]. Although there are some slight variations by state, there are fourmajor requirements to becoming a professional engineer (PE): Graduate from an ABET-accredited engineering program, Pass the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam, Work under a PE for four years (three years with a Master’s in engineering), and Pass the PE exam.Undergraduate engineering students may take the FE exam prior to graduation in their senioryear [5]. During an engineering student’s senior year, their time is limited and occupied withsenior design projects, finishing course work, and job hunting. Studying for the FE exam is oftenthe last thing on their minds. However, their interest increases when they learn that being able tolist on their resume that
Expectations of Non-Technical Students,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2004). < http://www.asee.org/acPapers/2004-1387_Final.pdf>.14. Kuc, R.,” Teaching the non-science major: EE101 - The most popular course at Yale.” Proceedings of the 1997 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (1997). American Society for Engineering Education. .15. Ollis, David, “Installing A New "Technology Literacy" Course: Trials and Tribulations, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2004). American Society for Engineering Education. .16. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, (Editors). How People Learn: Brain, Mind
Junior Male 8 Chemical Engineering Junior Female 9 Accounting Senior Male 10 Political Science Sophomore MaleBased on past experiences, Honors College students prefer to be treated like graduate students.These students benefit most from courses that integrate free discussion with flexible approachesto topics. They prefer to be responsible for their own learning and to having instructors that arereceptive to students’ ideas for the course. With this in mind, the course was scheduled to meetonce per week for two and a half hours using a graduate seminar format
Paper ID #7356Engineering Design Process Knoweldge: Comparison between Teachers Newto Engineering and More Experienced TeachersMs. Ming-Chien Hsu, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ming-Chien Hsu is a doctoral candidate of Engineering Education at Purdue University with research in- terest in students’ transformative learning experiences. Hsu’s past experience in electrical engineering and her current pursuit in engineering education prompt her interest in exploring how learning experiences, e.g. design and interdisciplinary experiences, foster epistemological, interpersonal, and intrapersonal de- velopment.Dr. Monica E
rapidly, rather than specific fields, a very broad overview would bepreferred, focus on…basics.In my opinion, a minor in engineering would be similar to being a 1/2 engineer. It can be verydangerous to an organization if someone has a little engineering background and theorganization is using their limited knowledge to make decisions.It appears that the survey hit all the key elements that come to mind. Keys are an understandingthe economics of engineering decisions and being able to communicate within multi-disciplinaryteams/skill levels.Non-engineers with the ability to understand a discussion of a technical nature and have a senseof the relative advantages, disadvantages, benefits, and risks would be extremely useful to anyorganization that
educator needs to share ideas openly to discuss and frame a better future for our activities. Having the flexible and open-‐minded approaches and philosophical basis together with shared engineering values and concepts are essential for paving a better road to the future of engineering and engineering education. AcknowledgementThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under awards: DUE 0837314 and DUE-‐0920164. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The author would like to thank
AC 2012-4204: ”OMG! THAT’S WHAT AN ENGINEER DOES?”: FRESH-MEN DEVELOPING A PERSONAL IDENTITY AS AN ENGINEERStephen Rippon, Arizona State University Steve Rippon is the Assistant Dean of Student Services in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. In this capacity, he oversees the Engineering Schools’ K-12 outreach, under- graduate student recruitment, undergraduate engagement programs, and the Engineering Career Center.Dr. James Collofello, Arizona State UniversityMs. Robin R. Hammond, Arizona State University Page 25.16.1 c American Society for Engineering
students) based on student learning style as determined by theFelder online LSI. Strong preferences in any learning style were grouped together, with visuallearners subordinated to any other strong preference due to their large predominance. Studentswithout strong preferences were grouped as most convenient.Students were tasked with reverse-engineering the manufacture of Dippin’ Dots, a type of icecream available at specific concession stands. During the exercise, we circulated among thegroups and observed the style of work and informed students of their like-minded groupmembers. Sure enough, groups tended to perform to learning style. Dippin’ Dots were availableto eat during the exercise, and the class took place outdoors to facilitate the food
Session number 3661 Engineering For A Better World: The Meaning Of Utopian Thinking For Engineering Education Erik de Graaff, Wim Ravesteijn Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands Jaffalaan 5 2628 BX Delft, the Netherlands email e.degraaff@tbm.tudelft.nl 1. Introduction In recent years we have seen that conferences of the eight richest countries in the world in Seattle, Genoa and Florence invoked large demonstrations by anti-globalists who condemn the economic policy
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, School, Editors, John Bransford, Ann Brown, Rodney Cocking,National Academy Press, 1999. Page 8.810.7 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education
promote 21st century skills andhelp learners build up their “habit of mind” [2] for scientific reasoning and inquiry.Computing has made possible profound leaps of innovations and imagination, resulting infundamentally new ways of science and engineering practice [3]. This paradigm shift has asignificant impact on the skills needed for a diverse science and engineering workforce who iscapable of designing and deploying cyber-based systems, tools and services. However, oureducation has not kept pace with this evolution, especially at the K-12 level. In fact, there is acrucial need to bring cyberinfrastructure (CI) learning experiences into classrooms of secondaryeducation.Environmental sustainability has become increasingly prevalent in teaching
: 10.1007/s11948- 017-9910-6.[10] J. Haidt, The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage Press, 2012.[11] J. D. Greene, Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York: Penguin Books, 2014.[12] M. H. Bazerman and A. Tenbrunsel, Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What’s Right and What to Do about It. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.[13] R. F. Clancy, “The Ethical Education and Perspectives of Chinese Engineering Students: A Preliminary Investigation and Recommendations,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1935–1965, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00108-0.[14] B. Keysar, S. L. Hayakawa, and S. G. An, “The Foreign-Language Effect,” Psychol. Sci., 2012, doi: 10.1177
toprepare the students with practical skills that are directly applicable to the industry. With thisgoal in mind, a seamless integration of the RF courses into the program curriculum should bedevised. One of the ways to implement the necessary courses seamlessly is to use technicalelectives allowed in the program curriculum to teach the necessary RF engineering courses. Thisapproach minimizes the impact of creating the RF engineering program on the existingcurriculum. Figure 1: RF Curriculum OverviewEven with RF engineering courses as technical electives, it would not be easily feasible to add allthe traditional RF engineering courses to the degree programs due to the restriction on themaximum number of credits for a
to support this statement. Well funded,“fat” programs will probably never again be the norm. Faculty of engineering and technologyprograms have an opportunity to steer their own destiny if administrators will create supportiveenvironments.Engineering and technology faculty should remain open-minded about the possibilities of afuture technology worker surplus in their fields. Administrators of these programs should becognizant of the job security concerns of their faculty should engineering and technologyprograms be eliminated. Additional study needs to be done of the jobs outlook in specificengineering and technology fields to provide data that will support sound decision making
help anchor key concepts in student’s minds have been very successful. Thisis not an easy task to accomplish. One of the most successful MEAs was the one on signalprocessing and using characteristics of functions to differentiate between two signals, withapplication to voice recognition. This was particularly attractive to students and faculty alike andthey were able to see the value of an MEA through this particular example.ConclusionsOur findings have shown that an approach based on a positive looking engineering pre-calculuscourse tuned to get students ready for calculus is making an impact. The combination ofincorporating engineering MEAs into the classroom curriculum, addressing topics necessary forengineering calculus is important, and
. Write at least two sentences; 2) List atleast three words/phrases that come to mind when you think of an engineer; and 3) From yourperspective, what kind of activities you think are typical of an engineer? Fifteen minutes weregiven to the students to complete this part of the test. All written responses were transcribedverbatim into a spreadsheet.Data analysisDrawings and open-ended responses were analyzed by two researchers (i.e., the last author and adoctoral student, which is the first author). Following the procedure described by Oware et al.4,an inductive data analysis approach was utilized to code the drawings and written responses.After reading and rereading the questionnaire responses and discussing their impressions of theentire data
AC 2011-701: COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL APTITUDE, PRIOR EX-PERIENCES, AND ENGINEERING ATTITUDE FOR MALE AND FEMALEMECHANICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTSMichele Miller, Michigan Technological University Dr. Michele Miller is an Associate Professor in mechanical engineering. She teaches classes on manufac- turing and human factors and does disciplinary research on microelectromechanical systems and precision machining. Her educational research interests include problem solving in the lab and informal engineering education.Anna Pereira, University of California, BerkeleyBenjamin Mitchell, Michigan Technological University
Session 1375 A New Engineering Educator’s Guide for Creating a Summer Engineering Internship Program Mark R. Tufenkjian California State University, Los AngelesAbstractAn internship experience can play a pivotal role during a student’s educational journey. Aninternship provides a student with an outstanding opportunity to advance their qualifications botheducationally and professionally. This paper presents an organizational framework for newengineering educators to plan, develop, and implement a simple yet effective internship programat their universities. The
they are trying to do. When a Page 15.1391.8 person first comes to you and says what they want, [it] may not actually be the solution that they need. It is really up to us to try to understand what you are trying to achieve and then have an open mind to consider the possible options. That’s one that I think is a big oneFor most engineers in our study, meeting with clients or colleagues and trying to determine theirneeds was a challenging and satisfying part of their work lives, as this engineer’s experienceillustrates: I like meeting with the clients and hearing what they have to say and either agreeing with
experience.Teachers were given 10 min to draw an engineer (previously they were asked to close their eyesand imagine an engineer at work) on a sheet of paper (directions were read to the teachers andalso provided in writing in the sheet of paper). Once they had completed their drawings, teacherswere given 15 min to answer three question prompts (read by a facilitator and projected on thescreen for the whole audience to see them during the entire 15 min) related to what they haddrawn: 1) Describe what the engineer is doing in your drawing. Write at least two sentences. 2)List at least three words/phrases that come to mind when you think of an engineer. 3) What kindsof things do you think an engineer does on a typical day? List at least three things
, Needs-to-Know, and Next Steps Focuses on Authentic Issues Students address problems and issues from Engineering Grand Challenges of the 21st Century and community needs Students complete tasks in a simulated or real STEM work environment in which they are working like STEM professionals Students are exposed to STEM careers Students collaborate with professionals beyond the classroom Includes an intentional instructional focus on helping students develop the interpersonal skills valued in real-world environment such as 21st Century Skills /Habits of Mind Focuses on Significant Academic Content Students learn important
. Page 7.598.5 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ã 2002, American Society for Engineering Education q Be flexible and creative. Plan for activities to take longer than expected and for unforeseen technical difficulties to arise. q Provide and distribute to participants an exhaustive check list of “Things To Bring”. q Place a lot of effort into team building early in the process, and be prepared to mediate the occasional dispute that may arise. q Institute a dress code, but be reasonable and mindful of current fashions. q Provide 24-hour contact information for parents. q Interact continuously with hosting facility
perceive thatthe Engineering Design Process helped them complete their project successfully. Future workincludes investigating the different phases that make up the design process to evaluate students’perception of that phase, collecting similar data sets from future sophomores’ class andcollaboration with faculty from other departments to gage their student’s reception of thismodule. Furthermore, an entrepreneurial minded learning approach will also be explored. Seemore details on the card: https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/3984.References [1] L. L. Bucciarelli, “Designing and learning: a disjunction in contexts”, Des. Stud., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 295–311, May 2003. [2] F. Ewere, “Exploring Sources and Skill levels of Accidental
held in the United States. Its mission is to engage the greatest minds inscience. Engineering education curriculum needs to include visits to Engineering Festivals. Proceedings of the 2012 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering EducationTRADE STUDIES Trade studies are well understood in the engineering education discipline and in thebusiness environment. It provides the information necessary for making well-informed decisions.Decision-making is also well understood and needs to be part of the context of system thinkingfor the K-12 community to be relevant. The current challenge is that there is currently not astandard for K-12 engineering education [1] or a consensus on how engineering education topicssuch
. Accelerometer and its application at floor/roof levels.Computer Modeling and SimulationWith respect to earthquake engineering subjects, a meaningful learning experience in computermodeling and simulation will only take place if students have mastered appropriate fundamentalbackground course materials. It is also important to consider the computational nature of thediscipline, especially keeping in mind that the analytical predictions will help studentsunderstand the structural behavior observed through laboratory experiments. As a result, a five- Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2014, American Society for Engineering Education
Paper ID #24665Smartness in Engineering Culture: An Interdisciplinary DialogueDr. Emily Dringenberg, Ohio State University Dr. Dringenberg is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Ohio State Uni- versity. She holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering (Kansas State ’08), a M.S. in Industrial Engineering (Purdue ’14) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education (Purdue ’15). Her team, Beliefs in Engineering Re- search Group (BERG) utilizes qualitative methods to explore beliefs in engineering. Her research has an overarching goal of leveraging engineering education research to shift the culture of
Paper ID #11544Ethics Education as Philosophical History for EngineersDr. Daniel J. Biezad P.E., California Polytechnic State University Daniel J. Biezad is professor emeritus in the aerospace engineering department of the College of Engi- neering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly). He received the B.S. in electrical engineering from the Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT-1966), the M.S. in astronautical engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT-1972), and the Ph.D. in aeronautical and astronautical engineering from Purdue University (1984). He has received the
Professional Development Director for the Engineering is Elementary project. She has 10+ years of experience as both a science educator and researcher that includes teaching biology, en- vironmental outreach education, and research in biopsychology. Prior to joining the EiE team, Yang was a founding teacher at an alternative school for ”at risk” teens. She understands the challenges of working with children that struggle in a mainstream school environment and the importance of creating a classroom that fosters inquiry and student-centered learning. With that in mind, Yang conducts teacher professional development that not only teaches content, but models strong science pedagogy so that elementary school teachers can
2006-16: ON THE STRUCTURING OF THE GRADUATE ENGINEERINGDISQUISITIONDavid Wells, North Dakota State University David L. Wells has been a manufacturing engineer for over four decades, roughly equally divided between industrial and academic employment. He has been Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at North Dakota State University since January 2000. Prior to this appointment, he served in a manufacturing engineering and education post at Focus: HOPE for six years and on the faculty of University of Cincinnati for fifteen years. His early career included some twenty years in research and development, manufacturing engineering and production management in the power generation
Paper ID #15716Abstraction Thresholds in Undergraduate Electrical Engineering CurriculaDr. Lance C. Perez, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dr. Lance C. P´erez received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia, and his M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Notre Dame. He is currently a Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln where he directs the Perceptual Systems Research Group. His research interests include information, video and signal processing, engineered healthcare and engineering education.Dr. Presentacion Rivera-Reyes