students will be collected and analyzed to study theteaching and learning effectiveness of these modules for further improvement. Each module willbe a complete, and stand-alone package that operates in three modes, i.e. Learning, Assessment,and Game modes. The Learning Mode teaches fundamental concepts through simulations andvisualization, the Assessment Mode quizzes on the understanding of these concepts withconceptual questions, and the Game Mode gives problems for students to apply concepts andtheir critical thinking and problem-solving skills. All the activities are carefully thought throughand planned to cover, teach, and assess critical concepts in a systematic matter.2. MechGames: Projectile Motion moduleThis section discusses the pilot
each subjectwere determined by university planned common exam times. For example, Chemistry 115common exams were scheduled on Monday evenings from 7 – 9 pm so those tutoring sessionswere scheduled on “off weeks” from exams.Chemistry 115 was scheduled for Monday, Mathematics 155 (Calculus) was scheduled forTuesday evenings and Mathematics 153 / 154 (Calculus Part 1 & 2) was scheduled for Thursdayevenings. These subjects were chosen since the majority of students in the Engineering LLCwere enrolled in those courses.In the spring of 2019, tutoring was expanded to cover Physics 111 (General Physics) andMathematics 156 (Calculus 2) as those were classes that the majority of the students typicallytake in the spring semester.House Cup / Running
together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives. 8. Every group in class participated equally. 9. Every person in my group participated equally. 10. As a result of this project, I have a better understanding of the amount of work involved to design a complex machine. 11. Having the entire class work on a single collaborative project is a better learning experience vs. every person working on individual projects. Students rated the questions above on a scale from 1 – 5 where a 1 was strongly disagreeand a 5 was strongly agree. Results from the assessment survey are shown in Figure 6 below: Figure 6: Course survey, before
. Consequently, it may be especially important to ensure that students enroll in a mathcourse that aligns with their current skill set, even if they must devise an alternative plan to meetfuture prerequisite requirements. Among our population, and others [20], math self-efficacy wasmore dependent on grade earned, rather than course enrolled.To what extent might math self-efficacy be associated with persistence in engineering?We indeed found that math self-efficacy was highest among students who were retained throughtheir sophomore year. Given the potential role of math self-efficacy in retention, it may beimportant to encourage classroom environments and support activities that help to build mathself-efficacy, especially among students who do not
-advising model infused several Research on academic advising stands to gainformative topics and activities into the first-year engineering from applying a CRT lens. For example, previouscourse. These included major selection; identification of peer- research at one institution reported a change insupport mechanisms; references to available counseling, advising structure increased student satisfactiontutoring and career-planning resources; periodical remindersregarding academic deadlines; check-ins to identify students at overall [4]; however, it failed to account for possibleacademic and/or medical risk; and early interventions for differing experiences among engineeringstudents who experienced
six General Education outcomes. The overalltheme of the seminar, as well as the topics of the individual seminar sections, are determined bythe faculty. Based on the freshman population, there are typically 14-28 different seminar topicsand 18-23 sections with approximately 20 students per section. Because of the broad nature ofthe General Education outcomes, each seminar section varies in its particular topic, spanningmany different disciplines. The School of Engineering at The Citadel used the curriculum updateas an opportunity to engage both engineering and non-engineering students with engineeringtopics in the freshman seminars. The new plan calls for each section of the Freshman Seminar tobe matched with a three-credit-hour composition
important to plan out theimplementation process for the game. It was decided to first implement the core game functionality.To verify that core game functionality is correct, multiple exhaustive rounds of the new Snake gamewere to be played. After ensuring that the base functionality of the game was complete and correct,the hardening and obfuscation was to be included.As previously mentioned, obfuscation techniques were to be junk code insertion, rabbit-holefunction calls, and stack pointer manipulation. Junk code insertion is a common and relativelysimple technique in basic code hardening and obfuscation. The goal of this technique is to muddythe source code of an application without changing the functionality of the application. To do this,random
admissionsrecords. The academic plan (major), semester GPA and cumulative GPA for each semester astudent was enrolled were obtained from College of Engineering records. There are also recordsfor each degree the students were awarded and the year and semester of degreeawarded. Demographic information is coded as reported to the Integrated PostsecondaryEducation Data System (IPEDS).The students are grouped by cohorts of their attendance at ESCape. These cohorts alsocorrespond to the students’ first semester in college. All of the participants were first-time, first-year students. Comparison data comes from the College of Engineering and the Office ofInstitutional Research and Planning. Using these sources, a comparison can be made betweenthe ESCape attendees
semantics and tricky syntax.Programming students today must master some of these languages in order to be viable jobcandidates.Programming is a complex cognitive task that can be broken down into four concrete steps, atleast at the outset. For larger systems there may be other aspects as well: ● Comprehension of the desired task ● Planning a sequence of steps to accomplish that task ● Writing a program in a particular language to implement the algorithm ● Testing and (usually) debugging the program In teaching programming, we can show students the programming constructs of alanguage, such as a loop, but like any language, fluency comes through practice. The obviousway to build competence is to have students write programs
important point, which is to say that increasing the numbers of women and underrepresentedminorities in engineering is best done, not by working to change the students, but by changingourselves. The plan for a garden is laid out and anchor plants, maybe trees or bushes, are selected first.These plants need to be diverse themselves to ensure the overall health of the ecosystem. They serveas shade for seedlings not yet ready for full sun and even serve as a kind of existence proof themselves.The metaphor corresponds to a diverse faculty, which needs to be a deliberate part of a strategic plan,and all of the faculty need to focus on broadening participation. The ASEE Diversity RecognitionProgram [11], for example, includes attention to the
. What do people need to do/do differently today to make tomorrow different from yesterday? (4) Describe how we/we will hold ourselves and others in our environment accountable?This presentation also describes how experiential learning has been incorporated within each of the four interventions in order to improve learning and promote an inclusive, vibrant academic environment as well as detailed descriptions of each activity, workshop evaluation results, and future plans. 11Reiterate the sessions title, “Creating an Inclusive, Vibrant Learning Environment within a Large Software Engineering Program ‐Experiential Learning Experiences
student cohortgroup related to combatting imposter syndrome, strategic planning for a career (who andwhat do want to be when you grow up), recognizing and managing micro and macroaggressions in the workplace and laboratory setting, and training in an asset-basedapproach to mentoring emphasizing growth versus fixed mindset in our training. Studentsalso focused on team building, communication training particularly in regard to “bragging”about one’s accomplishments, time management, how to give presentations utilizingtechniques in improvisation, college readiness related to applying for college and thetransition from high school to college, as well as building self esteem through effective selfpromotion.The activities for WRAMP was to not only
better understandthemselves and the context of their aversive experiences [5], due to its association withcounterfactual thinking.Counterfactual thinking can benefit future behavior by offering a behavioral script for self-improvement [6]. The functionality of regret is related to its affective and cognitive components;the negative affect aroused by counterfactuals can increase strategic planning and motivation topromote future improvement [7], whereas the cognitive component is related to functionalconsequences like planning and self-improvement [4]. However, regret and counterfactualthinking can also be dysfunctional. The affective component of regret is often associated withnegative outcomes like reduced well-being and avoidant responses to
] 2 Overview According to the CSU Office of Institutional Research, Effectiveness, and Planning [11], the 2018‐2019 Enrollment Statistics for CBE were: 322 Students Enrolled 33% Females and 67% Males 17% Pell Recipients 21% First Generation 36.6 % Minority and International Statistics and figures for all departments in Walter Scott Jr. College of Engineering available in [11].Weber and Atadero. 2020 Annual CoNECD Conference. 3Minority includes students who self‐report a minority status; nonminority
using game-based learning will demonstrate higher mathematicsGPA than the control group of students in the construction science and management program.For the second test, the study will divide students into adequate numbers of control andexperimental sample size groups.The research team plans to add more modules to the PCLG. The additional modules will bebased on the game leveling concept. The PCLG will use the student’s level of Pre-Calculusknowledge as a way of measuring the average statistics of their character – making questionseasier or harder to compensate their learning. To motivate student learning, the game willaddress the psychology of getting the rewards of leveling up.As a pilot study, the research team plans to include this game
-PBH students.Inspired from the first round of PBH implementation in Dynamics, the authors plan to refine thePBH implementation process in future offerings of this course. Specifically, the authors plan toconduct a multiple semester based study. In the second round of implementation, the PBHassignments will be kept optional in the first semester. The students who do not opt to completethe PBH assignments will serve as the control group of students for data comparison for the PBHstudents. The incoming grades of all students will be looked at by obtaining student grades fromthe previous “Statics” course in sequence through the University IKM (institutional knowledgemanagement) database to gauge the type of student and their interest. The
statements of support of a similar nature were not recorded from the virtual event.Given that students indicated a preference for an in-person event, whether they be a student or analumnus, our plan is that Senior Design Day should return to being an in-person event but withimproved and expanded digital content. We plan to continue to probe our research questions andtake steps to increase the number of responses we receive.References[1] Wilder, Laura Ingalls, 1867-1957. Little House on the Prairie. New York, N.Y.:HarperCollins, 1963.[2] Talley, A., and Compeau, C., “Senior Design Day – Multi-discipline and Multi-departmentCapstone Presentation Event,” 2018 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[3
question’s coupled explanation was free response for this experiment, sowe could collect additional data for the CMR reasoning question. In the future, we will give theCMR pre- and post-IBLA to allow us to compare the changes in student reasoning due to theIBLA. We will also use the survey responses to modify the IBLA and consider making theactivity shorter for students. In the future, we also plan to analyze the performance of students inrelation to their ethnicity, gender, etc. to identify possible correlations between studentperformance and feelings of belonging in the classroom.AcknowledgementsThe work was funded in part by a grant from the California Governor’s Office of Planning andResearch Learning Lab (https://calearninglab.org
the Thomas O. Spicer EndowedScholarship In Chemical Engineering for the 2021-22 academic year. She plans to work inindustry upon graduation in May 2022.Trent PorterfieldMr. Porterfield is a chemical engineering undergraduate at the University of Arkansas and isfrom Houston, Texas. He has been named to the Chancellor’s List in each semester from Spring2020 to Spring 2021. He plans to work in industry upon graduation in May 2022. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceW. Roy PenneyDr. Penney is a Professor Emeritus of Chemical Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Hisresearch interests include fluid mixing and process design, and he has
hiring of strongresearch faculty which resulted in little to no emphasis on practical application and a heavyemphasis on math and sciences theory [7]. In 1976, Harrisberger and Others, as a part of the American Society of EngineeringEducators expressed that a experiential learning program should support the following: “problemsolving skills, interpersonal awareness, creative expression, communication skills, technicalskills, self-confidence building, computation skills, engineering fundamentals, organizationalskills, leadership skills, planning skills, professional ethics, engineering judgment” [6, p. 7]. Inthe late 1980s, the clash between higher education engineering or engineering technologyprograms and employers emerged. Feedback
engineering education through a design-focused, project-rich curriculum that engages students through collaborations with industry and society across all eight semesters. A first-generation college student, Kurt earned his Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from the Univer- sity of Iowa. He has served as chair of ASEE’s International Division, and was founding chair of ASEE’s Community Engagement Division. He is recipient of best conference paper awards for the 2009 and 2016 ASEE Annual Conferences.Dr. Justin J Henriques Justin Henriques is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison Univer- sity. He holds a Ph.D. and M.S. in systems engineering, a masters in urban and environmental planning
did “Twin Cities groups.” There was an absence of managers’ in- depth knowledge and as such, authority accrual through “expert power” (Badawy 1995) could not occur. Also of interest in Figure 5 is the greater dissatisfaction, albeit by a small amount, of “Twin Cities groups” with eventual project outcomes than “Duluth teams.” One might argue that the groups from the Twin Cities, unbeknownst to them, had a richer project management experience than their Duluth counterparts who did not require the same level of detailed plans and execution per trip to client locations. The twin cities groups were, thus, arguably more involved and better equipped at the end of the exercise and were less satisfied with the
router, some computers and a wirelessaccess point. Eventually, they create larger models using OPNET software. The high levelbehavior of different applications in IEEE 802.11 networks will be simulated on discrete eventsimulations. This allows students to measure several performance characteristics such as end-to-end delay, aggregate throughput, congestion, number of retransmissions, etc. in such kind ofnetworks.Course outline for Lab:The topics are scheduled for a 14-week semester with laboratory assignments. The subjectscovered are [12, 13]: ▪ Wireless LAN Devices and Standards ▪ How Wireless Works ▪ IEEE 802.11 Physical Layer Standards ▪ IEEE 802.11 Medium Access Control and Network Layer Standards ▪ Planning and Building a Wireless
need to go to such detailed organization of documentation is because of the vastamount of information that students need to go through in a very short amount of timeduring the start of the semester. Besides the Projects’ Description package, copies of theCourse of Study, a Bidding Form for each team to bid on the projects, and a StudentSchedule Table to help plan field trips to sponsors’ locations need to be ready to bedistributed to the students on the first day of class. The Course of Study documentationis very detailed (typically ten pages long) and contains information on the following:* Class room and meeting dates / times* Office hours of the instructor* Purpose and objectives of the course* Assessment and grading policy* Team formation
hour in the city and you are searching for a parking spot. Once you find one, you willhave a brief moment to pull up and back your car in. With automated parallel parking – noproblem! – but with horns blaring, what is your back-up plan if the automated system fails?Could you take over and park the car flawlessly? Have you ever done that? Could you even dothat now?In engineering, we are depending more and more on computer tools to model and analyze thesystems we conceive. If we do not use these tools correctly, or if the assumptions on which thesetools are based do not match our needs, or if the tools have a bug, or …, could we take over andapply basic mathematics and physics to the problem at hand, at least to gain insight, if not theexact
wereshipped. More than 95% of mobile phones, 90% of hard drive controllers, 40% digital TVs andset-top boxes, 15% microcontrollers, and 20% mobile computers are using the ARM processors.To keep up with the embedded industry change, we have updated the contents of ourmicrocontroller courses with the goal to keep up with the technology change and make ourgraduates more marketable. We have taught the ARM Cortext-M4 MCU in our secondmicrocontroller course and plan to also teach the simpler version of the ARM Cortex-M MCU inour first microcontroller course.Three major issues must be addressed in order to teach a new microcontroller. First, we need tochoose an appropriate Cortex-M4 demo board for students to perform laboratory experimentsand design
where the underlying theory and mathematics of the coursecontent was taught. These lessons were presented in a traditional classroom setting with shortactive learning exercises included into the lesson plan meant to keep students engaged, such aspolling, discussions, and think-pair-share exercises. On Fridays, students would attend a 50 minuteno-lecture Friday session that would take place in a classroom specifically designed for activelearning sessions. This classroom had large communal tables to best facilitate collaborative learn-ing and display monitors at every table. Students were asked to self-select groups during the firstno-lecture Friday sessions and then sit with this group each Friday.During the first few minutes of these sessions
Paper ID #35261A Reconfigurable and Modular Hardware for Remote Learning of AnalogCircuit DesignMr. Yixin Xiong, Penn State University Yixin Xiong is a senior student at the Pennsylvania State University, majoring in Electrical Engineering with a concentration in circuits and electronics. His interests in circuits were developed in a music pro- cessing circuit design project in a major course, and enhanced in later higher-level circuits design courses. He is planning to attend graduate school after graduation to study deeper in this field.Stephen Porter, Penn State University Stephen is a recent graduate of Penn State
able to form the plan for the application phase. Phase 3: Application – Next Steps in the Project EvolutionAs this project is a work in progress, the undergraduate research project is not complete.Utilizing the information from the questionnaire and the information gathered in the Reflectionphase, the researchers will narrow down the brainstorm ideas to the most suitable options. Next,work on the initial prototype design will begin. The research will continue on to CAD drawing,software simulation, and prototyping as well as important analyses of the chosen device design.ConclusionThe student found the research project to be advantageous, especially during a semester ofmostly online courses. The project created a connection
(PI) for each student outcome (SO) asmandated by ABET [6] and used to measure the CO, and the mapping of each CO to the properSO (student outcome). Section 2 provides a summary of each laboratory experiment and theequipment used. Section 3 summarizes the project activities. Section 4 outlines the remoteinstruction during the health pandemic. Section 5 discusses the learning outcomes assessment,and Section 6 includes conclusions and plans for future work.Section 1: IoT Course SetupThe course is an introduction to IoT at the system, subsystem, and component level. Studentswill gain hands-on experience assembling and testing IoT devices to achieve node to clientcommunication, node to node communication, and peer to cloud communication. The