. Page 23.469.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Electric Vehicle Circuit and Electrical System Senior Lab ProjectAbstractAs part of a multidisciplinary team, electrical engineering students worked with computer andmechanical engineering students to create a small-scale electric vehicle. The major tasks of theteam were design and performance prediction; fabrication of the vehicle, control circuits, andcomputer data acquisition board; system integration and testing; racing the vehicles against otherteams; and comparing performance data to predictions. This paper will discuss the electricalengineering students’ design efforts for the project. The
Session 3548 Do Not Optimize, Solve the Problem – Development of Critical Thinking Skills in DFM Small Projects Zbigniew Prusak Central Connecticut State UniversityAbstractThis paper describes activities, requirements and assessment techniques used in small projects inDesign for Manufacturing course. The projects are assigned to teams of 3 to 7 students, and thevast majority of work is done in class under specific time constraints. The team size and timeconstraints for each problem on hand try to imitate real work environment of time-constrainedmeetings
events (green upward triangles)this project and their course work in the ECE department at the University, we have reviewedhow many credit hours of course work in the department would be directly related to thisproject. It should be first noted that students in the current ECE curriculum at the University arerequired to take a total of 131 credit hours (electrical engineering option, or EE) or 132 credithours (computer engineering option, or CE). This includes (1) 48 credit hours of the LiberalStudies Core composed of theology, philosophy, ethics/moral responsibility, history, writing,speech, fine arts, literature, social science, science, mathematics, first-year seminar, leadershipseminar, and senior capstone; (2) 20-23 additional credit hours
Session 2563 Innovative Approaches to Collaborative Design Projects Mark Rajai, Ali Kashef University of Memphis/University of Northern IowaAbstractRapid changes in technology and a global economic recession have prompted many leadingmanufacturing companies to reevaluate and upgrade their design and manufacturing process.An increasing number of these companies have moved from traditional design environment to avirtual one. Companies such as Boeing have utilized various new software/tools and adoptedinnovative technologies to reduce cost and time to market for new products. In
student, an assessment of the individual student’scontribution to the project, and the student’s individual oral presentations during the semester.EXAMPLE PROJECTS Over the past seven years at least 30 different companies have furnished projects for thesenior capstone course in the manufacturing engineering technology program at Texas A&MUniversity. Some companies have supplied multiple projects. Some past projects are listed below by project title: 1. Aircraft food tray design and manufacture 17. Gate and riser standardization 2. Aircraft skin modifications 18. Injection mold die changing 3. Analytical test device manufacture 19. Foundry ladle skimming 4. Dust/wood chip separation
- Applied Systems ● Engineering Technology - Technical Operations (off-campus distance) ● Master of Science in Engineering TechnologyThe school has a focus on practice and strives to prepare students for industry. To achieve thisgoal the school has adopted a Project Based Learning (PBL) core that has a common core of fiveproject courses, with at least one in each year of the program. The first two courses, ENGR 199and 200, focus on the basics of project work and act to level students’ abilities. ENGR 350 has afocus on entrepreneurial product design. ENGR 400 and 450 are the capstone project courses.The capstone projects are done for industry and typically include product design, test equipment,production equipment, or process
Business Projects and Authentic Learning Angie Crist Russ Newcomer Michael Propst Pedro Leite Engineering Technology Department Computer Systems Technology Kansas State University – Salina Abstract This paper describes our experiences working with two student-led team projects: an internship project and a volunteer project. Both projects involved the design, development, and
golfball shooter for their capstone project. These students applied their knowledge of CADD, FluidPower, Machine Tool Technology and Dynamics, and successfully completed the project. Thereare numerous application-oriented publications in the area of Engineering Mechanics and wehave cited two of them in this paper.1, 2 We hope our course related hands-on project will inspirethe ET faculty community further and many more interesting projects will be presented at thefuture ASEE conferences.Introduction:Middle Tennessee State University is one of the fastest growing universities in the United States.We have about 28,000 students and our Engineering Technology (ET) is one of the tendepartments in the college of Basic and Applied Sciences. The ET
approach provides students the opportunities to work withindustry on projects in a real operational environment. These experiences give students solidtechnical education, strengthen their project management skills, and expose them to significantengineering challenges found in real industrial settings.Lenoir10 presented guidelines for success for capstone projects. Moore11 discussed issues Page 8.301.1involved in externally sponsored senior projects. Jordan and Schell12 pointed out some legal Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American
Session 1566without him.Bibliography[1] Faste, R., B. Roth, and D.J. Wilde, “Integration of Creativity into the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum,”ASME Resource Guide to Innovation in Design Education, Cary A. Fisher, Ed., American Society of MechanicalEngineers, New York, 1993.[2] "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Effective for Evaluations during the 2001-2002 AccreditationCycle," ABET, 2000. (http://www.abet.org/images/Criteria/eac_criteria_b.pdf)[3] Dutson, Alan J. et al, 1997. "A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses," Journal of Engineering Education. 86(1):17-28.[4] Marin, John A., James E. Armstong Jr., and James L. Kays, "Elements of an Optimal Capstone Experience,"1999
departments of business and accounting, computer science, and mechanical engineering.In this project, ME students have had an opportunity for understanding the basic structure of costestimating relationship (CER) equations and AI techniques. This professional expertise can beeffectively and efficiently applied to economic analysis in the Senior Capstone Design and tofurther solve ill-structured problems the professional setting.5. Concluding remarksThese types of team dynamics are not common among engineering students in the traditionallecture setting. Allowing students to form teams with multiple disciplines and to work on projectsthat require knowledge from many different areas of study affords them a great opportunity forbroadening the scope of
;www.mines.edu/academic/epics/ values, society & decisions; environment, resources, science & technology; international studies.University of Dayton, OH. Engineering ETHOS provides international service internships as wellin Technical, Humanitarian as through collaborative research and hands-on classroomOpportunities of Service (ETHOS) projects that support the development of appropriatequickplace.udayton.edu/ETHOS technologies for the developing world.Georgia Tech. School of Civil & Courses include: Lab for Sustainable Design & Construc-Environmental Engineering. tion; Sustainable Issues for
and Design Requirements. Students work in teams of 3 throughout the semester.Various software tools are used and the final design is presented to the class. Each team mustproduce a detailed set of engineering drawings as well as a final design report. The designproject is extremely valuable in teaching the importance of team project organization and timing,as well as tolerancing, manufacturing techniques, fits and producing detailed engineeringdrawings. Finally, the design project supported the ABET Student Outcome 5 and 7: Ability tofunction effectively on a team, and Ability to acquire new knowledge. These outcomes areassessed with an in-class survey and results reported.1. IntroductionThe use of design projects (or capstone projects) is an
educationand professional journals shows multiple proposals for specific capstone and senior projects, butlittle about the special requirements for teaching such projects online. These results are evidenceof a need to address the specific challenges and requirements for online teaching of seniorprojects. Online learning requires the student to participate and learn virtually via computer, asopposed to in a traditional classroom environment. Though online learning is not for everyone,it's important for prospective students to determine whether or not it's something they would liketo pursue1,2,3. The following are pros and cons for online learning:Pros(a)- Online learning provides flexibility because students are able to work when it's convenient
ratheran introduction to project management and spreadsheets as an Engineering design tool. The classhas a very strong hands-on component using Microsoft Excel and MS Project. The students arethen required to use both tools in their later courses, particularly in their laboratory courses andplanning/tracking of the Capstone Design course. These students also take a Technical Writingcourse from the English Department to prepare them for report writing.We use several assignments of increasing difficulty to expose the students to Excel as a designtool and Project to organize and track a project. The quarter culminates with small teams ofstudents using both tools to design, plan, and track a virtual project of their choice such asstarting a small
at Purdue University is offered as one section of therequired senior year capstone design course in the Aerospace Engineering curriculum4. Thatcourse is structured such that several local teams are formed, and at least two projectproposals are formally submitted to the RGSFOP program, with the best from among thelocal project plans being selected for submission to RGSFOP. This obviously would be abetter format, but is only feasible with a greater commitment of resources from the offeringdepartment (e.g., what appears to be secure funding for two or more teams per year, and fullcourse load credit for the course instructor). However, at WVU the Aerospace Engineeringsenior capstone design course has always been, and appears likely to remain for
the project regarding how well the team met the course goals and objectives. • In-Progress Reviews. The faculty advisor holds numerous In-Progress Reviews with each team (two during the first semester and four during the second semester) to discuss their successes, challenges, and project assignments. • System Requirements Specification. Students write a technical report for each of the major design elements and the final capstone computer systems design which requires them to demonstrate their knowledge of technological, social, political, economic, and ethical factors and an understanding of the impact on their system design. Students must also work with their
mechatronics curriculum developmentefforts: an undergraduate concentration in mechatronics, Frontiers in Education, 2005. FIE '05. Proceedings 35thAnnual Conference 19-22 Oct. 2005 Page(s):F3F - 7-8[8] V. Genis, W. Rosen, R. Chiou, W. Danley, J. Milbrandt, G. Marekova, S. Racz,T. Kitchener, and B. LaVay, Laboratory- and Project-Based Courses in the Engineering Technology Curriculum,Philadelphia, PA Fall proceeding of ASEE Mid Hudson Section 2007[9] Murray, W.R.; Garbini, J.L.; Mechatronics capstone design projects at the University of Washington, AdvancedIntelligent Mechatronics, 1999. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE/ASME International Conference on 19-23 Sept. 1999Page(s):598 - 604[10] Weiner , Tim, New Model Army Soldier Rolls Closer to Battle, NY Times
industry sponsor perspectives.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the HPI-Stanford Design Thinking Research Program. Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Regional Conference 19Bibliography1. Prince, MJ, RM Felder, “Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases,” Journal of Engineering Education, April 1995, pp. 165-174.2. Dutson, AJ, RH Todd, SP Magleby, CD Sorensen, RH Todd, “A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, January 1997, pp. 17
mechatronics curriculum developmentefforts: an undergraduate concentration in mechatronics, Frontiers in Education, 2005. FIE '05. Proceedings 35thAnnual Conference 19-22 Oct. 2005 Page(s):F3F - 7-8[8] V. Genis, W. Rosen, R. Chiou, W. Danley, J. Milbrandt, G. Marekova, S. Racz,T. Kitchener, and B. LaVay, Laboratory- and Project-Based Courses in the Engineering Technology Curriculum,Philadelphia, PA Fall proceeding of ASEE Mid Hudson Section 2007[9] Murray, W.R.; Garbini, J.L.; Mechatronics capstone design projects at the University of Washington, AdvancedIntelligent Mechatronics, 1999. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE/ASME International Conference on 19-23 Sept. 1999Page(s):598 - 604[10] Weiner , Tim, New Model Army Soldier Rolls Closer to Battle, NY Times
of the instructional strategy. Cheville and Bunting [8] and Smith [9]have showed that higher levels of competencies can be developed by active learning, often usingteams and projects. Simpson et al. [10] advocate interdisciplinary capstone projects since thatexperience is more representative of what students will find in the real world. Prince and Felder[11] have found out that inductive methods like project-based learning are more effective thantraditional deductive methods, for achieving a broad range of learning outcomes. Schaffer et al.[12] have concluded – based on their study of 256 students from 60 teams - that crossdisciplinary team learning increases self-efficacy. Apelian [13] believes that one of the importantskills for the 21st
psychrometrics in cooling units-understanding the implications involved in converting salt water into freshwaterWith the goal of encouraging creativity the performance of each design was minimallyweighted in the grading and the design aspect was completely open-ended. Theinstructor was available for questions and to help recognize potential issues but refrainedfrom offering suggestions during the design phase. As heat transfer or fluid mechanicscourses typically follow thermodynamics the project was not intended to be a capstone,but did provide valuable experience from which a student could build from in a futuresenior design project. The project also provided an opportunity to present a qualitative
reflect the actual needs ofthe student. Students too may not be fully knowledgeable of the design depth requirement attheir home institution. In some instances design projects are not convincingly sufficient to meethome institution requirements. Advanced advising at the home institution is essential butconsidering the many steps and barriers involved in the application process this is oftenoverlooked.One Semester Design Experience. EPS is a semester long design experience. Many capstonedesign requirements in the U.S. are two semesters in length. There is always the question as towhether this one semester experience will count toward the capstone design requirement in theU.S.Academic Calendar Differences. There are significant differences in the U
and tools for technology commercialization and entrepreneurship 6. Create start-up, technology-based, revenue-generating ventures that will create jobs in Brevard County, FloridaCourses Supporting the ProgramCourse 1: Senior Design – This is the series of three System Design capstone core courses,beginning with Junior Design in the spring of the Junior year, which focus on conceiving,defining, designing, validating and demonstrating innovative new product ideas. System DesignI and System Design II are taken in the Fall and Spring terms of the senior year. The studentswork on cross-functional teams and learn by participating in and delivering results for businessplanning, new product development, project management, project
course is one of the main precursors of Senior Design capstone course, having embedded inits curricula, besides seven laboratory activities, a final student-led team project that has the mainoutcome, a working prototype of a thermo-fluid system. The unique character of this courseconsists in being the only exposure that our students will have to heat and mass transferphenomena through laboratory activities enhanced by lectures. Laboratory activities account fortwo thirds of the course, while the classroom-lecture part, only for one third. The materialconveyed primarily, is using hands-on approaches.During this course students will explore experimentally basic thermodynamic relations; they willconduct experiments related to flow of compressible
the learning outcomes for the engineers, and to identify possible improvements; Interviews of Masters students in education who are also classroom teachers; Surveys of all senior engineering undergraduates in order to compare learning outcomes for students who work on community projects with those who work on traditional capstone projects; Pre- and post-lesson surveys to gauge middle school students’ comfort level with science, math, and engineering, and understanding of engineers and what they do; and Teacher-generated assessments in science class and math class to measure the student learning from the lesson plans developed.Learning Outcomes for Engineering Students These projects
structural engineering path acompanion course could be developed as part of a senior level capstone project. This coursecould use the design and analysis skills developed over the student’s academic career to designand build a structure. This could range from a pedestrian bridge to tensegrity domes. Thepossibilities are open to student’s imagination and determination. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education References1. Ressler, S. J, “Designing and Building File-Folder Bridges: A Problem-Based Introduction
. For example, in one course Inormally have 10 teams of 5-7. In the past it would be normal to have 4 dysfunctional teams persemester. Now, the rate is typically one. The process is much more enjoyable for me and the stu-dents.Another welcome outcome is that the students who are normally having problems in groups findthemselves in teams where they can thrive. As a result many of them produce surprising results. Itis inspiring when a team that (on paper) should have been easily defeated has the strongest show-ing.Bibliography1. Jendrucko, R. J., Wasserman, J.F., “Optimizing Student Learning in a BME Capstone Design Course Sequence”,ASEE Annual Meeting, 2004.2. Jack, H., Ray, J., Farris, J., “Design and Build Projects as a Curriculum Thread
Marine Biology Ecology Water Treatment CEE Core Course Water Resources Water Management Figure 8: Impact at college courses. Page 12.823.10VII. SummaryThis paper presents a multi-year project of designing and fabricating a robotic aqua probesystem. The course structure and content described in the paper can be easily adopted byother institutions for their capstone design or pertinent courses as laboratory experiments.The
be used as a comparisonwith forces derived from pressure distribution measurements.It is sometimes difficult to get students to fully complete a course project that is a part of acourse with lectures and labs since they have homework problems and reading assignments at thesame time as they work on their project. A project of the extent that has been shown in this paperis probably better suited for a senior capstone design project where the students can concentratemore on the project itself. Alternatively, one can let the students work on the same project duringtwo different courses scheduled either during the same semester or two consecutive semesters.The cost of building the experiment described in this paper was around $3,200 including