creative critical ideas to develop. Wemaintained rigorous expectations for students while demanding the out of the box thinking thatinnovations require. Developing comfort with discomfort, working collaboratively with peoplefrom other disciplines, and attaining agency through their individual talents and skills were allarenas where we saw significant student growth, particularly articulated in the Final Projectpresentations. Students also expressed gratification at the opportunity to work acrossdisciplines, learn from each other, and even share strengths with each other. For many it wasthe only class that held space for that experience in their University career. While timeconsuming to plan, the rewards for students and faculty are worthwhile
they might actuallysolve in their professional careers. As one student stated: “It provided a realistic scenario similar to a problem which could be encountered on the job.”Other students explained how the real world example helped them “to learn the material better”: “By working on a real life problem with [company name] Superchargers, it allowed me to see real world problems and how we can solve them with dynamics.”One student stated that the experience helped them to value what they are learning in class: “It was nice to get a taste of what real world problems are like. Because it helps me see the value of what I am, or should be learning.”Open-endednessStudents expressed both excitement and frustration
? d. They also give an example of how “a fluid pressure of 1,000 psi can push with 3140 lbs. of force. A pneumatic cylinder using 100 psi air would need a bore of almost 6½ in. (33 sq. in.) to develop the same force.” How is this so? e. Go to the “Education & Careers” section on the website. Under the “Employment” section review the companies listed where career opportunities exist. Pick three companies and describe how they may use pneumatics.A second analytical computational assignment is being developed to help expand a student'sknowledge of pressurized air and transitioning from ideal gas operational ranges to non-ideal gaspressure ranges and how those two ranges can impact
, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance under- standing of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering
of New Mexico, Drake State Technical College, and Chandler-Gilbert Community College. The award focused on expanding outreach activities to increase the awareness of potential college stu- dents about career opportunities in electronics technologies. Dr. Alaraje is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), a member of the ASEE Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing Division, a member of the ASEE Engineering Technology Division, a senior member of the Institute of Electrical & Electronic Engineers (IEEE), and a member of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Department Heads Association (ECETDHA).Mr. Mark Highum, Bay de Noc Community College Mark Highum is currently the
Tucker, Tucker Innovations Dr. Tommy Tucker is the CEO and owner of Tucker Innovations. He has a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineer- ing from the Georgia Institute of Technology. He has over 15 years of experience writing computationally intensive software applications for engineering, medical, and defense applications. After spending the early part of his career at high tech start-up companies, Dr. Tucker founded Tucker Innovations to fa- cilitate his software consulting activities. Through Tucker Innovations, Dr. Tucker has aided various organizations in producing software applications from concept to product launch and continuing through multiple release cycles. Clients range from small high tech startup companies to
undertaken to support the current campus operations and research at the UMES toreduce its carbon footprint. The first phase, led by a multidisciplinary team of university faculty,career scientists, staff, and supported by students, saw the implementation of a year-roundbiodiesel generation capability [7]. The project’s rationale stemmed from the institution’s sizeableagricultural operations (UMES is an 1890 land grant institution) which were undertaken by heavymachinery operating on copious amounts of traditional diesel fuel (Figure 1). Biodiesel, on theother hand, is a renewable alternative which can be produced by virgin oils extracted from oilseeds, or used oils, such as the waste oils from the university’s cafeteria. Through the process
curricular content makes a difference in shaping the beliefs and expectationsstudents hold as they transition into their professional careers. Such an assumption is warrantedgiven the way other topics appear in the curriculum. For example, if an emphasis on teamworkand problem-solving were not perceived as relevant to professional practice, then one would notexpect them to receive as much attention as they do4,5. Similarly, engineering ethics is anothersuch pivotal topic, and therefore one would expect it to appear in undergraduate courses. Yet,this is not uniformly the case. To understand the discrepancy in engineering ethics coverage, thiswork focuses on some of the central actors in course content decisions – engineering departmentfaculty members
conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize prac- ticing engineers’ understandings of core engineering concepts. He is a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education.Dr. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher, Florida International University Dr. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher is an assistant professor at Florida International University. Her research interests focus on understanding how organizational change occurs in higher education with respect to teaching and learning in STEM courses.Mr. Sean Lyle Gestson, Oregon State University Sean Gestson is a recent graduate from the University of Portland where he studied Civil Engineering
results. Section 5 is a discussion ofconclusions and future steps to address issues encountered in the assessment.2. BackgroundWe describe instructional strategies and infrastructure that focus on wireless communicationssystems and enable development and evaluation of educational modules designed to makecomplex topics more accessible throughout academic and professional careers of STEM workers.These learning experiences are intended to be immersive, and include game-like, visuallyengaging tutorial exercises as well as asynchronous exercises in which participants program orconfigure autonomous radios and systems.GamificationOne of the major hurdles to overcome in the education process is in teaching the computationalprocesses involved in SDR
. His research interests include Humanitarian Engineering, social justice in engineering education, global engineering education, professional engineering practice, and curriculum design.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science
range of learning styles, making the method moreaccessible to a wider range of students. Additionally, experiential learning and place-basededucation can give students an insight to this “real world” by providing the activeexperimentation that is essential for engineering careers. Furthermore, experiential learningmethods can be used to meet an ability to “acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, usingappropriate learning strategies” by offering a foundation for learning as a life-long process.Service learning is a subset of experiential learning and integrates a community servicecomponent. Service learning in the context of this case study relies upon a university’scommitment to a non-profit entity which is supported by the university
to upskill while retaining their current job cannot afford to take 1-2 years to study abroad. • Family ties: Students who have responsibilities to their family (e.g., kids, aging parents) cannot fulfill these duties while studying abroad. • Visa restrictions: Students who come from countries where getting visas to the U.S. is diffi- cult might not be eligible for residential programs.At the same time, getting an advanced degree from a U.S.-based institution is still of high value tosome of these students: • Career opportunities in multinational firms: Students can advance their careers based on educational credentials from a known, international university. • Potential eligibility for the U.S
alternative contexts and lifelong learning skills. Table 3: Samples Responses for Stages 4-7 of the Perry Model or the King and Kitchener Reflective Judgment StagesParticipant Response showing Stage 4 Response showing Stage 5 Response showing Stage 6 Response showing Stage 7 Learning a CAD program is By understanding MatLab, important to me because I codes could be written with will be using it for the rest certain parameters given of my academic and specific inputs. Having an professional career. understanding of MatLab John Inventor, or similar CAD will greatly benefit
student’s reaching the insight that their valuelies not purely in their technical knowledge and skills, but also in how they are applied toameliorate risk in the development of engineering solutions in complex environments.Without navigation with regard to the nature of engineering (as technology) and the role ofvolition in activity, it is not surprising that students are quite often perplexed when confronted bythese innovations. The practices and values to which they are exposed are most often than notdrawn from a diverse gamut of potential future career pathways and associated professions withtheir various value systems, ways of performing their profession, and not least understandings ofwhat knowledge and skills are of value and to be valued
Paper ID #25470Investigation of the Transition from Order to Chaos by a Numerical Simula-tion of Pohl’s Wheel ¨Dr. Gunter Bischof, Joanneum University of Applied Sciences Throughout his career, Dr. G¨unter Bischof has combined his interest in science and engineering applica- tion. He studied physics at the University of Vienna, Austria, and acquired industry experience as devel- opment engineer at Siemens Corporation. Currently he is an associate professor at Joanneum University of Applied Sciences and teaches engineering and applied mathematics.Markus Klatzer, Joanneum University of Applied Sciences Markus Klatzer
Students Success Network, Engaging Adjunct Fac- ulty, and other funded initiatives as well as leading Achieving the Dream’s teaching and learning programs and network-engagement activities. Prior to joining Achieving the Dream, Cindy served for more than 20 years in community colleges as an associate vice president for instruction, a department chair, and a faculty member. Cindy began her career as a middle school and high school teacher.Mrs. Alexis K. Van Winkle, University of Central Arkansas c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Knowledge in the Making: What Engineering Students are Learning in MakerspacesIntroductionExtensive funding and resources
, constructing knowledge, and solving problems [1].However, research has shown that undergraduate engineering students engage in limitedinformation gathering while working on engineering design tasks [2], suggesting that they mayneed to 'relearn' the question asking they naturally engaged in as children. At the same time,interest in engineering at the undergraduate level is often fostered through childhoodparticipation in engineering activities. Some argue that by the time children reach middle school,their interests and perceptions towards their future careers are established [3]. Therefore, whenchildren lack access to opportunities to learn about engineering in pre-college settings, thisresults in limited understanding about engineering and
logic before introducingstudents to the ‘higher-level’ topics of microprocessors and the Internet Of Things (IOT). Analternative and potentially more motivating approach is to reverse this sequence. This paperdescribes the design of a new hardware kit and sequence of laboratory exercises which aim togive students hands-on experience with Embedded systems and IOT at an early stage in theiracademic careers. The kit is based on a low-cost, wireless-networked, 32-bit ARMmicrocontroller with integrated Cloud support. The sequence of lab exercises which buildincrementally on one another is described in detail, and the experience gained running them forthe first time is reported. Outcomes relate to the ability to extend knowledge from an
North Carolina State University studying high precision op- tical replication methodologies, his Master’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University developing computer aided fixture planning methods, and a BSME from Texas Tech University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Strategy for Integrating Workplace Skills Development into a Manufacturing Engineering CurriculumAbstractWorkplace skills development are an important though often an indirect outcome of Engineeringcurriculums. These skills are critical to successful careers in job environments where graduatesmust increasingly navigate the challenges of adaptation to new technologies and the
Paper ID #31448A Systematized Review of the Students’ Upbringing Influence on theirSpatial ReasoningMr. Hassan Ali Al Yagoub, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Hassan Al Yagoub is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research in- terests include diversity & inclusion, students’ persistence, advising and mentoring, engineering career pathways, and school-to-work transition of new engineers. He holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology. Prior to
beginning their post-secondary school journey. Manystudents are finishing their high school career in an Advanced Functions or Algebra IImathematics course.Methodist University began an Engineering Program in 2016 with no changes in the requiredmathematics sequence. As at other universities, if an engineering student (or any STEM student)is not prepared to start in Calculus their first semester, he/she must begin in the appropriate lowermathematics course according to their ACT or SAT math score. Even though a more formalmathematics placement mechanism would be preferable, Methodist University does not have theresources to implement a placement mechanism at this time. Thus, ACT or SAT math scoreshave been used. Furthermore, as a small, private
graduates from the 22 years that the instructorhas taught the class, and obtained 184 responses (21 % response rate of all enrolled students),with yearly percent of total enrollments responding and cumulative responses plotted in Figure 3.Of the respondents, 42.4 percent (78 respondents) indicated that they have designed steelstructures in their career. Student’s self-perception of preparedness in structural steel design forthe workforce and graduate school are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Average ratings(on a 1 to 4 scale, with 4 being better prepared than peers) were 3.3 for both questions, indicatingstudent self-perception as being overall better prepared than their peers from other institutions.Results were similar whether the alumni
Director of the INSPIRE Institute at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the integra- tion of STEM concepts in K-12 and postsecondary classrooms in order to help students make connections among the STEM disciplines and achieve deep understanding. Her work focuses on defining STEM inte- gration and investigating its power for student learning. Tamara Moore received an NSF Early CAREER award in 2010 and a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) in 2012.Dr. Sean P Brophy, Purdue University at West Lafayette Dr. Sean Brophy is the Co-Leader of the Educational, Outreach and Training them for the George E. Brown Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES). His research in
library resources to help narrowdown their topic of interest. Successful groups have also used the marketplace to find eithermanufacturers or distributors that provide highly engineered industrial products to themarketplace. The company’s technical literature can also help with the selection of a final topicto develop. The writing project also contributes to students’ ability to work in teams. The courseinstructor describes his motivation for teaching and providing experiential learning in thefollowing way. Team and project learning in engineering help students realize the dynamics ofthe engineering marketplace. The knowledge gained by working in team-based education helpsprepare young professionals for careers in engineering. Engineering
engineering students. A totalof 34 undergraduate students participated in the study. Of these, 32 were male and 2 were femalestudents. All students stated that they were interested in pursuing a career in engineering. Thestudents were divided into two groups with the first group being the initial pilot run of the data. Inthis first group there were 24 students, in the second group there were 10 students. The groups’demographics were nearly identical to each other. Analysis of the collected data indicated thatproblem-solving skills contribute to metacognitive skills and may develop first in students beforelarger metacognitive constructs of awareness, monitoring, planning, self-checking, and strategyselection. Based on this, we recommend that the
Program (teep.tufts.edu).Dr. Kelli Paul, Indiana University-Bloomington Dr. Kelli Paul is a postdoctoral researcher in science education at Indiana University. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology specializing in Inquiry Methodology from Indiana University in 2006. She managed a consulting business for 10 years working on evaluations that focused primarily in the areas of education and STEM for middle and high school students, especially women and minority students. Her research interests include student engagement and interest in STEM and STEM careers as well as the development of instruments and evaluation tools to assess these constructs.Dr. Adam Maltese, Indiana University-Bloomington Associate
Emphasis on Engineering Communication for First-Year Students”, T127, 26486, 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Washington, DC: ASEE, 2019. 9Didiano, T., Wilkinson, L., Turner, J., Franklin, M., Anderson, J., Bussmann, M., Reeve, D., and Audet, J., “I Have a Ph.D.! Now What? A Program to Prepare Engineering Ph.D.’s and Postdoctoral Fellows for Diverse Career Options”, M328, 26276, 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Washington, DC: ASEE, 2019.Eggleston, A., and Rabb, R., “Experiential Learning and Communication: iFixit in
Harden’s curriculum map different biological topics such as hypertension are nested inside amore general topic such as cardiovascular systems 14 .Graph-based methods and hierarchies quickly provide an overview of the curriculum but theydon’t often consider the paths that students take through the curriculum (as measured by studentlearning data) or the temporal aspects such as when in their academic careers students are takingeach course. Including student data is important because the intended curriculum is not alwaysfollowed by students as prescribed. In our review we found two examples that consider thecurriculum temporally. Trimm et al. show students’ risks of not graduating over the course of thecurriculum 26 . Plaza et al. compare
education. In reviewing early attempts at K-12 engineering education, theNRC found that including engineering in K-12 education has numerous benefits including:improved learning and achievement in science and mathematics; increased awareness ofengineering and the work of engineers; understanding of and the ability to engage in engineeringdesign; interest in pursuing engineering as a career; and increased technological literacy. 2Initially individual states led the effort to include engineering in K-12 education. More recentlyattention has shifted to the national level by integrating engineering design into the NextGeneration Science Standards (NGSS) at the same level as scientific inquiry. The NRC notesthat the insight and interest students gain