbig data. and the network technologies illustrated in the Fig.1 because they seek specific concern in order to substantiateKeywords - Big Data, Cluster, Hadoop, Security the eradication of vulnerabilities. I. INTRODUCTION Databases works on a very
, J.S., “A handbook for classroom management that works,” Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development (ASCD), Alexandria, VA, pp 166, 2005.3. B. Van Veen, “Flipping SignalProcessing Instruction, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine,” vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 145 – 150, 2013. DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2013.22766504. A. Seidman, “The Learning Killer: Disruptive Student Behavior in the Classroom”, Reading Improvement, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 4046, 2005.5. C. M. Clark, and P. J. Springer, , “Thoughts on incivility: student and faculty perceptions of uncivil behavior in nursing education,” Nursing Education Perspectives, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 93–97, Mar.–Apr. 2007.6. D. Wingert, and T. Molitor, “Best Practices: Preventing and
Transforming Engineering Education. Special Session. Frontiers of Education Conference. Washington, D.C.19. Greenfield, B., & Jensen, G. M. (2010). Beyond a code of ethics: phenomenological ethics for everyday practice. Physiotherapy Research International, 15(2), 88-95.20. Habermas, J. (1998). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.21. Harris, C. E., Jr. (2013). Engineering Ethics: From Preventative Ethics to Aspirational Ethics. In Michelfelder, D.P. et al (eds). Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles, and Process. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.22. Hett, A. (2004) Nanotechnology: small matter, many unknowns, Zurich, Switzerland
engineering education and research." International journal of electrical power & energy systems 24.10 (2002): 799-805.31. Kezunovic, M. "Teaching the smart grid fundamentals using modeling, simulation, and hands-on laboratory experiments." Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2010 IEEE. IEEE, 2010.32. Karady, George G., et al. "Role of laboratory education in power engineering: Is the virtual laboratory feasible? I." Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 2000. IEEE. Vol. 3. IEEE, 2000.33. Larsson, Mats. "ObjectStab-an educational tool for power system stability studies." Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on 19.1 (2004): 56-63.34. Nasiruzzaman, A. B. M. "A student friendly toolbox for power system analysis using MATLAB
Paper ID #9979Elements of Teaching Design under UncertaintyProf. Stephen Ekwaro-Osire, Texas Tech University Dr. Stephen Ekwaro-Osire is the associate dean of research and graduate programs in the Whitacre Col- lege of Engineering at Texas Tech. He is also a full professor in the Department of Mechanical Engi- neering and a licensed professional engineer in the state of Texas. He most recently served as the interim chair of the Department of Industrial Engineering. Before that, he served as the director of the graduate program and graduate advisor. Prior to that, he was the director of the undergraduate program in the
struggling student. One of the bestsystem. However, if problems B, C, and D all depend on A’s examples is CyclePad, a fully implemented articulate virtualvalue, then system might force a student to redo his or her laboratory that uses qualitative reasoning to capturework on problems B, C, and D. This can often surprise the thermodynamic knowledge from an introductory textbookunsuspecting student, leading to frustration. [10]. It provides explanations of calculations and coaching Another issue is the human-computer interface. We know support for students through a major portion of a semester’sthat the software must be friendly and accommodating to all training in thermodynamics, including key
statistic numbers. E3 =RANK(D3,$D$3:$D$23) Create a rank ordering invalues assuming data come from a single population. The values in column D.Figure1 shows the spreadsheet implementation of this F3 =VLOOKUP(E3,$A$3:$B$23,2) Resample the values inexample. We separate our data into three sets at random and column B. B25 =SUM(B3:B10) Compute the sum of thecalculate the value of the test statistic. This value is
resilient global operations• Education and Training Air: Anti-Access, Area Denial (A2/AD) Global Vigilance, Reach and Power dependent upon contested Global Domains and Globalized Industrial Sectors Distribution A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 6 Air Challenges and Opportunities Contested Congested Constrained Military Expenditure ($B
largerpopulation. The steps for the research method are depicted in Figure 1. Qual. Data Quant. Data Qual. & Qualitative Survey Collection Collection Quant. Claims Hypotheses (Phases 1&2) (Phases 1&2) Findings Figure 1: General research methods strategyFirst, two phases of qualitative research methods were employed. The first phase, a collection ofopen-ended questionnaire responses, assessed (a) the educational gains of EWB-USA membersand (b) descriptions
Do Women Select Engineering? 79% of female engineering majors decided to pursue engineering in their junior or senior year of high school Majority identified specific classes, curricular, or co- curricular activities as when they learned about engineering as a major or professionLehr, J.L., Finger, H., Kwang, B. (2012) When, Why, How, Who – Lessons from First Year FemaleEngineering Students at Cal Poly for Efforts to Increase Recruitment. (Annual Conference of the 8Pacific Southwest Section of the American Society for Engineering Education)Students who took an AP Exam in a particular content area were more likelyto major in a related discipline in college than students
performance can be achieved; b) If achieved,performance will lead to desired outcomes; and c) Those outcomes will lead to satisfaction.7Research applying Expectancy x Value theory has shown that engineering students who havehigher expectations will have better academic performance 8, and those who see higher value fora task will persist longer.7 Expectancy x Value theory has been developed to examine students'motivations toward long-term goals at a degree or course level.7Expectancy was operationalized to assess how students expected to do in an introductoryengineering course. Survey items evaluating expectancy include, “I expect to do well in thisengineering course” and, “I am confident I can do an excellent job on the assignments and testsin this
with embedded systems before? If, yes, please specify the course(s), projects developed, and devices used. 6. Have you worked with open-source embedded systems? i.e. Arduino, Raspberry Pi, etc. Please specify with which devices you have worked and enumerate the projects developed.For Questions 2-4, students selected their response from a simple choice list of options. Theoptions were: (a) A lot, (b) Some, (c) A little, and (d) None. Questions 5 and 6 included fields thatoffered students the opportunity to elaborate in their responses.3.3 Post-Tutorial Survey QuestionsThe questions of the post-tutorial survey allowed for collecting feedback from the students abouttheir experience conducting the exercises in the tutorial modules
Employment Projections, "STEM Occupations", Occupational Outlook Quarterly 2007, BLS 4. Occupational Outlook Handbook www.bls.gov/oco. 5. J. Kuenzi, C.Matthew, and B. Mangan, "Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education Issues and Legislative Options", CRS Report for Congress, 2006. 6. Bonvillian, W. B. "Science at a crossroads", The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology Journal, 16, 915–921, 2002. 7. Gonzales, P., Guzmán, J. C., Partelow, L., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., Kastberg, D., & Williams, T., "Highlights from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)", Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education
Education, 31 (1): 30-43.2. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook 1, Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.3. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.4. National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.5. [Reference redacted for blind review]6. [Reference redacted for blind review]7. Boelkins, M. (2013). Active Calculus. Electronic book available at http://faculty.gvsu.edu/boelkinm/Home/ Download.html .8. Hake, R.. (1998
Scutt, H. I., Gilmartin, S. K., Sheppard, S. & Brunhaver, S. in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.10 Bird, B. Implementing Entrepreneurial Ideas: The Case for Intention. Academy of Management Review 13, 442-453 (1988).11 Lee, L., Wong, P. K., Foo, M. D. & Leung, A. Entrepreneurial Intentions: The Influence of Organizational and Individual Factors. Journal of Business Venturing 26, 124-136 (2011).12 Ajzen, I. Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32, 665-683 (2002).13 Krueger, N. F. & Carsrud, A. L. Entrepreneurial Intentions: Applying the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Entrepreneurship & Regional
theengineering faculty especially for continuous improvement on an ongoing basis rather than ayear before evaluation time.Conclusions 1. ABET Assessment process has demonstrated accomplishment in improving the quality of education, yet some important attributes of education such as the creativity and the development of an ability to think have not been given due attention they deserve. 2. In the assessment process, regarding employer survey, there should be a way to check if the data collected is representative of all the areas across a discipline in engineering. 3. There is a need to assign a level of importance to the five Engineering Skills based attributes (a, b, c, e and k) with respect to the other professional skill
: Examining practicing professionals. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 68(2), 14-26.17. Hartman, N. W. (2009). Defining expertise in the use of constraint-based CAD tools by examining practicing professionals. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 69(1), 6-15.18. Peng, X., McGary, P., Johnson, M., Yalvac, B., & Ozturk, E. (2012). Assessing novice CAD model creation and alteration. Computer-Aided Design & Applications, PACE, (2), 9-19.19. Rynne, A., Gaughran, W. F., & Seery, N. (2010). Defining the variables that contribute to developing 3D CAD modelling expertise. In E. Norman & N. Seery (Eds.), Graphicacy and Modelling. The International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum
UnLecture V: Software Engineering Ethics and Technology/Patent WarsRetrospection:Part I: Ethics1.1. What are your personal ethical principles related to a) workplace b) software engineering. You may give specific examples.1.2. What ethical questions have arisen in your professional experience? Explain how you (or the person involved) resolved the dilemma? Relate each experience to a clause in the IEEE/ACM Software Engineering Code of Ethics (include the clause #).1.3. Pick a specific clause from one of the 8 principles in the IEEE/ACM Software Engineering Code of Ethics (include the clause #). Critique the selected clause quantitatively. Include examples, as needed. Note: Avoid using the same clause for both (1.2) and (1.3).1.4
(Unpublished manuscript). 1993, Syracuse University: Syracuse, New York. 39. Leuf, B. and W. Cunningham, The wiki way: Collaboration and sharing on the internet. . 2001. 40. Auyung, L., Building a collaborative online learning community: a case study in hong kong. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2004 31(2): p. 119-‐136. 41. Jonassen, D., et al., eds. Learning to solve problems with technology: A Constructivist Perspective (2nd ed.). 2003: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill. 42. Wial, H. and A. Friedhoff, Bearing the Brunt: Manufacturing Job Loss in the Great Lakes Region, 1995–2005, in Metro
Leading Apparel Specialty Retailers’ CSR Practices as Communicated on Corporate Websites: Problems and Opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013: p. 1-24.9. Brito, M.P.d., V. Carbone, and C.M. Blanquart, Towards a sustainable fashion retail supply chain in Europe: Organisation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008. 114(2): p. 534-553.10. Nagurney, A. and M. Yu, Sustainable fashion supply chain management under oligopolistic competition and brand differentiation. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012. 135(2): p. 532-540.11. Wiengarten, F., M. Pagell, and B. Fynes, Supply chain environmental investments in dynamic industries: Comparing investment and performance
, Frontiers in Process Modeling Symposium, New Orleans, March 9 – 13, 2008. 5. Greene, A. (1996). Decision-Support Tools Provide Competitive Edge. Managing Automation, March 1996, p.8. 6. McIlvaine, B. (1996). Planning and Scheduling Gets the Job Done. Managing Automation, August 1996, pp.24-26. 7. Wu, P.Y. (1999) Visual Capacity Modeling for Interactive Production Planning, Proceedings of the Computer Technology Solutions Conference (CTSC’99), Detroit, Michigan, published by the American Society of Manufacturing Engineers. 8. Takahashi, K. (2008) Increase Profits with a Production Planning Scheduler. Retrieved September 2013 from http://www.lean-manufacturing-japan.com/advanced-planning-scheduling. 9