readiness benchmark levels in science. – Essential preparation for all careers in the modern workforce – Scientific and technological literacy for an educated society National Academy StudiesCall to Action Framework/Standards Curriculum Implementation Development DevelopmentNorm AugustineC. Dan MoteLinda Katehi Assessments Evaluation 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Motivation: Why now?• Overall college graduation levels in the United States have
Education at Purdue University (USA). Claudio received his Bachelor of Science degree from the Higher Education Institute of Amazonia, in Brazil, in 2011. In 2014 he received his Master of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the State University of Campinas in Brazil. In May 2020, he completed his Ph.D. at Purdue University. His research interests lie in the area of educational technology and digital learning in diverse settings.Dr. Gregory John Gage, Backyard Brains Dr. Gregory Gage is a Neuroscientist and the Co-Founder and CEO of Backyard Brains. Greg is an Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Molecular & Integrative Physiology department of the University of Michigan. His research focuses on
in higher-leveluniversity courses. Figure 1 contains a comparison of an old curriculum part (left) with a same-level new curriculum part (right) taken straight from the assignment, respectively. The old part isa junction box with instructor added annotations meant to clear up confusion with the provided,hard-to-see dimensions. Even with the annotations, students were unable match the mass orvolume provided in the answer key, which graders use to judge accuracy. The updated curriculumpart, a converging diverging nozzle, solves these problems by providing visible dimensions,allowing matchable mass and volume values, and incorporating aerospace concepts. Additionally,faculty A included a lecture on the CATIA certification and its
implementation tools theywill need in the following years. MATLAB is included due to its use in several upper-level labcourses across disciplines. The FYE curriculum focuses on introductory programming skills andMATLAB syntax. However, the learning activities, developing geometry calculators and gameslike Tic-Tac-Toe, do not directly apply to their future use cases in lab settings. Gamedevelopment differs significantly from the algorithm development and logic skills required tocreate scripts to assist with a complex, research focused experiments. In response to thatdisconnect, we developed hardware-enabled data collection MATLAB modules to integrate asituational learning experience[1]. These modules enable students to collect data individually andwork
respective professional knowledgeabout curriculum, learning, teaching and students.As a result of quality professional development, teachers often learn how to integrate theirprofessional knowledge with content knowledge. Consequently, teachers might deepen theircontent knowledge in ways that will allow them to enhance their school curriculum. As theystrengthen their understandings of how their curriculum might best be interconnected, they willlikely incorporate a wide variety of interesting and worthwhile problem contexts, includingengineering. Or, they may learn new and innovative teaching strategies, which better guide theirstudents toward understanding of that curriculum. They might learn new ways to negotiateclassroom discussions as an avenue
activity-based lessons,and then apply design and systems-level thinking skills in an integrative, real-world-based project.While mechatronics-based courses and modules are becoming commonplace in engineeringcurricula, many of these experiences occur later in the educational experience. The uniqueness ofthe module presented in this work is that it is designed for a first- or second-year engineeringcourse and could be adapted to complement existing design-based courses and expanded to anentire course. Another unique aspect of the module is the way it integrates creative thinking,systems engineering and microcontrollers to engage students in design-build-test real-worldprojects. The paper presents the rationale for the pedagogy used, the activity
perspectives regarding ESI. At theend of the survey, respondents were asked to provide their email address if they werewilling to be contacted for a follow-up interview. Of the 1448 survey respondents, 230indicated willingness to participate in an interview.The second phase of the study involved conducting interviews with educators to learn moreabout their ESI instructional practices and general perspectives regarding the integration ofESI into the engineering curriculum and educational experiences of engineering students.Between September 2016 and April 2017, 52 survey respondents were contacted forinterviews with the intention of conducting 36 interviews. Selection of these individuals wasbased on an iterative and collaborative process within the
students alsotrained 15 other university students, both in the United States and Guatemala, who have taught thecurriculum to an additional 150 students in Guatemala, which illustrates the scalability and sustain-ability of the curriculum across countries, communities, and cultures. Conclusions. By integrating human-centered design and the SDGs into engineering curricula andtargeting communities that work with women and girls, we believe the Ignite program can impactthree of the SDGs – renewable energy, quality education, and gender equality.Key words: Multidisciplinary design; international programs; technology applications INTRODUCTION In a display of global unity, all 193 countries
uses the same (or possiblyan inappropriate) model. This paper discusses an approach of “learning through failure”,where students develop simulations for systems that produce results not matching reality.The goal is to make students aware of the need to critically validate any results obtainedfrom a process simulator.IntroductionProcess simulation has become a core element of chemical engineering education. Recentsurveys have indicated that simulators are used in most chemical engineering curricula,with an increasing use outside the capstone design course. Equilibrium stagedseparations, process control, and thermodynamics courses are the three most commonsettings for incorporating simulation into the curriculum outside the capstone
Paper ID #43735Can Hands-on Statics Improve Student Learning?Prof. Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl serves as professor and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College in northwest Washington state. His current project involves developing and piloting an integrated multidisciplinary learning community for first-year engineering. More general teaching and research interests include designing, implementing and assessing activities for first-year engineering, engineering mechanics, and scientific computing. Eric has been an active member of ASEE since 2001. He was the recipient of the
by Grayson2 in The Making of an Engineer.The manufacturing engineering curriculum is structured around the creation of a student’stechnical toolbox. This technical toolbox supports the four professional components required for Page 6.229.2undergraduate manufacturing engineering ABET accreditation. The four professional studiesProceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition ©2001,American Society for Engineering Educationcomponents are: materials and manufacturing processes; process, assembly, and productengineering; manufacturing competitiveness; and manufacturing integration methods
activities. The survey also sought feedback onperceptions of the sufficiency of ESI education and broad perspectives regarding ESI. At theend of the survey, respondents were asked to provide their email address if they werewilling to be contacted for a follow-up interview. Of the 1448 survey respondents, 230indicated willingness to participate in an interview.The second phase of the study involved conducting interviews with educators to learn moreabout their ESI instructional practices and general perspectives regarding the integration ofESI into the engineering curriculum and educational experiences of engineering students.Between September 2016 and April 2017, 52 survey respondents were contacted forinterviews with the intention of conducting 36
Initial Lessons from Nexus Learning for Engineering Students Achieved Via Interdisciplinary Projects for Outside Clients Matthew J. Traum, Christopher F. Anderson, Christopher M. Pastore, Michael J. Leonard School of Design & Engineering Philadelphia UniversityAbstractPhiladelphia University’s approach to education is called Nexus Learning. It emphasizes active,engaged learning; collaborative and interdisciplinary team work; and experiential real-worldlearning. Emulating professional practice, students participate in curriculum-integrated projectsfor external clients. These real-world projects are intentionally organized with a broad andchanging
ones (e.g., a Riemann sum can be evaluatednumerically to approximate an integral).A Suggestion for Coupling Math and Engineering EducationOne set of issues that arose repeatedly in the workshop discussions was the concern that studentsdon’t see connections between mathematical tools, concepts and principles and their utility inengineering. A related concern was the time lag between exposure to mathematics and itsapplication. The notion of “just-in-time” learning arose repeatedly, and the suggestion was madethat the math courses be more application- or example-driven and be more evenly spread throughthe curriculum, rather than “front loaded” into the first two years. Our group shares theseconcerns, but thinks that the above suggestion is
Civilization 3 hours Literary Expression 3 hours Living Systems 3 hours Economic Systems 3 hours Oral Expression 3 hours Logical Systems 3 hours Political Systems 3 hours Written Expression 3 hours Physical Systems 3 hours Social Systems 3 hoursIII. The 300-400 Level Interdisciplinary Curriculum: THEME: INTEGRATION OF KNOWLEDGE: LIVING IN AN INTERDEPENDENT UNIVERSE Each student takes two 300-level courses that integrate two or more categories of the core curriculum. 300 Level Interdisciplinary Courses …………………………………………………………………………………………… 6 hours
, the PtD idea has gradually gained acceptance in the U.S. [3]. However,the traditional curriculum offered by civil engineering programs in the United States does notintegrate PtD concepts [4]. It has been suggested that the engineering community will notincorporate PtD into the curriculum until the accrediting body, ABET, includes it in either aGeneral Criteria or the Program Critera. The majority of civil engineering programs in theUnited States are accredited by ABET. Recently, ASCE’s Civil Engineering Program CriteriaTask Committee (CEPCTC) added a requirement for the curriculum to include an explanationof safety, effective for the 2024-2025 accreditation cycle. Specifically, CEPCTC suggests ninelecture topics that can be used to comply
design implementation course during their senior year5.The program offers at least six courses in which engineering design practice is included. Computeraided design and drafting, as well as solid modeling of parts, are strongly emphasized in theEngineering Graphics curriculum. Integrated methodology of solid modeling, analysis, and rapidprototyping in a product design process are emphasized in the CAD/CAM course. Students areasked to search for a product consisting of two or more components and to use our facilities todesign and build a prototype model. The projects are graded according to creativity, level ofchallenge, accuracy, and quality of final product (prototype model). Furthermore, application ofcomputer aided technologies in
. Owens – marissa.owens@unlv.eduOverview & Objective A STEM integrated problem-based curriculum was developed for third grade, designed toaddress the NGSS Standards, the Common Core Mathematics Standards, and Computer andTechnology Standards. The main objective of the project was to develop curriculum that couldsupport the adoption of the NGSS Standards in the state of Nevada while providing students withan integrated learning experience that could promote achievement among diverse learners. Thelong-term goals of the project were to pilot, revise, and expand upon the curriculum for othergrade levels. One unit in particular, as part of this larger project, was a six-week lesson focused on anengineering design challenge related
entry to describe the digital systems. The two most widely used HardwareDescription Languages in industry are VHDL (Very High Speed Integrated Circuit HardwareDescription Language) and Verilog (Verifying Logic). Although most traditional electrical andcomputer engineering programs have updated their curriculum to include topics in hardwaredescription language and programmable logic design (FPGA/CPLD), two-year and four-yearelectrical engineering technology programs have fallen behind and are moving slowly in updatingtheir curriculum. To effectively meet the next generation’s workforce needs, the electrical andcomputer engineering technology curriculum must be current, relevant, and teach technology thatis widely used in industry. To meet this
) 16 (AVG) OUTCOMES Chart 3Chart 3 provides an overview of student perception regarding the quantity of opportunities toengage in skills associated with each of the 16 Program Outcomes, as provided by their EEcourses. Again, when used with data from the database records, this data provides importantfeedback that can indicate any deficiencies within the program. Again, not surprisingly, thestudents felt that their EE curriculum provided the most opportunities to engage in theapplication of math, science, and engineering (Outcome #1), and to identify, formulate, and solveengineering
problem-solving skills and proficiency in the use of techniques andtools that implement these skills.3. Develop design skills and integrate design throughout the curriculum.4. Develop proficiency in written, oral, and graphic communication.5. Introduce and develop an appreciation for the arts, humanities, and social sciences.6. Promote engineering ethics, personal integrity and responsibility, and professionalism.7. Develop teamwork and leadership skills.8. Instill a commitment to lifelong learning.The aerospace engineering program is accredited under the EC 2000 criteria by the EngineeringAccreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.The crux of changes to this long-standing program of aerospace engineering
thinkingskills being assessed are often hyper-specific to that discipline (e.g. chemistry, environmentalscience). The results identified an important gap in the need for a more comprehensive tool thatis not tied to a specific discipline and a tool that can be applied outside of STEM contexts. Connecting the Research and Future DirectionsThe overarching theme tying together the research in this project is based on the importance ofcommunity in various K-12 contexts, ranging from training for the STW to curriculum forengineering efforts in rural schools. For example, leveraging partnerships and communityconnections is crucial for overcoming barriers presented by systemic disruptions while also beingincredibly important to leverage
moreeffectively and efficiently teach concepts, theory and problem solving skills. This pilot study willsupport instructors by providing an insightful understanding of the students’ successes andchallenges when dealing with real-world problems using data analytics.A team of faculty members in computer science, mechanical engineering and constructionmanagement at Alabama A&M University implemented ProjBL instructional practices in threecore courses in STEM curricula by integrating data analytics skills in Fall 2023. This pilot studyhas focused on: (1) designing the three courses in computer science, mechanical engineering andconstruction management by adding data analytics components into team projects; (2)incorporating engagement strategies in
,through the interactions of students, faculty, and industry, through participation in engineering-related activities, and through reinforcement of shared similarities. The goal of this project is todevelop a mechanical engineering program where students and faculty are immersed in a cultureof doing engineering with practicing engineers that in turn fosters an identity of being anengineer. This culture of “Engineering with Engineers” is created through changes in four areas:shared vision, reflective faculty, relevant curriculum and pedagogy, and supportive policies. Ineach, a variety of actions create the cultural change, address barriers to change, and ensuresustainability. A common theme unifying these changes is a significant connection to
programs, curriculum and workforce initiatives, including the National Association of Manufacturers Ed- ucators’Council. She is a Fellow of the American Society of Engineering Education, a member of Tau Beta Pi and Epsilon Pi Tau honor societies. She is a charter member of both the National Academy and the University of South Florida’s Academy of Inventors. Dr. Barger holds a licensed patent and is a licensed Professional Engineer in Florida.Dr. Richard Gilbert, University of South FloridaMr. Michael C. Ennis, Harris Corporation Michael Ennis is a Manufacturing Engineer for Harris Government Communications Division and an Adjunct Professor at Brevard Community College in Palm Bay, Florida. Harris is an international com
Seattle University’s Response to ABET’s Pilot CriteriaKatherine Kuder, Seattle University; Joshua Hamel, Seattle University; Yen-Lin Han, SeattleUniversity; Wesley Lauer, Seattle University; Michael Marsolek, Seattle University; AgnieszkaMiguel, Seattle University; Teodora Shuman, Seattle UniversityAbstractOur University’s Civil, Computer, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering programs voluntarilyparticipated in ABET’s 2023-2024 pilot study to show how the program satisfied ABET’sproposed language to incorporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) into their accreditationstandards. ABET’s initiative aimed to evaluate how well programs integrate DEI principles intothe curriculum (Criterion 5) and faculty awareness and
, published in ranked journals (e.g. Journal of College Science Teaching), reviewed conference proposals (e.g ASEE).Dr. Hasan Deniz, University of Nevada Las Vegas Hasan Deniz is an Associate Professor of Science Education at University of Nevada Las Vegas. He teaches undergraduate, masters, and doctoral level courses in science education program at University of Nevada Las Vegas. His research agenda includes epistemological beliefs in science and evolution education. He is recently engaged in professional development activities supported by several grants targeting to increase elementary teachers’ knowledge and skills to integrate science, language arts, and engineering education within the context of Next Generation
linked to a vertically integrated framework of our curriculum, which combines core engineering concepts andprocess design around biodiesel plants in different courses of our program. Finally, the teams submit a “strategiesreport” (engineering logbook), where all engineering strategies to achieve the process engineering goals aresummarized and discussed. With this revamped version, we expect to guide students to assume responsibility fordesigning sustainable chemical processes while enhancing students’ career readiness.Keywords: Curriculum integration, chemical process design, sustainability.IntroductionThe integration of sustainability-related topics in the chemical engineering curriculum has beenstrategized in different teaching approaches and
© 2001, American Society for Engineering EductaionAs engineering programs struggle to find a way to help improve their students’ writing, theyhave turned to a variety of solutions. ABET’s outcomes-based assessment allows forindividualized responses from engineering programs4. Over the past decade, some universitieshave integrated writing into existing engineering courses5, established engineering writingcenters6, among other alternatives. In July of 1999, the School of Electrical and ComputerEngineering at Purdue University hired me as a communications specialist; among my initialduties, I was asked to develop an institutional response to documenting communicationsoutcomes in the undergraduate students. This paper will describe one aspect of the
Session 1438 Impact of Product Data Management (PDM) trends on Engineering Graphics Instruction Eric N. Wiebe North Carolina State UniversityAbstractThe use of 3-D Computer-aided Design (CAD) systems in engineering design and manufacturinghas popularized the concept of the virtual product database. Product Data Management (PDM)and similar computer-based information management tools have increasingly been implemented tohelp manage this product database. Just as 3-D modeling is becoming an important component ofthe engineering graphics curriculum, PDM concepts