understand how toseek assistance and navigate college campuses, are most likely persist to degree completion.Accordingly, this research seeks to examine a sample of non-traditional college students enrolledin science and engineering programs in four urban community colleges to determine (a) the typesand frequency of support practices they utilize, (b) how such practices influence theirachievement, persistence and transfer status to four year colleges and universities, and (c) how inturn their propensity for innovation and creative problem solving affects such choices andpersistence. The study analyzes the pedagogical practices—practices designed to fostersuccessful transfer from community college to four-year colleges and universities and
(37) =-2.02, p = .025 0.33 Pre: 4.43 t(37) = 0.75, p = .2288 -Performance/Comp. Post: 4.67 Post: 4.36BeliefsNote. Survey were collected at the beginning of the semester (Pre) and at the end of the semester (Post). Arrows are intended to signaldirectional changes in mean values. Green arrows signal desirable changes. Red arrows signal undesirable changes.References[1] J. Feldman, Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms. Corwin Press, 2018.[2] L. B. Nilson, Specifications grading: Restoring rigor, motivating students, and saving faculty time. Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2015.[3] G. A
already had with a resistance of R1 = 6 Ω [Look at the new diagram and try to find the second electrical device.] Let’s call the current flowing through the first electrical device I1, and the current flowing through the second electrical device I2. In contrast, the contextualized diagrams represented the electrical circuit componentswith life-like images, as illustrated in Fig. 1(b). The contextualized text presented the electricalquantities and circuit components as well as total resistance calculation and practice problems inthe context of real-life scenarios, as illustrated by the following excerpt corresponding to Fig. 1: Imagine that you connect a second light bulb with a resistance R2= 12 Ω in parallel to the
-Breneman, “What is an Equitable Makerspace?,” in Proceedings of the ISAM conference, 2022.[2] A. Longo, B. Yoder, R. Chavela Guerra, and R. Tsanov, “University Makerspaces: Characteristics and Impact on Student Success in Engineering and Engineering Technology Education,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2017, p. 29061. doi: 10.18260/1-2--29061.[3] M. B. Jensen and M. Steinert, “User research enabled by makerspaces: bringing functionality to classical experience prototypes,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. AI EDAM, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 315–326, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1017/S089006042000013X.[4] P. M. Ludwig, J. K. Nagel, and E. J. Lewis, “Student Learning
Paper ID #34432Streamlining the Path from Community College to Engineering DegreeCompletionDr. Christy Wheeler West, University of South Alabama Christy Wheeler West is an associate professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engi- neering at the University of South Alabama, where she also serves as Director of the Office of Undergrad- uate Research. She holds a Ph.D. from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. from the University of Alabama. She teaches material and energy balances and chemical reactor design, and endeavors to incorporate student professional development in her courses.Dr. Eric J. Steward
underrepresented group. In addition to scholarshipsupport, CLEAR Scholars are provided with an intentional set of activities that promotes studentretention, achievement, and persistence to graduation through: (a) Community-building througha cohort model; (b) Leadership and career development; (c) Engagement with industry; (d)Advising through mentoring; and (e) Resources for academic success (hence the acronymCLEAR). The ultimate goal of this project is to produce engineering graduates with lowerstudent loan indebtedness and greater preparation for post-degree roles.Entering the ProgramStudents apply for the CLEAR Scholars program as rising sophomores. To qualify, they must beengineering majors with a GPA of at least 2.7 earned in freshman math, science
introductorydynamics,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[6] C. A. Moulton, A. Dubrowski, H. Macrae, B. Graham, E. Grober, and R. Reznick,“Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect?: a randomized, controlledtrial,” Annals of surgery, 244(3), 400-409, 2006.[7] K. A. Ericsson, “Acquisition and maintenance of medical expertise,” Academic Medicine,90(11), 1471-1486., 2015.[8] S. Andersen; P. Mikkelsen, L. Konge, P. Caye-Thomassen, and M. S. Sørensen, “Cognitiveload in distributed and massed practice in virtual reality mastoidectomy simulation,” TheLaryngoscope, 126(2), E74-E79, 2016.[9] J. v. Merrienboer, P. A. Kirschner, Ten Steps to Complex Learning: A Systematic Approachto Four-Component
Engineering Education, 94(1), 57–72.10. 2010 U.S. Census Data. (2010). Retrieved January 10, 2014, from www.census.gov/2010census/data11. Miller Jr., J. A. (2003). The Science and Engineering Workforce: Realizing America’s Potential. Rep. No. NSB 03-79.12. Keith, J. L., Ayer, D. B., Rees, E., Freda, D. V., Lowe, J. K., & Day, J. (2003). Brief of Amici Curiae Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Leland Stanford Junior University, EI Du Pont de Nemours and Company, International Business Machines Corp., National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, National Action Council, 02-241.13. Wulf, W. A. (1988). Diversity in Engineering. The Bridge, 24(4).14. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st
Paper ID #13195Evidence of Students’ Engineering Learning in an Elementary ClassroomKristina Maruyama Tank, Iowa State University Kristina M. Tank is an Assistant Professor of Science Education in the School of Education at Iowa State University. She currently teaches undergraduate courses in science education for elementary education majors. As a former elementary teacher, her research and teaching interests are centered around improv- ing elementary students’ science and engineering learning and increasing teachers’ use of effective STEM instruction in the elementary grades. With the increased emphasis on improved
. 2. 2006.[8] A. Godwin, “The Development of a Measure of Engineering Identity,” 123rd Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Annu. Conf. Expo., p. 15, 2016.[9] Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, P. M. Sadler, and M.-C. Shanahan, “Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 47, no. 8, p. n/a-n/a, 2010.[10] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Women Engineering Students and Self-Efficacy: A Multi-Year, Multi-Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self- Efficacy,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 27–38, 2009.[11] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Westview
. (1983). Inquiring systems and problem structures: Implications for cognitive developments. Human Development, 26, 249-265.7. Perry, W. G. (1968/1999). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College years: A Scheme. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.8. King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.9. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10. Hofer, B. & Pintrich, P. (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.11. Moore, W. S. (2002). Understanding
open-ended andLikert scale format questions (Appendix B). Both surveys underwent a face and contentvalidation process. During the face validation base, we conducted three rounds of assessments toensure that the survey questions were clear and understandable to participants. Simultaneously,we carried out three rounds of content validation, which involved consulting subject matter andengineering education experts to assess the relevance and comprehensiveness of the surveycontent.Data CollectionPhase 1: Interview with the Instructor & Student Baseline SurveyInterview with the Instructor: A 45-minute Zoom interview was scheduled with the courseinstructor, The semi-structured interview's purpose was to gain insights from the
largerpopulation. The steps for the research method are depicted in Figure 1. Qual. Data Quant. Data Qual. & Qualitative Survey Collection Collection Quant. Claims Hypotheses (Phases 1&2) (Phases 1&2) Findings Figure 1: General research methods strategyFirst, two phases of qualitative research methods were employed. The first phase, a collection ofopen-ended questionnaire responses, assessed (a) the educational gains of EWB-USA membersand (b) descriptions
socioeconomic status [16]), whichmay negatively impact design performance. Additionally, the limits of human cognition begin tobe tested as the number and complexity of trade-offs, constraints, and user needs that must beconsidered grows [4], [13]. Finally, traditional/manual design approaches are resource intensivedue to the amount of time required for creating preliminary designs, and for manually correctingpotential errors made by the human designer during these tasks.Figure 1. (a) Genetic algorithms exploring possible solutions for renewable solar-energy systemsin the Aladdin CAD software [8]; (b) Variational autoencoders for structure-aware designgeneration [9]; (c) CAD model generation using large language models, such as ChatGPT [10].Thus
are strong problem solvers, and who understand how toseek assistance and navigate college campuses, are most likely persist to degree completion.Accordingly, this research seeks to examine a sample of non-traditional college students enrolledin science and engineering programs in four urban community colleges to determine (a) the typesand frequency of support practices they utilize, (b) how such practices influence theirachievement, persistence and transfer status to four year colleges and universities, and (c) how inturn their propensity for innovation and creative problem solving affects such choices andpersistence. The study analyzes the pedagogical practices—practices designed to fostersuccessful transfer from community college to four
sessions include academic counseling, familiarizing students with sites and resourcesfor finding REU’s and internships, describing ECS collegiate societies and how to become amember, informing students about opportunities for research with faculty, attending conferences,enrolling in competitions, and learning about graduate school. Appendix A is an example of thecalendars we developed and shared with all SPARK faculty mentors that they could use to trackstudents’ engagement with various career opportunities. Appendix B is a questionnaire thatmentors used at the end of the first year to increase students’ familiarity with departmentalresearch and career ideas. Appendix C is a mentoring guide for helping the students identify theirstrengths and
(items 16-46 on the AWE LAESE survey), including the original twenty-one 7-point Likert scale questions, plus the ten 7-point Likert scale questions asking “to what extent doyou agree.” The LAESE subscales include: (1) Engineering career expectations, (2)Engineering self-efficacy 1, (3) Engineering self-efficacy 2, (4) Feeling of inclusion, (5) Copingself-efficacy, and (6) Math outcomes efficacy. The two subscales measuring “engineering self-efficacy” are differentiated in what they seek to measure as follows: (1) The “Engineering self-efficacy 1” subscale measures a student’s perception of his or her ability to earn an A or B inmath, physics, and engineering courses and succeed in an engineering curriculum while notgiving up participation in
opportunities are discussed.The second year activities have continued to focus on the achievement of the five objectives ofthe grant project. These are: a) create and implement a new Associate of Applied SciencePhotonics and Laser Technology (AAS PLT) program; b) fully equip an Optics and PhotonicsLaboratory for education and training; c) train faculty to teach core courses in the AAS PLTprogram; d) perform outreach activities to local high schools to promote the new program; e)educate 30 or more students or workers by the end of the project.Objective a) has been fully met by the end of year two in the grant project. The program has nowbeen offered for a full two academic years, and all the program curriculum was developed andtaught at least once. The
perceived appropriateness? 4. What are teachers’ rationales for (a) integrating or (b) not integrating specific digital technologies? Literature ReviewEngineering, Technology, and Science: Natural Integration Opportunities for PositiveOutcomesFor decades, educational researchers have espoused integrated science instruction as a means toincrease student engagement, interest in science, and achievement (e.g., Roth, 2001). As a result,many different commercial curricula (e.g., Engineering is Elementary, Project Lead the Way,Lego Robotics) and open-source software (e.g., WISEngineering) exist to facilitate integratedinstruction. Further, design-based, project-based, and problem-based learning can
-line on January 8, 2008 from http://www.nae.edu/nae/engecocom.nsf/weblinks/MKEZ- 68HQMA?OpenDocument).6. Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139-151.7. Jesiek, B. K., Haller, Y., & Thompson, J. (2014). Developing Globally Competent Engineering Researchers : Outcomes-Based Instructional and Assessment Strategies from the IREE 2010 China Research Abroad Program. Advances in Engineering Education, 4(1), 1–31.8. Jesiek, B. K., Thompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global Engineering Competency in Context : Situations and Behaviors Global. Online Journal for Global Engineering
, and American Indian students)in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) majors. Even with massiveinterventions, the underrepresented students have not experienced exceptional gains [12].The State University of New York Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (SUNYLSAMP), has been a National Science Foundation funded program since 1996. SUNY LSAMPspans across 400 miles and serves many New York state doctoral granting institutions, smallliberal arts institutions, and community colleges. At its core, SUNY LSAMP objectives include:a) curricular and pedagogical innovations in STEM education; b) development of an innovative,cognitive, and social support network; c) development of experiential learning that leads toresearch
recommendations expressed in thispaper are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.References[1] M. Y. Bin Yahya, Y. Lee Hui, A. B. M. Yassin, R. Omar, R. O. anak Robin, and N. Kasim, “The Challenges of the Implementation of Construction Robotics Technologies in the Construction,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 266, p. 05012, 2019.[2] S. S. J. manyika, S. Lund, M. Chui, J. Bughin, J. Woetzel, P. Batra, R. Ko, “Jobs lost, jobs gained: Workforce transitions in a time of automation,” 2017.[3] K. Afsari, S. Gupta, M. Afkhamiaghda, and Z. Lu, “Applications of Collaborative Industrial Robots in Building Construction,” 54th ASC Int. Conf. Proc., no. August, 2018.[4] A. Jayaraj and H. N. Divakar, “Robotics in
(Unpublished manuscript). 1993, Syracuse University: Syracuse, New York. 39. Leuf, B. and W. Cunningham, The wiki way: Collaboration and sharing on the internet. . 2001. 40. Auyung, L., Building a collaborative online learning community: a case study in hong kong. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2004 31(2): p. 119-‐136. 41. Jonassen, D., et al., eds. Learning to solve problems with technology: A Constructivist Perspective (2nd ed.). 2003: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill. 42. Wial, H. and A. Friedhoff, Bearing the Brunt: Manufacturing Job Loss in the Great Lakes Region, 1995–2005, in Metro
. Sweeney, S. Nolen, M. Koretsky, M. Bothwell, D. Montfort, S. Nolen and S. Davis. “Re-situating community and learning in an engineering school.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017, https://peer.asee.org/27753.[3] S. Lord, D. Rover, N. Kellam, N. Salzman, E. Berger, E. Ingram and J. Sweeney. “Work-In-Progress: Talking about a revolution - overview of NSF RED projects”. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017, https://peer.asee.org/28903.[4] S. Lord, J. London, N. Salzman, B. Sukumaran, T. Martin, A. Maciejewski, J. LeDoux and J. Sweeney. “Work-In-Progress: Progress of the NSF RED Revolution”. Paper and panel
anticipates testing these advancements in future endeavorsthrough a subsequent research study.5. References[1] J. H. Mathewson, “Visual-Spatial Thinking: An Aspect of Science Overlooked by Educators,” Sci. Educ., vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 1098–237, 1999, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098- 237X(199901)83:1.[2] G. Duffy, S. Sorby, and B. Bowe, “An investigation of the role of spatial ability in representing and solving word problems among engineering students,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 424–442, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1002/JEE.20349.[3] M. Kozhevnikov, M. A. Motes, and M. Hegarty, “Spatial Visualization in Physics Problem Solving,” Cogn. Sci., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 549–579, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1080/15326900701399897.[4
parallel, we have adapted the findings from the interview study into a survey protocol, also draws on priorFlit-Path surveys that focused on identity, sense of belonging, and program experience. Survey itemsinclude: (A) Resource Utilization – level to which specific economic, academic, and social supports arebeing used by students; (B) Experiences – relative perceived value of support received through interactionswith each component of Flit-GAP; (C) Outcomes – intentions to persist in their program, knowledge of andinterest in graduate school, knowledge of and interest in entrepreneurial and IT-career pathways, successin securing internships/jobs, and academic progress; (D) Background controls – demographics (e.g.gender, race, ethnicity, parental
internationalcollaboration investigating the role of socioeconomic class for teaching and learning aboutengineering design and community engagement; b) a mentoring program between theengineering university and community college under study, including a university outreachprogram to assist LIFGs in enhancing their résumés; and c) strategies to bring LIFG funds ofknowledge into engineering science and design courses.IntroductionThe goal of our research project is to discover how innovation and creativity in engineeringproblem solving can be fostered by integrating the knowledge and experiences of low-incomeand first-generation students (LIFGs) into engineering education. Broadening participation is akey feature of engineering education reform, but dominant
- total a= # unique b (c) # unique d (e)cially the students, knowing what score a b*a (c*a) d*a (e*a)was being done. The students R - represented students U - underrepresented studentswere not told before or after the presentations about the scoring done by the authors. Thescoring rubric is shown in Table 1. The key aspects of mechatronics we want to measureinvolvement in are: 1) choosing sensors (S), 2) choosing motors (M), 3) development of dataacquisition system (D), 4) choosing and programming filtering and signal processing hard-ware and software (F), 5) synthesizing motor control (C), and 6) overall system integration(I). The existence column indicates whether the elements
ExamplesMany different laboratories can be designed and developed using this generalmodulation/demodulation platform. The following Matlab script shows the modulation schemeof QPSK. We have included in the script many options of different digital modulations such asBPSK, QPSK, 8PSK, 16QAM, 64QAM etc. Students can change the desired digital modulationby simply uncommenting the few lines of Matlab code in the provided script. Figure 6. Matlab Script to Change Modulation ConstellationFigure 7 (a) and (b) show the transmitted QPSK constellation and received QPSK constellationfrom the SDR based general modulation/demodulation platform. (a) Transmitted Constellation (b) Received
evaluations by students, professional development workshops materials,post-workshop survey results, aggregated results of surveys of outreach activities (summer campprograms) and collection of demographic data, list and examples of published papers, and allproject reports. Moreover, any deviations from the original research plan were reported.New Laboratory and Course Development and Student FeedbackThe new Renewable Energy Systems Training (REST) laboratory was developed based on theequipment from Amatrol Inc. [1] as depicted in Figure 1. (a) (b) (c) (d) Figure 1. Laboratory equipment [1]: (a) Solar PV installation, (b) solar PV troubleshooting, (c) solar thermal