Collection

2008 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

M.G. Guvench

fact the junior electronics courses (ELE342and ELE343) constituting prerequisites for this course also emphasize design but at a smaller scale andusing discrete BJT and off-the-shelf ICs rather than at the chip level using CMOS technology. Thisemphasis on “design” in our electronics sequence of courses has been implemented starting with an NSFgrant to establish and develop a “Computer-Integrated-Electronics” Laboratory (C.I.E. Lab) in the early1990’s. The concept of “Computer-Integrated-Electronics Laboratory” simply brings computers into theelectronics lab where designs implemented are tested for verification. Availability of PC-basedcomputational and graphics software along with inexpensive circuit simulation tools like “PSpice

Collection

2010 ASEE Zone 1 Conference

Authors

R. Radharamanan; Jeng-Nan Juang

between the channel height, fan velocity, and air speed was needed.By using analysis of variance, residuals, and regression an equation for predicting the air velocitywas found with a 95% confidence interval. The data were found to be normally distributed withthe exception of one outlier. The accuracy of the model increased when both the channel heightand fan speed were used as regressor variables.IntroductionThe first working fuel cell was developed in 1839 and the 1960’s fuel cells aided in the Apollomissions. With the advances made in electrochemical processes, a broad range of applications isexpected in the future. As a potential candidate for an environmentally benign and an efficientelectric power generation technology, proton exchange

Conference Session

Collaborative Learning in Engineering

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keating Dinsmore Ms., University of Michigan; Laura Hirshfield, University of California, Berkeley; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings.https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22602Context of All in Which You Live: How Women Engineering Students Perceive Gender BasedPatterns in Teams ​ 14 Dabić, M., Posinković, T. O., Maley, J. F., Vlačić, B., Marzi, G., & Kraus, S. (2024).Exploring the multifaceted challenges of women in engineering: A comprehensive literaturereview. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 3325–3339.https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2023.3342980 Ingram, S., & Parker, A. (2002). The influence of gender on collaborative projects in anengineering classroom. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 45(1), 7–20.https

Conference Session

ENT-8: Mentorship, Creativity, and Ethics in Academic Entrepreneurship

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anne K DeChant, Penn State University Hershey College of Medicine; Erika Swift, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine; Alyson Grace Eggleston, Pennsylvania State University; Robert J. Rabb P.E., Pennsylvania State University; Mark Daniel Pacey, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

y audience mentors Before 2.1 1.2 1.7 2.4 1.8 1.4 1.0 2.0 After 4.8 3.8 4.2 4.8 3.4 3.4 3.6 5.0 Difference 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 1.6 2.0 2.6 3.0Figure 1. Innovation Fellows Pre- and Post-Program Perceptions with Average ChangeOverlay Plot.Fellows post-program score distributions were also weighted toward the 4’s and 5’s as shown inthe scoring distribution plot in Figure 2. Of note, all Fellows provided 5’s (Strongly Confident)in their ability to network with industry

Conference Session

Diversity, Inclusion, and Representation in STEM

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexander Grey, University of Connecticut; Adeline Smith, University of Connecticut; Alexandra Hain, University of Connecticut; Jada-Lynn De Laia Vercosa-Bennett, University of Connecticut; Stephany Santos, University of Connecticut; Valerie Maier-Speredelozzi, The University of Rhode Island

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division (COMMENG)

,” International Journal of ScienceEducation, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1067–1088, May 2015, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863.[7] M. Penman, J. Tai, G. Evans, J. Brentnall, and B. Judd, “Designing near-peer mentoringfor work integrated learning outcomes: a systematic review,” BMC Med Educ, vol. 24, no. 1, p.937, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05900-6.[8] P. A. S. Ralston, J. L. Hieb, and G. Rivoli, “Partnerships and Experience in Building STEMPipelines,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 156–162, Apr. 2013, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000138.[9] T. Lowrie, S. Leonard, and R. Fitzgerald, “STEM Practices: A translational framework forlarge-scale STEM education design,” EDeR. Educational Design Research, vol. 2, no. 1, Art

Conference Session

International Division (INTL): Cultivating Global Competencies

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shazib Z Vijlee, University of Portland

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International Division (INTL)

for a Flat World,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; 2007; Honolulu, Hawaii.4. “Conference Session: Educating Graduates in Engineering for a Flat World,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; 2008; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.5. S Williams and O. Petersen “Panel Sessions: Educating Graduates For A Flat World 1, 2, 3, and 4”; ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; 2007; Honolulu, Hawaii; https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-- 22056. R Sandekian, B Amadei, A Brown, BK Jesiek, SY Lu, SN Wosu, JW Via, “Panel Sessions: Global Engineering - What Does That Mean?”; ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; 2016; New Orleans, LA.7. I Lodigiani, “From Colonialism To Globalisation: How History Has Shaped Unequal Power Relations Between

Conference Session

Two-Year College Division (TYCD) Technical Session 1: Transfer Pathways

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Curtis R. Taylor, University of Florida; Jennifer Gove-Cooper; Pamela L Dickrell, University of Florida; Angela Lindner, University of Florida; Janna L Underhill PhD, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College Division (TYCD)

in 1983 and an M.S. degree in chemical engineering from Texas A&M University in 1987. Her Masterˆa C™s thesis work, funded by the Texas Transportation Institute, inJanna L Underhill PhD, University of Florida ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Evaluating Engineering Transfer Success: Insights from a 2-Year to 4-Year College Partnership ProgramIntroductionCommunity colleges (CC), also referred to as 2-year colleges, play a critical role insocioeconomic mobility and the technological competitiveness of the United States (U.S.).Numerous studies have shown the value of a bachelor’s degree as a source for increasingearnings and economic mobility over a person’s

Conference Session

Faculty Development: Grading and Artificial Intelligence

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael J McGinnis, LeTourneau University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

are informally discussed (e.g. [9]), and formalprofessional development opportunities in this space occur, the author could not find a paper thatdescribed the creation, implementation and assessment of a workshop directed toward gradingfor engineering faculty (two excellent example resources that are adjacent to this gap are inFelder and Brent’s description of the NETI workshops [10], and Estes et al.’s assessment of theASCE ExCEEd workshop [11] which describe general engineering teaching workshops). Thispaper focuses on presenting the content and outcomes of a workshop focused on gradingefficiently both in terms of student learning outcomes and faculty time spent on task – referencesdescribing various aspects and methods of grading are

Conference Session

Disability in Engineering Programs (Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division ECSJ Technical Session 3)

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Figard, University of Georgia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

success inengineering undergraduate programs. 7References[1] A. E. Slaton, “Body? What body? Considering ability and disability in STEM disciplines,” inProc. ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., Atlanta, GA, USA, Jun. 2013.[2] K. Sang, T. Calvard, and J. Remnant, “Disability and academic careers: Using the socialrelationship model to reveal the role of human resource management practices in creatingdisability,” Work Employ. Soc., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 722–740, 2022.[3] R. Figard, S. Brunhaver, and J. Bekki, “‘It is so exhausting to constantly have to explain topeople’: Exploring the effects of faculty interactions on disabled students,” in Proc. ASEE Annu.Conf. Expo

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adeel Khalid, Kennesaw State University; Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

wereconsistent, enabling reliable analysis of adoption rates, tool usage, and perceived impacts. Forqualitative questions, particularly in open-ended responses, 5 faculty members provided detailedfeedback, offering valuable insights into challenges, ethical concerns, and suggestions forgenerative AI integration. This response distribution allowed for both statistical analysis and richnarrative exploration of faculty perspectives.Faculty SurveyThe intent of the faculty survey is to understand generative AI adoption and usage by educators.The following questions are asked in the survey. Q1. Have you adopted generative AI tools in your teaching or research? • Yes • No [If No, skip to Q17] Q2. Which platform(s) do you use? [ChatGPT

Conference Session

MATH - Hands-On Curriculum in Mathematics Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Djedjiga Belfadel, Fairfield University; Danushka Bandara, Fairfield University

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics Division (MATH)

, where students engage with foundational material before class,supports active programming practice and collaborative problem-solving during class time. Addingstructured group work, peer feedback opportunities, and teaching assistant support will further enhancethe learning experience and maintain its interactive nature.Requiring MathWorks certification and using auto-graded programming modules help ensure consistentengagement and measurable learning outcomes. This approach provides a solid framework for fosteringactive learning and supports the development of both individual and team-based skills in engineeringeducation.References[1] P. T. Goeser, W. Johnson, S. L. Bernadin, and D. A. Gajdosik-Nivens, “Work-in-Progress: TheImpact of MatLab

Conference Session

ERM WIP I: Methodological Applications in the Disciplines

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brendan Lobo, University of Toronto; Sinisa Colic, University of Toronto; Chirag Variawa, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

,” Stud Sci Educ, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–39, 2008, doi: 10.1080/03057260701828101.[2] B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. B. Krathwohl, TAXONOMY OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES; The Classification of Educational Goals. 1956.[3] M. Scardamalia and C. Bereiter, “Text-Based and Knowledge Based Questioning by Children,” Cogn Instr, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 177–199, Sep. 1992, doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI0903_1.[4] S. R. Goldberg, C. Venters, and A. Masnick, “Refining a Taxonomy for Categorizing the Quality of Engineering Student Questions,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.18260/1-2--37649.[5] “Hugging Face – The AI community building the future

Conference Session

ELOS Technical Session 1: Integrating AI, VR, and MR in Engineering Lab Experiences

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Yitong Zhao, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Juliana Lynn Fuqua, Cal Poly Pomona

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

Psychology and Sociology at California State University Polytechnic, Pomona who completed her doctoral degree at the University of California, Irvine. Dr. Fuquaˆa C™s dissertation at the ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Development of an AI student assistant in the VR thermal fluids lab and evaluation of its impact on students’ learningAbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic illuminated challenges with student experience with laboratoryinstruction. It caused the field to rethink how we engage students. This, in conjunction with tightspaces and a growing student population, has led to the need for more inventiveness. This projectexplores the efficacy of an enhancement, the

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Poster Session (Track 1.A)

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony Cortez, Point Loma Nazarene University; Paul Schmelzenbach, Point Loma Nazarene University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

to 0.5 Hz. (f) Repeat steps a-e, overlaying each plot on top of the others, as long as the random amplitude is less than 9. (Once it is 9 or larger, stop) (g) Create a title that displays the number of sine waves that were generated in your plot. (Note: This number can change with each running of your script file. Therefore, create a variable to keep track of this count.) (h) Label the x and y axes with “Time (s)” and “Amplitude (m)”, respectively. (i) Add a legend that shows the frequency of each plotted sine wave. Each label in your legend should include the appropriate variable, number, and units. For example: f = 0.56192 Hz.The exam was designed to test different levels of critical thinking and coding skills

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Poster Session (Track 1.A)

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Linda Davis Ahlstrom, Utah State University; Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Cassandra J McCall, Utah State University; Michaela Harper, Utah State University; Wade H Goodridge, Utah State University; Daniel Kane, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

usedAI technologies we can see that education in engineering is changing. How we anticipate theserapid changes will be of upmost importance in engineering programs at every university.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation through AwardNo. 2346881. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] H. Al-Juboori and G. Noonan, “Leveraging the Power of Digital Immersive Technologies to Enhance Engineering Education and Learning,” 2024 IEEE Glob. Eng. Educ. Conf. EDUCON Glob. Eng. Educ. Conf. EDUCON 2024 IEEE, pp. 1–5, May 2024, doi

Conference Session

WIP Poster Session: Emerging Research and Practices in Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aysel Guliyeva, The Institute of Education of the Republic of Azerbaijan; Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510 [7] Yue, M., Jong, M. S.-Y., & Dai, Y. (2022). Pedagogical design of K-12 artificialintelligence education: A systematic review. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315620 [8] Williams, R., Park, H. W., Oh, L., & Breazeal, C. (2019). PopBots: Designing anartificial intelligence curriculum for early childhood education. Proceedings of the AAAIConference on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019729 [9] Yi, H., Liu, T., & Lan, G. (2024). The key artificial intelligence technologies in earlychildhood education: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10637-7 [10] Castro-Schez, J., Morcillo, C., Albusac, J

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Renata A Revelo, The University of Illinois at Chicago; Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of Cincinnati; Julio C Mendez, University of Illinois Chicago; Luis E Montero-Moguel, The University of Texas at San Antonio

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2215408 and 2215788. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] P. Freire, Education for critical consciousness, vol. 1. Bloomsbury Publishing, 1973.[2] P. Gurin, B. R. A. Nagda, and X. Zúñiga, Dialogue across difference: Practice, theory, and research on intergroup dialogue. Russell Sage Foundation, 2013. Accessed: Jul. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=OAlRAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq= gurin+intergroup+dialogue&ots=hTQB0UuxyT&sig

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeff Wolchok, University of Arkansas; Timothy J. Muldoon, University of Arkansas

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

, Özkan DS, Strom HC, editors. Where Do We Meet?Understanding Conference Participation in a Department of Engineering Education. 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition; 2019.4. Krause SJ, Middleton JA, Judson E, Ernzen J, Beeley KR, Chen Y-C, editors. Factors impactingretention and success of undergraduate engineering students. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition;2015.5. Vicente S. Exploring Programmatic Elements, Learning, and Sense of Belonging in an EngineeringInternship Program2024.6. Fluker C, Perez-Felkner L, McCoy K, editors. Students’ Perceptions of their Engineering IdentityDevelopment and REU Summer Program Experiences: An Equity-Centered Analysis. 2022 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition; 2022.

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ying Wang, FHI 360; Emily Bolger; Rachel L Renbarger; Taylor Boyd, Western Michigan University; Noah D Finkelstein, University of Colorado Boulder; Charles Henderson, Western Michigan University ; Andrea L Beach, Western Michigan University; Scott P. Simkins, North Carolina A&T State University; Marcos Caballero

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

results, and performing a similar analysis with the full text all of theincluded articles.Acknowledgment and NSF DisclaimerThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNumbers (2201792, 2201793, 2201794, and 2201795). Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science FoundationReferences[1] C. M. Massey and A. Stephens, Eds., Scaling and sustaining Pre-K-12 STEM education innovations: Systemic challenges, systemic responses. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2024. doi: 10.17226/27950.[2] J. Lachal, A. Revah-Levy, M. Orri, and M. R. Moro, “Metasynthesis: An

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Justin Charles Major, Rowan University; Karin Jensen, University of Michigan; Kailey Nicole Head, University of Michigan; Sowmya Panuganti, Purdue Engineering Education; Ash Quadd, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

faculty. Changingthe narrative from a necessity of high stress in engineering to one of well-being will create aninclusive academic environment where all can thrive. Challenging engineering’s culture ofhardship may also help recruit and retain UES and change public opinions of engineering.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant#2400607 and #2400608. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] ​ M. E. P. Seligman, Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press, 2011.[2] ​ J. Gesun et al

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Justin L Hess, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Robert P. Loweth, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Udeme Idem, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

policy making," PNAS Nexus, vol. 3, no. 6, 2024.[5] E. Ferrara, "Fairness and bias in artificial intelligence: A brief survey of sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies," Sci, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 3, 2023.[6] P. Sahoo, A. K. Singh, S. Saha, V. Jain, S. Mondal, and A. Chadha, "A systematic survey of prompt engineering in large language models: Techniques and applications," arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.07927, 2024.[7] C. Shah, "From Prompt Engineering to Prompt Science With Human in the Loop," arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04122, 2024.[8] D. A. Norman, The design of everyday things. Basic books, 2002.[9] K. Dugan, S. Daly, C. Michaels, S. Skerlos, and A. Verhey-Henke, "Investigating a socially engaged design

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer R Amos, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Houshang Darabi, University of Illinois Chicago; Nikith Rachakonda, The University of Illinois at Chicago

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

[1] J. Cuseo, “‘Decided,’ ‘Undecided,’ and ‘In Transition’: Implications for AcademicAdvisement, Career Counseling, and Student Retention,” in Improving the First Year of College,Psychology Press, 2005, pp. 36–56. [Online]. Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781410611864-7[2] C. A. Malgwi, M. A. Howe, and P. A. Burnaby, “Influences on Students’ Choice of CollegeMajor,” Journal of Education for Business, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 275–282, May 2005, doi:10.3200/joeb.80.5.275-282.[3] D. Ghosh, S. Harford, H. Darabi, and J. Amos, “Board 315: Improving Students’ Decision-Making Behavior in Choosing an Engineering Pathway,” in ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Conference Proceedings, Baltimore, United States, Jun. 2023.[4] Tran, Ashley Y

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pilar Gonzalez, University of Texas at El Paso; Benjamin C. Flores, University of Texas at El Paso; Song An, University of Texas at El Paso; Karime H Smith, University of Texas at El Paso

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). 2023. Diversity and STEM: Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities 2023. Special Report NSF 23-315. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpdhttps://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd.[4] Chen, X. (2013). STEM Attrition: College Students' Paths into and out of STEM Fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001. National Center for Education Statistics.[5] S. R. Herrera and C. A. Medina, "Adelante: Social Mobility at a Hispanic-Serving Institution," Journal of Latinos and Education, pp. 1-18, 2023, doi: 10.1080/15348431.2023.2228603.[6] S. Mendoza, A. N. Armbrister, and A. F. Abraído-Lanza, "Are you better off? Perceptions of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elliott Clement, Oregon State University; James L. Huff, University of Georgia; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

adapting and developing course activities and structurefocused on fostering student design activity engagement. Expansion to different engineeringfields and further considerations of professional engineering engagement will be needed toexpand our understanding of motivation in design activity engagement and reach more fields andsettings.Acknowledgements:This work was supported through funding by the National Science Foundation (Awards No.2138019, No. 2138106 and No. 2514040). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego; Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of Cincinnati; Gordon D Hoople, University of San Diego; R. Jamaal Downey

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

, Whiteness, and Education. Routledge, 2009.[2]​ P. Freire, Pedagogy of the oppressed. Routledge, 1973.[3]​ D. A. Chen, J. A. Mejia, and S. Breslin, “Navigating equity work in engineering: contradicting messages encountered by minority faculty,” Digital Creativity, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 329–344, Oct. 2019.[4]​ G. Bachelard, Épistémologie: Textes choisis par Dominique Lecourt. 1980.[5]​ P. Bourdieu, “The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason,” Soc. Sci. Inf. , vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 19–47, Dec. 1975.[6]​ D. Swartz, Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. University of Chicago Press, 2012.[7]​ J. A. Mejia, D. A. Chen, O. Dalrymple, and S. M. Lord, “Revealing the Invisible

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xinyu Zhang, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Lynnette Michaluk, West Virginia University; N’Diya Harris, Wright State University; Ansley Lynn Shamblin, West Virginia University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

-generations (first-gen), low socioeconomic status (SES) students, ruralstudents, and more, even though they intend to support those students. Recruitment is critical toreach and convince underserved students to enroll in those programs to broaden participation inengineering. Limited literature focuses on recruitment practices and barriers in those programs[2-3]. Difficulties were reported in identifying effective recruitment strategies. The BCSER PIled an engineering summer bridge program formerly funded by NSF Scholarships in ScienceTechnology Engineering and Math (S-STEM) program and observed the recruitment challengesafter federal grant phased out in her own bridge program and other similar ones that lack federalfunding. The purpose of this BCSER

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nigel Berkeley Kaye, Clemson University; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Evan Taylor, Clemson University; Makayla Headley, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

class.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2306156. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.ReferencesBandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Information Age Publishing; pp. 307–337.Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Brown, S. & Burnham, J. (2012). Engineering Student's

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 9

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer C Mallette, Boise State University; Harold Ackler, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

Relevance & Method Impact of Assessment of How are you using what you learned? Relevant to curriculum current practices research What experiences stuck? question Senior project experiences–what has Method(s): been most directly applicable? survey, interview What do you wish you had done more of? What alumni

Conference Session

DSAI Technical Session 9: Student Reflections, Metacognition, and Competency Mapping

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paromita Nath, Rowan University; Melanie Amadoro, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (DSAI) Constituent Committee

highest level of hierarchy (HH), and (iii) knowledge connectedness, indicated bythe number of cross-links (NCL). Using this method, the total score (TS) of the concept map iscalculated as follows: T S = N C + HH × 5 + N CL × 10 (1)Using Eq. 1, the total score for the concept map illustrated in Fig. 1 is calculated to be 40, whereN C = 10, HH = 4, and N CL = 1. In this study, we employ the traditional scoring method toevaluate the concept maps.Data AnalysisThe data collected from the concept maps and survey were analyzed using the followingmethods:Concept Map Iteration AnalysisThe concept map scores were systematically examined to assess their evolution over multipleiterations

Conference Session

ERM WIP II: Equity & Accessibility in Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Kane, Utah State University; Wade H Goodridge, Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 817–835, Nov. 2009, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016127.[6] D. H. Uttal et al., “The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 352–402, 2013, doi: 10.1037/a0028446.[7] S. Wood, W. Goodridge, B. Call, and T. Sweeten, “Preliminary Analysis of Spatial Ability Improvement within an Engineering Mechanics Course: Statics,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016, p. 25942. doi: 10.18260/p.25942.[8] R. Yahne, D