. The facultyexamined the learning experience, exploring ideas they could use to improve their teaching and studentlearning. The opportunity to put their ideas into practice came with an Advanced Research ProjectsAgency-funded Technology Reinvestment Project grant awarded to the Engineering Research Center forPlasma-Aided Manufacturing. The grant included funding for a new freshman introduction toengineering course beginning fall, 1994. The Fall 1994 Pilot Course The new course’s faculty met during the summer of 1994 to plan the course. They set the goal ofthe course to provide freshmen engineering students with an experience that allows them to discover
they can build to meet the challenges associated with theirindividual career paths and to adapt to the rapidly changing technologies. To that end, thecreation of cohesive course sequences as an opportunity to implement the reform was identified.Three cohesive course sequences, so called “track”, have been offered to the students. The Designand Manufacturing track provides seven closely-integrated courses to help students learn how toapply engineering fundamentals to practical design and manufacturing problems. The trackcourses include: Engineering Materials, Numerical Analysis, Manufacturing Processes, MachineDesign, Computer-Aided-Engineering, Advanced Manufacturing Engineering, andManufacturing Systems. The track courses will not only cover
PBLPedagogy with Modern Manufacturing Case Studies” (0737089). This project involves thedevelopment of real-world learning modules to illustrate to engineering students educationalconcepts such as: • safety (alarm management, emergency shutdown systems, and flare management), • control (cascade, ratio, feedforward, override controls, and model predictive control), • data acquisition (knowledge generation, information technology, data mining) • application of modeling to manufacturing improvements (real-time optimization, computer aided modeling and simulation, and data reconciliation)Our goal is to improve the problem solving ability of engineering graduates while familiarizingthem with the Information Technology (IT) tools found in a
2006-817: FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCES IN ENGINEERING CURRICULUM: THECASE OF CHEMISTRYJosef Rojter, Victoria University of Tech. Page 11.658.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Fundamental Sciences in Engineering Curriculum: The Case of ChemistryAbstractAs a response to concerns and suggestions of the Institution of Engineers, Australiaaccrediting the undergraduate curriculum in mechanical engineering, the Department ofMechanical Engineering at Victoria University of Technology (VUT) decided to incorporatechemical sciences into its undergraduate curriculum. The first semester of second yearmaterials technology subject was set aside to include
regarding operations of engineering corporations andtheir paths to entrepreneurial success. Students were required to present in teams on a newbusiness idea related to the assigned engineering project of the course. Student learning was alsoassessed through surveys on the impact and effectiveness of integrating the entrepreneurshipcomponent into the first-year engineering class.IntroductionToday, numerous technology companies established by engineers are leading innovation andeconomic growth of the nation, which simultaneously strengthens the global economicleadership of the U.S. in science and engineering. However, many developing nations arerapidly developing their work forces in high tech fields and gaining comparative advantage inscience and
experiencesmay be limited to the audiovisual interaction with the instructor and the blackboard and may beenriched by modern technology-enabled classrooms that can deliver impressive intensity ofknowledge transfer through the use of various audio-visual tools, while seamlessly incorporatingactive learning techniques [1,2]. In this paper, we focus on an evidence-based practice study thathas been carried out in an Engineering course for Juniors, Introduction to Thermodynamics (seeFigure 1), to assess the effectiveness of the technology-enabling (E-Learning) environmentlabeled as Google-Classroom (GC), into enriching classroom teaching. We show ways to use anintegrated online homework delivery system based upon the Google online ecosystem, anintegrated
digital native students is the topic of thispaper.Aside from educational integrity, engaging digital natives could lead to an improvement in theirproblem-solving skills. Moreover, Accrediting Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)standards stress the need for engineering graduates to have the ability to solve problems in additionto being knowledgeable of current issues. In addition, complex problem solving skills is predictedto be the most prevalent skill to thrive in the workforce in 2020 [5]. Real world problems helpstudents’ understanding to become more integrated [6, 7]. However, most instructional approacheslimit students’ ability to transfer learning by focusing on course-specific information.Active learning involves students
counselor and outdoor adventure trip leader. He holds an M.Ed in Education Research from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Joelle Clark, Northern Arizona University Joelle Clark is Principal Investigator of PLANETS (Planetary Learning that Advances the Nexus of En- gineering, Technology, and Science), a NASA-funded cooperative agreement (NNX16AC53A) with the Center for Science Teaching and Learning, Northern Arizona University where she also serves as the Associate Director for Professional Development Programs.Dr. Christine M. Cunningham, Museum of Science, Boston Dr. Christine Cunningham is an educational researcher who works to make engineering and science more relevant, accessible, and understandable
Materials Engineering Program.Dr. Joni M Lakin, Auburn University Joni M. Lakin, Ph.D. from The University of Iowa, is Assistant Professor of Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology at Auburn University. Her research interests include educational assessment, educational evaluation methods, and increasing diversity in STEM fields.Dr. P.K. Raju, Auburn University Dr. P. K. Raju is the Thomas Walter Distinguished professor of Mechanical Engineering at Auburn Uni- versity. He is the co-founder and director of the NSF-funded Laboratory for Innovative Technology and Engineering Education (LITEE). LITEE has been recently recognized by the National Academy of Engi- neering as one of the model programs in the country
Paper ID #16609Preparing Undergraduate Engineering Students for the Internet of ThingsDr. Samuel J. Dickerson, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Samuel Dickerson is an assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engi- neering. His general research interests lie in the area of electronics, circuits and embedded systems and in particular, technologies in those areas that have biomedical applications. He has expertise in the design and simulation of mixed-signal integrated circuits and systems that incorporate the use of both digital and analog electronics, as well as optics, microfluidics and devices
awarded the Dominion Strong Men & Women Excellence in Leadership Award, Richmond Joint Engineers Council Engineer of the Year, AAAS Diplomacy Fellowship, and the NSBE Janice Lumpkin Educator of the Year Award.Dr. LaChelle Monique Waller, Virginia Commonwealth University Dr. Waller is currently a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Teaching and Learning, School of Education at Virginia Commonwealth University. She received her B.S. degree in Biology with a minor in Chemistry from Chowan University and a Ph.D. degree in Genetics Bioinformatics and Computational Biology from Virginia Tech. Dr. Waller is interested in utilizing innovative technologies and biological sciences to provide direct support for
service-learning projects offer students an opportunity to experience first handthe application of technology within the framework of cultural dynamics to benefit acommunity. International hands-on experiences play a key role in the development of futureglobal engineers who can navigate the complexities of global market forces. These engineershave a better understanding of the global community and the role of engineers in improvingthe quality of life for the world’s people. Integration of the local community in projectdesign, development and implementation results in a more sustainable solution with theneeds of the community at the forefront. Students benefit from this integration by gaining abetter understanding of the community and its culture
opportunity for engineering education graduates is the education technology market, withboth products and services, that targets engineering education in K-16. Companies that createeducation technology products many times develop accompanying curriculum and professionaldevelopment for their products, all of which can significantly benefit from the expertise andperspective of a formally trained engineering educator. Texas Instruments Education Technologyrecognized this potential value and invited a Doctoral Candidate in Engineering Education tohelp them explore this market.This paper describes a single case study of a Doctoral Candidate in Engineering Education whosought a summer internship in an industry setting. The student worked for Texas
AC 2012-5293: EXAMINING THE EXPLANATORY VARIABLES THATIMPACT GRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENT ENROLLMENTDr. Manoj K. Jha, Morgan State University Manoj K. Jha is professor and Founding Director of the Center for Advanced Transportation and Infras- tructure Engineering Research (CATIER) in the Department of Civil Engineering at the Morgan State University, Baltimore, Md., USA. He obtained a Ph.D. in civil engineering with transportation special- ization from the University of Maryland, College Park in 2000; a M.S. degree in mechanical engineering from the Old Dominion University in 1993; and a B.E. degree in mechanical engineering from the Na- tional Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India, in 1991. He also attended the
potential) of current engineering-related efforts in a variety of contexts (e.g. political, economic, social…). Together these form apicture of both student awareness of issues and the impacts of those issues in the world. Ofcourse, other departments may have their own sub-criteria developed for 3j, however as will beseen in this study, such a division between issues and impacts lends itself to using distinct sets ofboth broad-based and case-specific quiz questions. Outcome Description J Knowledge of Contemporary Issues Criteria J1 Knowledge of contemporary issues in engineering/technology J2 Knowledge of the impacts of contemporary issues in engineering/technology Table 1: Criteria used by
interest in andrelevance to math and science in elementary school students. This project was designed toaddress study results by the National Academy of Engineering1 and President’s Council ofAdvisors on Science and Technology (PCAST)2, among others, which have identified the needto enhance the pathways to careers in science, technology, engineering and math to attract anabundant, diverse and proficient workforce. This involves both improving our educationalcontent and conveying the importance, value and satisfaction that can be achieved in suchcareers. As the PCAST report emphasizes improving STEM education requires we “focus onpreparation and inspiration.” Further, “imprinting” engineering as a career pathway, as Ellis,Jackson and Wynn3 have
Technology Conference, (1997).3. Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K. Learning and teaching styles in engineering-education. Journal of Engineering Education 78, 674-681 (1988).4. Felder, R. M. and Soloman, B. A. Index of learning styles. http://www.ncsu.edu/felder- public/ILSpage.html, accessed on June 2003.5. Haji, R. Venomous snakes and snake bite. http://www.zoocheck.com/programs/exotic/venom/snake.shtml, accessed on June 2003.6. Kadiyala, M. and Crynes, B. L. A review of literature on effectiveness of use of information technology in education. Journal of Engineering Education 89, 177-189 (2000). Page 9.1416.5
and engineering experience needed in the rapidly growingarea of maintenance and reliability engineering. Interaction among team members,communication with industry experts, and the use of electronic information systems arestrongly emphasized in the course.2. Description of the CourseThis section provides an outline of the course and the expectations of student learning.The course materials are also drawn from recent research and development inmaintenance technologies. The choice of topics described may vary from one semester toanother and depends on the mix of students from various engineering disciplines. One ofthe objectives of the course is to prepare students to place themselves well professionally,by providing the fundamentals of
Session 2530 Bringing the K-12 Stakeholders onto the Engineering Education Team J. Clair Batty, Karen O. Batty Utah State UniversityAbstractThe enhanced global perspectives brought on by exploding information technologies haveprecipitated dramatic changes in industry. Recognizing that suppliers and customers arestakeholders in the product realization process and bringing them onto the production team hasresulted in significant improvement in quality and efficiency.Engineering education would do well to follow this model. Communication and cooperationbetween colleges of
); vice president, IntegratedProduct Definition (1994); vice president, Engineering (1992); director, Longbow Apache Engineering(1991); manager LHX Technology, Flight Technology, Advanced Configuration Design, and AH-64Product Definition (1984-1991).Before joining MDHS, Mr. Winn held several engineering and executive positions within the U.S. ArmyAviation Research and Development Command and the U.S. Army Aviation Systems Command. He wasresponsible for engineering support of integration, design, and airworthiness qualification during theaircraft development cycle of major Army helicopter systems, including the AH-64 Apache and the UH-60Blackhawk.Mr. Winn received his B.S. in aerospace engineering from California State Polytechnic University in
onwards Teaching, Administration and Research have been his forte. His administrative experience speaks volumes. He has held various positions as Head, Department of Mechanical Engineering from 1996- 99, He became the Head of the Department of Bio-Medical Engineering, Osmania University between 2001-2003 and 2005-2007 and Founder/ Director, Centre for Energy Technology in Osmania University, Hyderabad. Principal, University College of Engineering, Osmania University for nearly 8 years, Dean Faculty of Engineering for 2 years and also the member of the Executive council at Osmania University. Awards and honours have been exemplary to his intellectual. Capability Notable among them are: 1. Eminent Engineer National Award
An Alternate Paradigm for Undergraduate Engineering: The Bachelor of Arts Kimberly A. Whelan, Sharon A. Jones Lafayette College Introduction The National Academy of Engineering (NAE), and the American Society for Civil Engineers (ASCE) are on record stating the problems associated with the prevailing paradigm for undergraduate engineering education in the USA.1, 2 Several of the problems stated refer to the need for a more liberally trained engineer who has mastery of the essential engineering principles, but realizes the social impact of technology and is well equipped with communication skills. Typical
;technology assessment (tradeoffs), including social and environmental life cycle assessment;prototype development and testing; designing for manufacturing and industrial design; andproduction economics. There is also an implicit assumption about skill development in suchareas as CAD and graphics, tolerances, and generating and analyzing data. There has been atendency to reduce design to (consumer) product design that will need corrective action at somepoint to include services, systems, and the public sector, among other topics of design. The context of engineering design and development is becoming global in nature and,now, engineering students can expect to work in multi-cultural teams for multinationalorganizations in overseas locations
thesecharacteristics, especially strength and deformation. This paper describes one module – a steelmodule – of a suite of multimedia civil engineering materials courseware modules that usedmodern communication technologies to educate undergraduate students anytime/ any place. Avirtual laboratory is included in the courseware that allows the student to conduct virtuallaboratory tests on steel in tension, in torsion and impact. A universal testing machine capable ofapplying tension, compression and torque, and a Charpy V notch impact testing machine aresimulated. The courseware utilizes interactive animations, sound and graphics to enhancelearning and retention, and improving the connection between theory and experiment. Themodules are geared to active
throughouta student’s school career. However, making technology accessible for learning is challenging dueto cost, safety and implementation concerns. This paper describes a method for drawing oncurrent, real life challenges faced by researchers in the field and translating such experiences intoa secondary school level program. The concept of the competition, application of LEGOMindstorms® robotics platform, methods of organization and expansion, past experiences andfuture plans are presented. Our goal is to show an example of how to integrate off-the-shelfrobotic technology with current real-world engineering challenges and to engage students in thefields of engineering, robotics, and medicine in a fun and exciting atmosphere.Introduction and
Session 3238 Enhancing Engineering Graphics Courses Through Animated, Sophisticated, Multi-Media, Graphical Presentations Dr. Wafeek S. Wahby Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, IllinoisAbstractExploring new instructional methods that use technology tools adds an important aspectto the cognitive abilities and visualization skills of on-campus undergraduate students.This paper presents visual examples from an ongoing experiment that was started in 1998at the School of Technology, Eastern Illinois University to study the effectiveness of the“show-and-tell-and-let-apply” (SATALA) approach
Towards Gender Balance in Engineering for an Expanding Global Market Place Muge Mukaddes Darwish Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, Ali Nejat Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TexasAbstractA global economy requires that engineers understand the importance of both cultural and genderdiversity to be more efficient in solving problems in our world of technology andcommunication. Nearly four decades ago, Unites States engineers led one of the greatestaccomplishments of all time by successfully landing men on the moon and returning them safelyto America. Four subsequent crews
EFFECTIVE DESIGN, INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT OF AN ON-LINE ENGINEERING COURSE Ronald P. Uhlig Shekar Viswanathan ruhlig@nu.edu sviswana@nu.edu School of Engineering and Technology, National University, 11255 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037The emergence of life-long learning has been a happy result of theexplosion of information and the much wider availability of informationthrough the Internet today. The Internet is battling its way into highereducation by offering a flexible and accessible alternative for busy peoplewho want to pursue higher education. However, questions have beenraised whether online instruction
quickly.The MSPS program prepares students with science, technology, engineering, and mathbackgrounds to take on management roles when they enter the job market by providing themwith the skills needed for a successful career. A compelling aspect of this program is the capstoneinternship. Students have the opportunity to gain exposure to their field of study. Students andtheir internship employers report that the MSPS program coursework prepares students for asuccessful internship. The internship program is mutually beneficial for the student and theemployer. The students are continuously rated with above-average skills, including interpersonalskills, knowledge of concentration, oral and written communication, quality of work, and overallperformance
“My First Year Teaching In a College Of Engineering” By Martene Stanberry, Ph.D. The first year of teaching as a faculty member in a College of Engineering provided mewith many opportunities for professional growth. It served as a time to set a foundation on how Iwill teach, do research, and serve the university and community in which I am a part. During thistime it was important to meet the challenges and expectations of the Department of MathematicalSciences, the College of Engineering, and Tennessee State University (TSU) as well as achievethe career goals and aspirations I had set for myself. There are several important factors to consider when making the transition to