thatembodies the technology as a material or physical object, and (2) a software aspect,consisting of the information base for the tool.8Prior educational research involving Diffusion of Innovations (DI) theory has focused on theuse of computer technology,9 course management systems,10,11 and online teachingmaterials.12 While these studies have found the adoption of technology in classrooms to becorrelated to student achievements13 and teaching experience,14 the focus tends to be on thehardware components of technologies and neglects the software components. Research onhardware has identified relationships between use of technologies and the characteristics ofadopters,15,16,17 but it has not addressed the adopters’ perspectives, which have been argued
tenth weeks discuss Mohr’s circle. Page 11.482.3A nine-question survey was provided to students in an introductory mechanics course in theSpring 2005 and Fall 2005 semesters. This survey was conducted online using SurveyMonkey(www.surveymonkey.com) and took place during the tenth and eleventh weeks of instruction.The text of the survey is included in Appendix A. Formative evaluation of the survey wasconducted prior to implementation with students. Several experts in mechanics of materials aswell as non-experts outside the field were asked to take the survey and comment on its structureand clarity. The survey was also vetted in a discussion with
these changes, traditional textbooks remain prevalent, butthey increasingly struggle to meet modern courses' diverse and dynamic needs. Traditionaltextbooks, typically organized to comprehensively cover a course's syllabus, need moreflexibility to address specific course requirements. This inflexibility often results in a disconnectbetween provided content and the evolving curriculum demands. Additionally, the static natureof traditional textbooks limits their ability to incorporate current information, diminishing theireffectiveness in rapidly advancing academic disciplines.Research has highlighted the limitations of traditional textbooks in comparison to electronicformats. Rockinson-Szapkiw et al. [1] show that students using e-textbooks
humankind unique, both individually and as a species, remains unclear. Advances in neuroscience and computer science, as well as ethics, generate questions about the nature of intelligence, consciousness, and personhood and the rights and protections associated with being human. In this course students tackle classic readings from Descartes to modern ruminations on artificial intelligence, examine our relation to our creations and pets, and the way our various identities affect how our personhood is perceived and protected.Some basic information from the course syllabus is described below.Broad Topics covered 1. Basic neuroscience 2. Distinctions between humans and nonhumans 3. Emotional connection and dependencies between
. Page 14.808.2Semester research projects culminated in updating WikiBooks pages to share the students' new-found knowledge in a particular robotics topic. Students were encouraged to apply their semesterpractical projects to various Missouri S&T robotics competition entries such as the IEEERobotics Competition and the Intelligent Ground Vehicle Competition. Continuing in this open-source philosophy, all course documents, including lecture slides, reading material, sourcereferences and robot kit hardware and software were posted online. This enables the educationaland hobby community to contribute and develop the course-ware beyond the duration of classsessions, creating a 'living course' that continues to evolve and improve, increasing its
Theme Responses Examples Course materials 17 case studies, syllabus Training and best practices, input from professionals, experience 7 field experience Resources 4 financial (for projects), software Projects 4 identifying partners/locationsThe discussion on barriers uncovered several themes, as well as strategies to overcome thebarriers. The companion poll to this discussion is found in Table 11. Foremost among the barrierswere curricular constraints. Many participants felt that their curriculum does not allow much, orany, flexibility where a course on EA could be
.” 8The authors were very pleased with the project’s outcome. However, several changes will bemade for the Spring 2007 course offering: 1. The project will be carried out with the senior class only. This is due to the fact that students at the senior level have more technical knowledge and overall academic coursework to appreciate the topic of diversity and its impact on their professional lives. 2. The project will be part of the coursework, it will be noted in the course syllabus, and will be assigned much earlier in the semester (perhaps around week 5). 3. The project will be graded as a regular lab project not as an extra-credit assignment. 4. Rather than choosing a country; students will be assigned a technical project
/guidelines are formed to ensure bothteams (EEP and ECE SD) get a fulfilling experience; however, none of the teams get an undueadvantage over the other teams in their respective classes. These rules also help the EEP teamwith their “sponsorship” role for the ECE SD team since, for most of them, this is the first timethey have been in this role.Grading and assignmentsBoth teams must complete their respective class deliverables based on their respective instructorsand class rubric. Both teams are graded separately based on the individual course policies andassignment rubrics by their respective instructors. Neither of the teams can assist the other teamwith their class assignments or graded project deliverables as part of their course syllabus
. The fact that the theoretical circuital knowledge of the students in this course does not cover ejwt excitations. It is more useful in basic courses such as Electrical Circuits and Electronics I. Next semester I expect to use it more often since I will be teaching Electronics I. Lack of time allocated to this kind of exercise in the syllabus. Time constraints prevented integrating the device more often. Preparing a class using a new device requires time for preparation. Limited multimeter functions also limited the use of the device. The workshop was given after the courses were designed (mid-semester workshop). Labview by National Instruments and Arduino fill most of the material for experiments but
areavailable, it is anticipated that the project will provide students with a practical application of theprinciples of basic thermodynamics and heat transfer, and of the specific principles associatedwith solar energy harvesting. Details of the project are provided, along with possible extensionsand variations for future course offerings.2. BackgroundA new course in renewable/sustainable energy has been developed for the mechanicalengineering curriculum at USAFA, and is being taught for the first time in the Spring 2011 term.As opposed to many of the texts in the renewable/sustainable energy field, the text selected1provides a computationally intense basis for most of the topics in the course syllabus. Guestlecturers and a field trip to the National
] Algorithms and problem-solving [8] Data structures [13] Recursion [5] Object-oriented programming Event-driven and concurrent programming Using APIs Figure 2 An example of an area in computer engineering and the topics included in that areaAn instructor who wants to use an open-ended project for a class completes an online formwhich includes the course information, project title, a project description, and a checklist whichclassifies the project using the BOK classification data. This form becomes part of the data thatis used for assessment of the course.All
data in Spring 2023 (without ProjBL) and the new data inFall 2023 (with ProjBL and data analytics) are compared. The same instructor taught the courseusing the same syllabus. And the same course learning outcomes have been assessed. It has beenobserved that the percentages of “Satisfactory” students for both learning outcomes a) and b)have been improved in Fall 2023 compared with the results in the baseline data in Spring 2023(without PorjBL). Meanwhile, the ABC rates are also improved compared with the baseline datain Spring 2023. In addition, all teams completed their projects on time. Table 1. Assessment Data in CS405- “Linux with Application Programming” Learning Outcomes: a) Design, implement, and evaluate a computing-based solution
didactic staff of the science ofpedagogy constitutes the basis of the essential pedagogical competencies of engineeringteachers, along with specialized competencies. The basic teaching model of the Science ofEngineering Pedagogy follows the principles of an iterative process, making it an effectivetool for the design of a study program, study plan, syllabus, course, or conference. Finally,the integrated quadruple instruction model of Engineering Pedagogy Sciences is the basisof integrated course design and one of the preconditions for effective teaching and learning,as well as the basis of the teaching competencies expected of engineering teachers.Teachers’ pedagogical competencies are becoming increasingly important in evaluating thequality of
Interventions Faculty Can Deploy to Increase Retention: A Faculty 2 Cookbook for Increasing Student Success 3 4 Byron Hempel^, Kasi Kiehlbaugh^, Paul Blowers^ 5 ^Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona 6 Abstract 7 8 Student retention in college is often expected to be handled by advisers, staff, and administrators. 9 Faculty, however, are the only members in academia that students are required to interact with regularly.10 For most courses offered in higher education, the contact time between faculty and students is normally11 three hours per week, allowing faculty to have a large impact on student outcomes. This paper discusses12 how to deploy
. If yes, what is the primary focus of these courses? 5. What specific learning outcomes are expected in these courses? 6. What is the name of the institution where the course is taught? 7. Is the syllabus available online? 8. Do you use a textbook? 9. If yes, please provide the author and title. 10. If no to the above, do you provide seminars, non-credit courses, etc. on leadership for your students? 11. If yes, how many students per year participate in the seminars, non-credit courses, etc.? 12. Does your institution feel leadership for engineering and science students is important for the future? Why? 13. If so, what is your intention for ensuring these learners get
(after having reviewed the syllabus during the first course meeting) that45% of their total ENGR 101 grade is related to design project assessments: • First required meeting with first author & MS Teams use 3% • Project Requirement Specification 5% • Second required meeting with first author & MS Teams use 3% • Progress Report 8% • Third required meeting with first author & MS Teams use 3% • Final Presentation 5% • Final Report 10
StudentsAbstractThe Study Cycle is a set of guidelines rich with self-regulated learning (SRL) techniques thatenables students to plan, prepare, and enact their studying by focusing on five comprehensivesteps: previewing before class, engaging in class, reviewing after class, holding study sessions,and seeking help as a supplement. This paper reports on initial findings of a qualitative study inwhich a workshop on the Study Cycle was taught to a class of second-year IndustrialEngineering students as an intervention, aiming to understand effects of the module onengineering students’ SRL strategy use in an engineering course. Students self-reported SRLstrategy use in a one-minute paper pre-workshop and two sets of post-workshop reflections. Thispaper examines
Writing Teaching and Learning EthicsY4 Independent Research Ethics Teaching and Learning WritingThe modular courses (modules) have undergone extensive changes based on formal and informalyearly assessment. Following is a summary of the modules as initially proposed. The Writing module, initially proposed as Professional Communication, aims to provide trainees with the opportunity to learn about the structure and content of diverse documents, and the opportunity to apply this knowledge to prepare documents for technical and non-technical audiences. Trainees were expected to reflect on their development through keeping up an online blog. The Training in Independent
the equipment. Authors also point outthat the remote access might provide non-educational uses such as remote access might provideopportunities for remote monitoring, controlling, and diagnosing manufacturing systems locatedat different geographical locations [15].De Jong et al. indicate challenges associated with the integrating the virtual and hands-onlaboratories. According to the authors, three challenges are presented as follows [16]; Creating online environments that use stored data to guide them for virtual experiments Determining ideal balance between the virtual and physical investigations for courses in different areas Determining and understanding the skillset and applying the corresponding strategies for
related to the discussion from the previous stage.This material can be taught using any pedagogical approach (e.g., lectures, in-class activities,computer simulations, discussion). It may be necessary to modify the course syllabus and/ormethod of presentation to ensure coherence between the course material and the theme.However, it is expected that these modifications, at least initially, could be minor. Although themethods used in this stage are similar to those typically used to incorporate real-world problemsinto a course, it is critical that they be well-integrated with the Grand Challenge theme.Stage 5: Application of Course Content to the ChallengeNext, students apply the course-specific content, tools, and techniques to a real-world
concepts and their preparations for future engineering courses. Therefore, theinterdisciplinary team designed online instruments to collect data on student perceptions.Students were asked to complete the instruments both at the beginning and the end of thesemester so that changes in perceptions might be measured. Baseline data were collected with apre-test survey of students in STEP and non-STEP classes at the start of the academic year forlater comparison with mid-year and end of year survey results. Baseline data indicated little or nodifference between students in the STEP and non-STEP groups in their responses to perceptionsurvey questions, except that the comparison group expected a slightly higher proportion of factand formula memorization
problems were similar in the two offerings, the assessment mechanisms variedgreatly. The assessment mechanism for the homework in S13 did not include written reflection.Instead, a check / check-minus / check-plus system was implemented. The description of thisgrading method as issued in the course syllabus is as follows: 0 points: Student does not submit the assignment, or submits extremely poor work. CHECK-MINUS (1 point): homework does not minimally fulfill the assignment requirement, or is sloppy, or is unprofessional, or contains major conceptual errors. CHECK (2 points): homework minimally fulfills the assignment requirements, does not contain conceptual errors, and is neatly presented. CHECK
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The MOOCIBL platform: a custom-made software solution to track the innovation process with blockchain learning tokensAbstractInnovation is becoming more prevalent in education. However, limited tools have beendeveloped to track and characterize the innovation process in education. This paper presentsMOOCIBL, a custom-made online platform that tracks the different processes that occur in anInnovation-Based Learning environment. This study introduces the concept of learning tokens astiny individual trackable pieces, thought of as breadcrumbs documenting students' learning in acourse.Throughout the course, students create tokens that
paper.Additionally, the upcoming generation views materials retrieved online differently than thoseobtained from other sources. Clifton Poole stated “there is a tendency to think that cutting andpasting from the Internet is a form of good research and not plagiarism.”6 Several students arefurther confused because of online access to scholarly journals and conference reports throughtheir libraries web sites. Townley and Parsell note that “the Internet presents mixed messagesthat may confuse people as to what is and what is not acceptable appropriation practice.”7 The Internet also facilitates the ultimate form of plagiarism, turning in someone else’spaper as one’s own. A simple search for “research papers” on Google will produce a list ofplaces to
different group of students, over the course of the semester. This approach also gives thestudents several opportunities to evaluate their own individual work, the work of theirteammates, the work of their own group, and the work of another group. These evaluations playa major role in helping me to assign grades to the group as a whole, as well as to each individualmember of the group.Getting StartedOn the first day of class, along with the normal paperwork (syllabus, etc.), students complete aself-evaluation questionnaire regarding their current level of familiarity with a wide variety ofcomputer science topics, along with the Computer Science courses they have completed and thecourses they are currently taking. This is very useful since students
projects, including specific project descriptions and samples of student work.This web page also provides access to current course materials, including the syllabus, calendar,evaluation forms, and the notebook specification. It may be viewed athttp://ecswww.baylor.edu/faculty/doty/EGR4390/EGR4390.html.III. Course RequirementsThe senior design class is scheduled as two hours of lecture and a three hours of laboratory perweek. The two lecture hours are used as staff meetings, with the faculty and the students sharingin the delivery of information. A weekly design milestone is the focus of these staff meetings.The three-hour laboratory concludes the week’s activities with an activity related to that week’sdesign milestone. Major milestones require
exploratory and work. The process allows students to learn about a variety individual work. The students explore topics and are at the of topics through the exercise. It allows the students to lowest two level in Bloom’s Taxonomy focusing on increasing initiate some of the content for the laboratory course, it their Knowledge and Comprehension of the topics. Students allows new perspective and ideas to develop and plant the are asked to review all the phase 1 project presentations online seeds for future design work for these students. and are not required to keep to their initially selected topics as the project develops
and civil.Liberal Learning at Our CollegeLiterature refers to liberal learning, liberal education, and general education as courses in non-professional areasthat are required to develop complete professionals. The courses, it is assumed, are taught like any other coursesand therefore do not really help build life-long learning skills. We have attempted a different approach. Wehave defined Liberal Learning as ―self-learning in self-chosen liberal areas with self-defined scope‖. Unlike astandard course, the course does not have a defined syllabus, identified text or reference books, classroomlectures, and standard examinations. Students define their own syllabus, hunt or harvest for learning resources
multi-year participation canachieve a depth of skills and ownership of outcomes [10]. Thus, full academic year andmulti-year projects enable impactful experiential learning, while short semester projects maylimit student growth. One challenge to multi-year participation for students is fitting theadditional work-load and credit hours into their schedules.Faculty Instructors and Mentors IDPro is taught through an approach that brings together program and projectmanagement. The course is led by a single lead instructor of record (IOR) and a graduateteaching assistant for two-semester timelines. While the IOR establishes the course syllabus,provides content and assignments, conducts performance reviews, and assigns grades, theirprimary role
Level Engineering Courses,” Universityof Colorado, Rocky Mountain Section Meeting, April 1996, Laramie, WY.11. University of Wisconsin, web site. Available online at http://newtraditions.chem.wisc.edu, 1998.12. Hake, Richard, “Interactive-Engagement vs. Traditional Methods: A Six-thousand Student Survey of MechanicsTest Data for Introductory Physics Students,” American Journal of Physics, Vol. 66, pp.64-74, 1998.13. Felder, Richard M., Steven W. Peretti, “A Learning Theory-Based Approach to the Undergraduate Laboratory,”1998 Annual Conference Proceedings, American Society of Engineering Education, Seattle, WA, June 1998.14. Bean, J. Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learningin the